Reviewed head d2820e8 (Opus review; CI run 1408 checks / unit and 1409 infra-pin green on d2820e8).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reviewed at ccdb9dc: full suite 78/78, CI run 1289 green, identity equal to bf9019e. Review: PR #191 comment 2185.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- test_price_secret.py: the fixed-tariff note on the real /config/validate
route, EN and NL, and none for a spaces-only profile (web.py lang wiring).
- test_price_service.py: the start line is INFO, not WARNING; a dismiss that
raises does not stop the cycle.
- test_maint13/test_setup_only/test_watchdog: ignore only the dismiss of the
old card, so a create with that id is still counted.
- DECISIONS rule 7 quotes the settings note as it is; messages.py comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Reviewer mutations survived the round-2 page checks: Start forced always
disabled (|| true), and the two flags swapped between Start and Stop,
because the checks only looked for each flag somewhere in the file. The
check now pins each flag to its own button. No behaviour change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two reviewer mutations survived the suite: the web layer routing only a
truthy unit (an empty unit then started the bare pick), and the page
showing the server's English instead of its own sentence by code. Both
are now checked. The bare maint_start comment that said a per-battery
unit would ship half a surface is replaced by a pointer to
_maint_unit_action(). No behaviour change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- a 502 or refused read turns waiting on, the next good read off, and a
read timeout never (two mutants survived without this)
- the flag changes no write with live readings, not only with 502 ones
- the page script's amber dot and batteries-tab banner for "waiting"
- DECISIONS: about 5 minutes per start stage, not "at most"
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Supervisor proxy answers 502 to every add-on read, write and websocket
until Core is RUNNING (proxy.py api()/websocket() -> check_api_state()), so
the add-on cannot control while a slow integration holds HA's start, even
with its entities live. Measured on a safety112 repro stack with the
2026.08.0 proxy code: first write 1.0-4.4 s after RUNNING, 238-300 s after
live readings. Not routed around (DECISIONS/SAFETY-112-...).
While the API does not answer, the first status row is red and is the
banner ("Waiting for Home Assistant to finish starting"), Home shows a
"waiting" state in EN/NL instead of "Needs you now", and the log adds a
"still waiting" line every 5 minutes and the wait's length at the end.
A safety stop, a stalled loop or shadow mode keeps its own headline.
Control, writes, heartbeat and the stand-down are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The new status row's id `solar_forecast` had no Home title, so Home showed
it under the fallback "Inverter connection". Add "Solar forecast" /
"Zonneprognose" to ui_text, and checks for the title, the tomorrow-gap hint
and blank list rows (review mutations R7, R9, R14 now killed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
HOLD's time check moves into Maintenance._hold(), used by step() and
_no_soc(). A hold that loses its SoC now ends at hold_min, writes
last_completed and logs the same COMPLETE line. The 15 min HOLD line says
the hold still ends at its normal time. Behaviour with a reading is
unchanged (differential trace against db9e231).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The test table gives 1.5 kW at N=2 and 3.9 kW summed at N=3 under a
surplus, and about 1 kW after a lost link without one; not 1.9 kW.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mutation M13 (a battery out of the split counted in the house point)
survived; a direct check now kills it. win[0] is read through a guard
(test_named_absence).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
While a battery settles from its ended drain (SAFETY-95), the house point
was grid + every battery's reading. A register can be 10 s older than the
meter, so B swung 860 -> 1650 -> 870 W on A's old reading (rig check 5).
Now the house point is held and moved only as far as the meter proves:
each battery is between its last changed reading and its commands since
(a reading that changed this cycle, or a refused side, as it reads).
N=1 and 1 s registers are byte-identical to release/1.0.
DECISIONS/SAFETY-103-old-readings-after-a-drain.md, test_safety103.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
config.yaml version 0.14.0 -> 0.15.0 (minor: behaviour change from
SAFETY-94/97, no option change). New `## 0.15.0` section with the contents
since 0.14.0 (cf705a9#171, 3129dae#172) and the known issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner decision 2026-10-04 (review R1). A wrong idle reading more than
about 100 W off hid every refusal on that battery. Clamped under the band,
the band keeps 0 W +-25 W, so a battery reading about 0 W while refusing is
caught whatever was learned or restored. Samples are still taken to 250 W.
Beyond about +-170 W of idle a battery behaves as in 0.14.0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The N=1 stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's parked test are centred on the
idle reading; learning stops while control is stopped or the sign watchdog
has latched. Each had no check (review mutants X7, X8, X13, X14).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
At a 5 s meter a register frozen at rest on B trips the stale gate before
the 12-cycle evidence; its refusal must be centred on B's idle reading,
or the site stops and re-trips instead of refusing B.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
B's power reading shows -95 to -118 W at idle (standby draw), so the
|reading| < 100 W refusal band never held a refusing B: never at N=2,
and since SAFETY-94's shared rule not at N=1 either (review F1).
Each unit now learns its idle reading (app/idle.py): only while control
runs, the unit is not refused/stale/tripped and its command has stayed
within 50 W for 120 s; first value a 120 s mean, then a 30 min follow;
samples beyond 250 W dropped, value clamped to 250 W; saved per unit and
restored. The shared refusal evidence, compute()'s N=1 engage and end,
the unit refusal ends, the stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's "parked"
test are centred on it. Until learned it is 0 W, the rule as it was.
Refusing B caught at N=1 28/28/65 s and N=2 24/24/60 s (1/2/5 s
meters), before never; refusing A unchanged. Healthy B with its offset,
SAFETY-94's scenarios, 96 runs: 0 stale, 0 refused. Live replay: 0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
The stale-reading gate counted its 35 s from the register's last change, so
after a rest the first read after a new command tripped it (SAFETY-58; live
2026-10-03, four trips 1 s after the command). It now counts only the time
the command asked the register to move.
At N=1 the refusal engaged after 12 frozen cycles if the reading was under
100 W at that moment, which a battery reversing through its lag passes at a
1 s meter. The refusal now needs the N>1 evidence at every roster size: under
100 W, one way, for 12 cycles spanning 22 s, restarting when the reading
moves 50 W towards the ask.
DECISIONS/SAFETY-94-lagging-battery.md; test_safety94.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A battery still in CHARGE but dropped by the allocator (stale link, or a
SAFETY-73 refusal contradicting its charge) left its -2000 W in the loop's
start point, and B went 0 -> -1600 W in one cycle. The end is now noted
after the unit claims are filed: in CHARGE, live and not contradicted.
Tests: part 6 (stale link, refusal) and a spy on the guard suspension.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
At N>=2, when a battery's maintenance charge ended, its watts stayed in the
loop's start point and landed on the other battery (B 0 -> -1600 W in one
cycle, charging from the grid at a 6000 W house). On the cycle a charge
ends, the loop now starts from what the others stood at plus that
battery's new command. N=1 and all identity digests unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
admin
