SAFETY-103 review: correct the swing after a refusal or lost link in DECISIONS
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 34m52s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s

The test table gives 1.5 kW at N=2 and 3.9 kW summed at N=3 under a
surplus, and about 1 kW after a lost link without one; not 1.9 kW.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-08 04:13:08 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent 98dd110a4f
commit c6f23a69d4
@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@ still swing up to 130 W, a third of a slew step.
the saturation freeze (SAFETY-96), unchanged.
- A lost link or a refusal ends the tail at once (A is out of the split, or
reads ~0 W). The swing after them is the loop's own on a lagging plant,
the same with 1 s registers and on release/1.0 (up to 1.9 kW at N=3 under
a surplus): not this card.
the same with 1 s registers and on release/1.0: under a surplus up to
1.5 kW at N=2 and 3.9 kW summed at N=3; after a lost link about 1 kW
even without one. Not this card.
- A battery that overshoots its command, or a reading offset beyond the
range, can put the true power outside the range; the meter then moves the
point, as before.