SAFETY-52-refused-hold
385
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 admin
|
587751b115 | Merge pull request 'INSTR-01: grade diff()'s suppression rule at the level it is written at, one case per clause' (#72) from INSTR-01 into release/1.0 | ||
 glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
3de4453956 |
INSTR-01: match the finding KIND, because M12 was not holding this file to its own rule
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m7s
Review APPROVED |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
f6f3f227c1 |
INSTR-01: restore M12 on the leg I generalised past, and measure the clause that had no row
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m6s
Review found two things this PR asserted about itself that were false. Both are mine and both are worse than the defect the card was filed for. ⚠️ "NO FIXTURE CAN RESTORE IT, MEASURED BOTH WAYS" WAS NOT TRUE, AND TWO MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT AN IMPOSSIBILITY PROOF. I deleted M12 - SAFETY-44's working end-to-end control for the off-roster narrowing - on the argument that the provenance clause made it unrestorable. The structural claim behind it, that `run()` builds both snapshots from one state file so "already latched" and "made by this transition" are incompatible, IS TRUE OF SAME-STEP AND FALSE OF STAGED: `snapshot_over()` starts the after-leg over the file the BEFORE-leg wrote, so a transition-made destination is available there. Both arrangements I measured were same-step shaped. Review found the third. RESTORED, and it discriminates with all six clauses in: staged leg, legacy+shed, shipped _m12_new = VANISHED unit/shed/sign_tripped ...C5 narrowing removed _m12_new = [] ⚠️ suppressed ⚠️ AND MY FIRST RESTORATION DIDN'T DISCRIMINATE EITHER, for a reason worth recording: `data.pop(k, False)` RETURNS the value, so shed lost the KEY and kept the LATCH - `_grade_store_migration()` saw `on_roster_latched`, never re-armed garage, and there was no transition-made destination. The finding was reported whether or not C5 existed and the control looked restored. `and False` is the difference between "the key is gone" and "the LATCH is gone", and only the second reaches the re-arm this arrangement needs. ⚠️ WHAT ACTUALLY BROKE WAS M12's exit-0 PRECONDITION, NOT M12. A legacy-shaped fixture is never clean. That precondition is the one SAFETY-44's own commit called "belt-and-braces, load-bearing only if the exit-0 requirement is ever relaxed", saying what closed the gap is `_m12_new` BEING A SET DIFFERENCE - and a stable dirty baseline is fine for a set difference. So I deleted a control on the strength of a precondition the same commit had already called not load-bearing. That is removing coverage rather than failing to add it, which is the worse of the two directions. ⭐ AND THE BARE-KEY CLAUSE HAD NO ROW AT ALL. Review deleted `k.rsplit("/", 1)[-1] == bare` and the whole 28-file suite stayed GREEN. 5e mutated five clauses; the comprehension carries more, and this one is load-bearing: a vanished SAFETY-02 `sign_tripped` was suppressed by a SAFETY-42 `delivery_tripped` on a roster unit - a DIFFERENT FAILSAFE's key. The rule's own comment says "THE TEST IS NOT 'the name appears somewhere'. It is: the SAME bare key", and nothing measured that sentence. `unit/*/delivery_tripped` is machine-read, so it is reachable on any real two-latch store. R7 added; C2 now flips exactly R7. All six clause-removals now flip exactly their own row: C1 machine_read -> ['R6-machine-read'] C5 off-roster -> ['R2-narrowing'] C2 same bare key -> ['R7-bare-key'] C6 injectivity -> ['R5-injectivity'] C3 same value -> ['R4-value'] C7 provenance -> ['R3-provenance'] THREE DANGLING CITATIONS TO A CONTROL THIS PR HAD DELETED, one of them in the shipped tool eight lines below the paragraph condemning exactly that ("a citation is the worst possible carrier, because it reads as having been checked"). The tool no longer names a check; it states the property - every clause has a row, and each removal flips its own. A STALE SAFETY-44 BLOCK saying both fixes were "REVERTED OUT OF THIS CARD, because THIS SUITE CANNOT MEASURE EITHER ONE" - describing a tree this PR replaced. Rewritten as a map of where each clause is now measured. A comment that outlives its subject is the same defect as a citation that outlives its check. AND A SELF-CONTRADICTION about the driver, in the file and in the last commit message: "THE DRIVER IS WRITTEN INTO THE TREE UNDER TEST" eight lines above "THE DRIVER GOES IN A TEMPDIR, NOT IN THE TREE". The code does the tempdir; the first sentence stated the read-only-CI bug the same commit says it fixed, as if it were the design. It now says the driver IMPORTS the tree and is WRITTEN to a tempdir. ONE HOLE REMAINS OPEN AND IS STATED AS UNMEASURED: attribution. `sorted()` decides which vanished key claims a destination, so a deleted key can sort first and be named as the one that migrated while the key that really moved is reported VANISHED. Review measured that `sorted(` -> `list(` leaves the suite green - every 5e case has at most one candidate, so no row can see ordering. Still exit 1, so a wrong sentence rather than a hidden loss. Recorded rather than left looking guarded. 28/28 files pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
91b0d5e4dc |
INSTR-01: grade the suppression rule at the level it is written at, one case per clause
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m4s
SAFETY-44 produced THREE inert controls for this one rule, each inert differently, and split the two remaining fixes out rather than ship them unmeasured. This is that card, and the first thing it did was explain why the end-to-end route could never have worked. ⚠️ `moved_to` IS ONE COMPREHENSION CARRYING FIVE CONDITIONS WITH FIVE DIFFERENT REASONS TO EXIST, AND `run()` BUILDS BOTH SNAPSHOTS FROM ONE STATE FILE. So "the destination was already latched" and "the destination was made by this transition" are the same file answering two incompatible questions: the arrangement that reaches one forecloses the other. That is why rebuilding a fixture to reach clause N kept moving the others, and it is not a fixture problem. ⭐ SO THE RULE IS GRADED WHERE IT IS WRITTEN - `diff()` on constructed Snapshots, ONE CASE PER CLAUSE. Six rows, and on the SHIPPED tree before any fix they already separated the two known defects: R1 rename (legitimate) migrated correct R2 narrowing vanished correct R3 provenance MIGRATED ⚠️ the defect R4 same value vanished correct R5 injectivity BOTH migrated ⚠️ the defect R6 machine_read vanished correct The two one-line fixes SAFETY-44 reverted are back, and R3/R5 flip while R1/R2/R4/R6 do not - so the legitimate rename is still suppressed and this is not an over-correction. ⭐ AND EACH CLAUSE REMOVAL FLIPS **EXACTLY ITS OWN ROW**, which is the acceptance criterion this card was filed with: C1 machine_read removed -> ['R6-machine-read'] C3 same value removed -> ['R4-value'] C5 off-roster removed -> ['R2-narrowing'] C6 injectivity removed -> ['R5-injectivity'] C7 provenance removed -> ['R3-provenance'] A removal that flips nothing is an unmeasured clause; a removal that flips someone else's row means the cases are not separable after all. Neither happened. ⚠️ AND M12 IS DELETED, WHICH IS THE MOST USEFUL THING THIS CARD FOUND. M12 was SAFETY-44's end-to-end control for the narrowing and it was a REAL control - red when the narrowing was removed. Adding the provenance clause disarmed it, and NO FIXTURE CAN RESTORE IT, measured both ways: with the sibling latched in its own right, C7 rejects the destination before C5 is consulted, so the mutation is reported whether or not C5 exists; making the destination transition-made means a flat latch, which makes the shipped run dirty and breaks M12's own precondition. The second half of the card's acceptance criterion - "M12 still turns red with the new clauses in" - is therefore UNSATISFIABLE, and the honest answer is to remove the control rather than keep one that has become inert. R2 measures C5 strictly better. Part 5 keeps the end-to-end coverage; discrimination lives in 5e. `state-both-latched.json` goes with it. Nothing referenced it once M12 was gone, and the first draft of that paragraph said it was "kept, because 5e's R2/R3 are derived from the arrangements it represents" - a nice sentence and not a reference. An unused fixture a comment calls load-bearing is an inert check one directory over. TWO THINGS THE DRIVER GETS RIGHT ON PURPOSE: - it is written to a TEMPDIR, not beside the tool. `checks / unit` mounts the checkout READ-ONLY, so writing into the tree works on a dev box and is `OSError: Read-only file system` in CI - green for whoever wrote it and red on every PR. Caught by running it in the check image before committing. - the TABLE stays in the test file and the driver goes into the tree under test, so a mutation to the tool cannot also move the answer it is graded against. 28/28 files pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
admin
|
806390d8b1 | Merge pull request 'SAFETY-44: the latch migration takes the roster, and the guard stops being defeated by the key the defect wrote' (#71) from SAFETY-44 into release/1.0 | ||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
775f3a2e82 |
SAFETY-44: keep attribution in-tree, add the third clause, and correct a claim I made for my own precondition
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m56s
Review APPROVED |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
f109153216 |
SAFETY-44: ship only what this suite can measure, and split the two clauses it cannot
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m58s
⚠️ REVIEW FOUND THE INJECTIVITY CHECK INERT IN THE SAME WAY M12's FIRST DRAFT
WAS, three paragraphs below the comment diagnosing it. Removing the whole
mechanism left 28/28 GREEN: part 5's two destinations are `sign_reason` and
`sign_tripped`, DIFFERENT bare keys, which can never contend. The
`len(_dests) >= 2` precondition was true and established nothing - "not
asserting over an empty list" was correct, "this run can exercise injectivity"
was not.
Review also measured a second, narrower silent loss: `moved_to` accepts a
destination regardless of whether the TRANSITION put the value there, so a
roster unit already latched in its own right is a free suppression slot. A build
deleting `old-a` while renaming `old-b` -> `shed` reported exit 0, NO FINDINGS,
with `old-a` "migrated" into a key that already held True.
⚠️ I WROTE BOTH ONE-LINE FIXES AND HAVE REVERTED BOTH, because THIS SUITE
CANNOT MEASURE EITHER. Three attempts, three different ways of proving nothing:
1. assert injectivity over part 5's real destinations
-> passes with the entire mechanism deleted (non-contending bare keys)
2. build a dedicated fixture for the two-claimant case
-> discriminates NOTHING: both snapshots read one state file, so nothing
vanishes and there are no migrated lines with the clause or without it
3. rebuild M12's fixture so the destination is transition-made, to reach the
provenance case
-> ⚠️ DISARMED M12 FOR THE NARROWING. All three clause-removals came back
GREEN at once, and the control I had measured RED last round was gone.
⭐ (3) IS WHY THIS IS A SPLIT AND NOT A JUDGEMENT CALL. A later fix to the same
function silently disarmed the control for an earlier one, and I saw it only
because I re-drove the removal rather than trusting the suite's exit code.
Shipping two more unmeasured clauses into the rehearsal instrument, on a card
whose entire subject is checks that cannot reach what they name, would be the
fourth inert artifact in one PR. They go on their own card, with review's
measurements as the starting evidence and the fixture built BEFORE the fix -
which is the ordering that worked for M12 and failed every time I inverted it.
⚠️ AND THE SPLIT IS SAFE, WHICH IS WHY IT IS AVAILABLE. Both remaining holes are
in the REHEARSAL TOOL, not the controller. The round-2 narrowing guarantees a
suppressed key is always OFF the roster, so no roster unit loses protection;
what is left is rollback-view/history mis-reporting on a tool an operator runs
before commissioning. Nothing here can disarm a latch on a live site, and
inverter B goes in on ~2026-09-12. Review offered this split explicitly.
M12's PRECONDITION IS STRENGTHENED, because the exit code could not carry it.
It now requires the shipped tree to be clean AND to not already report the
finding the mutation exists to produce. The first draft passed on exactly that
gap: the fixture's own litter made the run red and nothing separated the two.
Re-driven after the revert, on the round-3 fixture:
shipped exit 0
`vanished_unit not in after.units` gone ⚠️ exit 1
28/28 files pass. The controller half is unchanged since
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
f6d7bfcb04 |
SAFETY-44: give the moved-not-lost branch a control that reaches it, and make the move injective
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m38s
⚠️ THE CONTROL I WROTE LAST ROUND WAS INERT, AND REVIEW MEASURED IT. M12 ran its
mutant over `state-legacy.json` and the findings diff against the UNMUTATED tree
was EMPTY. It "passed" because that fixture's STAGED leg is already exit 1 on
pre-existing litter, and `"migrated unit/shed/" not in out` was trivially true
because a pre-DEV-02 FLAT store has no shed latch to lose - after migration only
the FIRST roster entry is ever latched.
The decisive measurement is the one it could not make: reverting the
`vanished_unit not in after.units` narrowing - restoring exactly the rule that
hides a real latch loss - left 28/28 GREEN.
⚠️ SO IT WAS HABIT 4 WEARING THE CLOTHES OF ITS OWN FIX, AND WORSE THAN THE
"NO CONTROL" IT REPLACED, because it reads as checked. That is this commit's
own argument about the M3 mis-citation, turned on the thing I wrote to answer it.
⭐ THE FIXTURE CAME FIRST THIS TIME. `state-both-latched.json` is a store at
SCHEMA_VERSION with `unit/garage/*` AND `unit/shed/*` both latched by ONE site
event, so the reasons match too - the arrangement in which same-value
suppression is most dangerous, and the one no existing fixture could produce.
M12's mutant then makes ONE roster unit's latch key VANISH while its sibling's
survives at the same value:
shipped tree, both-latched fixture exit 0, no findings
one unit's latch key deleted exit 1, ADDS
VANISHED STORE KEY unit/shed/sign_tripped
narrowing reverted ⚠️ RED (was 28/28 green)
And it asserts the PRECONDITION - the fixture is clean on the shipped tree -
plus that the mutation ADDS findings rather than coinciding with ones the
fixture already had. An empty diff there is exactly what made the last draft
inert, and nothing said so.
⭐ AND THE MOVE IS NOW INJECTIVE, which is the narrower hole review found still
open. `moved_to` is "any machine-read key with the same bare name and the same
value", and `DEFAULTS["sign_tripped"] is False` means `True` is the ONLY
non-default value a latch can hold - so N vanished keys could all claim the SAME
destination, by construction rather than by coincidence. Measured on a rename
carrying `inverter-a` -> `garage` correctly while DROPPING `inverter-b` -> `shed`:
migrated unit/inverter-a/sign_tripped = True -> unit/garage/sign_tripped
migrated unit/inverter-b/sign_tripped = True -> unit/garage/sign_tripped
Zero store-key findings, on a run where `shed` came up UNLATCHED. Two keys
cannot both have become one key. `diff()` claims each destination once.
⚠️ AND THE CHECK FOR IT IS ANCHORED TO A RUN THAT ACTUALLY PRODUCES MIGRATED
LINES. A dedicated mutant was written first and asserted over an EMPTY list -
vacuous, passing, indistinguishable from working, the same defect twice in one
sitting. These fixtures cannot produce two claimants (`migrate_unit_keys()`
moves FLAT keys only, so one flat latch yields one migration), so rather than
build a fiction to grade, injectivity is asserted over part 5's real migrations,
with a PRECONDITION that there are at least two of them. THE TWO-CLAIMANT
ARRANGEMENT IS A STATED RESIDUAL: bounded in `diff()` by construction, not
measured end-to-end.
Finding 4, and my correction to it was also wrong. The comment cited "line 315"
and "two hundred lines below"; the fix I wrote said "~54 lines down", which was
review's distance to the WRONG line, carried to a new referent without
re-measuring - inside the sentence apologising for a wrong number. Recomputed at
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
d1b7e3f113 |
SAFETY-44: decide per key, because one shared flag let an unrelated latch veto the repair
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m58s
⚠️ REVIEW DEFEATED THIS CARD'S OWN FIX WITH ONE ADDED KEY, and the project's own instrument agreed on the unmodified tree. The guard classified each key and then wrote ONE site-wide `namespaced_latched` for BOTH "on the roster" and "off-roster but not UNIT_A", so a single latched key belonging to a unit the operator had removed from `inverters:` vetoed the repair of the misdirected `inverter-a` latch beside it. Measured, roster ['garage','shed'], store stamped so the migration fix cannot reach it: sign_tripped + unit/inverter-a/sign_tripped -> [('garage', True), ...] ...AND unit/old-shed/sign_tripped -> ⚠️ [('garage', False), ...] A site DRIVING on a state file that reads `sign_tripped: true` - the sentence in this card's own first paragraph - and `tools/rehearse_roster.py` printed `LATCH CAME UP DISARMED` on it, exit 1, against shipped code. It matters more than a normal hole because this guard is, as main.py says, the ONLY repair path for an install already stamped by 0.9.0. ⚠️ AND IT IS INSTANCE #17 OF HABIT 4, IN THE EXTENSION MUTATION.md ADDED TWO DAYS AGO. The two fixtures written for this card each hold ONE arrangement - `_staged_store` has only `inverter-a`, `_other_store` only `inverter-b` - so the flag was never written twice with opposite intents in a single store. A per-key check whose keys have never disagreed WITHIN ONE STORE is a check over whichever key came last. Three variables now, one per case, and a fixture holding BOTH. Four cases driven: stranded-only repairs, +1 unrelated repairs, +2 repairs, off-roster-only does NOT (which is DEV-02's control, still green). ⭐ AND THE MOVED-NOT-LOST RULE HID A GENUINE LATCH LOSS. The match was bare key plus value over the whole of `machine_read`, with no identity - and `DEFAULTS["sign_tripped"] is False`, so the ONLY non-default value a latch can hold is `True`. Any surviving latched roster unit therefore suppressed any other unit's vanished latch. Review measured a build that drops `unit/shed/sign_*` while `unit/garage/sign_*` survives, both latched by one site event so the reasons matched too: none in LEG SAME-STEP: nothing vanished, nothing stranded ... NO FINDINGS in the rehearsed transitions exit 0 A roster unit's persisted SAFETY-02 latch deleted, transition reported clean. The legitimate case is a RENAME - the key left `inverter-a`, which is not on this roster, and arrived under `garage`, which is - so the vanished key's own unit must be OFF the roster. A key whose unit is still on the roster has not been renamed, it has been lost, and no amount of the same value elsewhere makes that untrue. ⚠️ AND THE BOUND I CITED FOR IT DID NOT EXIST. Both the comment and the last commit message said "what M3 (delete the flat rollback view) measures". M3 is not that mutant - it drops `sign_reason` from `LEGACY_UNIT_KEYS` - and the one I meant, M9, vanishes only FLAT keys, so neither can satisfy the `unit/` gate the rule sits behind. NEITHER EXERCISED THE BRANCH; it had no negative control at all, in a card whose subject is checks that cannot reach the failure they name. A citation is the worst carrier for that, because it reads as having been checked. M12 is written for it and driven: a roster unit that stops restoring its latch is exit 1, and the suppression does not swallow it. `misdirected` IS UNREACHABLE FROM THE CALL SITE, and the claim that it was a benefit is withdrawn rather than restated. `unit` is `roster_names(opts)[0]` and `build_roster()` names its first entry from the same list, so `unit` is a member of `roster` by construction; review measured it - dropping the `roster` argument inside `migrate_unit_keys()` survives 28/28. The argument stays for the reason `_verify_moves()` gives for its own `roster=None` branch, it is what a NEW caller gets - and a guard nothing exercises is a guard nobody knows works, so it is now exercised at the function's own level: a wrong `unit` comes back misdirected, the marker is not stamped, and the same call with a roster name stamps it. Dead `if _roster_names else UNIT_A` removed; `roster_names()` never returns []. THE OPERATOR MESSAGE IS ASSERTED. Review deleted it whole (`if stranded:` -> `if False:`) and 28/28 stayed green - `stranded` had no other consumer, so the list existed only to print a line nothing checked, and that line is the entire operator-facing half of the repair. Now: exactly one SAFETY-44 line at ERROR, naming the stranded key and the roster it was measured against. A wrong line citation removed: the call-site comment said "line 315's comment" and "two hundred lines below", and both were wrong (315 is the CFG-03 defaults note; the comment meant is ~54 lines down). Cite the thing, not its coordinates. ⚠️ AND WHAT 5b/5c ACTUALLY PIN IS RECORDED, because review is owed the distinction: `mutant_tree()` asserts its target exists, so EDITING the guarded line makes the file red at the ANCHOR before any behaviour is measured - which looks identical from the exit code and proves much less. It happened twice while writing this commit. The behavioural coverage lives in test_maintenance.py section 13 and test_inverter.py, which build stores rather than strings. Fixture strings no longer say "measured" - they are synthetic, and the repo's other fixture carries an explicit SYNTHETIC header. 28/28 files pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
5e382f52f6 |
SAFETY-44: the latch migration takes the roster, and the guard stops being defeated by the key the defect wrote
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m56s
⚠️ A DISARMED SAFETY-02 GUARD ON AN INSTALL WHOSE STATE FILE SAYS IT IS PROTECTED. `Controller.__init__` called `migrate_unit_keys(store, UNIT_A)` - a hardcoded constant - while its sibling `migrate_maint_keys(store, unit, roster)` takes the roster and refuses a write no machine reads. On a store that ran pre-DEV-02 flat and declares `inverters: [garage, shed]`, the latch moved to `unit/inverter-a/sign_tripped`, `_verify_moves()` read it back under the name it had been HANDED, was satisfied, and stamped the marker. Not one inverter came up latched, and the next start skipped the migration too. That is the MAINT-05 defect verbatim, still live in the function whose own docstring describes it, and `_grade_store_migration()` did not catch it: its "is anything namespaced latched" test was satisfied BY THE MISDIRECTED VALUE ITSELF. ⚠️ THE REASON IT WAS LEFT WAS A HALF-TRUTH. "There is no roster yet - the `Inverter`s restore their latch in their constructors." The KEYS must be written before the `Inverter`s read them; the NAMES do not come from the `Inverter`s. `roster_names(opts)` reads them off the options before anything is constructed - which is exactly what it already existed to do for `MqttPublisher` - and returns `[UNIT_A]` on the flat shape, so today's upgrade path is byte-identical. TWO EDITS, AND THEY DO DIFFERENT JOBS. Measured per leg by reverting each one: SAME-STEP leg STAGED leg both edits (shipped) clean latch armed, litter reported guard reverted latch armed ⚠️ DISARMED call site reverted latch armed, litter latch armed, litter So the GUARD carries the safety and the CALL SITE carries the hygiene and the withheld marker. The table is in test_rehearse.py part 5 because a reader who assumed the roster-aware migration re-arms the latch would delete the guard as redundant in a tidy-up and take the STAGED column with it - and STAGED is what "upgrade now, declare the roster later" produces, which is the path an operator actually takes. Only the guard reaches an install already stamped by 0.9.0. ⚠️ AND "OFF THE ROSTER" ALONE WAS TOO BLUNT, WHICH test_inverter.py CAUGHT. The first draft treated every off-roster latch as litter. In DEV-02's restart case the store carries `unit/inverter-b/sign_tripped = True` from B's own trip while the roster being graded holds only A - and the blunt rule re-armed a HEALTHY A off the flat key B's trip had mirrored. DEV-02's defect rebuilt inside its own guard, which is what the paragraph I was overruling had been right to fear. Narrowed to `UNIT_A`, which is the only name the broken migration ever wrote - `roster_names()` falls back to a POSITIONAL `inverter-N`, so `inverter-a` is not a name this code hands to anyone else. A latch stranded under any other name is a real unit out of today's config and still counts as protection. Residual, stated in the code rather than left to be found: a site whose own first unit is NAMED `inverter-a`, latched, then taken out of the roster gets re-armed on `inverters[0]` - a healthy unit held at 0 W until an operator clears it. The conservative direction, against a site DRIVING on a file that says it is latched. ⭐ AND FIXING THE CODE EXPOSED A FALSE POSITIVE IN THE HARNESS. With the latch now landing under `garage`, `rehearse_roster.py` reported VANISHED STORE KEY for `unit/inverter-a/sign_tripped` three lines above the same value sitting under `unit/garage/sign_tripped`. A key that moved to a namespace a machine reads has not vanished - and an alarm that fires on the harmless case is one an operator learns to dismiss before the real one arrives, which is CONTROL-C's own argument. The test is not "the name appears somewhere": same bare key, same value, under a key in `machine_read`, the set built by driving a real start. A latch that genuinely went missing has no such key and is still a finding, which M3 (delete the flat rollback view) still measures red. Test parts replaced deliberately, as both of them asked to be: - test_rehearse.py part 5 asserted the defect "as REQUIREMENTS so that a fix turns them red". It now asserts the fix, with 5b and 5c as negative controls - one per edit - and 5b doubles as the leg-splitter's positive control, since reverting the guard is the build where the two legs DISAGREE. - test_maintenance.py section 13 was headed "RECORDED, NOT FIXED" and said the fixing card "should expect them to go red and should replace them". Replaced, plus two cases it could not have had: the already-stamped store, and the `inverter-b` negative control for the narrowing above. 28/28 files pass. Not run: nothing - this is host-side only, no rig, no hardware. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
admin
|
46c022c926 | Merge pull request 'ARCH-02: rehearse the flat-to-roster switch - and SAFETY-44 re-confirmed by a second instrument' (#70) from ARCH-02 into release/1.0 | ||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
22ca341459 |
ARCH-02: assert the invariant, because a fixture cannot enumerate arrangements
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m55s
Review approved and then attacked part 5b, the control that stands between B1's
defect and a green suite. It got through in three edits:
A1 delete `END LEG` 5b CATCHES it 2 FAIL
A2 ...and reorder the legs 5b BLIND 1 FAIL
A3 ...and reword the closing summary 0 FAIL, "all checks passed"
with a splitter that closed
ZERO legs
⚠️ TWO OF THOSE THREE ARE ORDINARY REFACTORS - reordering report legs, rewording
a summary line - and neither reads as touching a safety check. 5b caught the
unclosed splitter only because the clean leg happened to be printed LAST, and
the backstop that saved A2 was a hardcoded transcription of the tool's own
sentence, so rewording that sentence blinded it too.
FIXED BY ASSERTING THE STRUCTURE RATHER THAN ADDING A FIXTURE: a leg may not
open while one is open, and every leg that opens must be explicitly closed.
Driven - deleting `END LEG` now fails on the FIRST edit, whatever the order or
the wording:
AssertionError: leg 'SAME-STEP' opened while 'STAGED' was still open - the
tool stopped closing its legs, and a splitter that never closes swallows the
closing summary into the last leg.
All three attacks include that edit, so one assertion kills the class. Clean
tree unchanged: 28/28, all checks passed.
⭐ AND THE RULE IN MUTATION.md IS EXTENDED, because review's finding is the
general case of it. It said "a per-thing check that has never seen the things
DISAGREE is a total". Part 5b DOES make them disagree, every run, and was still
blind. So:
...AND ONE THAT HAS ONLY SEEN THEM DISAGREE IN ONE ARRANGEMENT IS A TOTAL
OVER THAT ARRANGEMENT. When a fixture cannot enumerate the arrangements,
assert the invariant they share.
Also recorded, NOT fixed, with the reason: the reference carries `entity_id
unique_id device` and grades all three, but never the discovery TOPIC. Review
measured `homeassistant/... -> ha/...` exiting 0 with no findings while every
announced entity dies. `discovery_payloads()` already returns the topic and
`announced_rows` discards it, so a fourth column closes it - but the prefix is
HA's fixed contract rather than a name this project chooses, so it is not what a
tidy-up rename reaches. Lower LIKELIHOOD than the N1 gap it resembles, not lower
consequence, and it stops being a note the day the topic becomes configurable.
Two stale figures corrected: the tool claimed five migration mutations where
there are nine, and pointed at a DOCS.md heading that does not exist (the real
one is "Before you commission inverter B", verified present at DOCS.md:1577).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
9c1a9e0f17 |
ARCH-02: M7's evidence was filtered out by its own finding kind
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m56s
The mutation battery prints the distinct findings each mutation caused, matched on the finding's KIND. The pattern's character class was `[A-Z -]`, which has no underscore - so `UNIQUE_ID DRIFT:` did not match, and M7, the mutation that renames `mqtt.BASE`, printed its verdict with no evidence under it at all. A filter that silently drops the very finding a mutation exists to produce is the same defect as the rest of this card, at display scale. No behaviour change: M7 was red before and is red now, and it now shows why. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
638c213944 |
ARCH-02 round 2: the pin could not tell one red leg from two, and the tool went
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m57s
quiet when a flag was forgotten Both blocking findings were reproduced before anything was changed, and both are the class this card exists to guard against. B1. THE PIN WAS A COUNT, AND A COUNT CANNOT SEPARATE TWO ROUTES. The rehearsal reaches the disarmed latch by two independent paths and prints every finding TWICE per red leg - once in the leg's block, once in the closing summary - so ONE red leg satisfied `count(...) >= 2`. Measured: shipped code 4; with `migrate_unit_keys()` handed the roster's own name (SAME-STEP fixed) 2, PASSES; with a guard-side fix (both fixed) 0. The check named "NOT THE SAME-STEP PATH ALONE" reported ok on the build whose only remaining failure IS the staged path. The tool now prints `LEG <id>` / `END LEG <id>` and the pin requires the finding in EACH leg by name. ⚠️ AND THE FIRST SPLITTER CARRIED THE SAME DEFECT ONE LEVEL DOWN - it opened on the marker and never closed, so the last leg absorbed the closing summary and read red whenever ANY leg was red. Caught by building the one fixture that separates them. Part 5b is now that fixture, run every time: a tree in which SAME-STEP is genuinely clean and STAGED is not. A per-thing check that has never seen the things disagree is a total with extra steps. ⚠️ AND IT CORRECTS A CLAIM THIS CARD MADE. `main.py:250` is NOT the whole fix. Measured on that exact change: LEG SAME-STEP clean, LEG STAGED still DISARMED - the staged path stamps `schema_version` on the flat start and the roster start's migration returns early before the name it is handed matters. DOCS.md now says so, with the measurement. B2. A FORGOTTEN FLAG WAS A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH. Omitting `--live-entities` printed "nothing orphaned" and exited 0, with `grep -ci` for the words returning 0 - while an UNREADABLE file exited 2. The asymmetry was backwards. Omitting it now refuses (exit 2); `--no-live-entities` is the deliberate opt-out and carries a standing banner in the header AND on the exit line, because a report is skimmed from the bottom. N1. THE REFERENCE DID NOT CARRY WHAT HA KEYS ON. It held entity_ids only, so renaming `mqtt.BASE` (every unique_id moves) and changing `DEVICE["identifiers"]` (HA sees a new device) both came back exit 0 - real orphanings with every composed id byte-identical. The reference is now three columns (`entity_id unique_id device`), is loaded on EVERY run including a degraded one, and M7/M8 pin both. `object_id` is deliberately not a column and its rename is required to SURVIVE, which is what bounds the four mqtt.py mutations. Also found while fixing the above, and fixed with its own paired positive: the VANISHED check did not carry the default/non-default rule the STRANDED check does, so a pair of migrated DEFAULTS moving namespace read as two findings and CONTROL-C went red on a CORRECT build. M9 drops non-default keys and must still be a finding. N2/N3. DOCS.md withdraws the unmeasured "not recoverable by advancing again" - its own reasoning cut the other way and nothing here tested a re-advance; the measured part (eight rows stop updating, history gaps, automations stop firing) stands. And the byte-identical-input property is `test_rehearse.py`'s assertion, not the tool's. FRAMING. SAFETY-44 is ALREADY RECORDED on the merge base - `test_maintenance.py` section 13, with the "guard is defeated by the very key the defect wrote" sentence, in a file this card does not touch. DOCS.md now says this is independent re-confirmation through a second instrument, reachable from an owner-supplied state file rather than only from a fixture, and not a discovery. app/ is still untouched. 59 checks in test_rehearse.py, 9 mutations red, 2 required survivors, 3 clean controls. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
1841416aa4 |
ARCH-02: put the fresh-install checks in the part they belong to
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m49s
They were printing under "6. THE REVERSE DIRECTION", which is not what they are about, and part 2's heading still said two controls when there are three. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
cb8f800180 |
ARCH-02: the harness was red on every fresh install, and a third control says so
A store the add-on has never written has no latch and no history. The DEV-02 migration still runs on it - `schema_version` is absent, so `from_version` is 0 - and it writes `sign_tripped = False` and `sign_reason = ""` under `inverter-a` before `build_roster()` exists. On a declared roster nothing reads either of them, so the first draft called both STRANDED and exited 1. Every fresh install that grows a second inverter would have been reported as a failed transition. ⚠️ THAT IS A DEFECT IN THE ALARM, NOT A CASE TO SUPPRESS, and store.py already carries the distinction it needed: `MigrationReport.lost` reports a dropped `sign_tripped=True` and NOT a dropped `sign_tripped=False`, because "absent" and "never tripped" are the same statement - and because an alarm that fires on the harmless case is one an operator learns to dismiss before the real one arrives. The stranded check now makes the same split, on the VALUE and not on the key name: a key stranded at its default is printed under its own heading, visibly, and is not a finding; the same key stranded at a non-default still is. SAFETY-44 turns on `sign_tripped = True`, so it is untouched, and a check pins both halves against each other so the softening cannot widen into a hole. CONTROL-C is the fresh install, and it is a third clean control rather than a line in a comment: the shipped code is right about it and the harness must say nothing. It is the control that found this. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
018da00b74 |
ARCH-02: show the mutation evidence, not the tool's own docstring
The mutation battery printed every line of the harness's output starting with a warning sign, and the harness's header is four paragraphs of them - so each mutation's evidence arrived buried under "THIS TOOL RUNS THE REAL Controller" repeated six times, and each finding appeared once per transition leg plus once in the summary. The filter now matches a finding's KIND and de-duplicates, so what part 3 prints is the set of distinct findings the mutation caused. No behaviour change: the same six mutations go red for the same reasons. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
e06906d65f |
ARCH-02: rehearse the flat-to-roster switch, and it comes up disarmed
Nothing had ever run the real `Controller` through the transition inverter B's commissioning performs on 2026-09-12. `tools/rehearse_roster.py` does, over a COPY of a state file given as an input path, and reports the difference: every store key that moved, appeared, vanished or was STRANDED under a name no machine reads; every entity id before and after with orphans named; and whether the maintenance history MAINT-05 moved once survived being moved again. ⭐ WHAT IT FOUND, AND IT IS SAFETY-44's ANSWER. A store that ran pre-DEV-02 flat and declares a multi-inverter roster comes up with its SAFETY-02 latch DISARMED unless the first roster entry happens to be called `inverter-a`. `Controller.__init__` hands `migrate_unit_keys()` the hardcoded `UNIT_A`, so the latch lands in `unit/inverter-a/sign_tripped`; a roster of ["garage","shed"] reads `unit/garage/sign_tripped`, which is absent. And `_grade_store_migration()` - the guard written for exactly this - sees the migration's OWN misdirected key satisfy its `namespaced_latched` test and returns without re-arming. Measured, not argued: the file says `sign_tripped: true`, no inverter is latched, nothing is held at 0 W. The same state file onto a roster whose first entry IS `inverter-a` comes up latched, so the finding is attributable to the name. The staged upgrade reaches it too: the flat start stamps `schema_version`, and the roster start's migration then takes its early return. ⚠️ NO RUNTIME CODE IS CHANGED HERE. The fix to `migrate_unit_keys()` belongs to SAFETY-44 reopened as a defect, shown red before it; this commit is the instrument that shows it red. THE CHECK CAN FAIL, AND WAS SEEN TO. `test_rehearse.py` establishes two CLEAN CONTROLS first - two transitions the shipped code gets right, on which the harness must say nothing - and then breaks the shipped migration and the entity-id composition six ways in a private copy of the tree, requiring each to turn its control from green to red WITH THE RIGHT FINDING NAMED. One mutation is required to SURVIVE, with the reason written down. The synthetic state carries maintenance history and a legacy-shaped latched `sign_tripped` with no `schema_version` beside it, because state built by the happy path cannot detect a migration that only mishandles legacy shapes. ⚠️ THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE HARNESS HAD HABIT 4 IN IT and its own battery caught it - MUTATION.md's thirteenth instance, third in an instrument. The entity diff composed both sides with the same build, so renaming the MQTT device moved every id equally and it reported "no orphans" about a change that orphans everything. `--live-entities` is the fix: a reference that does not move with the code. THE RETREAT is supported and does not corrupt state - the flat rollback view keeps the latch and the first pack's history live - but it orphans eight HA entities, and the ROUND TRIP is not supported: a maintenance cycle completed while rolled back is discarded on re-advance. Stated in DOCS.md as a decision. Fetching /data/state.json, the options blob and the entity list are OWNER STEPS and are written down. ⚠️ Nothing here was run against real state and nothing here claims to have been. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
admin
|
37dd0f00cc | Merge pull request 'SAFETY-43: delinquency measured against the ask, not against a flat 500 W' (#69) from SAFETY-43 into release/1.0 | ||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
1448bd909b |
SAFETY-43: the no_account switch was graded by nothing
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m29s
Review's remaining non-blocking finding, and it is B1's shape one level down -
in the fix for B1.
`wedged_loop`'s `no_account=True` was used in exactly ONE place: the cut-out
fixture, where it PROVABLY cannot change the answer, because a pack at its own
cut-out is never asked and the gate is never reached. Review neutered the switch
so it removed nothing, and the file stayed GREEN while printing
...named=(nobody); with account() DELETED: 0/200
with `account()` not deleted. A line asserting a mechanism that did not happen.
⭐ THE SWITCH DOES BITE, ON A FIXTURE THIS HELPER COULD ALREADY REACH. At the
same cut-out with EQUAL weights, `plan()` hands B a 50/50 share, so the account
gate is the only thing keeping it silent. Measured:
cut-out, OPT-09 weights gate on 0/200 gate DELETED 0/200
cut-out, EQUAL weights gate on 0/200 gate DELETED 200/200
Asserted. Driven: neutering the switch now goes RED on exactly that check, and
nothing else.
Two things this buys beyond closing the finding. It proves the switch removes
the gate, so the printed "with account() DELETED" line is about a run in which
something was. And it gives part 8b the end-to-end account-gate control ON A
POSITIVE SHARE that the block previously had to outsource to test_delivery.py
part 1 - the arm is no longer only true, it is locally demonstrated.
Suite: 27 files, all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
admin
|
a0d981731c | Merge pull request 'SAFETY-31 AC 4: the alarm's attribution was graded by nothing, and a mutation proved it' (#68) from SAFETY-31-attribution into release/1.0 | ||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
b21e229adf |
SAFETY-43 round 2: the cut-out "positive control" was vacuous, and the record
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m29s
stated the wrong mechanism ⚠️ REVIEW FINDING, BLOCKING, AND IT IS THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS WRONG RATHER THAN THE BEHAVIOUR. Part 8b's cut-out arm claimed an "identical power trace" to the wedged arm and that "what separates them is `account()`". EVERY PART OF THAT WAS FALSE, and the check survived deleting the gate it named. Measured: cut-out arm, account() live named 0/200, distinct B shares: [0] cut-out arm, account() FORCED None named 0/200, distinct B shares: [0] wedged arm, account() live named 200/200, shares 77/125/133/154 W At its own cut-out the pack's usable energy ABOVE that cut-out is zero, so `weights()` answers 0.0, `_fill()`'s preferred pass gives it nothing, the healthy sibling covers the load alone so the last-resort pass never runs, and its share is 0 W ON ALL 200 CYCLES. A unit with a 0 W share is not in `asked`, so `len(asked) < 2` returns {} BEFORE EITHER ARM IS EVALUATED and `account()` is never consulted. Nothing was identical, "100 % of the ask" was 0/0, and the arm never reached the comparison it was written to grade. WHAT REPLACES IT IS A BETTER FACT, NOT A WEAKER ONE: at its own cut-out OPT-09 STOPS ASKING THE PACK AT ALL, so SAFETY-43's relative arm is never reached. That is a SECOND, INDEPENDENT protection sitting UPSTREAM of `account()` - the allocator declines to ask before the detector has to decline to alarm. So the arm is kept and re-pointed, not deleted: * the 0 W share is now ASSERTED (`_sat_last[1][Bee] == 0`), not inferred from the silence - a control that cannot say WHY it is quiet cannot fail; * the arm runs a SECOND time with `account()` DELETED (`no_account=True`) and must still be silent, which is what proves which mechanism does the work; * the account gate's claim is re-pointed at test_delivery.py part 1, where it is graded on a REAL positive 125 W share. ⚠️ AND IT WAS INVISIBLE FOR ONE REASON WORTH KEEPING: that was the ONLY line in part 8b that did not print its shares. `inverter-b+0` would have been on screen from the first run. Every line in the part prints them now. The derated control's vacuity guard also now asserts ITS OWN unit is asked, rather than re-asserting a different run's 200/200 - which is exactly why the old guard could not see this. ALSO, from the same review: N1 app/delivery.py said 0.05 was "twelve times more sensitive" than 0.85. 0.85/0.05 = 17 and no reading of the pair gives 12. An unsupported number in shipped source; replaced with what was actually measured. N2 M14's recorded count was 4 named checks in test_delivery.py and it is 5 - part 1's pre-existing "a shortfall AT the threshold is not one" also goes red. It under-claimed, so it never inflated the evidence, but a recorded figure that does not reproduce is still one. N3 test_delivery.py part 1 printed the alarm sentence with a bare `delinquent(...)["b"]`, which raises KeyError under M12/M13 and ABORTED THE FILE AT PART 1, leaving parts 2-8 ungraded. The direction is safe (an abort is a red; MUTATION.md's defect fabricates only greens) but the recorded coverage read smaller than the truth. It is a `.get` now, and M12/M13's counts are re-run: 7 and 7 named checks, not 5 and 6. CFG-07: the assessment is unchanged (worse by one control cycle, 35.0 -> 40.0 s, deliberately not fixed here) and now says WHEN it has to close - BEFORE INVERTER B IS COMMISSIONED (~2026-09-12), because the band is unreachable at N=1 and commissioning B is when it first becomes reachable - and that CFG-07 HAS NO DECISION DOCUMENT IN THIS TREE, so whoever takes it writes one first. No behaviour change. `delinquent()`'s two arms, the fraction, `min_w` and the N=1 path are all untouched by this commit. 27/27 suites green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
2271e147c6 |
SAFETY-43: delinquency measured against the ask, not against a flat 500 W
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m20s
`delivery.delinquent()` named a unit whose `short_by()` gap exceeded an
ABSOLUTE `min_w = Tuning.saturation_w = 500 W`. OPT-09's SoC-aware weights
shrink a low-headroom unit's share, and shrinking the share shrinks the gap, so
a unit standing at +125 W and delivering 0 W - 100 % delinquent - was never
named. Measured end to end on the real loop (test_packshare.py part 8b):
load 1500 W, B wedged at 15 %, equal weights named on 199/200 cycles
load 1500 W, B wedged at 15 %, OPT-09 weights named on 0/200 cycles
⚠️ The suppressed regime is the quiet one: at a load the healthy sibling covers,
the meter is satisfied, `unmet_w` is 0 and no action-log line fires, so this
alarm is the ONLY instrument that would have told the operator.
WHAT CHANGED, in one line:
named if short_by() > min_w OR short_by() > frac * share
⚠️ `min_w` WAS NOT LOWERED. It exists to stop normal saturation being reported
as delinquency, and lowering it trades a missed alarm for a false one on every
unit at once - SAFETY-41's four-attempt regime. This is a SECOND way to be
named, not a looser first one: all seven of test_delivery.py part 1's existing
fixtures answer identically under both rules, and the absolute arm's suppression
window is still exactly 1000 W / 6500 W, still asserted in part 8b.
THE FRACTION IS DERIVED, 0.85. admin/goodwe:sim/delivery_window.py gained a
`--fractions` axis and grades the constant over the SAME 2640 no-fault runs that
produced `delivery_hold_s`'s 35.0 s floor. Worst continuous legitimate episode,
worst of three families, twenty fractions:
frac 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
worst 90.0 90.0 70.0 70.0 60.0 55.0 55.0 60.0 45.0 45.0 s
frac 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 *0.85 0.90 0.95 0.99
worst 40.0 40.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 s
absolute arm alone: 35.0 s (SAFETY-42 §3.3, reproduced in the same runs)
⚠️ NO CLIFF ANYWHERE: 0.45-0.99 is flat within one control cycle, and it is not
monotone - §3.3's own mechanism (c). ⚠️ "Zero false namings" is NOT achievable
at any fraction and the record says so; what is zero is false ALARMS - 90.0 s
worst against a 185 s hold, so nothing comes within 95 s of notifying anybody.
N=1 control 0.0 s at every fraction in all 2640 one-inverter runs; flapping
0.0 s in all 840.
DRIVEN. Part 8b pinned the SUPPRESSED behaviour and said "if it ever goes red
because the alarm fired, read the card that made it fire". It now grades BOTH
rules on one run - `share_frac=None` is SAFETY-42's rule exactly:
OPT-09 weights, absolute arm alone named on 0/200
OPT-09 weights, the shipped rule named on 200/200
POSITIVE CONTROL. Same fixture, same weights, same 125 W share, one legitimate
fact changed: a pack at its own 10 % cut-out is named on 0/200 (account() still
gates it), and a unit delivering HALF its share is named on 0/200.
N=1 BYTE-IDENTICAL, asserted: `plan()` handed a `weights` mapping that raises on
any read still answers identically at a roster of one, and the same mapping
raises at a roster of two; `delinquent()` answers {} on all 84 single-unit
(share, measured, rule) combinations including 0 of 125 W.
MUTATION, run on fresh :ro trees: M12 (drop the relative arm), M13 (frac -> 1.0)
and M14 (frac -> 0.05) are all red on named checks. The constant cannot move in
either direction unseen.
⚠️ CFG-07 gets ONE CONTROL CYCLE WORSE and is deliberately not fixed here: the
worst legitimate episode goes 35.0 -> 40.0 s, so the schema's `int(30,900)`
false-tripping band widens from [30,35] to [30,40]. CFG-07 should be re-derived
against 40.0 s.
No option value, no schema bound and no default changed. 27/27 suites green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
admin
|
6719bd882f | Merge pull request 'TEST-21: delivery_hold_s's floor re-derived — 30.0 s did not reproduce, it is 35.0 s, and 185 still stands' (#67) from TEST-21 into release/1.0 | ||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
f76639c7b2 |
TEST-21: two of the argmax's four axes are on an edge, and the doc did not say so
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m22s
§3.3 already set the standard - "a worst case sitting on an edge of the grid
would be a number about the grid" - and then did not check its own argmax
against it. Review did. Reproduced here independently before writing it down:
stagger 0 -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 0.0 15.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 s
weights (A) at stagger 4 0.5 -> 20.0 0.7/0.9/0.99 -> 0.0
0.10 -> 35.0 s
Strictly increasing in stagger, maximal at the largest modelled stagger, and
maximal at the most asymmetric split. Interior only in `gain` and `slew_w`.
⚠️ SO THE HEADLINE IS 0.0 s AT stagger=0. The 35.0 s is ENTIRELY a product of
the modelled serialised-write stagger, which is declared MODELLED in the harness
and is a TERM of the figure rather than a detail of it. A site whose two writes
land in the same cycle does not produce this episode at all.
It does not move `delivery_hold_s`: 185 s must cover the worst the modelled site
can produce, and four cycles of stagger is inside what a real two-inverter write
path can do. What changes is that a reader asking "is 35.0 s about the plant or
about the grid?" now gets the answer instead of the invitation.
⚠️ THE PR BODY HAD CLAIMED THE ARGMAX WAS "interior to the grid, not on an edge
of an axis I had to choose". That was wrong, and it is the claim the doc's own
standard exists to test. The grid is the record's own, fixed by §3.3 before this
rebuild ran, which is the mitigating half and is stated too.
Also: `nl.yaml` wrote "35.0 s" beside "5,29 keer" and "75,0 s" in one sentence.
Dutch takes the comma.
Suite: 26 files, all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
adminandClaude Opus 5
|
57775d4e06 |
TEST-21: delivery_hold_s's floor re-derived, and 30.0 s did not reproduce
No code and no option changes. What changes is a number this repository claimed
about a shipped safety constant.
`delivery_hold_s: 185` shipped resting on "30.0 s, the worst continuous
legitimate episode at the shipped threshold across all 2640 runs", plus a lag
sweep giving 45.0 s and 90.0 s - from a harness `DECISIONS/SAFETY-42` §1
deliberately did NOT commit, because it imports `plantsim` and `frame_check` out
of admin/goodwe. So the floor under a safety constant could not be re-run. That
is PROC-01's shape, with eleven instances in three days.
The harness is committed now, in admin/goodwe as `sim/delivery_window.py`, and
NOT here. `plantsim` and `frame_check` are that repo's; restating them in this
tree is CI-08's coupling, which has broken three times, and the alternative
fate - skipped for want of its imports - is a green that establishes nothing.
There the dependency runs one way: THIS repo's `control`, `arbiter` and the
shipped `delivery.delinquent()` are imported live out of whichever checkout is
under test. Its `--selftest` is now a step in that repo's `checks.yml`, so a
change here that moves `saturation_w`, `max_w`, `delivery_hold_s` or the shape
of `delinquent()` goes red there instead of leaving a stale number here.
cd goodwe/sim && GOODWE_ADDON_REPO=/path/to/goodwe-addon \
python3 -B delivery_window.py --selftest --campaign --blag
⚠️ THE HEADLINE DID NOT REPRODUCE: 35.0 s, not 30.0 s. Recorded as measured. The
harness was not adjusted until it agreed - the one correction made during the
rebuild was made AGAINST the doc's number (§1 records it) and made every figure
LARGER.
WHAT REPRODUCED - and it is the part the compatibility promise rests on:
* the N=1 control arm is 0.0 s at EVERY threshold in EVERY run. §3.2's algebra
measured, not argued.
* the flapping family is 0.0 s everywhere in all 840 runs - the family that
defeated SAFETY-30's site window still cannot touch this check.
* 45.0 s at twice A's lag, to the cycle.
WHAT DID NOT:
* the headline, by one control cycle (30.0 -> 35.0 s); the reversal family by
two (20.0 -> 30.0 s).
* the NON-MONOTONE curve. §3.3 finding 3 read 55.0 s at 250 W against 40.0 s
at 100 W as a property of the reduction. This rebuild's curve is monotone.
The mechanism is real and is still the reason not to read either table as a
sensitivity curve, but it is an ARGUMENT now, not a measurement, and it is
written down as weaker.
* the low-threshold rows, badly (40.0 -> 120.0 s at 100 W). Nothing ships
there, but that gap is the honest measure of how much of the original table
was a property of axes nobody wrote down. §3.3 fixes every axis COUNT and
RANGE and no individual value; the rebuild prints its choices above its own
table so the caveat travels with the number.
* the four-times-slower row moved the OTHER way: 75.0 s, not 90.0 s.
185 s IS NOT CHANGED. It is 5.29x the re-measured worst (the record claimed
6.2x), 2.47x the four-times-slower case, 6.2x the firmware's LINK_STALE_S veto
and 4.9x inside the billing quarter. All four bounds clear and none narrowly,
and the ordering of the argument is unchanged. Moving a shipped safety constant
because a margin went from 6.2x to 5.3x while every bound holds would re-open
SAFETY-41's four-attempt false-trip regime for nothing.
⚠️ ONE CONSEQUENCE AN OPERATOR CAN HIT. At 30.0 s the rig's floor coincided with
the firmware's veto and a reader could not tell which was binding. At 35.0 s the
rig's is strictly the binding one - and it is ABOVE the schema's own
`int(30,900)` minimum. `delivery_hold_s: 30` is therefore below a MEASURED
legitimate episode and would report on ordinary saturation. Both translations
now say so. Raising the schema floor is a change to a shipped option's contract
and is left to its own card rather than smuggled in here.
⚠️ THE B-LAG ROWS ARE RELABELLED THROUGHOUT. Inverter B does not physically
exist (~2026-09-12); `plantsim.INVERTER_B` is A COPIED, `measured=False`. Every
two-inverter figure in this record is two copies of A, and the lag sweep is a
SENSITIVITY STUDY ON A HYPOTHESIS ABOUT B, not a measurement of it. The old
wording - "MEASURED, not felt" - overstated exactly that, and "the RAMP does not
move it at all" was too strong: halving it is worth 0 s at A's lag and +5 s at
twice it.
Touched: DECISIONS/SAFETY-42 §1 and §3.3, app/delivery.py's provenance comment,
config.yaml's `delivery_hold_s` block, both translations, CHANGELOG Unreleased.
26/26 suites pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
9099ceb1af |
SAFETY-31: the grid is 42, not 90, and the wrong number was in the failure text
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m27s
Review reproduced every figure in both PRs except one, and rejected on it. ⚠️ "0 of 90 GAINS x SPLITS combinations produce opposing shares" - the SUBSTANCE is right and review re-measured it, but the DENOMINATOR is invented. sitesim.py declares GAINS with 7 entries and SPLITS with 6: the grid is 42. 90 is not even divisible by 7, so no reading of "GAINS x SPLITS" reaches it. It is almost certainly TEST-20`s RUN count (84 + 6), which is a different quantity that happened to be nearby. ⚠️ AND THE WORST COPY OF IT WAS INSIDE THE `PRECONDITION FAILED` TEXT, so the next engineer to see this scenario go red would have been handed an unreproducible measurement as their diagnosis - the exact defect class this campaign exists to correct, in the failure path where it does the most harm. Corrected in all seven places. At the failure-text site the denominator is now `len(GAINS) * len(SPLITS)`, computed rather than typed, so it cannot drift from the grid again - the same fix test_translations.py already took. Also N3: a missing blank line was going to render the S3 and M19 paragraphs as one in DECISIONS. Re-run after the change: `inject.py two_master_circulation` PASS in 35 s, norig, no rig lock taken. Add-on suite 26 files, all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
295a2aedb6 |
SAFETY-31 AC 4: the alarm's attribution was graded by nothing, and a mutation proved it
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m27s
`pos, neg = opposing(...)` -> `([], [])` in main.py's `check_circulating()`
(-102 B) deletes the "Right now X is discharging while Y charges" clause from
the operator notification, and SURVIVED ALL 26 FILES. The commit that shipped
this card claimed "18 mutations, all RED"; the ledger has no entry for the
attribution, and this is that entry.
It is not dead code. Ledger M18 - the whole `await check_circulating()` call
removed - is red on four checks, so the function runs. The three checks on the
notification asserted METER CANNOT SEE, CONTROL HAS BEEN STOPPED and `isolator`,
and never an inverter name. `circulation.py`'s own docstring calls that sentence
the first thing somebody woken by this alarm needs and "impossible to
reconstruct from the number alone".
test_watchdog.py section 6a closes it on a fixture that can tell three failures
apart:
* the roster is ["garage", "shed", "cellar"] - operator names, none of them
`UNIT_A`, for test_maintenance.py section 11's reason: on a fixture whose
names are the module's own constants a check cannot tell the roster from
the constant;
* the site is run TWICE, MIRRORED, so the sentence is not symmetric and a
pos/neg swap is a different red from a deletion;
* a third pack rests at 5 W, so the floor that stops a pack in standby being
named as a participant in a 6 kW loop is graded too.
Mutations, on a tree with no __pycache__ mounted :ro into the checks image:
M20 pos, neg = opposing(...) -> ([], []) -102 B RED (2 checks)
M21 pos and neg exchanged +0 B RED (3 checks)
M22 opposing(..., min_w=cfg.min_w/2.0) -> 0.0 -25 B RED (3 checks)
26/26 files green with the block in place.
AND A DISCLOSURE, WHICH IS THE UNCOMFORTABLE HALF. DECISIONS section 3 records
that the 924-run campaign behind `circulation_w: 700` and `circulation_hold_s:
75` used a harness that is not committed in either repository. Two further
sweeps have now been run and no two of the three agree: peaks of 1700 W, 2750 W
and 1048 W, and worst-continuous figures above 700 W of 5.0 s, 15.0 s and 5.0 s.
That is NOT evidence of fabrication and is not reported as any. The committed
sweep measures why the spread is that wide: on one grid, changing only the
plant model and the write-stagger set, the worst legitimate peak is 1048 W, or
2250 W, or 0 W. The plant and the stagger are TERMS of the number. What the
spread does establish is that the claim cannot be adjudicated while the
instrument is missing.
The window argument survives and is now committed - all three sweeps trip zero
times, on 924 + 48 + 840 non-faulty runs. The threshold CURVE does not survive
as stated: `505.0 s at 100 W`, which is what the "knee at 400 W" argument rests
on, is 10.0 s on the committed grid. The curve still falls with the threshold,
so the knee is real in direction; its depth is established by nothing anybody
can run, and this commit says so rather than repeating it. The overclaiming
comment at test_watchdog.py's 1700 W fixture ("the worst single transient the
rig can produce") is replaced with what the fixture can support.
The committed, re-runnable half is admin/goodwe's `two_master_circulation`,
opened as a separate PR against that repository.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
admin
|
bb469163a6 | Merge pull request 'UX-04: nothing was hidden, the defaults pin was never built, and CFG-04 was closed by UX-02' (#66) from UX-04 into release/1.0 | ||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
477911afa1 |
UX-04: the 59 was computed and then graded against "> 15"
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m22s
Review approved and found four things worth fixing. Three are cosmetic; the fourth is the same defect this card is about, one level up. ⚠️ THE FLOOR WAS PRINTED AS 59 AND ASSERTED AS `> 15`. So a manifest change dropping the required count to 20 would have passed while the sentence beside it still said 59 - a number displayed but not graded, which is exactly what let UX-01's AC 3 survive review in the first place, and exactly the shape `test_translations.py` was already fixed for. Now DERIVED and graded in two separate assertions, because they are two different claims: 1. `_EXPECT_REQ = len(schema) - len(_OPTIONAL)`, where optional is Supervisor's own rule - a `?` suffix, plus `inverters` because `UiOptions` marks a list optional - asserted EQUAL to Supervisor's required count. The printed number is computed, so it cannot go stale. 2. ⚠️ AND THE WITHDRAWAL'S PREMISE, SEPARATELY. The equality alone is not enough and I checked why: both sides read the same `?` convention, so marking a key optional moves BOTH and it stays green - measured, by making `slew_w` optional and watching it pass. That grades Supervisor agreeing with us, NOT the thing AC 3 was withdrawn for. The second assertion grades the premise: the floor is still far above the ~15 AC 3 asked for, and if it ever is not, the withdrawal needs re-arguing rather than re-asserting. Driven, both directions, against the real 2026.08.0 image: clean PASS "floor is DERIVED: 71 schema keys minus 12 optional ones is 59, and Supervisor's own required flag agrees" premise threshold 15 -> 40 FAIL "the floor of 59 is still far above the ~40 AC 3 asked for" Also: a dangling reference to `DECISIONS/UX-04-hiding-and-the-deepmerge.md`, which was never the filename shipped, and `DOCS.md` still saying section F "prints" what it now grades. Not changed, and review agreed both are disclosed rather than defects: the pair-keyed ledger cannot see a SECOND site for a pair it already holds (the site count can grow while the pair set cannot), and the probe's assertions run by hand rather than in CI because they need the Supervisor image - the same status as before this card, not a regression. Suite: 27 files, all pass. Probe: all cases passed on ghcr.io/home-assistant/amd64-hassio-supervisor:2026.08.0, --network none. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
Claude Opus 5
|
21f22b393a |
UX-04: nothing was hidden, the defaults pin was never built, and CFG-04 was closed by UX-02
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m20s
UX-01's three unmet acceptance criteria, closed out. It shipped in 0.7.0 and is LIVE, so all three describe the running install. No behaviour, no schema and no default moves here: config.yaml, translations/ and every module under app/ are byte-identical to |
||
|
admin
|
6e7b23388c | Merge pull request 'PKG-13: the no-op half of the pre-deploy check has never run as documented' (#65) from PKG-13 into release/1.0 | ||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
1ba35f9c99 |
PKG-13: one safe.directory flag, not two, and the tighter of the pair
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m19s
Review found `-c safe.directory={where}` and `-c safe.directory=*` set on the
same invocation, the specific value redundant once the wildcard is present.
Dropped the WILDCARD rather than the specific path, which is the opposite of
the suggestion and the tighter end of it: `_git()` always runs `-C where`, so
the only repository it ever reads is the one it was pointed at, and naming that
one path grants exactly the trust the tool needs. `*` granted trust to every
repository on the machine for the lifetime of each subprocess - harmless for
read-only `log`/`show` with no tty, as review measured, but broader than the
job.
Verified after the change: the documented container invocation still runs BOTH
halves and reports `no runtime change since the last bump` / `CLEARED for
deploy`, so the fix this branch exists for is intact.
Suite: 26 files, all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
0b653c35a6 |
PKG-13: the no-op half of the pre-deploy check has never run as documented
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m19s
⚠️ THE INVOCATION ON PKG-09's CARD AND IN THE TOOL'S OWN DOCSTRING RUNS ONLY HALF THE CHECK. The container runs as uid 0 against a checkout owned by the operator, and git refuses that: fatal: detected dubious ownership in repository at '/w/goodwe-addon' `_git` returned non-zero, `last_version_change()` returned None, and the silent-no-op check - THE REASON PKG-09 EXISTS - reported SKIPPED. Measured, on the documented command against release/1.0: ⚠️ SKIPPED: could not ask git what changed since the last bump; the no-op check is INCONCLUSIVE, not clean NOT CLEARED and with `--user $(id -u):$(id -g)`, unchanged otherwise: no runtime change since the last bump - nothing to deploy CLEARED for deploy. ⚠️ THE TWO HALVES WERE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE ACROSS THE TWO DOCUMENTED ENVIRONMENTS. In the container the validator ran and git skipped; on a bare host git ran and the validator skipped on aiohttp. NEITHER DOCUMENTED COMMAND RAN BOTH. The pre-0.9.0 clearance was sound only because it happened to be driven as two separate invocations. ⚠️ AND IT WAS INVISIBLE IN THE ONLY CASE ANYONE HAD RUN. `main()` consults the git result only when `shipped == deployed`; every real run so far compared 0.7.0 against 0.9.0 and printed its verdict without ever needing git. FIXED IN `_git()` WITH `safe.directory`, NOT BY DOCUMENTING `--user`. The tool should be correct however it is invoked rather than requiring every future caller to remember a flag; the read is read-only, on a repository the operator is about to deploy from. ⚠️ WHY THE TESTS COULD NOT SEE IT, WHICH IS THE FINDING BEHIND THE FINDING. `test_version_gate.py` invokes the gate with `sys.executable` against fixtures it creates as its own uid, so no fixture could ever meet an ownership mismatch. MUTATION.md habit 4 in a fourth shape, inside the file written to prevent it - after the pickaxe bug, after the one-bump history, after the filter-only survivor. Two fixtures added: - a directory that is NOT a git repository, so the lookup genuinely fails: the gate must exit 2 saying INCONCLUSIVE and must NOT say CLEARED. - ⚠️ THE EXIT CODES PINNED BY VALUE, NOT BY TRUTHINESS. `returncode != 0` is satisfied by collapsing NOT-CLEARED into REFUSED, which review found the earlier draft could not tell apart. 1 says "this deploy is wrong"; 2 says "nobody checked". Driven: collapsing 2 into 1 now goes red on exactly that check. Suite: 26 files, all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
admin
|
d0633665c9 |
Merge pull request 'PKG-12: bump 0.8.0 -> 0.9.0, so the five merges behind it can actually ship' (#64) from PKG-12 into release/1.0
PKG-12: bump 0.8.0 -> 0.9.0, so the five merges behind it can actually ship |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
8e3734f5ea |
PKG-12: the live options WERE checked, and the changelog said they were not
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
Review approved the bump and, in doing so, dated one of its own paragraphs.
When this section was written the pre-deploy check had not been run and the
changelog said so, correctly. The owner then exported the reference install's
options and the check cleared, which makes the shipped sentence false in the
release notes an operator reads at the hardware.
Replaced with what was measured, twice:
stored blob as-is exit 0, CLEARED
effective post-upgrade config exit 0, CLEARED
(the 70 stored keys merged OVER 0.9.0's
71 config.yaml defaults)
max_w 5000, slew_w 400, rule-10 ceiling 555.6 W.
⚠️ AND THE SECOND CHECK IS NOT CEREMONY. The stored blob has 70 keys, not 71:
`delivery_hold_s` arrived with SAFETY-42 in 0.8.0, so a box running 0.7.0 has
never stored it, and it is REQUIRED in the schema with no trailing `?` - the
exact shape that becomes exit 78. It resolves to its `options:` default of 185
because the Supervisor sets `App.options = deepmerge(defaults, stored)`, which
`tools/supervisor_selfapi_probe.py` §D pins against a real Supervisor image.
Review re-derived that independently rather than taking the reasoning on trust.
"Your saved settings are valid" and "what the box will actually run is valid"
are different questions, and only the second one is the one being asked before
a deploy.
Suite: 26 files, all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
86bdf49332 |
PKG-12: bump 0.8.0 -> 0.9.0, so the five merges behind it can actually ship
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m14s
⚠️ MINOR FOR NEW FUNCTIONALITY, NOT FOR A BREAK, AND THAT DISTINCTION IS
CHECKED RATHER THAN ASSERTED. PKG-07 was minor because a config that started on
0.7.0 could be REFUSED on 0.8.0. Nothing of that kind is true here:
- `options:` and `schema:` hold 71 top-level keys on both
|
||
|
admin
|
fcaa72418d |
Merge pull request 'PKG-09: refuse a deploy that would be a no-op, or that the add-on would reject' (#63) from PKG-09 into release/1.0
PKG-09: refuse a deploy that would be a no-op, or that the add-on would reject |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
04b3330def |
PKG-09: refuse a deploy that would be a no-op, or that the add-on would reject
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m16s
Two ways a deploy of this add-on has gone wrong, and the Supervisor reports both as success. THE SILENT NO-OP. The Supervisor keys the built image by `version:`, so `ha apps update` against an unchanged version installs nothing and says it worked. PKG-06 recorded this on 2026-09-05 with six merges behind an unbumped version; PKG-07 recorded it again on 2026-09-06 with six. Both times a human noticed. Nothing else was going to. THE REFUSED CONFIG. A config the shipped validator rejects is SystemExit(78) - the add-on does not start. ⚠️ AND THE INGRESS PANEL GOES WITH IT, because the add-on serving it is not running, so recovery means the Supervisor UI. ⚠️ IT CAUGHT A LIVE ONE ON ITS OWN PULL REQUEST. Run against release/1.0 while this branch was in review: version 0.8.0 on both sides with UX-02's and OPT-09's runtime commits already merged behind it. The class this exists to catch had recurred, the same day, unnoticed - which is the argument for PKG-10, a non-required post-merge check, since this script only helps someone who remembers to run it. ⚠️ THE FIRST VERSION WAS BROKEN ON EVERY REAL REPOSITORY AND ITS TESTS COULD NOT SEE IT. The "when did the version last change" lookup was `git log -S`, the pickaxe, which finds commits that change the COUNT of a literal string. A bump edits the line IN PLACE, so the count never moves and it returned only the commit that first INTRODUCED the line. Measured here: -S -> |
||
|
admin
|
fdb3b69397 |
Merge pull request 'OPT-09: the weights parameter nothing ever passed, and what it cannot do' (#62) from OPT-09 into release/1.0
OPT-09: the weights parameter nothing ever passed, and what it costs SAFETY-42 |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
cab267c4f3 |
OPT-09: the 6500 W window is a bound the ratings never let the site reach
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m10s
Round-2 non-blocking findings, both fixed. ⚠️ THE WINDOW FIGURE WAS ARITHMETIC NOBODY HAD RUN. `min_w * (w_A + w_B) / w_B` = 6500 W is correct about `_fill()`'s PROPORTIONAL regime and is not a reachable steady state: the healthy pack's own 5000 W rating binds first. SWEPT on part 8b's own fixture, reproduced rather than transcribed: load equal OPT-09 site target A B 1000 199/200 0/200 1080 997 83 2000 199/200 0/200 2170 2003 167 3000 199/200 0/200 3250 3000 250 4000 199/200 4/200 4340 4006 334 4500 199/200 8/200 4890 4514 376 4900 199/200 41/200 5320 4911 409 <- largest suppressed 5000 199/200 195/200 8000 5000 3000 <- A at its rating 6000 199/200 195/200 8000 5000 3000 So the alarm returns BELOW the formula bound, not above it, and the largest site target reached with the wedged unit still under the 500 W threshold is 5320 W - not 6500. The equal-weights "suppressed below 1000 W" bound is unreachable for the same reason: the equal arm names the wedged unit 199/200 at EVERY load swept, 1000 W included. The formula and its check are kept, because the mechanism they state is right and it is the mechanism that generalises to other ratings. What was wrong was the sentence around them, in four places, implying the site passes through the bound. Each now carries the sweep and says the rating binds first. ⚠️ THIS NUMBER CAME FROM THE REVIEW, NOT FROM THE BRANCH, and was adopted in good faith by the implementer. The reviewer found it in round 2 and said so. That is worth recording: a figure arriving from a trusted reviewer got less scrutiny than one written by the author, and PROC-01's eight fabricated numbers in two days is now nine. The rule that catches it is the same either way - run it before you ship it. Also: the DECISIONS header's base sha, stale for the third time ( |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
8d83ef0dfb |
OPT-09: the weights DO move on a wedged unit, and that narrows SAFETY-42
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m11s
B1, the blocking review finding. §5 of the decision said:
"A wedged unit reads a healthy SoC, so no envelope closes and no weight
moves - OPT-09 cannot see it at all."
The first clause is true and is about the ENVELOPE. The second clause is
FALSE, and it was load-bearing for the claim that OPT-09 and SAFETY-42 meet
without overlapping. A weight is a function of a pack's ENERGY HEADROOM, not
of what the pack delivers, so a wedged unit's weight moves whenever its
headroom differs from its sibling's - the ordinary case this card exists to
exploit. And delivery.delinquent() (app/delivery.py:484, threshold at :531)
names a unit only while its short_by() gap exceeds min_w = Tuning.saturation_w
= 500 W in ABSOLUTE WATTS. Shrinking the share shrinks the gap below the
threshold, and the alarm stops firing on a unit still delivering nothing.
So the seam, stated accurately: OPT-09 stops the ask AND narrows SAFETY-42's
detection window for a low-headroom unit. That is a DETECTION REGRESSION at
N=2. It is disclosed here, not fixed: making delinquent() relative to the ask
rather than absolute is SAFETY-42's code and a design change, filed as its own
card.
1. THE CORRECTION, in the three places that carried the claim
* DECISIONS/OPT-09-soc-aware-weights.md §5 - rewritten. States the seam
accurately, quotes the sentence it is replacing, carries the measured
rows and the window arithmetic, and names the residual in the same voice
as SAFETY-13's "2 of 272" and SAFETY-42's "the discriminator does not
exist". Also drops "they meet and do not overlap" from the opening.
* app/packshare.py - a new section in the module docstring, immediately
after "weights are a comfort choice for stability and not for delivery",
which is where the over-read starts.
* CHANGELOG.md - a new paragraph in the SAFETY-42 entry, ending on the
operator-facing sentence: a wedged inverter with less energy headroom
than its sibling can now go unreported at ordinary house loads.
test_packshare.py part 8's closing check and its "what this file cannot
see" list repeated the same false clause; both now say the ENVELOPE cannot
reach a wedged unit and point at part 8b for what the WEIGHTS do to it.
2. THE GRADED CHECK - test_packshare.py part 8b, 6 named checks
The reviewer's probe, reproduced: real compute(), real plan(), real
packshare.weights(), real delivery.account(), real delivery.delinquent();
the only model is the plant (A obeys within one cycle inside its rating,
B accepts its share and delivers 0 W). Unit B is WEDGED at 15 % against
its own 10 % floor, so envelope() does not close and account() explains
nothing - a SAFETY-42 true positive by that card's own definition, which
a PRECONDITION check asserts before anything is concluded from it.
load 1500 W, B wedged at 15 %, equal weights named on 199/200 cycles,
site target +3000 W, shares a+1500, b+1500, grid +0 W, named=[b]
load 1500 W, B wedged at 15 %, OPT-09 weights named on 0/200 cycles,
site target +1630 W, shares a+1505, b+125, grid -5 W, named=(nobody)
load 6000 W, B wedged at 15 %, equal weights named on 199/200 cycles
load 6000 W, B wedged at 15 %, OPT-09 weights named on 195/200 cycles
suppression window: equal weights, site target < 1000 W; OPT-09
weights, site target < 6500 W of a 9600 W site
THE CHECKS ASSERT THE CURRENT, UNFLATTERING BEHAVIOUR ON PURPOSE - that
the weighted arm names NOBODY where the equal arm names the wedged unit.
A check asserting the alarm still fires would fail, and papering over it
would be worse than the original defect. The 6000 W row is there so the
part is not pinning "the weighted arm never names anybody": past the
healthy pack's own rating, _fill()'s last-resort pass hands the wedged
unit 3000 W and both arms name it. The window is real and it has an edge.
MUTATION - packshare.weights() keeps its shape and forces every weight to
1.0 (M11 in part 11's table, which now has 11 rows). RUN on a purged tree
with python3 -B, not reasoned about:
load 1500 W, B wedged at 15 %, equal weights named on 199/200 cycles,
site target +3000 W, shares a+1500, b+1500, grid +0 W, named=[b]
load 1500 W, B wedged at 15 %, OPT-09 weights named on 199/200 cycles,
site target +3000 W, shares a+1500, b+1500, grid +0 W, named=[b]
load 6000 W, B wedged at 15 %, OPT-09 weights named on 199/200 cycles,
site target +4000 W, shares a+2000, b+2000, grid +4000 W, named=[b]
suppression window: equal weights < 1000 W; OPT-09 weights < 1000 W
FAIL AND WITH OPT-09's WEIGHTS IT IS NAMED ON NONE OF THE 200 [...]
FAIL ...and the arithmetic behind it, stated as a window [...]
FAIL AND IT IS NOT THAT THE WEIGHTED ARM NEVER NAMES ANYBODY [...]
test_packshare.py exits 1. Restored: exits 0.
3. THREE PROC-01 PROSE DEFECTS
* DECISIONS/OPT-09-soc-aware-weights.md:3 said "Base: release/1.0 @
464d398". The branch was rebased; git merge-base HEAD
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
f8e501393f |
OPT-09: the weights parameter nothing ever passed, and what it cannot do
`allocator.plan()` has taken a `weights` argument since ALLOC-01 and NOTHING
had ever passed one - main.py called `resolve()` without it and the arbiter
defaulted it to 1.0 per unit - so the site target was split 50/50 regardless
of what either pack could do. Two things now feed it, and they are different
kinds of thing:
* a `pack` UNIT claim at P_SAFETY that CLOSES a unit's envelope at its own
`bms_soc_floor` or at 100 % - a PERMISSION, obeyed absolutely, so an empty
pack is not asked to discharge and its share goes to the sibling;
* SoC-aware weights by ENERGY headroom in kWh - a PREFERENCE, which
`_fill()`'s last-resort pass will override the moment the sibling saturates.
Measured (test_packshare.py part 8): at a load one pack cannot cover, the
weighted arm and the shipped arm command the IDENTICAL watts into an empty pack
and deliver the IDENTICAL watts. Only the envelope stops the ask, and what it
buys is not delivery - it is a reported `unmet_w` where the record used to read
impeccable. Weights are a comfort choice for STABILITY and NOT for DELIVERY.
Also: an optional per-entry `capacity_kwh` (schema change, all-or-nothing across
the roster, rule 9 refuses a partial one); per-pack arbitrage sizing, with the
sell side's no-op stated rather than hidden; and a 0 W trade refused by name,
because a 0 W arbitrage claim is a park order that outranks the loop.
SAFETY-42 and this card meet at one hazard from opposite sides - OPT-09 stops
the site ASKING a pack whose SoC says it cannot deliver, SAFETY-42 alarms when a
pack that said it could does not - and its end-to-end fixture moved as a result.
Its finding is unchanged and is now stated on the two quantities its rejected
discriminator actually reads.
Not filed at all at a roster of one: at N=1 every source routes to the site, so
the interval would bound the SITE TARGET, and SAFETY-25's decided Option A
stands untouched on the live install.
⚠️ INVERTER B DOES NOT EXIST. Its 4600 W / 20.48 kWh / 10 % are FROM DATASHEET
AND SERIAL, and `sim/plantsim.py`'s INVERTER_B is inverter A copied
(`measured=False`), so every two-inverter figure here is arithmetic or two
copies of A. No hardware was touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
admin
|
3d2999337d |
Merge pull request 'UX-02: the validator's refusals, next to the field, before the save' (#61) from UX-02 into release/1.0
UX-02: the validator refusals, next to the field, before the save |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
bcee2356e0 |
UX-02: pin both halves of the max_w fix, because neither was graded
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m16s
Review of the fix commit found that BOTH halves reverted with the whole 24-file suite still green - including the half that turns a crash into a SILENT ACCEPTANCE, which was my own wrong first attempt at this fix. A fix nothing grades is a fix that comes back. MUTATION.md habit 4. ⚠️ AND THE OBVIOUS PIN HAD THE SAME DEFECT IT WAS WRITTEN TO CATCH. "problems_ and_ranges does not raise" is ALSO satisfied by the backstop swallowing the exception and returning [] - the silent acceptance half two exists to prevent. MEASURED: with both halves reverted, every max_w check reported `ok` and only the forced-boom pins went red. So half one is now pinned on `build_roster` ITSELF, where the backstop cannot answer for it. That is the same defect as the one being fixed - a check whose data cannot reach the failure it names - written into the check for it, and it is the twelfth recorded instance. New section 2b of test_selfconfig.py: - `_flat_max_w` agrees with `_number()` across ten shapes, so composition tolerates exactly what rule 9 tolerates. - ⭐ `build_roster(max_w="")` does not raise - half one, standing alone. - a cleared box answers with the validator's own verdict; an unparseable one answers "max_w 'abc' is not a number". - ⭐ clearing max_w on the LIVE shape (5000 W rail, explicit slew_w 400) is REFUSED by rule 10 "against a site rail of 2000 W". `unit_caps_indexed` reads the flat rail through the same `_number`, so the rail collapses in lockstep and rule 10 catches the collapse. This is what makes the fix safe rather than merely non-crashing: the box cannot be emptied into a quietly halved rail. - ⭐ the backstop never returns an empty list, forced by monkeypatching build_roster to raise; and the patch is shown undone. DRIVEN, all four arms through the real harness: clean rc=0 fails=0 revert half one rc=1 fails=2 (_flat_max_w -> bare float()) revert half two rc=1 fails=2 (backstop returns [] again) revert BOTH rc=1 fails=3 Each half is caught on its own, which is the property the earlier draft lacked. Suite: 24 files, all pass. Not addressed here, filed instead: N3 (`/config/` 404s), N4 (undeclared keys on a hand-crafted POST, which the page cannot produce and Supervisor drops), N5 (saving pins every default as an explicit option), the page reporting "would start" for a blob Supervisor's own schema refuses, and 2000.0 hardcoded in three places that agree today with nothing pinning them together. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
2bb07ccdde |
UX-02: the panel was weaker than the startup gate for one field
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m9s
Applying review finding N1, which was non-blocking because it fails closed, and
N2, which is a fabricated number.
N1. Clearing the `max_w` box answered HTTP 500 on a non-JSON body, which the
page rendered as "cannot reach the add-on" - untrue, and for the most prominent
limit field's most likely transient state. The cause was a disagreement between
two files that `inverter.py`'s own docstring says to keep in step:
validate.py `_number()` reads "" as "use the default", so rule 9 saw 2000
and was content
inverter.py line 515 did a bare `float(opts.get("max_w", 2000))`, which
raises ValueError on ""
So a shape rule 9 TOLERATED could not be composed at all - the docstring's rule
inverted. The roster path never had this: `_entry_max_w` already guards. Only
the flat single-inverter path did. `_flat_max_w()` now reads empty as the
default exactly as `_number()` does, and unparseable as 0.0 exactly as
`_entry_max_w` does, where rule 9 refuses it by name at line 790.
⚠️ THE FIRST ATTEMPT AT THIS MADE IT WORSE, AND THE PROBE CAUGHT IT. Guarding
`build_roster` in `selfconfig` with `except: return validate(opts), []` turned
the 500 into ZERO PROBLEMS for `max_w: ""` - the validator has nothing to say
about it, so an empty list came back and the page would have ENABLED SAVE. A
crash became a silent acceptance. The guard is kept as a backstop for shapes
neither file anticipates, but it can no longer return an empty list: if the
roster cannot be composed and the validator names no reason, that disagreement
is itself reported.
MEASURED after the fix, `problems_and_ranges` with no HA:
max_w 5000, slew_w 400 0 problems (the live shape)
max_w "", slew_w 400 1 problem rule 10, "against a site rail of
2000 W" - clearing the box FAILS
CLOSED on the live install rather
than silently halving the rail
max_w "", slew_w 0 0 problems accepted at the 2000 default
max_w "abc" 1 problem "max_w 'abc' is not a number"
Before the fix, both "" and "abc" raised ValueError instead.
N2. `translations/en.yaml:7` said "all 71 keys ... so ALL SEVENTY are rendered".
The 70->71 correction had been made in one half of the sentence and not the
other. 59-of-71 required is correct and was re-measured.
Suite: 24 files, all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
|
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
fdaf3fb54f |
UX-02: the validator's refusals, next to the field, before the save
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
The Configuration tab can only render types and ranges. `validate.py`'s most
useful refusals are CROSS-FIELD - two inverters naming one `setpoint_entity`, a
`maintenance_charge_w` above `max_w`, a flat `setpoint_entity` left set beside a
declared roster - and the Supervisor's UI has no way to express a rule spanning
two keys. Today the operator meets those as exit 78 in a log, after saving and
restarting. This puts them on the screen beside the field they name, before
anything is written.
WHAT IT ADDS
app/configui.py the field model, built from `GET /addons/self/info`'s own
`schema` + `translations`. No option key, no label, no
rule of its own. UX-01's `Group · ` label prefix becomes a
real section heading, in whichever language resolved.
app/selfconfig.py the Supervisor conversation and the write gate.
app/config_page.py the page. Its longest function decides which HTML input a
type deserves; it contains no rule.
app/web.py five routes. Still the only file a reviewer has to read to
answer "does anything here reach the inverter".
THE FOUR THINGS THAT COULD HURT SOMEBODY, AND HOW EACH IS HELD
1. A blob the SHIPPED validator refuses is never written - not warned about,
not written. An invalid blob plus a restart is exit 78, and the panel is
gone with the add-on that serves it.
2. A blob that moved underneath is refused, not clobbered. Read hands out a
sha256 of the canonical blob, save hands it back, and the stored blob is
re-read IMMEDIATELY BEFORE the write. This is SAFETY-28's discipline
applied to configuration - "a blob reaches the Supervisor only if it was
derived from the blob stored right now" - with the honest weakening stated
in the decision record: a second writer is DETECTED, not made
inexpressible.
3. Every message is the validator's own, byte for byte. test_selfconfig.py
part 6 inserts ONE new rule into a COPY of validate.py, hashes every file
under app/ to show validate.py is the only one that differs, and serves the
real /config/validate route out of that copy in a subprocess. The new
sentence arrives, filed under the key it names.
4. Nothing on the surface commands an inverter or clears a latch. Saving does
not restart: applying costs a control interruption - the wind-down commands
0 W on every inverter - so that is a separate, confirmed button that says
so first.
MEASURED, NOT CITED (tools/supervisor_selfapi_probe.py, run against
Supervisor 2026.08.0's own code; it contacts nothing)
- the three self-paths are permitted, and `/addons/self/info` is admitted by
the `default` role too while `options` and `restart` rest on the bypass
ALONE. The probe's first draft claimed the role admitted none of the three
and went red.
- `/addons/self/options/validate` is NOT reachable from inside an add-on, so
the only validator this panel can call is ours - which is the one with the
cross-field rules.
- a POST that omits a key does not preserve it: the key reverts to
config.yaml's default. Hence whole-blob read-modify-write.
- the Configuration tab CAN be removed, and doing so drops 0-of-71 options
through and takes the add-on down. The card said it could not be; it stays
by decision, which is a better reason.
DOES NOT TOUCH config.yaml, main.py or any control path. UX-01 is a dependency,
not something this supersedes: its translations are where every label,
description and section heading on this page comes from, and the Configuration
tab is still the recovery surface. DECISIONS/UX-02-two-config-surfaces.md
records which surface is authoritative (neither: the stored blob is) and what
the second surface costs.
Also corrects a stale "70 options" in three prose spots to the 71 the probe
counts - config.yaml grew a key in SAFETY-42 and the sentences did not follow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
---
⚠️ REBASED ONTO release/1.0 @
|
||
|
admin
|
3368231048 |
Merge pull request 'PKG-07: bump 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0, and stop the changelog calling shipped work unreleased' (#60) from PKG-07 into release/1.0
PKG-07: bump 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0, because 0.7.0's own default is now a refused config |
||
|
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5
|
06661c5e17 |
PKG-07: bump 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0, because 0.7.0's own default is now a refused config
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m6s
Six merges landed behind an unbumped 0.7.0 - CI-06, SAFETY-38, SAFETY-39,
SAFETY-37, SAFETY-13, SAFETY-42. PKG-06 recorded this exact failure YESTERDAY
(
|
||
|
admin
|
464d398051 |
Merge pull request 'SAFETY-42: a unit that stops delivering, and the discriminator the card asked for does not exist' (#59) from SAFETY-42 into release/1.0
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m6s
SAFETY-42: alarm when the saturation freeze persists past the plant bound |