glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 91b0d5e4dc
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m4s
INSTR-01: grade the suppression rule at the level it is written at, one case per clause
SAFETY-44 produced THREE inert controls for this one rule, each inert
differently, and split the two remaining fixes out rather than ship them
unmeasured. This is that card, and the first thing it did was explain why the
end-to-end route could never have worked.

⚠️ `moved_to` IS ONE COMPREHENSION CARRYING FIVE CONDITIONS WITH FIVE DIFFERENT
REASONS TO EXIST, AND `run()` BUILDS BOTH SNAPSHOTS FROM ONE STATE FILE. So
"the destination was already latched" and "the destination was made by this
transition" are the same file answering two incompatible questions: the
arrangement that reaches one forecloses the other. That is why rebuilding a
fixture to reach clause N kept moving the others, and it is not a fixture
problem.

⭐ SO THE RULE IS GRADED WHERE IT IS WRITTEN - `diff()` on constructed
Snapshots, ONE CASE PER CLAUSE. Six rows, and on the SHIPPED tree before any
fix they already separated the two known defects:

    R1 rename (legitimate)   migrated                      correct
    R2 narrowing             vanished                      correct
    R3 provenance            MIGRATED                      ⚠️ the defect
    R4 same value            vanished                      correct
    R5 injectivity           BOTH migrated                 ⚠️ the defect
    R6 machine_read          vanished                      correct

The two one-line fixes SAFETY-44 reverted are back, and R3/R5 flip while
R1/R2/R4/R6 do not - so the legitimate rename is still suppressed and this is
not an over-correction.

⭐ AND EACH CLAUSE REMOVAL FLIPS **EXACTLY ITS OWN ROW**, which is the
acceptance criterion this card was filed with:

    C1 machine_read  removed -> ['R6-machine-read']
    C3 same value    removed -> ['R4-value']
    C5 off-roster    removed -> ['R2-narrowing']
    C6 injectivity   removed -> ['R5-injectivity']
    C7 provenance    removed -> ['R3-provenance']

A removal that flips nothing is an unmeasured clause; a removal that flips
someone else's row means the cases are not separable after all. Neither
happened.

⚠️ AND M12 IS DELETED, WHICH IS THE MOST USEFUL THING THIS CARD FOUND. M12 was
SAFETY-44's end-to-end control for the narrowing and it was a REAL control -
red when the narrowing was removed. Adding the provenance clause disarmed it,
and NO FIXTURE CAN RESTORE IT, measured both ways: with the sibling latched in
its own right, C7 rejects the destination before C5 is consulted, so the
mutation is reported whether or not C5 exists; making the destination
transition-made means a flat latch, which makes the shipped run dirty and
breaks M12's own precondition. The second half of the card's acceptance
criterion - "M12 still turns red with the new clauses in" - is therefore
UNSATISFIABLE, and the honest answer is to remove the control rather than keep
one that has become inert. R2 measures C5 strictly better. Part 5 keeps the
end-to-end coverage; discrimination lives in 5e.

`state-both-latched.json` goes with it. Nothing referenced it once M12 was
gone, and the first draft of that paragraph said it was "kept, because 5e's
R2/R3 are derived from the arrangements it represents" - a nice sentence and
not a reference. An unused fixture a comment calls load-bearing is an inert
check one directory over.

TWO THINGS THE DRIVER GETS RIGHT ON PURPOSE:
  - it is written to a TEMPDIR, not beside the tool. `checks / unit` mounts the
    checkout READ-ONLY, so writing into the tree works on a dev box and is
    `OSError: Read-only file system` in CI - green for whoever wrote it and red
    on every PR. Caught by running it in the check image before committing.
  - the TABLE stays in the test file and the driver goes into the tree under
    test, so a mutation to the tool cannot also move the answer it is graded
    against.

28/28 files pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-08 23:51:35 +02:00

GoodWe RS485 Controller — Home Assistant add-on repository

Replaces a GoodWe battery inverter's vendor controller with a local one: holds net grid exchange at zero by emulating the inverter's smart meter over RS485, and runs the monthly battery maintenance cycle the vendor box was doing.

repository.yaml            add-on repository metadata
goodwe_controller/         the add-on
  config.yaml              manifest + options schema (the per-site config form)
  app/                     the controller
    control.py             the control law — pure functions, no I/O
    maintenance.py         the monthly cycle state machine
    hass.py                Supervisor/Core API access
    store.py               persistent state in /data
    mqtt.py                optional status entities
    web.py                 ingress UI — routes only, status and configuration
    config_page.py         the configuration page's markup, style and script
    configui.py            its field model, built from the Supervisor's own
                           schema + translations — owns no key, label or rule
    selfconfig.py          reading and writing this add-on's own options,
                           with the validate-first / compare-and-swap gate
    main.py                orchestration, heartbeat, failsafe behaviour
  test_control.py          runnable checks — no framework needed
  test_maintenance.py      runnable checks — walks a full cycle in fake time
  DOCS.md                  the add-on's documentation tab
  MUTATION.md              how to run a mutation so the result means something
  tools/mutation_run.sh    the mutation harness - purges bytecode, then grades
  tools/supervisor_selfapi_probe.py  what the Supervisor really permits and
                           returns, run against its own release image
firmware/goodwe-master.yaml  ESPHome config for the T-CAN485
estop/rs485_log.py           optional RS485 e-stop / bus witness
docs/GoodWe-RS485-Field-Guide.pdf  the guide techs carry (10pp, A4)
docs/build_guide.py          its single source - rebuilds the HTML and PDF
FIELD-GUIDE.md             how to edit and rebuild the guide

Picking this up after a break? Read HANDOVER.md first — current state, what is known broken, and what to do next.

Install

Settings → Add-ons → Add-on store → ⋮ → Repositories → add

https://gittea.kammenstraatha.duckdns.org/admin/goodwe-addon

then install GoodWe RS485 Controller.

⚠️ The repository must be PUBLIC for this to work. Home Assistant clones it anonymously; against a private repo the store shows nothing and gives no useful error. If it must stay private, install locally instead: copy goodwe_controller/ into the machine's /addons/ folder, then ha store reload — it appears as a Local add-on.

⚠️ Bump version: in goodwe_controller/config.yaml for every change. Supervisor keys the built image by that version, so without a bump it silently reuses the old image and your fix appears not to work — on your bench and on every client's machine.

Requires Home Assistant OS or Supervised. Add-ons cannot be installed on HA Container or Core.

Read this first

The inverter holds its last command forever. It has no meter-timeout of its own — a controller that dies mid-command leaves the battery running until a human intervenes. Measured on real hardware: 5 kW of discharge held for 113 seconds after a controller went silent.

Three layers exist because of that, and only the third covers the Home Assistant machine itself dying:

  1. ESP32 watchdog — no fresh setpoint for ~30 s → command 0 W, and keep commanding it.
  2. Wind-down before firmware updates — 0 W written before the update starts.
  3. RS485 e-stop (optional) — writes 0 W after 30 s of total bus silence.

Sites sold without the e-stop must have the acknowledgement in FIELD-GUIDE.md §10 signed.

Development

The control law and the maintenance machine are pure Python with no Home Assistant imports, so they run anywhere:

cd goodwe_controller
python3 test_control.py
python3 test_maintenance.py

Both must pass before shipping any change. To prove a check bites - the way almost every claim in this repository was established - mutate the module and run tools/mutation_run.sh, which clears __pycache__ first. It is not optional: a same-size edit reverted inside one second leaves CPython reusing the old bytecode, and the run grades code that is not there. goodwe_controller/MUTATION.md has the mechanism, the measurement, and what the flags do not do. They are not unit-test theatre — each assertion corresponds to a rule whose absence produced an observed failure on real hardware, and the comments in control.py say which.

Compatibility

Check the serial number, not the model name. Characters 6-8 of the serial are the platform tag:

tag platform verdict
ESU EMU ESA BPS BPU EMJ IJL 105 — ES/EM/BP, AA55-era meter bus supported
SPB SPN 745 — SBP G2 (GW…-SBP-20) no
ESN ESC 745 — ES G2 (GW…-ES-20) no
ETU EHU BTU … 205/745/753 — ET/EH/BT hybrids no
SDT DST MSU NSU … PV-only inverters — no battery to control no

A "-20" or "G2" suffix means a different platform with a different meter protocol. The tags come from the goodwe library's PLATFORM_105_MODELS, which is also what Home Assistant's own integration uses to pick a protocol.

  • GoodWe ES / BP family inverters (AA55 / RS485 meter-bus generation)
  • The protocol is reverse-engineered. There is no vendor contract, and a firmware change on GoodWe's side could break every installation at once. Say so when you sell it.
S
Description
No description provided
Readme
18 MiB
Languages
Python 98.1%
JavaScript 1.2%
CSS 0.3%
Shell 0.2%
HTML 0.2%