The N=1 stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's parked test are centred on the
idle reading; learning stops while control is stopped or the sign watchdog
has latched. Each had no check (review mutants X7, X8, X13, X14).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
At a 5 s meter a register frozen at rest on B trips the stale gate before
the 12-cycle evidence; its refusal must be centred on B's idle reading,
or the site stops and re-trips instead of refusing B.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
B's power reading shows -95 to -118 W at idle (standby draw), so the
|reading| < 100 W refusal band never held a refusing B: never at N=2,
and since SAFETY-94's shared rule not at N=1 either (review F1).
Each unit now learns its idle reading (app/idle.py): only while control
runs, the unit is not refused/stale/tripped and its command has stayed
within 50 W for 120 s; first value a 120 s mean, then a 30 min follow;
samples beyond 250 W dropped, value clamped to 250 W; saved per unit and
restored. The shared refusal evidence, compute()'s N=1 engage and end,
the unit refusal ends, the stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's "parked"
test are centred on it. Until learned it is 0 W, the rule as it was.
Refusing B caught at N=1 28/28/65 s and N=2 24/24/60 s (1/2/5 s
meters), before never; refusing A unchanged. Healthy B with its offset,
SAFETY-94's scenarios, 96 runs: 0 stale, 0 refused. Live replay: 0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
The stale-reading gate counted its 35 s from the register's last change, so
after a rest the first read after a new command tripped it (SAFETY-58; live
2026-10-03, four trips 1 s after the command). It now counts only the time
the command asked the register to move.
At N=1 the refusal engaged after 12 frozen cycles if the reading was under
100 W at that moment, which a battery reversing through its lag passes at a
1 s meter. The refusal now needs the N>1 evidence at every roster size: under
100 W, one way, for 12 cycles spanning 22 s, restarting when the reading
moves 50 W towards the ask.
DECISIONS/SAFETY-94-lagging-battery.md; test_safety94.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A battery still in CHARGE but dropped by the allocator (stale link, or a
SAFETY-73 refusal contradicting its charge) left its -2000 W in the loop's
start point, and B went 0 -> -1600 W in one cycle. The end is now noted
after the unit claims are filed: in CHARGE, live and not contradicted.
Tests: part 6 (stale link, refusal) and a spy on the guard suspension.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
At N>=2, when a battery's maintenance charge ended, its watts stayed in the
loop's start point and landed on the other battery (B 0 -> -1600 W in one
cycle, charging from the grid at a 6000 W house). On the cycle a charge
ends, the loop now starts from what the others stood at plus that
battery's new command. N=1 and all identity digests unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A SoC reading flipping across the reserve swapped ~1000 W between the
batteries on each flip (grid +-500 W with unequal lags). Also grades
next_quarter()'s staleness boundary (29.5 / 30.5 s).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
At N>=2 a battery at or under its own peak reserve now weighs 0 whenever
the site gives (not only for the peak), a draining battery's pin becomes
a floor at its drain rate so it rises before the held one gives, and a
quarter's edge is graded on the next quarter when its first telegram is
late. SAFETY-25 option A stays: the held battery is still drawn once the
others are full. N=1 unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Crash, not stop, for SAFETY-61; Watchdog off by default; its own
warning for the 50 W peak margin (also under a higher month peak);
"refuses power" for SAFETY-52/73; no one-house options claim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bump config.yaml version 0.12.0 -> 0.13.0 and close a ## 0.13.0
CHANGELOG section covering every merge since 0.12.0 (a45ed06), with the
known issues SAFETY-90/91/92/93/94. Option surface 77 -> 83, none removed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rule 2 graded each battery against last cycle's command and graded charges
too. On plantsim's battery (10 s lag) at the 2 s meter it warned at every
drain or charge start and 15 times an hour under the peak guard at N=2; a
charge tapering near full warned 11 times in 50 min (SAFETY-42 section 7).
Now a discharge is graded against the least it stood at over SHORT_CYCLES /
SHORT_SPAN_S. DOCS lists `mode-bound` under Loop reason. test_safety85 part 7:
peak guard with a dead battery, lagging plant, taper; part 3: the bound ends
with maintenance.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A 6500 W house needs more than B alone: A must give (the N>=2 suspension),
with a non-vacuous run without it (banks over the cap, 'Load too high').
Without P1 the charge is not sized, as at N=1: A charges at 2000 W.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Kills M5 (refiled at P_SAFETY) on its own sentence, not only through the
per-cycle claim check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A floor exactly at the drain rate stays at P_PEAK (kills `lo >= rate`), and
part 4's N=2 check no longer shares its failure list with N=1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
At N=1 the drain is the site SET at P_MAINTENANCE (60), so the peak floor
(P_PEAK, 50) was not applied and the house imported what the drain left.
Where the floor asks for more than the drain rate, main.py now refiles the
peak claim at P_MAINTENANCE, so it wins; safety SETs still park everything.
Nothing else changes: safety78_identity --diff against 35cdffe changes only
cycles where the guard wanted more than the drain; N=2 is byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- The alarm must hold for peakguard.ALARM_HOLD_S (10 s) on the projection's
clock. A load that tops cap + battery for ~5 s every 30 s alarmed at every
quarter start while the quarter landed under the aim (sine4500_fast).
- A cycle with no battery reading leaves the hold alone.
- Notified once per quarter, but the ERROR line is written per episode.
- New sim scenarios (sine4500_fast, twice7000, step6500_gap) with 5a4cdc2
digests; control still byte-identical. Unit checks for export and the
hold across a missing reading. test_peakguard's saturated fixture moves
the hold start back instead of waiting it out.
- DECISIONS and DOCS updated: costs of the hold, tolerance reasoning, the
double count in control left to a follow-up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- A refusal past the log-once set or the 32 cap is counted in the log at
1, 10, 100 and so on, so a repeated attack stays visible.
- The logged topic is printable only (no forged log lines).
- mode_announcement(): the start-up store logic, now tested with a real
Store. A removed config topic stays stored, so a start with no broker
cannot forget it (rename case tested).
- A test ties each HA mode option to the page's English name.
- packmode.enabled() is tested for "true", 1 and "false".
- Retained-command text, DOCS and DECISIONS updated to match.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Each battery gets an MQTT-discovered Mode select and Use switch, only while
battery_modes_enabled is true. Commands go through handle_action(), the
/action path; refusals are logged once. Retained commands are never applied.
Turning modes off removes exactly the configs announced (kept in the store).
With modes off the announcement is byte-identical to ed739d4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reviewed: a mode gives way to the peak floor only as far as it needs; SAFETY-03 kept at the rail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A new install names no inverter. When that is the startup gate's only
refusal, the add-on now serves the setup wizard in setup-only mode instead
of exiting 78. It builds no controller, MQTT client or meter task, its
HomeAssistant is read-only (every service call refuses before sending),
Controller refuses a read-only HomeAssistant, and /action answers 409.
Any other refusal still exits 78. DECISIONS/UX-15-setup-only-mode.md.
Wizard fixes from the UX-13 P4 test:
- F1: /config/validate converts what it can, so a conversion error blocks
its own step and the live checks still run; save 422 carries steps.
- F2: saves send the model the page opened (base); only keys this page
changed are written onto the blob stored now.
- A meter entity missing from Home Assistant is red on the last step.
- Step 1 says the reading went down after a skip that followed a fall.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Setup tab draws the Installer view's page model one step at a time,
from each field's `wizard` step in app/uilayout.py: meter (with the kettle
test), inverters and batteries, solar (optional), prices, peak limit
(battery modes: "comes in a later update", OPT-11), check and start.
It reuses P2's controls and saves through /config/validate and
/config/save. No route was added.
- First run: /config/model says `setup_needed` when the stored options name
no power request entity, or on a new install (no `setup_done` and no
`auto` in the Store, control not started). The page opens #setup only
when opened with no route. The wizard's save writes `setup_done`.
- Kettle test: GET ha/entities?entity= reads one entity now, in W. The
change decides: up keeps meter_invert off, down turns it on; a net or
import/export meter that goes down blocks the step with what to check.
- Last step: validate.setup_checks() beside the refusals: the meter reads,
each power request entity exists in HA (bad if not, SAFETY-77), battery
levels and power with direction, solar sign, prices. Saves with
shadow_mode on by default, then a confirmed restart naming the 0 W.
- P2 test finding (a): a stale save lists only the keys the other surface
moved (the blob handed out on open, by fingerprint, against stored now).
- test_setup.py; tools/ux13_wizard_blobs.py makes the 88 blobs the wizard
can save; all accepted by Supervisor 2026.08.0 AppOptions (offline).
- DECISIONS/UX-13-setup-wizard.md; DOCS "Setup, for a new install".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LyR88rXETvwhTgx6yHE39p
- Trade blocks: none on a battery with no room, no sale at a negative price
or while the emptiest battery is at arbitrage's floor, nothing when a
level is unknown. A give after a charge may use what the charge put in.
- The refusal line names the real reason: prices not published vs gap.
- The plan's peak line uses the guard's ceiling (this month's peak once
above the cap), as the peak card does.
- House below zero: 0 W inside the idle band, no figure beyond it.
- Price bars are "Low price" / "High price": the add-on trades in one hour.
- Control toggle: one request in flight at a time.
- test_home: the new cases; the house-sign mutation now goes red.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- uimodel: editing a listed inverter keeps the stored flat keys, and a
region of "own" keeps a stored price_taxes_profile (both were dropped).
- haentities: a failed read also waits CACHE_S, so polls while Home
Assistant is down do not queue one 10 s read each.
- ui_text: the Flanders preset names its DSO, and the help says
Wallonia and Brussels have no figures yet. REGION_PRESETS cites the card.
- tests: decode of a reversed solar row, both kept keys, the backoff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Engage (and seed from a stale stop) below REFUSED_BELOW_W, the probe's
own 100 W answer, not below saturation_w: a battery derated to 100-499 W
was held at 0 W ~93 % of the time.
- A reading of 100 W or more in the held direction ends the refusal, probe
or not: at a 1 s meter SETTLE_CYCLES is 12 s, shorter than a healthy
reading's lag, and that held a healthy step at 0 W until the next probe.
- test_refusal part 5b and a seed test; DOCS states the N>1 limit; the
DECISIONS record carries the traced cause of the replay's extra trips.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- After a restart, each restored stop (direction per inverter and site,
delivery, circulation) also writes its saved reason to the action log.
log_level defaults to info and events starts empty, so the DEBUG
evidence alone left the figures only in state.json.
- A flapping meter (ha_signed under a flat load, 42-97 s between changes)
logs at most one WARNING/INFO pair per 10 minutes, with the episodes in
between at DEBUG.
- LONG_LINE_OK refuses any key whose text is a safety reason.
- test_watchdog keeps the byte pin beside the meaning pin, since the text
did not change.
- DOCS says the DEBUG line needs log_level debug.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Part 6 checked the quoted reason alone, so title + reason + tails logged
as 4+ sentences. It now also checks the whole line (at most 3 sentences,
none over 30 words); 25 lines failed and are rewritten (one-sentence
wrappers, two-sentence circulation and peak reasons, STALE_READING's
fixed limits on a DEBUG line). The clamp lines for one inverter are
pinned at 30 words with OUTPUT_CLAMP and the numbers kept. Home
Assistant's bare '400: Bad Request' while it loads becomes one plain
line; still WARNING, throttled, a failed write.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every WARNING and ERROR line is one plain line of at most 25 words, with
no card ids, capitals or semicolons; the reasoning of the ten longest is
on a DEBUG line. The ux08 allowlist is empty and its cap is 0 (43 -> 0).
The status page: the month-peak and peak-guard rows, the stale-reading
row, the top table (Why, Tariff, Arbitrage, Shadow mode, labels), the
Stopped banner and the line under the buttons, which now shows the plain
hint of each event instead of the raw action log. The Supervisor question
at start logs one line with a real reason.
Refusals are counted as shown (labels expanded, long cases driven), seven
were shortened, the card and parse errors lost their internals, a blank
value reads "empty", and the panel no longer files inverters.max_w under
the flat max_w. Option names lose "(JSON)", the NL texts are checked too.
DOCS gets a glossary (control board, isolator, Developer Tools) and card
ids move from headings to a "For installers" line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LyR88rXETvwhTgx6yHE39p
The Supervisor questions for the Details link are asked together with a
3 s budget instead of one after the other at 10 s each, so a hung
Supervisor cannot hold control start for 20 s. In shadow mode the
circulating and site-direction latches are pinned to keep their own red
row that says how they clear. Plainer inverter and battery wording.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Details link: /config/app/<slug>/documentation on HA 2026.2+ (the old
/hassio/addon path is a 404 from 2026.5), /hassio/addon on 2026.1 and
older. Slug from GET /addons/self/info, version from GET /info, hostname
as fallback.
- Shadow mode: the over-rating alarm and row say what would have been sent,
the peak alarm no longer says the battery is giving all it can.
- "controller" -> "the add-on" / "control". Settings named by their labels;
four labels changed to match (Peak reserve, Battery level entity, Solar
production ..., Reversed-sign solar entities).
- Shadow banner and inverter link notes moved to messages.py and checked.
- DOCS Notifications and Status page rewritten for home owners, with a
"For installers" part each. Allowlist 168 -> 167.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LyR88rXETvwhTgx6yHE39p
Every Commissioning row and every page banner is now worded in
app/messages.py (row_*, banner_*): one sentence of at most 15 words, a red
row up to three sentences so a latch still says how it clears, banners at
most 12 words. No row names a Home Assistant entity: sensors by their
setting, solar sources by their place in the list. Reason codes and limits
stay on the log line and event list; rows keep the numbers a reader acts on.
UX-07 item 1: ClampWatchdog counts over-rating and integrator-bound
engagements separately, and after an episode each count shows under its own
alarm's title instead of both under "output clamp".
No row colour, visibility or banner order changed. Rows carry an "id" so the
tests pin meaning rather than wording. The row and banner kinds leave the
allowlist (200 -> 168, cap equal). DOCS.md gains "Status page"; choices are in
DECISIONS/UX-08-short-notifications.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LyR88rXETvwhTgx6yHE39p
- not delivering: the body said control keeps running and then "start
control"; clearing it takes stop then start, and it now says so.
- peak reserve: the "reserve not set" branch is really soc_floor None,
i.e. an inverter's cut-out level missing; it now names that. The title
is true on all three branches ("Battery stopped limiting the peak").
- no semicolon run-ons in bodies (STYLE.md + test); loop-bound, circulating,
meter-frozen and multi-unit over-rating bodies rewritten to match.
- allowlist cap is now exact, so a shrink cannot leave room to regrow.
- DOCS names the settings behind "peak reserve" and "cut-out level";
DECISIONS no longer states the HA anchor behaviour as fact.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- DOCS.md / config.yaml: the watchdog's P1 age entity is
sensor.goodwe_p1_sample_age (device "GoodWe" + "P1 sample age", as
app/mqtt.py announces and the live install recorded), not
sensor.p1_sample_age_s.
- DOCS.md: the inverters: example and per-entry table carry the required
bms_soc_floor (and capacity_kwh); config.yaml's schema comment says four
required keys, not three.
- Field guide: marked v0.1.0/outdated; slew_w row no longer recommends the
1000 W that SAFETY-39 now refuses. HTML regenerated; the PDF is NOT
rebuilt (no Chrome here). README/DOCS pointers fixed.
- test_docs.py: the documented roster must pass app/validate.py and the
schema's per-entry keys; the documented entity id must equal the id
composed from app/mqtt.py; the wrong id may appear in no shipped doc.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
pv_entity becomes a roster: pv_entities beside it, replacing it, with the SITE total over the roster. One absent member makes the TOTAL absent - never the partial sum of the ones that answered, because a smaller number indistinguishable from a real one reads a week later as 'there was less sun than there was', which is the conclusion OPT-10 exists to test rather than to manufacture. A member honestly reporting 0 W is still summed.
Reviewed on PR 116. Re-run independently: supervisor_shape_probe.py SSG (exit 0, transcript reproduces byte for byte), the owner's real 75-key options blob through Supervisor 2026.08.0's own AppOptions (ACCEPTED, zero drift on any stored value, pv_entities defaulted to []), tel11_pv_trace.py --compare across both trees (every hash reproduces, control 846a10a5b89e unmoved on unset and one), the rejected-design mutant (trace REFUSED 5/5 with the partial sums named), the planted leak N8 (52/26/10 red cells), and eight mutations on fresh purged copies including N5 sum->max at +0 bytes - no survivors. Habit 24's central claim measured: TEL-11's own --compare refuses on every honest run now that release/1.0 is 0.11.0.
Green traced to this PR's own run: 829/1954, attempt 1, event pull_request, path checks.yml@refs/pull/116/head, payload naming PR 116 with base release/1.0 @ cccb2fa, 31 suites PASS in 7m53s - a real execution, not a laundered skip.
Not deployable as merged: config.yaml stays 0.11.0 and the CHANGELOG entry is PKG's call.
0.11.0 shipped `pv_entity` as a single string. The reference site's owner
reported within minutes of it going live that they have several PV inverters
and could configure one - which is ordinary for a multi-string roof, not a
property of one house. `pv_entities` is the roster and the row carries the
SITE total.
⚠️ THE HARD PART IS ABSENCE, NOT THE LIST. Three configured, one `unavailable`,
and the sum of the other two is a SMALLER NUMBER INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM A REAL
ONE. Read back by OPT-10 that says "there was less PV than there was" - the "no
irradiance" conclusion the channel exists to TEST. So `pv.total()` answers
`None` the moment any configured entity is absent: the topic carries HA's own
`None`, the entity goes to `unknown`, the recorder records a GAP. The
alternative (the partial sum beside a contributor count) was implemented and
run as mutation N1b; it loses because the MQTT row is read COLD a week later by
an attribution that would believe it, while the qualifying count would live in a
second entity with its own history. The partial information is not thrown away -
the STATUS PAGE names every entity that reported, with its watts, and every one
that did not, with its reason, because that surface is read LIVE by a human who
wants the diagnostic.
⚠️ AND THE MIRROR: a member honestly reporting 0 W is SUMMED. The test is
`is None`, never falsiness - a roster that blanked the site on a zero would
report an absence on every clear evening.
THE SURFACE IS MEASURED, NOT PREFERRED. `pv_entity` could not become a list:
tools/supervisor_shape_probe.py §G shows Supervisor 2026.08.0 answering an
0.11.0 install's stored string with `Invalid list for option 'pv_entity'`, and
deepmerge's list strategy is `override` so a `[]` default does not rescue it -
the live add-on would not start. `match(.*)?` does accept both shapes and is
rejected for a different, measured reason: it validates nothing (a string, a
list and the integer 417 all pass) and renders as a plain text box. So
`pv_entities` joins `pv_entity` and REPLACES it when set, CFG-04's rule for
`inverters:`, with a status caution saying which key won - a union would
double-count the inverter the old key still names.
STILL NOT A CONTROL INPUT. tools/tel11_pv_trace.py was extended rather than
replaced and now grades five claims over three document sets. The control hash
is UNMOVED - 846a10a5b89e… on `unset` and on `one`, on both trees - and the
roster control document is byte-identical between the two trees. 2/5 is a claim
TEL-11 could not make: with 0.11.0 as the baseline, "one entity behaves exactly
as 0.11.0 does" is a real cross-tree identity over control AND telemetry.
⚠️ TEL-11's OWN `--compare` REFUSAL HAD TO CHANGE, and that is MUTATION.md habit
24: a discriminator defined as "the baseline lacks this feature" dies on the
release that ships the feature, and dies as a false refusal.
Twelve mutations, each on a fresh purged `cp -a`, no survivors. N5 is +0 B
(`sum` -> `max`, the same three characters) and was run on a fresh copy with
`cmp` confirming the edit on disk. The fixture is three distinct NON-ZERO
contributions in two units with absence driven at EVERY position - a member
contributing 0 W could go absent without moving the sum of the rest, which is
habit 23 with a coinciding value in the arithmetic rather than in the plant.
31/31 in the CI image. Not deployable as merged: config.yaml stays at 0.11.0,
so predeploy_check.py reports a NO-OP until PKG cuts a version. A CHANGELOG
entry is wanted and deliberately not written - 11b forbids `## Unreleased` and
the bump is PKG's call; DECISIONS/TEL-12-several-pv-inverters.md is the
material it needs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
Bumps config.yaml 0.10.1 -> 0.11.0 and adds the `## 0.11.0` section, so the Supervisor offers the update that carries SAFETY-56's wording fix and TEL-11's `pv_entity`.
Reviewed at head b11bea7. Green traced to this PR's own run (827, attempt 1, payload names PR 114 base release/1.0, 31/31 real). Version gate 11a-11d, SAFETY-56's behaviour hash and TEL-11's four trace rows all re-measured on this tree and matching. slug unchanged; option surface 75 -> 76 with no validator rule added.
Two non-blocking findings recorded on the PR.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
Self-review. The note added to `### SAFETY-57` said the reading rule it is
qualifying is "two paragraphs up"; it is in the paragraph directly above - the
same one the note follows. A changelog that misdirects a reader to a paragraph
that is not there is the small end of exactly the defect this cut is fixing
three sentences of elsewhere, so it is corrected rather than left.
Text only, one line pair, still two files in the branch's diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
Two files, and no third. config.yaml 0.10.1 -> 0.11.0; CHANGELOG.md gains
`## 0.11.0` and three corrections to sections below it.
A MINOR BUMP, NOT A PATCH. TEL-11 adds an option - `pv_entity`, 75 keys -> 76 in
`options:` and `schema:` together - which is the same test 0.8.0, 0.9.0 and
0.10.0 were cut on. Nothing here can refuse a stored blob: the key is `str?`
with an `options:` default of "", validate.py does not mention it, no default
moved and no enum widened, so a blob that starts the add-on on 0.10.1 starts it
on 0.11.0.
THE TABLE HAS TWO ROWS AND THE WINDOW HAD FOUR MERGES. CI-9's follow-up
(9f6b9f1, `.gitea/workflows/checks.yml` only) and SEC-2 (239e120,
`docs/RELEASE.md` + README.md) are excluded under PKG-15's rule - AUDIENCE, NOT
IMPORTANCE. Neither file is under `goodwe_controller/`, neither is in the built
image, neither is in predeploy_check.py's RUNTIME tuple, and there is no version
of this add-on on which an operator can observe either. SEC-2 is the closer call
and the section argues it in full rather than asserting it: it is the more
consequential ticket of the two - it is why this release is a pull request
rather than a push to master - and it is still a procedure for whoever cuts a
release, not something the person deciding whether to press Update can act on.
Both are named in the section with pointers to PR #102 / checks.yml and PR #108
/ docs/RELEASE.md.
WHAT THE ENTRIES LET AN OPERATOR DECIDE. SAFETY-56: behaviour byte-identical
(6030175ed2ab..., reproduced in the CI image over 2390 capture reads, a 66-cell
grid stepped 120 times and six driven worlds), three surfaces named with the old
and new wording side by side - the STALE_READING line quoted onto the action log
and status page, the SAFETY-37 ERROR log line, and the readiness row that
asserted a false fact about a named entity. TEL-11: unset is byte-identical in
BOTH the control and telemetry documents, set is byte-identical in the control
document only; the three TEL-11 rows of that table were re-measured in the CI
image on this tree (control 846a10a5... twice, telemetry a443a6ce... / 4e6d1cb2...).
It is stated plainly that pv_entity is not a control input and does not change
what the loop does, and that absence publishes `unknown` rather than 0.
THREE CORRECTIONS BELOW THE NEW SECTION, WITHOUT REWRITING HISTORY. The 0.10.1
preamble said SAFETY-56 was open; the SAFETY-57 entry said its accusatory
diagnosis half was "deliberately untouched"; the 0.10.0 preamble left SAFETY-56
with no pointer while SAFETY-57 had one. All three quotations are what the
0.10.1 image actually prints and are left standing - a reader on 0.10.1 has to
recognise them - each now scoped to 0.10.1 and pointed at `## 0.11.0`.
VERIFIED. test_version_gate.py part 11 all four: 11a one contents table and the
slicer closed (302 lines under '0.11.0'), 11b 0.11.0 == config.yaml, 11c all
three RETIRED_PROVIDERS ids named - scoped to a pre-0.10.0 crossing and pointing
at `## 0.10.0`, which is where the evidence is - 11d still exactly one
`## Unreleased` below, PKG-08's, untouched. 31/31 in the CI image, checks.yml's
exact command, purged tree, `:ro`.
Not deployed and not installed. Shipping is a separate pull request from
release/1.0 into master, per docs/RELEASE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
Reviewed on the PR. Green traced to run 825 (PRNUM 113, BASEREF release/1.0, attempt 1, real 8m6s execution). Control-path identity independently reproduced on both trees and counter-tested with a planted leak (red on 26/41 cells); all three of the trace tool substituted refusals fire. M7 genuinely red. Three publication states distinct on the wire. 31/31 in the CI image.
Not deployable as merged: config.yaml stays at 0.10.1, so predeploy_check.py reports a NO-OP until PKG cuts a version.
Corrects the preamble's claim that the `guard the trigger` step keeps checks.yml filter-free "mechanically". It does not, for blind spots 1 and 3: the guard lives inside the workflow a filter makes Gitea skip, so for those the defence is the comment.
Names the filter that would actually get written - `branches: [release/1.0]`, not `[main]` - because it reads as tightening onto the protected branch, leaves every day-to-day pull request green, and switches off the `release/1.0` -> `master` release pull request that SEC-2 made the mandated path to an installed system. Points the forge fix at both protected branches, not just `release/1.0`.
Reviewed on the pull request. Verified from the branch's bytes: the guard's awk is unchanged and still refuses `branches:`, `paths:`, `paths-ignore:`, `branches-ignore:`, `tags-ignore:`, `types:` and the inline-flow form injected into the `on:` block of the edited file; comment-only at 0 non-comment changed lines, non-comment lines identical 139 == 139; the merged tree differs from c9aaf7f in this one file only. Green traced per CI-10 to run 824 / job 1949, payload PRNUM 102 / BASEREF release/1.0, base c9aaf7f, 30 PASS 0 FAIL.
Text only, no behaviour change. Three operator-facing sentences stop asserting a dead register where the gate cannot distinguish a dead register from a pack the BMS is refusing.
Reviewed on the PR: behaviour byte-identical (trace tool sha256 6030175ed2ab reproduced on both trees, plus AST identity with string constants normalised); five mutations re-applied on purged trees, all matching claimed named-red counts; SoC of the live episode independently measured at 11 percent; CI green traced to PRNUM 112 / BASEREF release/1.0.
Text only. No behaviour change - same conjunction, same limits, same MISSING,
same 0 W, same NOT READY. `tools/safety56_behaviour_trace.py` says so: 2390
capture reads, a 66-cell swept grid, and six driven controller worlds produce
the byte-identical document `6030175e...` on origin/release/1.0 and on this
branch, while the sentences differ.
THE DEFECT. SAFETY-37's conjunction is satisfied by two disjoint worlds - the
register has stopped reporting reality, or the SOURCE cannot comply with the
command - and nothing `freshness.py` is handed separates them. Three sentences
asserted the first. On the live 2026-09-21 episode it was the second: the pack
read 11 % for the whole 850 s hold, every command in that hold was a discharge,
and the register answered the first CHARGE command three seconds later. The
readiness row was worse still, because it asserted a false fact about a NAMED
entity that was present, numeric and updating - so the operator opened
Developer Tools, found it working, and had every reason to conclude the
diagnostics were broken.
THE FIX. Each message states what was OBSERVED and names BOTH explanations.
Three wordings, no shared helper: two are a log line about a behaviour, the
third is a banner about an entity, and a helper serving both would drop
whichever half the other caller does not need. SoC stays STATED, NOT WIRED -
part 11b drives the two worlds at 50 % and 11 % and the sentence does not move
one byte. The row does not branch on `batt_fresh.stale` either: `stale_note()`
already rides `liveness_notes()` a few rows below, so the discriminator is "is
that row there?", and part 11d asserts it is present in one world and absent in
the other.
THE CHECKS. test_freshness.py part 11 builds the pair of worlds with ground
truth written down rather than derived from the published stream, asserts they
are really two (40 of 40 reads differ) while the published stream is
bit-identical, and only then grades the sentences. Eleven mutations, all red:
each of the three sentences reverted (3, 2 and 2 named reds), the two
explanations transposed at ZERO bytes (1), the second explanation deleted (1),
the admission of ambiguity replaced by a ranking (1), all three reverted at
once (5), and two aimed at this card's own check - collapsing the world pair
(2) and emptying the accusation list, which a positive control against the
three sentences as 0.10.1 shipped them catches (1).
AND TWO OF THE ELEVEN FOUND DEFECTS IN THE CHECK RATHER THAN IN THE CODE.
Transposing `label` and `entity` in the row made it unfindable and the run died
on an IndexError - a red with no name and every later check ungraded, FCST-06's
shape exactly; `_s56_row()` returns a named absence now, 0 named reds before, 3
after. And the first invariance run compared a tree with itself, because it
archived a branch whose edits were not committed yet; the tool now REFUSES to
report "behaviour unchanged" unless the sentences halves differ, and both of
its refusals are driven.
SAFETY-57's part 10h check was the handoff and is inverted rather than deleted:
it required the accusation to still be present so that removing it had to be a
deliberate act. This is that act. Its escape clause is untouched.
Suite: 30/30 in the CI image, checks.yml's exact command, purged tree, :ro.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
Reviewed on the PR (issuecomments 1480, 1485, 1488, 1489). Documentation only: docs/RELEASE.md (new, 116 lines) plus a 2-line pointer in README.md's file map. No code, no workflow change.
Verified against the forge rather than accepted from the document:
- Both branch_protections rules re-read field-for-field identical (enable_push false, enable_force_push false, status check `checks / unit (pull_request)`, required_approvals 0, block_admin_merge_override true, no whitelists, no file patterns); master's rule created 2026-09-23T03:09:21; default_branch still master. Section 2's After table is exact. No protection was changed by this review - both rules re-read with their original updated_at.
- The empty-PR 405 trap reproduced independently on my own control (throwaway PR #111 between two same-SHA unprotected branches): empty PR -> 405 "Please try again later"; same PR after one commit -> 409 "head out of date". Section 1's "read the message, not the code" is correct and both messages are quoted accurately. PR #111 closed, branches deleted.
- release/1.0 (b0b24e5) is an ancestor of master (0f14c2a), so a literal release PR is empty right now - PR #109 has 0 commits, 0 files, and Gitea opened it anyway. Section 1's closing note is right.
- A master-base PR gets a genuine CI run, not a laundered skip: PR #107 head cb7e45b3 shows Waiting -> In progress -> success, "Successful in 7m56s", run 814. This PR's own head 9d593429 likewise, run 818.
- All five required steps are present and correctly ordered: work merges to release/1.0 with a version bump in goodwe_controller/config.yaml; release via PR release/1.0 -> master; direct push refused; green check before merge; `ha store reload` after, without which the Supervisor keeps serving the cached version. required_approvals: 0 is stated twice, so no reader can believe the dev/review split is enforced.
One non-blocking defect left open (issuecomment 1485): section 1 calls 0f14c2a "the only commit on master that carries no (#NN) merge suffix". 274 of master's 297 commits carry no suffix. The true statement is stronger - no release has ever reached master through a pull request, and 6f5e8e3 (0.10.0) was promoted by the same direct push one release earlier, so 0.10.1 was the second, not a one-off. Background, not procedure; wants a follow-up line change.
A third comment of mine (issuecomment 1488, merge style) is withdrawn in issuecomment 1489 - it rested on a premise I had not checked and which is false.
Reviewed on the PR (issuecomments 1455-1462): identity verified unchanged (slug goodwe_controller, no image: key, installed slug 68285ac7_goodwe_controller corroborated from HA backup metadata); version-gate 11a-11d re-implemented and verified independently; the 16-of-93-at-790s pairing re-derived from the committed 16-day capture (>=710: 17, >=790: 16, >=815: 15); the SAFETY-57 entry verified as a faithful move carrying only the three declared #104 documentation fixes; corrected 0.10.0 preamble corroborated to the day against backup metadata; suite 30/30 reproduced with checks.yml's exact command. Two files, no control code. The 710 s/790 s split between test_freshness.py and this file is a known, stated gap and takes its own card.
NOTE: master (the Supervisor's default branch) is still 0.10.0 and still lacks SAFETY-57. This merge does not deliver; bringing master to release/1.0 is a fast-forward and is the remaining step.
Reviewed and merged by the PR review agent. Acceptance criterion re-driven independently off the committed RS-485 capture: the verdict is withdrawn with 0x0518 held constant at -3 W, no external change. Counterfactual release_s=inf verified byte-equivalent to the shipped-before module over 242336 reads, so the SAFETY-37 conjunction is untouched. 30/30 suite green in checks.yml's own image; 11 mutations re-applied on a purged tree; the argued-equivalent M7 proved equivalent over full internal state.
Three non-blocking documentation findings filed on the PR (comments 3/7, 4/7, 5/7) for a follow-up before the next version is cut.
SAFETY-37's freshness gate reports a battery-power register as MISSING when it
stops following its own command, and a missing input is "command 0 W and keep
commanding" (§11.1 rule 1). The gate's only exit was "an arrival carrying a
DIFFERENT number" - and at 0 W nothing is asking the register to be anywhere.
The state had no exit reachable from inside it, and the log line promised the
opposite in the same sentence that announced the 0 W.
REPRODUCED FROM THE WIRE, NOT MODELLED. scenarios/safety57-2026-09-21/ is 3840
verbatim frames off the RS-485 pair, read from the passive sniffer, decoded by
tools/decode_bus_capture.py (0 unparsed, 0 bad CRC, 0 unknown shapes; the
mode->sign convention is graded off the capture, not trusted). The box was
running 0.10.0, so the 0 W in the trace IS the add-on's own claim:
10:51:24.7 0x0518 reaches -3 W. Pack at 11 %, the BMS refuses the discharge,
the inverter idles. THE REGISTER IS HEALTHY AND TRUTHFUL.
10:51:29.7 the command reaches +1060 W - 800 W of travel
10:52:00 the conjunction arms. Inverter.batt becomes None
10:52:21.7 the site commands 0 W, on the wire
... 0x0518 does not change value for 850.0 s. The setpoint does not
change value for 790.0 s. The house exports 2.4 kW throughout
~11:04 a human restarts the add-on. That is what ends it
AND IT HAD BEEN ESCAPING BY LUCK. Replaying the committed 16-day loop capture
through the shipped conjunction finds 93 trips whose wait for the BMS
keep-alive pulse that cleared them has a median of 143.4 s, a worst case of
21440.1 s, and 17 of 93 at or beyond this episode's 710 s. That distribution
belongs to the battery's firmware, not to this code.
THE CARD'S OPTION 2 ALREADY HELD AND IS NOT THE BUG. _grade() has required
|standing| >= MOVE_W since SAFETY-37. The trip was at +1060 W and the stuck
state is at 0 W; they are different moments, and an entry-side rule cannot
reach a state entered legitimately and then persisted. Nothing in the
conjunction is weakened here.
THE RULE, SAFETY-13's SHAPE ONE MODULE OVER - which latches get an exit, not
how long the block lasts:
the verdict is withdrawn when the obligation that produced it has been gone
for RELEASE_S, and the register is then re-graded from scratch.
RELEASE_S is BATT_OBLIGED_S, 17.0 s - the obligation window already derived in
the file (6.0 plant + 10.0 publish + 1.0 read), taken at the FLOOR of its band
for the mirror of MOVE_W's reason. Which half is safe is the opposite of
SAFETY-13's: being wrong long is the failure being fixed, being wrong short
costs one bounded re-grading window. Below 17 s the release pre-empts the
cheaper exit - the register answering by itself - and that is graded
behaviourally, not asserted.
The whole parked interval is now stale_input_s + RELEASE_S = 32 s. On the live
episode: telemetry back at 10:52:39 instead of 11:05:35, with 0x0518 still
answering the same -3 W. RED BEFORE (release_s=inf, a graded counterfactual and
not a second implementation), GREEN AFTER.
WHAT IT COSTS, AND IT IS NOT SMALL. A register dead for good is re-graded for
ever: over 1201 reads the held number reaches a consumer on 630 (52.5 %)
against 35 (2.9 %) before. Payable only because one window is at most 35 s and
the two consumers hold for 75 s and 85 s, so neither can reach a verdict inside
one and the re-trip clears both windows. No detection SAFETY-37 had is given
back - a permanent None clears the same windows for ever too - and the command
is derived from the P1 meter, never from batt.
Two clocks, deliberately: changed_mono/unchanged_s() stay facts about the
REGISTER, graded_from/graded_s() are the VERDICT's window. Collapsing them
either lies to the operator or defeats the re-grading.
main.py's stale line had its ESCAPE CLAUSE corrected - it promised a clearance
the state could not produce - and gained a STALE WITHDRAWN edge that says in
its own words that nothing has been learned about the register. The DIAGNOSIS
half is SAFETY-56's and is deliberately untouched, with a named check asserting
it is still there so that rewrite has to be deliberate.
Battery: 22 mutations, 21 red, 1 argued equivalent, 0 unexplained survivors.
Two findings kept in DECISIONS: _release()'s move_w test swapped for
unchanged_s SURVIVED at +5 B because every fixture rested at exactly 0 W (habit
11, closed by a 0/100/300 W fixture); and the code shipped a habit-22 comment
claiming the _release/_grade order was load-bearing, which the battery
falsified - the two act on mutually exclusive predicates, so the order is not
observable. MUTATION.md gains habit 23 for a mutation that ran, fingerprinted
clean, and was a no-op on the fixture because `0.0 or x` is x.
Suite: 30/30 in the CI image, checks.yml's exact command, purged tree, :ro, one
file at a time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
`master` has been `5184a2c` / v0.2.1 since 2026-08-25 - the tree that drives the
house - while every ticket since has landed on `release/1.0`. Three consequences
were live, and all three are what this merge closes:
* `master` is the DEFAULT branch, so Gitea indexes dispatchable workflows from
it. `master` had no `.gitea/` at all, which is why `GET /actions/workflows`
answered empty and the UI's dispatch button was missing.
* new pull requests default to `master`. #102 was opened against it by
accident and its first run graded the change merged into a stale `master` -
an honest-looking green answering the wrong question.
* AND THE ONE THAT NOW MATTERS MOST: the repository has not yet been added to
Home Assistant, and adding it is part of this release. `master` is the
branch the Supervisor will read the moment it is added, so whatever stands
here is what it shows and offers to install. This merge is what makes that
0.10.0 rather than 0.2.1.
NO CONFLICT WAS POSSIBLE AND THAT WAS CHECKED, NOT ASSUMED. `master` is a
direct ancestor of `release/1.0` (`git merge-base --is-ancestor` true), the
merge base IS `5184a2c`, and `origin/release/1.0..origin/master` is empty -
`master` carries nothing `release/1.0` lacks. `--no-ff` is used anyway, so the
crossing from 0.2.1 to 0.10.0 is one addressable commit rather than a pointer
move.
WHAT CROSSES: config.yaml 0.2.1 -> 0.10.0. The add-on the Supervisor will build
is a different program from v0.2.1 in the ways `goodwe_controller/CHANGELOG.md`
sections 0.3.0 through 0.10.0 describe - among them P1 meter ingestion, the
separate integrator the velocity form did not have, shadow mode, the tariff
plan and the multi-inverter roster. The ROLLBACK POINT does not move: tag
`v0.2.1` still names `5184a2c` and still names the tree that ran the house.
NOT A DEPLOY. Nothing is installed, no `ha addons update` is run, `/addons/` is
untouched and neither 192.168.2.158 nor 192.168.2.221 was contacted. Adding the
repository to Home Assistant, and pressing Install, remain the owner's call.
Verified before merging: the full suite in the CI image on `release/1.0`'s tree
- `cp -a`, purged, `:ro` mount, one file at a time, exactly the command in
.gitea/workflows/checks.yml - 30/30, exit 0; and PR #103's own
`checks / unit (pull_request)` was a real `success` on the merge, not a skip.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
Reviewed and merged by the PKG-15 review agent.
Verified rather than accepted:
- test_version_gate.py 11d pins `## Unreleased` blocks below the newest section at exactly one; deleting the block goes red (reproduced on a copy of the tree).
- 32 runtime commits since 86bdf49 and 24 accounted by the contents table, re-derived with predeploy_check.py's own RUNTIME rule; PKG-14's superseded 28/21 were correct when taken.
- app/validate.py imports neither main nor mqtt (read by AST), and SLEW_RAIL_FRAC / LOOP_TICK_S / PLANT_SETTLE_S are byte-identical across cb3f686..HEAD, so PKG-14's CLEARED transcript still holds.
- CI-9 (16b1d6c) touches only .gitea/workflows/checks.yml, outside the built image and outside RUNTIME.
- The SAFETY-48 entry keeps the capacity-tariff misreading out: no worst-quarter row in the A/B table, and the 3739 -> 3434 W figure appears only inside the paragraph that disclaims it.
Three non-blocking defects posted on the PR: the gain:0.3 / slew-rail tie values are swapped against DECISIONS/SAFETY-48; "touch three files between them" should say three runtime files; and the stated reason cb3f686 enters the count ("last..HEAD excluded it") is wrong, though the count is right.
0.10.0 was cut by PKG-14 on 2026-09-16 and three tickets have merged into
release/1.0 since. Two of them change the built image - one is a CONTROL LAW
change and one adds three MQTT entities - and neither is described anywhere in
this file. Tagging that tree today would stamp a number on contents the
changelog does not account for.
FOLDED RATHER THAN CUT AS 0.11.0, AND THE ARGUMENT IS CONDITIONAL.
0.10.0 has never been built or pulled anywhere: the reference install is on
0.7.0 (PKG-14's own predeploy run records `deployed on the box : 0.7.0`), the
repository carries exactly one tag, `v0.2.1`, and no release. So the string
`0.10.0` does not yet name a tree anyone is running, and the PKG-06/PKG-07
no-op that forbade re-cutting `0.9.0` does not reach it. Cutting 0.11.0 would
burn a number on a release that never left the repository. The condition is
checkable and the section now says so: run against a box already reporting
0.10.0, `tools/predeploy_check.py` refuses with THE DEPLOY WOULD BE A NO-OP and
names the runtime commits since the bump. `config.yaml` stays at 0.10.0, so
`test_version_gate.py` 11b still finds the two sides equal.
SAFETY-48 IS THE ENTRY THAT MATTERED MOST TO GET RIGHT, AND WHAT IT PROMISES
IS LESS EXPORT - NOT A LOWER BILL. The measured result is export 39.61 -> 34.07
kWh over the committed 16-day replay, 14 % of the replayed figure, falling at
every plant and tuning variant swept (~4 % to ~16 %, median near an eighth).
The section says in its own heading and its first line that the control law
changed, and it says PLAINLY that the billed quarter is not a claim: at every
plant lag <= 5.0 s - including the one that best reproduces the recorded export
- release/1.0's worst quarter is ALREADY 3434 W and this changes it by exactly
zero. The 3739 -> 3434 W headline exists at the single longest fitted lag, and
the lag is not identified by the recording. The costs are in the entry too: the
cap moves a saturation-frozen integrator on 1095 of 79 160 frozen ticks, 679 of
them outward; SAFETY-13's settle values moved; SAFETY-39's "the slew does not
own the over-absorption" is now false.
TEL-10 gets the three site rows, what each one is, and the two things a reader
would otherwise get wrong: the lead is NOT a subtraction of two published rows,
and `Loop reason` is not the `Why` row. It repeats neither of the two sentences
TEL-10's own review retracted - EIGHT messages stay first and the ninth,
`goodwe_ctl/availability`, is byte-identical but deliberately moves to last.
CI-9 IS DELIBERATELY NOT IN THIS FILE, AND THE OMISSION IS WRITTEN DOWN RATHER
THAN SILENT. It changes one file, `.gitea/workflows/checks.yml`, outside
`goodwe_controller/` entirely: not in the built image, not in `is_runtime()`'s
list, and not observable on any version of the add-on. This file is the release
note the Supervisor shows beside the version number, and a row here has to be
something the person deciding whether to press Update could act on. The note
above SAFETY-48 says so and says the rule is about audience, not importance.
THE STRAY `## Unreleased` AT LINE 1777 IS NOT TOUCHED, AND THAT IS A DECISION.
It is the 0.8.0-era block PKG-14 annotated: every row in it has shipped, the
annotation says which release each went to, and re-filing it is PKG-08's card.
It is also load-bearing - `test_version_gate.py` 11d pins the count of
`## Unreleased` blocks below the newest section at EXACTLY one, so deleting it
is red on the commit that does it, and so is adding a second.
TWO MEASURED FIGURES IN PKG-14'S PROSE WENT STALE AND ARE RE-DERIVED, NOT
ADJUSTED. The runtime-commit count since `86bdf49` is now 32, not 28, of which
the contents table accounts for 24, not 21; both re-run through
`predeploy_check.is_runtime()` itself. The other eight are the three misfiled
tickets (SAFETY-43 x2, SAFETY-44 x3, TEST-21 x2) and `cb3f686`, PKG-14's own
bump, which edits `config.yaml` and so counts as runtime - it was HEAD when
PKG-14 measured and is inside the range now.
PKG-14's `CLEARED, exit 0` predeploy transcript was NOT re-run and now carries
the check that says why it still holds: `config.yaml` is untouched by both
tickets; `app/validate.py` imports neither `main` nor `mqtt`, and the three
names it takes from `control` - SLEW_RAIL_FRAC, LOOP_TICK_S, PLANT_SETTLE_S -
are byte-identical across cb3f686..HEAD.
Verified: the full suite in the CI image, `cp -a` of the tree, purged, `:ro`
mount, one file at a time, exactly the command in .gitea/workflows/checks.yml -
30/30, exit 0. No runtime file is in this diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
adminandClaude Opus 5.5