753f70053986f1db27eca56654dc8649cca15249
33
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
753f700539 |
DEV-02: merge release/1.0, and close the two review blockers
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 4m15s
PR #43 was rejected on two findings and had gone unmergeable behind SAFETY-28 and the ALLOC-01 fix. This is the merge commit; the conflict resolution and both fixes are below, because a merge that also changes behaviour has to say so. THE MERGE, AND WHAT IT COST =========================== Two conflicts in main.py, both where SAFETY-28 and this card touched the same method: * `write_setpoint()` split into a site entry point plus a per-unit `_write_unit()` here, while SAFETY-28 put its record gate in the old single-unit body. `write_refusal()` now takes the INVERTER it is about. Asking it with `self.unit` - as release/1.0 does - would authorise A's share on B's wire, and would also trip test_inverter.py part 1's AST scan, which goes red on any read of a Controller N=1 view inside Controller. * the SAFETY-28 gate sits above the clamp and below the non-finite coercion, exactly where release/1.0 put it, and is now asked about `inv`. Fallout the merge produced in the checks, re-aimed rather than relaxed: * every fixture that calls `write_setpoint()` DIRECTLY - the clamp probe, the hung-heartbeat experiment and its serialised counterfactual, the split deadline probe - now arms a real allocation record first. test_inverter.py grows an `arm()` built through the shipped `resolve()`, the same shape test_clamp.py's is: the per-unit envelopes are filed as real `supervised` claims and the site target is their sum, so the water-fill has exactly one answer and the fixture cannot quietly become its own allocator. * test_clamp.py's two-unit failsafe fixture assigned `c.units`, which DEV-02 made a derived property with no setter. It appends a real `Inverter`. BLOCKER 1 - AC 4's ARBITER-BOUND EVIDENCE WAS VACUOUS ===================================================== test_peakguard.py claimed "each unit's `supervised` bound is ITS OWN `max_w` - give inverter B a different rating and the claim filed on inverter B moves with it", and compared B's bound against `_b2.max_w`. `second_inverter()` DEFAULTED B's rating to `LIVE_MAX_W`, which is A's. IT COMPARED (-5000, 5000) AGAINST (-5000, 5000): a number against itself, unable to observe the failure it named. Reproduced: filing the per-unit `device`/`supervised` claims from `self.inverters[0]`'s numbers while leaving `actuator=self.actuator_of(..., inv)` alone left ALL 19 FILES GREEN. At a roster of two with A=5000/B=3000 that makes inverter B's planned envelope (-5000, 5000) instead of (-3000, 3000) - a 2000 W over-command the arbiter believes is supervised. It is a DIFFERENT defect from the actuator variant the static routing pin catches, and only the actuator variant was in the mutation table. * `second_inverter()` gives B 3000 W - a hypothesis, marked as one - for every fixture in the file, so no check there can compare B against A by accident. * the claim is asserted against LITERAL numbers rather than against an expression that can read the same object twice, for `supervised` AND for `device` (whose `dev` had the same defect), plus the envelope the ARBITER RESOLVED for B - a claim filed right and resolved wrong is the same defect one layer down. * a PRECONDITION check fails if the two ratings are ever made equal again. * the BOUND mutation is in the table, beside the actuator one, and was observed RED (3 checks in test_peakguard.py) via tools/mutation_run.sh. ⚠️ THIRD INSTANCE THIS SESSION of a check whose DATA cannot reach the failure it names - ARB-03's call-site scan saw 3 of 8 appends, ALLOC-01's replay generator saw 0 escapes where a widened one saw 39,991. MUTATION.md gains a section for it beside the stale-bytecode and masking ones, and the rule is written at the line: ANY CHECK ASSERTING "X DIFFERS FROM Y" MUST BE RUN ONCE WITH X AND Y ACTUALLY MADE DIFFERENT. BLOCKER 2 - THE LATCH WAS SILENTLY DISARMED BY THE ROLLBACK ROUND TRIP ====================================================================== store.py's rule 2 keeps the flat keys "so a rollback still finds its latch". The operator path that rule contemplates is a ROUND TRIP, and this card lost the latch on it: 1. install migrates -> schema_version=1, unit/inverter-a/... = False 2. operator DOWNGRADES; SAFETY-02 trips inside the downgrade window and the old add-on writes only the flat `sign_tripped: true` 3. operator upgrades again -> `rep.ran` is False, so `_grade_store_migration()` returned early, and `Inverter.__init__` read the namespaced key: False Observed: the controller came up with `sign_wd.tripped = False` while /data/state.json said `sign_tripped: true`. That is store.py's own header sentence - "the file still says sign_tripped: true, the banner is green, and the controller resumes driving the wrong way" - rebuilt by the version marker. A firmware version change with a rollback path was performed on this site on 2026-09-02, so this is not hypothetical. Three changes, each graded by a mutation observed RED: * THE OPERATOR'S CLEAR CLEARS BOTH SPELLINGS. That is what removes the "re-arm forever" objection the `rep.ran` gate existed to answer: with the fossil cleared, `flat True + namespaced False` is unambiguously a downgrade-window latch. * A TRIP MIRRORS THE FLAT PAIR. Rule 2 only ever covered the latch present AT MIGRATION TIME - nothing flat was written for a trip taken afterwards, so an operator who downgraded found `sign_tripped: false` and came up DRIVING. store.py claimed the staleness could only fail toward a SPURIOUS latch. It could not; that sentence is corrected rather than left standing. * THE GUARD RUNS ON EVERY START, and asks the STORE - not the roster - whether anything namespaced is latched. A mirrored trip on B must not re-arm a healthy A, and the store is the right place to ask because it holds every `unit/*/sign_tripped` this install has written, including one belonging to a unit that is not in today's roster. Graded by the three-step scenario itself, run end to end in test_inverter.py part 2, with all three preconditions asserted - including that the catching start did NOT migrate anything, which is what used to skip the guard. Part 2's idempotence check now PRESSES the button instead of hand-writing the store, because the state it used to construct is not one the shipped clear path can produce. Part 3 grades the mirror and the clear on a real roster of two. test_watchdog.py's "the flat key is NOT written" assertion is re-aimed rather than deleted: its argument was right about the READ and wrong about the WRITE. Nothing at runtime reads that key, and the one thing that does ignores it whenever any namespaced latch is set - which a sibling's trip always leaves. What its absence actually cost was the rollback. HANDOVER.md and DOCS.md said the flat key "is never read again", which was the instruction an operator clearing a trip by hand would follow. Both corrected: it is a maintained rollback view, it IS read on every start, and clearing a trip by hand means clearing both spellings. MUTATIONS THIS ROUND, each applied on a purged tree via tools/mutation_run.sh and observed RED: * per-unit `device`/`supervised` BOUNDS from `self.inverters[0]`, actuator left correct -> test_peakguard.py 10g * `_grade_store_migration()` gated on `rep.ran` -> test_inverter.py part 2 * the operator's clear leaving the flat keys set -> test_inverter.py part 2/3 * a trip not mirroring the flat pair -> test_inverter.py part 3 * the guard asking only `self.inverters[0]` -> test_inverter.py part 3 19/19 files green on the merged tree. No hardware was touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
|
d48c6b971d |
DEV-02: correct the operator instruction the latch rename made wrong
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 4m13s
HANDOVER.md told an operator to "delete `sign_tripped` from /data/state.json" to clear a sign-disagreement trip by hand. After this card that key is a FOSSIL: the live latch is `unit/<inverter>/sign_tripped`, and the flat one is left in the file only so a rollback finds its latch and is never read again. Following the old instruction would delete a key that clears nothing, on the one path an operator reaches while staring at a FAILSAFE banner - so the instruction would look like it had failed. DOCS.md's §SAFETY-02 section named the file but not the key; it now names both, and says why there is one per inverter. No code change; the suite is unaffected and green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU |
||
|
|
ab6fbe2f9e |
SAFETY-25: record the owner's decision - option a, with alloc-01 as the revisit trigger
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m43s
The product owner answered SAFETY-25's §1 on 2026-09-02: OPTION A. The BMS cut-out is the DELIBERATE and only backstop for demand-driven discharge on the grid-following loop, and Option B - a loop-side reserve floor - is DEFERRED rather than rejected. Option A is the shipped behaviour, so this is a recording, not a change. `app/` is touched in exactly two places and both are comments that claimed the question was still open (freeze.py's finding, peakguard.py's point 2). No setpoint, no claim, no option, no default moved. The 17-suite run is green on the same numbers as before. WHY DEFERRING IS THE SAFE DIRECTION. Option B's proof - bms_soc_floor < loop_soc_floor <= peak_soc_floor, run through the real arbiter in test_peakguard.py part 10d - has an unstated premise: the reserve predicate and discharge_permitted() read the SAME state of charge. With two packs they read different numbers. The reserve binds on the emptier pack and files hi = 0; the peak guard, reading the other pack or an average, files lo = excess > 0; lo > hi is arbiter clause 3 and the answer is 0 W - the battery parked in the billed quarter, which is the failure the memo itself marks fatal. And no config validator can catch it: it is a runtime divergence between two readings, not a config ordering, so CFG-01's shape of check passes on the exact tree that parks the battery. Option A's cost is energy; Option B's cost built too early is the one quarter of the month that sets the bill. THE REVISIT TRIGGER IS ALLOC-01, recorded in §0c. Under ARCH-01's host-side allocator the two claims stop sharing a list: the loop floor becomes a per-inverter `hi` consumed as an INTERVAL at stage A, while the peak floor stays a site `lo` at stage B. Different claim lists, different stages, structurally unable to cross - a stronger argument than the ordering rule, because it makes the crossing unreachable rather than harmless. That is the shape in which Option B becomes safe to build. WHAT HAS TO BE RE-EARNED AT N=2 is stated plainly in §0d rather than left for someone to discover. SAFETY-27 now names five floors across two packs, so "the SoC" stops being a scalar the config can bound. And part 10f - the pin that made SAFETY-25 mergeable - CANNOT EXPRESS TWO PACKS: its dynamic half is a scalar 0-100 % SoC sweep against a single-series capture, and a two-pack exposure lives in the DIFFERENCE between two readings, which that sweep visits at no resolution. Its static half, the AST scan pinning the eight claim sources, still bites at N=2; the dynamic half goes silent. Merging a two-pack reserve on 10f's current green would be merging on a check that cannot see the failure. The options analysis is kept intact on purpose - §1-§7 stand exactly as written, including §5's "(recommended)" on Option B and §6's recommendation, with a new §0 saying what was decided and §6 marked as answered. A memo that recorded the verdict and deleted the reasoning is the failure this DECISIONS/ directory exists to prevent. Part 10e's check moved with the memo: it used to pin the honest "Status: OPEN" line and now pins that the memo names the option, the date and the trigger AND still carries both options and the recommendation. The tripwire itself stays - a ninth claim source in Controller.cycle() still takes 10f red on the line it is written, and "deferred" is precisely the state in which someone builds Option B by accident. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
182102eeaf |
SAFETY-25: say what peak_soc_floor bounds, and measure what it does not
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m41s
peak_soc_floor reads like a pack-wide reserve and is not one. The
grid-following loop has no SoC guard of any kind, so on a sustained-load
evening it discharges straight past that number and keeps going until the
pack's own BMS cut-out stops it.
The gap has now been written down four times without being filed -
SAFETY-18's finding (freeze.py:18), SAFETY-24's module note, its PR body,
and its honestly-uncaught 13th mutation - and never once measured. It is
measured here, on the committed 2026-08-20 capture, driving the SHIPPED
control.compute(), peakguard.decide(), peakguard.claim() and the real
arbiter.resolve() in main.py's order:
19:00-22:00 UTC, 830 W mean, minimum 701 W, zero export in the window
reference pack (300 Ah x 51.2 V x DoD 90) started at 21 %, one point
above peak_soc_floor
ends at 10.0 % - the bms_soc_floor cut-out
1525 Wh delivered by the LOOP over 587 cycles
549 cycles below peak_soc_floor, 343 of them still discharging
0 cycles on which the peak guard filed any floor at all
AND IT IS A BEHAVIOUR, NOT A CONFIG VALUE. The same evening ends at
9.9715 % at peak_soc_floor = 5, 11, 20 and 60 - the shipped value and both
ends of the schema range - identical to four decimal places. The option an
operator would reach for cannot move the number by any amount at all. On
the same day's high-load block the two states coexist: 49 cycles reporting
PEAK GUARD FLOOR-LIMITED and, on all 49 of them, the arbiter simultaneously
granting the loop up to 2000 W of discharge.
WHY SAFETY-24 COULD NOT CLOSE IT. The peak guard files a `lo` limit - a
LOWER bound on the setpoint. That asymmetry is exactly what makes it
trustworthy: a reviewer proved across 19,800 combinations that it can never
lower a target, cap a discharge or contradict the arbiter. The same property
makes it structurally incapable of stopping a discharge the loop itself
wants. A floor on the guard cannot become a floor on the pack by being
raised, and the sweep above is that sentence measured.
WHAT THIS COMMIT CHANGES IS THE HONESTY, on the four surfaces an operator
actually reads. That half is required whichever way the open question is
answered, and it is the real misstatement on the live system today:
* config.yaml, beside the option itself - it BOUNDS THE PEAK GUARD ONLY
and is NOT A PACK-WIDE RESERVE, with the replayed evening and the sweep;
* DOCS.md, in the options table and in a new section carrying the figures;
* the STATUS-PAGE ROW for a floor-limited guard. This is the one line a
human reads at the moment the guard stops discharging, and read alone it
says "the battery is being held at peak_soc_floor" - which the replay
shows is false in every cycle that row is rendered;
* the PERSISTENT NOTIFICATION, which outlives the page. It now names what
has stopped (the guard buying a lower bill) and what has not (the pack
being spent).
peakguard.py and freeze.py carry the measurement beside the findings they
already recorded, so the next reader does not have to take the caveat on
trust.
THE PRODUCT DECISION IS NOT TAKEN HERE, and must not be. Whether the loop
gets a reserve floor of its own decides whether this house's battery may
discharge to the BMS floor on a heavy evening; that moves real energy and it
is the owner's call. DECISIONS/SAFETY-25-loop-soc-floor.md is the memo AC 1
asks for: the options, what each costs, what each protects, weighed against
MAINT-01 (a pack repeatedly at the BMS floor is the SoC-drift condition the
maintenance cycle exists to correct, and an over-tight reserve fights it from
the other side) and against the fact that this would be the FIFTH SoC key -
OPT-04's arbitrage_soc_floor fired SAFETY-24's "revisit if a third floor
appears" trigger unremarked, so SAFETY-27's naming decision should land
first. It carries a recommendation and says plainly that it is not a
decision.
It also records a trap found while writing it, and now CHECKED through the
real arbiter rather than described: the obvious shape of a loop-side floor
is a `hi` limit at P_LOOP, and filed while the peak guard is asking for a
positive floor that is `lo > hi` - which arbiter.py resolves to a
CONTRADICTION at 0 W, the battery PARKED in the one quarter of the month
that sets the bill. It is the same crossing-limits hazard
shaping_suspended() already exists to avoid. The ordering
`bms_soc_floor < loop_soc_floor <= peak_soc_floor` removes it provably,
because wherever the reserve binds the guard is already floor-limited and
files lo = 0; both halves are run in part 10d.
test_peakguard.py part 10 is a TRIPWIRE, not a guarantee. It records a
defect and goes RED the day somebody builds a loop-side floor, so the
exposure cannot change size under a green suite and closing it has to be
deliberate. Part 11's mutation 13 stays honestly NOT CAUGHT - nothing
prevents the loop discharging past this floor - but it now reports a number
instead of a sentence.
Verified: 16/16 suites green in the CI image. Eight mutations, each against
a tree copied fresh with __pycache__ excluded and mounted :ro, so no .pyc
existed to go stale (MUTATION.md's structural immunity, the same one it
records for CI); byte deltas +61, -8, -465, -430, -1088, -46, file deleted,
and -95; none is +0 B. All eight go red on the named check:
M1 peakguard.claim() also files hi=floor_w -> 7 red, incl. 10c
M2 control.compute() gain forced to 0 -> 6 red, incl. 10a/10b
M3 scope sentence removed from the status row -> 10e red
M4 scope sentence removed from the notification -> 10e red
M5 scope paragraph removed from config.yaml -> 10e red
M6 scope bullet weakened in DOCS.md -> 10e red
M7 the decision memo deleted -> 10e red
M8 arbiter clamps crossing limits instead of
reporting a contradiction -> 5 red, incl. 10d
AC 2 is left explicitly OPEN, pending the owner's answer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
83911ed637 |
SAFETY-20: measure the freeze rail against the reachable ceiling, not max_w
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m37s
SAFETY-18's conjunction needs `abs(commanded_w) >= 0.95 * max_w`, but the
emitted command is clipped to the setpoint device's own [dev_min, dev_max]
range as well as to max_w - in clamp_to_rating()'s second stage and again as
the arbiter's `device` P_SAFETY limit claim. Measured on the shipped predicate
at the ticket's numbers, max_w 5000 on a +-4700 W inverter:
looks_frozen(unchanged_s=3600, commanded_w=4700, max_w=5000) -> False
The command is pinned at the hardware's rail, the meter has been frozen for an
hour, and term 2 is unsatisfiable by construction because 4700 < 4750. Any
device rating at or below 0.95 * max_w disarms the conjunction outright, and
the status page then printed `armed (... command is over 4750 W)` - a guard
that cannot fire, advertising that it can, which is the failure SAFETY-15,
SAFETY-19 and validate.py rule 5 all exist to prevent.
The rail is now measured against min(max_w, |dev_min|, |dev_max|), through a
new `rail_ceiling_w()` threaded into looks_frozen(), FreezeWatchdog.evaluate()
and both call sites in main.py. An unread rating leaves the old behaviour
exactly, and correctly: hass.limits() returns None whenever ESPHome is not up,
and on that path no device clamp is applied either, so max_w really is the
ceiling. A rating larger than max_w cannot raise the rail - this is a min(),
not a swap.
THE DELIBERATE CHOICE, since SAFETY-03 has landed. The arithmetic was kept
rather than substituting Decision.i_clamped / Decision.clamped. i_clamped is
the integrator bound (control.py:208, `bounded != i_w`), not "the command is
at the device rating", and `clamped` is the max_w output bound, unreachable on
a default install - neither is the device rail. More decisively, both answer
"did the LOOP ask for more than a bound", while the rail term asks "is the
command standing at the ceiling", and those coincide only when the loop is the
claimer that won. A maintenance SET or a peak-guard floor reaches the ceiling
through arbiter LIMIT claims with no clamp engaging at all, so a boolean rail
would go False exactly during a maintenance phase running against a frozen
meter - which freeze.py's own docstring names as the same fault with a worse
actuator behind it. The predicate is also public with two call sites that pass
DIFFERENT command values (self.target, and `standing` = last_write); a
per-cycle boolean cannot be passed per call site, so substituting it would
have silently decided the pre-clamp-versus-wire question that PM recorded as
still open. AC 1 governs, and it is satisfied literally.
The smaller of the two device bounds, not a per-sign pair. A per-sign rail is
tighter and is not wrong, but it is two rails needing two coverage verdicts on
a status row that carries one number, and the only configuration that
distinguishes them is refused at startup anyway. The symmetric ceiling can only
lower the rail, which widens term 2 rather than disarming it; term 1 carries
the whole no-false-positive argument and is untouched.
A ceiling of 0 W is NOT COVERED, not "armed at 0 W". A device that can command
nothing in one direction would make `abs(command) >= 0` true of every command
including a parked one - term 2 degenerately TRUE, collapsing the conjunction
into the bare unchanged_s > N threshold TEL-05 refused for false-tripping at
this controller's own operating point. rail_unreachable() returns the reason,
looks_frozen() stays silent, and the page uses the NOT COVERED row the
unsupported-transport case already has - a second reason to use that surface,
not a new mechanism.
AC 4, decided rather than assumed: NO NEW validate.py RULE. The configuration
is max_w above the device rating, which rule 2 (CFG-01) already refuses on the
identical predicate, re-run by run_control() once the real rating is known:
validate_startup_config({... max_w: 5000}, -4700, 4700)
-> ['max_w is 5000 W but number.sp accepts at most 4700 W - THE DEVICE
WINS ...']
A rail-specific rule would fire on a strict subset of that (0.95 * max_w >
dev_max implies max_w > dev_max) and could never be the rule that stopped a
start. The residue is the state where hass.limits() answered (None, None) -
ESPHome not up at boot, range checks skipped rather than guessed at, rating
never re-read - and there is nothing to refuse there by construction, which is
why the answer is a runtime row. Recorded in validate.py's "deliberately not
refused" list and pinned by four checks in test_validate.py, so the decision's
premise goes red if rule 2 is ever softened back to a warning.
HOW REACHABLE THIS IS, stated rather than glossed. Because rule 2 refuses the
configuration whenever the rating is known, min(max_w, dev_max) IS max_w on
every install that reaches the control loop with a rating it could read, and
this change is arithmetically dead there. That is clamp.py's argument for its
own second stage word for word: the case where it bites is the case where the
startup gate did not run or no longer holds, and a guard that quietly assumes
the gate ran is a guard that reports armed in exactly the state it cannot fire
in.
Verified by breaking it, per this project's rule. Reverting rail_w() to bare
max_w fails nine checks; deleting the NOT COVERED handling fails five. The one
that mattered: shipping the corrected predicate while NOT passing the rating
from check_meter_frozen() left the entire suite green, because nothing graded
the caller - so test_freeze.py part 5b now drives the real cycle() on a +-4700 W
device and asserts on the notification that leaves the process, and the
unwiring mutation fails three checks there. The peak-guard call site's wiring
is still ungraded (behind p1_enabled, needs a fed averager for `frozen` to have
any observable consequence) and that gap is named in the file rather than
implied.
Full suite: 15/15 in goodwe-addon-ci.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
9234016419 |
Merge release/1.0 (OPT-04) into SAFETY-24, and fix one grader the merge broke
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m36s
OPT-04 landed after the previous rebase. Conflicts were CHANGELOG.md and one IMPORT LINE in validate.py; both refusal blocks and both option sets survive untouched, and DOCS.md, main.py and config.yaml auto-merged. ⚠️ AND THE MERGE BROKE A CHECK THAT NEITHER CARD COULD HAVE SEEN ALONE. test_peakguard.py graded "the first `.decide(` call in main.py" and asserted there was exactly one. That was true when SAFETY-24 was written; OPT-04 added `arbitrage.decide(...)`, so the merged tree had two and the assertion failed. It failed loudly rather than grading the wrong call - the guard did its job - but it cannot ship red. Fixed by selecting the call by QUALIFIED NAME (`peakguard.decide`) instead of by position, and requiring exactly one of THAT. Other modules may now call their own decide(); this grader can no longer be moved by one of them. Verified still discriminating: a decoy `peakguard.decide` added to main.py turns it red on 7 assertions, and the `maintenance_soc_floor` swap still turns it red on 6. Also folded in the review's wording finding. An assertion read "a CONTROLLER whose SoC entity does not answer hands decide() None" while driving no Controller. The wiring property is stronger than the one claimed, and is now asserted on the SERVICE CALL: a Controller with no SoC never reaches the guard at all, because `inputs_ok` is False and cycle() stops at the safety claim first - so a `float(soc or 100)` defaulting line above the call site cannot disarm the floor. The original decide()-level check is kept, reworded to say what it actually grades. Full suite green on the merged tree: 15 files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
bdd7f18a54 |
OPT-04: charge cheap, discharge expensive - and only when it pays
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m16s
Four cards built the price stack and nothing traded on it. app/arbitrage.py is §10.1's priority 3, and it consumes all four rather than re-deciding anything: whether a trade is permitted at all, on which two hours, against which widened threshold is TariffPlan.arbitrage()'s answer, and that answer cannot be obtained without first saying whether the peak guard is holding. §9.1's "peak shaving outranks arbitrage" is therefore honoured structurally - there is no path to a spread that skips the question - and again in the arbiter, where P_PEAK (50) clamps a claim filed at P_ARBITRAGE (30). A guard that never ran is not a guard that is clear. On meter_source off the peak guard is never evaluated; that third state is carried as None and refuses, because charging at the rail creates the billed quantity while nothing measures the quarter. validate.py refuses that configuration too, along with arbitrage armed with no price source and a SoC floor at or above the ceiling. §17: never export into a negative price. The guard is on the hour being sold into, not on the spread - a day priced -0.30 .. -0.05 clears any threshold and its dearest hour is still negative. Buying in a negative hour stays allowed. resolve_tariff() may open an HTTPS connection and the tick feeds the ESP32 heartbeat, so the fetch runs in its own task at a 30 min cadence and the tick reads an attribute and an age bound. test_arbitrage.py section 8 asserts that structurally on the shipped AST: a fetch put back on cycle() is red. AC4 is NOT met and is not restated - this repository holds no price history. Section 7 replays a synthetic year and asserts the property that does not need real prices: every executed round trip cleared its own widened requirement, and zero discharges landed in the 522 negative-priced hours. At the shipped 0.10 EUR/kWh threshold a realistic Belgian day/night site does not trade at all. Reported, not tuned: that number and FCST-03's widening factors are one product decision and it is the owner's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
e709554857 |
SAFETY-24: an energy floor under the peak guard's forced discharge
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m29s
SAFETY-07 can command a discharge to hold a billed quarter down, and nothing below it consulted the state of charge. On the 2026-08-20 replay it asks for 878 Wh in a day. Relying on the BMS is not absurd - it is a real floor and it works - but it is the pack's protection rather than the operator's, and a month of aggressive quarters leaves the battery repeatedly at that cut-out with no EMS-side record of why. The first symptom is a pack never available when wanted, which is indistinguishable from the SoC drift MAINT-01 exists to correct. decide() now takes soc and soc_floor, both required and neither defaulted, and discharge_permitted() is the one place the question is answered. Above the floor nothing changes. At or below it the guard files a 0 W floor instead of a sized one - one-directional, so charging stays blocked and no discharge is capped - and reports floor_limited with the reason it bound. It is not a trip: every stop in 11.2's table still outranks the claim, and the floor is never negative, so 9.1's asymmetry survives as a property of the object (0 negative floors over 1296 swept combinations, SoC included). The SoC is graded only after `wanted > 0` is established, so it is never evaluated where it governs nothing. An unreadable SoC is floor-limited, not a full battery - a full battery is exactly the value that would disarm the floor, and this project shipped that defaulting once already. Failing to shave is not silent: one notification per episode (goodwe_peak_soc_floor), distinct from the saturation alarm because the two ask for opposite operator actions, plus its own status row and an action-log line. Verified by replay. The 2026-08-20 capture is driven against a modelled pack sized from the day's own measured appetite, so it genuinely exhausts: without the floor it reaches the BMS cut-out and holds there for 1227 guard cycles; with it the pack stops at 20.0 % and never touches the BMS. The energy withheld equals the energy between the two floors to within one cycle at the rail. The honest half is reported too - the worst quarter goes 4338 W -> 5030 W, because a floor-limited guard shaves less on purpose. Two new options, mirrored once in peakguard.PEAK_OPTION_DEFAULTS (TARIFF-02's pattern), imported by validate.py and main.py rather than typed as literals and pinned to config.yaml by a check that reads the file - so CFG-03 still tracks three places. validate.py rule 8 refuses peak_soc_floor <= bms_soc_floor at startup, in CFG-01/MAINT-04's manner. maintenance_soc_floor is deliberately not reused and not renamed: it is a drain target, not a spend limit, and the rename is recorded as a decision to revisit if a third floor appears. Eleven mutations of the shipped source were run against the checks; all eleven go red and there are no survivors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
c2ed509565 |
Merge release/1.0 (TARIFF-03) into SAFETY-07
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m12s
The anticipated conflict again, and only it: both cards prepend to CHANGELOG.md's Unreleased section. Both entries kept, SAFETY-07 first. app/main.py and DOCS.md auto-merged, so the overlap claim on #18 still holds - config.yaml and validate.py remain untouched by this card even after TARIFF-02 and TARIFF-03 widened both. Full suite green on the merge result, test_price.py and test_static_tariff.py included. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
9f8b721a4d |
Merge release/1.0 (TARIFF-02) into SAFETY-07
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m9s
Conflict was the one anticipated: both cards prepend to CHANGELOG.md's Unreleased section. Both entries kept, SAFETY-07 first. Nothing else of TARIFF-02's surface (app/price.py, validate.py rule 7, config.yaml, DOCS.md) overlaps this card - config.yaml and validate.py are untouched here, so the CFG-03 check still reads a config.yaml that only TARIFF-02 has widened. Full suite green on the merge result, test_price.py included. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
303525cfc5 |
TARIFF-03: static day/night and fully-fixed tariffs, first-class
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 2m43s
§9.2 puts a large share of the Belgian installed base on a static profile, and
an EMS that only works under dynamic pricing is an EMS for a minority. A new
`static_profile` option describes a two-period day/night tariff - or a single
fixed price - and app/static_tariff.py turns it into the same canonical
{start, eur_per_kwh, provisional} series the fetched providers emit.
Not a sixth provider plugin, for two mechanical reasons. capabilities() is a
classmethod, so a plugin's PriceProduct is fixed when the class is written -
but §9.2 makes STATIC and FIXED two different products and which one a site is
on is a property of the operator's data; StaticProfile.product derives it from
the number of distinct prices. And the plugin framework exists to stop a
FETCHED figure being marked up twice, which a number typed as all-in cannot be.
So the profile sits where §11.4 already says it does - under the providers, as
the fallback. Configured product and feed-is-down are one generator differing
in one flag, so the degradation path cannot rot unused.
"No arbitrage" is a type. TariffPlan.arbitrage() returns a variant whose
ALLOWED arm carries the spread and the cheapest/dearest hours and whose REFUSED
arm carries a reason and nothing else - .spread_eur_kwh on a refusal raises
rather than answering 0.0, so an optimiser cannot compute a trade from one.
Four refusals, all derived: peak guard holding, no price data, plan
provisional, or the series is FLAT. The last is AC2: a fixed tariff disables
arbitrage by arithmetic, not by matching on an enum. peak_guard_active is a
required keyword argument, so §10.1's priority 2 over 3 cannot be skipped.
Time-window shifting reaches the one shiftable load that exists: main.py's
cheap-window flag falls back to the static profile, and the UI gained a Tariff
row. Cheap is STRICTLY below the seven-day mean - `<=` would call every hour of
a flat tariff cheap, and 48 h taken on a Friday is two-thirds weekend.
A profile must tile every day type exactly once, checked at startup; a gap is
refused with the range named rather than filled in. `22:00-07:00 mon-fri` does
not cover Saturday morning, and that trap is what the check catches.
validate.py rule 7's stated reason expired exactly as TARIFF-02 predicted: the
test_price.py section 12 tripwire went red naming static_tariff.py. The message
now says what is true instead, and the tripwire is re-aimed rather than removed
- consumer set pinned, expired phrase asserted gone. Rule 7 also grew a second
refusal for static_profile alongside the HA price pair, the same silent-loser
conflict and a live one.
CFG-03 is not widened: static_profile went into price.py's PRICE_OPTION_DEFAULTS
- the one in-code mirror pinned to config.yaml by a check - and the new module
carries no defaults dict of its own.
Measured on the two committed days of this house's real P1 meter. 2026-08-20
(Thursday): 15.220 kWh imported, 9.606 day / 5.614 night, EUR 4.7185 under
day/night vs EUR 4.6725 flat, shifting saves EUR 0.8069 = 9.606 kWh x the
0.0840 spread, derived twice. 2026-08-23 (Sunday): 0.728 kWh, all of it
night-priced, which is the weekend row proving itself. §17 names six Belgian
scenarios; this is the seventh, and it is two days rather than a season - the
file says so rather than implying an annual figure.
All 12 suites green. Eleven mutations of static_tariff.py were each caught by
at least one check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC
|
||
|
|
616b62d3e9 |
SAFETY-07: cap the loop before it sets the month's billed capacity peak
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m7s
TARIFF-01 measured the quarter and said the consumer would be this card. It is
one new module, app/peakguard.py, and one new claim.
THE MECHANISM. Every cycle the guard projects the open 900 s block to its
end-of-interval average - from P1 telegrams only, never from the command - and
compares it to a ceiling. Over the ceiling it files ONE arbiter claim: a lower
bound on the setpoint at P_PEAK. That single shape is both behaviours 10.1 asks
for, a hard clamp on charging and pre-emptive discharge, and it cannot cap
discharge or export, because a floor cannot. 9.1's asymmetry becomes a property
of the object instead of a rule to remember.
excess = 900 x (projected - ceiling) / seconds remaining
floor = MEASURED battery power + excess
The 900/remaining gain is 1.0 at the top of the quarter and grows, so the guard
is gentlest where its projection rests on the least evidence. The floor is sized
from delivered battery power, not the standing command: a floor built on intent
re-adds its own unmet ask every cycle and winds to the rail whenever the inverter
fails to follow, and test_peakguard.py part 1 shows the two diverging.
IT TRIPS, AND THE CAPTURES DECIDED THAT. On the healthy reference day it engages
on zero of 95 quarters. The action is level-triggered, unlatched and re-derived
every cycle, so a false engagement costs one cycle of discharge rather than a
parked battery - the cost SAFETY-18 could not bound and this one can. Replayed on
2026-08-20 the billed quarter goes from 5029.8 W, above the inverter's own 5000 W
rating, to 3485 W, under the soft limit and without saturating. Quarters under
the limit across both committed days: 189/190 -> 190/190. Two days is not thirty
and AC 3 remains TARIFF-01's open item.
BLINDNESS IS CHECKED BEFORE THE PROJECTION IS GRADED, and it is a different
action. A fresh averager projects a confident 0 W, which is under every ceiling
there is; a meter gap longer than meter_max_age_s makes the projection read LOW;
a frozen meter reading export projects 0 W at full coverage. All three become a
floor of 0 W - no importing while the billed quantity is unobservable - which is
one-directional and cannot cost pack energy. That is the backstop SAFETY-18 could
not be: its alarm arrives at 300 s of a 900 s quarter and commands nothing. The
frozen term is freeze.looks_frozen() itself, on this cycle's standing command.
THE CEILING IS peak_cap_w, RAISED ONLY BY AN OBSERVED READING. NO_RECORD and
NOT_OBSERVED both leave it at the cap, so an unreadable peak store makes the
guard stricter and never looser. The gate is the reading's STATE, not whether a
number happens to be attached: today a `peak_w is not None` test behaves
identically, and depending on that coincidence is how a future last-known-peak
field would raise the ceiling off a read that failed. headroom_w() is
deliberately not consumed - cap minus peak turns a zero peak into FULL freedom.
TWO DEFECTS FOUND BUILDING IT, both in the interaction rather than the
arithmetic, and both caught by running the thing rather than by reading it:
* A LIMIT does not out-vote another LIMIT. arbiter.resolve() applies every
limit at or above the winner's priority and takes the most restrictive, so
the peak floor (lo >= 0) and the maintenance charge-only shaping (hi <= 0)
resolved to a CONTRADICTION and 0 W - the battery parked in the exact quarter
it should shave. Fixed by suppression, not priority: main.py drops the
maintenance shaping while the guard is engaged, which is what that branch
already did for the optional peak_forecast_entity - a key empty on a default
install, so until now the suspension could not fire on the site that needed
it.
* Thresholding `excess > 0` released the claim the instant it began working,
producing seventeen engage/release cycles in one 900 s quarter and leaving
that quarter 49 W over the limit it had spent fifteen minutes holding. That
is 10.2's oscillation. The threshold is now the floor itself, which is the
same arithmetic read as a level rather than as a switch.
PeakTracker.project() no longer reads a private name with a default.
getattr(averager, "_last_net", 0.0) failed quiet AND disarming - a rename credits
0 W held, the projection reads low, the money guard does not engage.
QuarterAverager.held_net_w is a documented public property now, read without a
default, and Projection carries it. TEST-13 item 4.
NO NEW OPTION AND NO FOURTH DEFAULTS SITE. The ceiling is peak_cap_w, the
coverage threshold is meter_max_age_s, the freeze predicate is meter_freeze_s,
and the achievable discharge comes from max_w and the device rating. config.yaml
and validate.py are untouched; 14's capacity_peak_limit_kw stays declined. On
meter_source: off there are no telegrams, so the guard does not run at all and
the status page says NOT COVERED - running it there blinded it permanently and
stopped every legacy install from charging, which is what the first cut did until
test_clamp.py's export case caught it.
test_peakguard.py: eight parts, all figures derived from the shipped config.yaml
and the committed captures. Part 8 runs seven one-line defeats of the guard and
reports which check bites; six do, and the seventh is reported as NOT caught,
because max(cap, peak) makes a zero peak the strictest ceiling there is and there
is nothing left to catch.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC
|
||
|
|
e102cde841 |
TARIFF-02 review: close the three other doors to the markup, and stop overclaiming
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 2m34s
Review of PR #16 wrote a double-counting plugin four ways. PluginOptions blocked one. The one that decided it touched nothing but PRICE_OPTION_DEFAULTS - a public dict in the module every plugin must already import for register() - so "the number is not in scope" was simply false, and an absolute guarantee a reviewer trusts is worse than a stated limit, because they stop checking. register() now refuses, AT IMPORT, any plugin whose own code mentions a framework-owned name: FRAMEWORK_KEYS plus PRICE_OPTION_DEFAULTS, price_option and _o. code_leaks() parses the class and drops every docstring node before searching, because every plugin is REQUIRED to name its sourced components in prose - engie_dynamic says "markup" in its docstring and a raw text scan false-positives on the documentation the same file mandates. A check that fires on required documentation is a check somebody deletes. test_price.py asserts that a raw scan really would have false-positived, so the strip is proven load-bearing rather than asserted. It fails OPEN if inspect.getsource() cannot find the .py, which the add-on image always can. Refusing to start a battery controller because a static analysis could not run would trade a real outage for a hypothetical accounting error - so instead the checks assert source was found for all five shipped plugins, and a build that lost it is a red check rather than a quietly disarmed guard. All three reachable attacks are written out as plugins in the suite and each must be refused at registration. The cost is measured, not asserted: honest wholesale 0.188, every attack 0.219 - one markup high, every hour, invisible in every log this add-on writes. The guarantee is now stated at its true size everywhere it appears: the framework adds the complement exactly once, GIVEN A CORRECT sources DECLARATION. A plugin that declares {ENERGY} while its feed is all-in still doubles while touching no framework name, and no code can catch that - the declaration is an unverifiable claim about somebody else's tariff. Measured in the suite (0.276) so the limit is a number rather than a caveat. The docstring/declaration check verifies that a plugin's two claims AGREE, not that either is true; that now says so. The three surviving mutations: M3 - _NoData's reason taking a default. This is the identical survivor left open on RIG-01's _Unread.cause: the shape was borrowed from sim/riglock.py including its blind spot, which is what borrowing a shape does if nobody re-runs the mutations against the copy. Closed by SIGNATURE - no constructor or handler of an outcome type may carry a default - so the next one is red without anyone writing a new case. M5 - the ENERGY-required guard was untested. Its consequence is that adds becomes {ENERGY, TAXES} and the emitted price silently omits the energy it is pricing. M7 - deleting the TLS refusal went green AND the check named for it still passed, because the old parser stripped a fixed len("https://") and mangled http://api.energy-charts.info/p into the host pi.energy-charts.info, which then failed the ALLOW-LIST. An assertion that does not test what it names, inside a security check. Fixed on both sides: the scheme is parsed as a scheme, so an http URL now resolves to its real and declared host and only the TLS rule can refuse it; and the check asserts the REASON. Fixing it surfaced M7b - the no-scheme guard was survivable the same way - found by mutating my own fix, and closed the same way. Also carried forward: rule 7's refusal is correct forever but its stated reason ("the provider decides nothing") expires the moment TARIFF-03 or OPT-04 lands. test_price.py section 12 now greps app/ by AST for a load_prices consumer and goes red when one appears, telling whoever lands it to update the message in the same commit. The first draft of that tripwire used a substring and matched the comment in validate.py explaining the tripwire - the same false-positive class as the plugin docstrings, hit twice in one ticket, and fixed the same way. Documented rather than coded around: vars(read).get("points", []) and bool(read) both still get past the absence type, and neither is worth code - defining __bool__ would turn a line that reads like a guard into one that IS a guard by accident, which is how .get(k, default) got here in the first place. Stated plainly in DOCS/CHANGELOG/PR: every fixture is synthetic, so the five feed URLs and JSON shapes are verified against a belief about what those suppliers publish rather than against the feeds. A wrong shape degrades to no-price-data, not to a wrong price. Review's own DST verification recorded: 149,040 hourly instants, 2020-2036, zero mismatches against zoneinfo. The residual is political, not arithmetic, and the docstring now says so. 24 mutations driven through the suite, 0 survivors. Whole add-on suite green. No deleted lines outside this ticket's own files; main.py still untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
852fc7ced6 |
TARIFF-02: one canonical price format, and a seam that keeps supplier names out of the optimiser
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 2m33s
Five provider plugins - generic_dayahead, engie_dynamic,
totalenergies_dynamic, eneco_eddy, manual_csv - all emitting exactly
{"prices": [{"start", "eur_per_kwh", "provisional"}]}, tz-aware at the
Brussels offset, EUR/kWh, all-in. Nothing consumes it yet; the seam
lands first, per the PM's ordering.
It is built in goodwe_controller/app/ rather than at specs.md 2.2's
ems/ingest/prices/, per the product owner's decision of 2026-08-30. The
behaviour 9.3 / 8.3 / 11.4 specifies is unchanged.
Three things shape the design, and each is the mechanism rather than a
comment saying to be careful:
Double-counting the markup is unreachable. A plugin does not return a
price - it returns the figure its source published and declares which of
{energy, markup, taxes} that figure already contains. assemble() adds
the complement, once, in the framework. A plugin is never handed
price_markup_eur_kwh: PluginOptions raises FrameworkOption on it, so the
line that adds the margin a second time cannot be written. Engie and
TotalEnergies publish a retail figure with their margin inside; adding
the configured 3 c/kWh on top would have made every arbitrage decision
wrong by that amount with nothing reporting it.
The product type is declared, not inferred from the plugin's name.
eneco_eddy is real-time/imbalance and gets 8.3's widened thresholds
through capabilities().product and volatility_regime(), never through a
name comparison - which is AC2. test_price.py asserts mechanically that
no plugin id appears anywhere in the framework's code, and drives a
sixth provider defined inside the test file to the right regime with
price.py untouched.
"No price data" is a type, not an empty list - the same rework
sim/riglock.py took under TEST-04. A fetch returns PriceRead.series(...)
or PriceRead.no_data(reason), and only the first carries fields. An
empty series is not constructible; no_data has no .points, no .at(), and
.get("points", []) raises rather than returning the default. A day of
free electricity and a day with no prices are different instructions -
arbitrage is pointless under one and forbidden under the other - and an
implementation returning [] cannot tell them apart. Every site-level
failure returns no_data; nothing raises into the control tick.
Also: injection stays a separate scalar (export_price_eur_kwh, AC4),
negative prices survive the boundary validator (17's regression case),
egress is allow-listed against each plugin's own declaration (16), and
no tzdata is used - the shipped Alpine image has none, so Brussels
offsets come from the EU rule and instants are carried as UTC.
validate.py grows rule 7: an unknown provider id, manual_csv with no
path, and - the HA overlap the PM told us to decide about -
price_provider set alongside price_now_entity/price_avg_entity, which is
two price sources where the HA pair silently wins. The HA sensors are
kept and still work alone; TARIFF-03 and OPT-04 are what replace them.
CFG-03 is not widened: the price defaults have ONE in-code mirror,
PRICE_OPTION_DEFAULTS, which validate.py imports rather than restating
and which test_price.py pins to config.yaml by reading the file.
test_price.py is runnable, assert-free in the house style, and every
verdict it prints is derived. It grades the markup arithmetic with
0.031/0.057 rather than the shipped 0.03/0.06, because 0.06 is exactly
twice 0.03 and a degenerate pair would make double-counting
indistinguishable from correct addition - and it asserts that
non-degeneracy as its first section. The DST checks run on the 23-hour
and 25-hour days, not on a normal day where a fixed 24-slot
implementation and a correct one agree. Thirteen mutations were driven
through it; all thirteen go red.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC
|
||
|
|
c040aac4b8 |
SAFETY-03: alarm when a computed setpoint exceeds the rating, do not just clip it
The clamp was never the missing half. specs.md 10.3 records an unclamped integrator climbing ~130 W per 4 s past 10 kW and reporting 14 768 W pinned at the 5 kW rail; clipped silently that is a flat, legal-looking 5000 W hold and nothing says the loop asked for three times it. write_setpoint() - the one path every write takes - now clamps to the VALIDATED max_w and reports whether the raw value differed; check_output_clamp() raises OUTPUT_CLAMP as a notification, an ERROR, an event row and a red status banner. Not a trip: the clamped value is written and the loop keeps running. The rating is max_w and nothing is min()ed at runtime - CFG-01 already refuses a max_w outside the device range at startup. The device range is applied second as defence in depth; it cannot bite after a successful validation, so if it ever does it alarms too and names the bound. No new config key. Decision grew i_clamped / clamped booleans, and that is the load-bearing part: `reason` is one string that slew-limiting and the saturation freeze overwrite, so an alarm keyed on it is silent on exactly the cycles a winding loop produces. Mutating main.py back onto the string drops the 10.3 replay from 2 engagements to 0. Distinct from saturation by construction - no shared reason code, notification id, status row or counter - and checked in the negative, after first asserting the saturation freeze really did engage. Two things found by running it rather than by reading it: a row per engagement flushed the 40-row event log and evicted SAFETY-18's own METER FROZEN? row (now coalesced per episode with an exact count), and a naive clamp turns a nan into a command at the full rating because every comparison against nan is False. test_clamp.py is new: assert-based, no framework. Six author mutations reproduced red, including "clamp kept, alarm deleted". Two of the check's own hypotheses about the freeze/clamp interaction were refused by its sweep and rewritten to what it measured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
7cde5d862a |
Merge release/1.0 into SAFETY-18 - CHANGELOG only
MAINT-04 (#10) landed on release/1.0 mid-review, so both branches had prepended a stanza. config.yaml and DOCS.md auto-merged clean; only the CHANGELOG needed a hand. Both stanzas are kept verbatim, MAINT-04's Unreleased above the new 0.5.2 - no text from either author edited. MAINT-04 is unreleased and 0.5.2 is being cut here, so a release manager may want to fold the two; that is an editorial call, not a reviewer's. Full suite green on the merged tree: arbiter, control, loop, maintenance, p1, validate, watchdog, freeze. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
7aa1bd052e |
SAFETY-18: a meter frozen at a wrong-but-fresh value now raises an alarm
A meter that answers 200 OK with a stale document forever is ARRIVING on every
poll, so every freshness mechanism in the stack reads it as healthy while the
loop integrates a constant error and rails: 360/135/75 s at the live install's
max_w: 5000 for a meter frozen at 350/1000/>=3000 W. Fifteen minutes of a 5 kW
unattended import sets the month's billed capaciteitstarief peak.
The detector is a conjunction, not the bare unchanged_s threshold TEL-05
measured and rejected:
unchanged_s >= meter_freeze_s AND |command| within 5 % of max_w
Both terms already existed and were already on the status page, and they fail
for independent reasons: at the converged point the command is nowhere near the
rail, and at the rail against a real load the kWh registers move in seconds. At
the shipped 300 s the relation is structural rather than a margin - the slowest
a healthy 1 Wh register can tick and still look unchanged is 12 W, which is
inside the 15 W deadband, so the command there is parked at 0 W.
Notification only, deliberately: an HA persistent notification with a fixed
notification_id, an ERROR log line, a UI event and a red status row. No claim,
no latch, no 0 W. A false trip parks the battery; a false notification costs an
alert. Only meter_source: homewizard_local is covered - the status page says
NOT COVERED elsewhere rather than pretending the guard is armed.
DOCS.md states the capacity-tariff exposure this does NOT close: peak_cap_w caps
maintenance charging and nothing caps the loop. That cap is SAFETY-07.
test_freeze.py grades both directions and was verified by breaking what it
watches (six mutations, all red): silent over the committed 40-minute converged
capture, silent over an hour of TEL-05's low-power case where the rejected bare
threshold is shown to fire, alarming on a genuinely frozen meter driven over
real HTTP through the real HomeWizardLocalSource (the rig's own hwsim freeze
fault when reachable), silent on the same railed command against a meter that is
still moving, and asserting on the service call that leaves Controller.cycle()
rather than on the watchdog's own flag.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC
|
||
|
|
878a6ce452 |
MAINT-04: refuse a maintenance charge the ceiling cannot deliver
config.yaml shipped max_w 2000 against maintenance_charge_w 2500. The cheap-window shaping files Claim.limit(hi = -maintenance_charge_w) against the supervised SAFETY limit's lo = -max_w, so lo > hi - the arbiter's clause 3, correctly resolved to 0 W and logged as a CONTRADICTION. Maintenance silently never charged in a cheap window on a default install, and the only evidence read like a bug in the arbiter rather than like the two numbers the operator set. validate_startup_config() now refuses maintenance_charge_w > max_w, the same shape as CFG-01's sign_disagree_w >= max_w. Equality is reachable (-max_w is a single valid point) and is not refused. Demonstrated by starting the add-on on the pre-fix pair: exit 78 and the refusal banner. maintenance_discharge_w was checked rather than assumed and is NOT the same case: the drain phase OWNS the actuator (Claim.set at P_MAINTENANCE), so the ceiling clamps it to +2000 W and the arbiter's explain() names the clamp every cycle. Loud, and it still moves energy - warned, not refused. The shipped maintenance rates drop to 2000 so the defaults pass the rule; max_w was deliberately not raised, because it is the supervised safety ceiling. test_validate.py now reads config.yaml itself, so a default the validator refuses cannot ship again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC |
||
|
|
cc4e88490b |
SAFETY-02 review: a latch that a restart clears is not a latch
BLOCKER. `auto` was persisted and `sign_wd.tripped` was not, so reconstructing the Controller against the same store - which is what a container restart does - brought it back ARMED, into the same fault, unattended: tripped=False, banner back to NOT READY, and it resumed commanding -1000 then -2000 W before re-tripping 180 s later. "Restart the add-on" is the first thing an operator looking at a FAILSAFE banner and a 0 W inverter will try, and under a supervisor that restarts a crashed add-on it is a loop of three-minute wrong-direction bursts. DOCS.md's "it does not clear itself" was false across a restart. `sign_tripped` and `sign_reason` are Store keys now, beside the maintenance state and for the reason store.py's own docstring gives. Written the moment the trip happens - reason first, flag second, so a crash between the two can never persist a latch with no explanation - restored in Controller.__init__, cleared only by the operator's start. The regression is covered: reverting the restore fails seven checks in test_watchdog.py. Review follow-ups, no behaviour change: - The arming gate is tested against the REAL arbiter. It is the decision the ticket turns on and it was asserted in three comment blocks and verified by nothing - every case passed `following` in as a literal. Twelve claim configurations now derive it from resolve(), including the redirect case `winner == "loop"` alone would have got wrong and the `lo` limit that raises magnitude without flipping sign. - The MQTT `status: "failsafe"` value is tested. The check that claimed to cover it restated the line above it and never touched the payload. - The worked example described a config that does not ship: at the defaults maintenance_charge_w 2500 against max_w 2000 is an arbiter contradiction and 0 W, not a -2500 W charge. Rewritten at 1500 W. The contradiction is a real pre-existing bug - a default cheap-window maintenance charge silently never happens - filed separately and deliberately not fixed here. - Forward hazard recorded at the gate: `winner == "loop"` disarms the watchdog under any higher-priority SET, and a peak-shaving strategy at P_PEAK IS grid-following in sign, so it would blind this for every peak event. - disagrees() is public so the replay harness stops carrying its own copy of the predicate it grades. - held_s takes the clock instead of reading one. - The two limits are now each stated in both places rather than one each. - The no-false-positive argument is tied to control.py's freeze permitting the command to cross zero; under the shrink-only encoding control.py records as rejected, this would false-trip on a load step. - Measured figures corrected: 93.4 % / 4212 of 17280, per-cluster 0.3/0.9/10.5/0.0, and the near-circularity of those figures is now stated rather than leaned on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
9aed43990b |
SAFETY-02: a loop can be fresh, tracking and inside its rating and still push the wrong way
The stale-input watchdog asks whether the meter is still talking. The saturation freeze asks whether the inverter can follow. The output clamp asks whether the number is too big. A loop can pass all three while charging the battery out of the grid, because the only thing wrong is the sign. On 2026-08-20 a commercial controller did exactly that four times in one day, for up to 77 minutes at a stretch, reaching a commanded -14 768 W against a ±5000 W inverter. app/watchdog.py compares the emitted setpoint against the authoritative P1 figure and, when they oppose each other with both over 300 W for 180 s continuously, files a failsafe SET claim at P_SAFETY, commands 0 W and latches there until an operator starts control again. Validated against that day rather than against an argument: sim/replay_sign.py in the infra repo drives this module over the committed captures of both 2026-08-20 and the healthy 2026-08-23 and reaches 18 trips on the fault day - every one inside a window NOTES.md §4.7 accounts for - and 0 on the healthy day. The four episodes do share one signature: 0.3 / 0.9 / 10.5 / 0.0 % sign agreement inside them against 92.9 % healthy. Three decisions the ticket could not make: - It is DISARMED whenever the grid-following loop is not what is driving. Sign agreement is a property of a loop that follows the meter, and a maintenance grid charge opposes the meter by design - 2500 W of charge into a house drawing 500 W is +3000 W on the meter against a -2500 W command, for hours. The gate tests the emitted number, not the winning claim's name, because a limit claim can let the loop "win" and still replace its value. - The trip LATCHES. Commanding 0 W removes the command side of the comparison, so the disagreement always clears the moment the trip works. - sign_disagree_w at or above max_w is refused at startup. The arbiter never lets a command exceed max_w, so such a threshold leaves the watchdog incapable of firing while the status page still reports it armed. What it does not catch, said out loud: an inverter that ACTS opposite to its command moves the meter further the same way, leaving command and meter in agreement. That is the saturation freeze's job. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
88cd97cc7a |
SAFETY-12: the loop thinks on a clock, not only when the number moves
run_control() ran cycle() only when the meter value differed from the previous poll. A meter that repeats a value therefore ran no control cycles at all - while the heartbeat kept re-emitting the last command and the firmware kept putting it on the wire every 2 s. Layer 1 stayed fed and every indicator read healthy, so a command computed from an old reading went on being executed through whatever the load did next. TEL-05 measured it: 70 s at a literally constant 350.0 W, 14 arrivals, zero cycles. cycle_floor_s (default 15 s) is a deadline on the GAP between cycles, reset by every cycle whichever trigger fired - not a second scheduler. On a healthy meter it never elapses, so the cycle rate and the commanded sequence are unchanged; test_loop.py asserts that by driving the real loop twice on one binary (a huge cycle_floor_s reproduces the old behaviour) and diffing the writes. 15 s is bracketed: above the ~11 s worst gap on a merely-unlucky healthy meter (~5 s arrivals, 1 s detection, one dropped poll retried on the next tick), below meter_max_age_s and the firmware's 30 s ingest veto, and equal to stale_input_s. A floor cycle runs the full law. Freshness is already decided upstream - past meter_max_age_s the reading is None, which is a P_SAFETY 0 W claim - and the integrator advances per cycle, not per second, so bounding the gap bounds the accumulation. Not a freeze detector: nothing here decides whether a repeated reading is true. DOCS.md's "accepted deviation" passage is qualified rather than deleted - the window is now bounded at 3 x cycle_floor_s instead of open-ended, and its "nothing accumulates while it is stalled" argument is called out as having covered windup and not staleness. Same correction in control.py's comment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
4d41b0a79e |
TEL-05 review follow-ups: show unchanged_s, name a timeout, keep the poll task alive
Four follow-ups on the reviewed and approved TEL-05 work. Additive; no shipped behaviour changes except the two failure paths below. 1. unchanged_s had no operator surface. DOCS.md told a reader "the transport tracks it as unchanged_s" and there was nowhere to look: main.py built the transport, scheduled run(), and never read the object again. The status page now shows it on the healthy P1 line. Still NOT thresholded and NOT folded into the age - that refusal was reviewed and upheld, because at the converged -10 W this controller aims for a 1 Wh register needs ~6 minutes to move, so any limit false-trips at the target operating point. The whole argument for leaving it to a human requires the human being able to see it. 2. The "equivalent mutant" note on the content_type guard was wrong, and the comment is downgraded to say so. web.Response(text=...) defaults to text/plain, so the fake meter CAN serve valid JSON under the wrong mimetype. Test added; shipped behaviour was already correct. 3. A timed-out poll logged an empty reason: str(asyncio.TimeoutError()) is "", so the status page read "last error:" and then nothing, on a hung meter, at the moment the battery had just gone to 0 W. Falls back to the class name. Note str(err), not `err or ...` - an exception object is always truthy. 4. submit() sat outside the try in poll_once() and run() had no except, so a raise would kill the poll task permanently and SILENTLY - safe (the age climbs, the controller commands 0 W) but indistinguishable from a dead meter. Both wrapped; poll_s is already the retry cadence, so no backoff. Also a comment at the parse_homewizard range(phases) slice: a 3-phase meter configured as 1-phase understates the capacity-tariff figure. Filed separately, not fixed here. 242 checks in test_p1.py (236 before, 6 new). test_control 55, test_arbiter 18, test_maintenance 21, all untouched and green. Each new check proved non-vacuous: six mutations, six named reds, no suite aborts, sources restored byte-identical. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
98109a9b91 |
TEL-05: read the meter, not Home Assistant's opinion of the meter
A fourth meter_source, `homewizard_local`, polling a HomeWizard P1's own local API (GET /api/v1/data) instead of watching an HA entity. The point is the age sensor. sensor.p1_sample_age_s is FW-01's watchdog input, and on every transport we had it measured "time since the value CHANGED", not "time since the meter REPORTED". Home Assistant offers nothing better: a repeated reading emits no state_changed, advances last_reported on neither serialiser, and state_reported cannot be subscribed to at all. Measured twice - 70 s of a frozen meter on the ENV-01 rig, and ten repeated readings against the live house. Our own capture of this house's meter goes 42.2 s and 97.0 s between changes, both past the default meter_max_age_s of 30, so the age sensor would have commanded 0 W on a perfectly healthy meter. Here every HTTP response is an arrival. The meter answered, now, with its current reading; whether the number moved is not consulted. Five identical readings are five arrivals. Reuses TEL-01's pipeline rather than restructuring it: same split_signed sign convention as ha_signed, same make_sample, same ingest stamping, meter_max_age_s, clock-recomputed age, plausibility bounds and the §20 unsigned-decode rejection. A failed or timed-out poll submits nothing, so it is a missing reading - never 0 W - and does not reset the age. meter_poll_s (default 5 s, the meter's own rate) is checked against meter_max_age_s once at startup, like the ha_signed entity ids. ⚠️ An arrival stamp cannot see a FROZEN meter, and no arrival detector can - one answering 200 OK with a stale number is arriving. The local API does expose what HA never had (the total_power_*_kwh registers stop advancing) and the transport tracks it as `unchanged_s`, but it is deliberately not folded into the age and not thresholded: this controller regulates grid toward ~0 W, and at a converged -10 W the export register needs six minutes to move by its 1 Wh resolution while the power figure legitimately repeats. Thresholding that would rebuild the false-trip limit cycle at the exact operating point we aim for. test_p1.py 179 -> 236 checks. Still defaults to off. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
1b343da8e3 |
DOCS: say plainly that ha_dsmr and mqtt_p1 have never seen real hardware
No meter in this installation uses either transport. Both were written to specs.md 5.2's assumption that a Belgian P1 exposes two unsigned registers, which the meter actually fitted here does not - it is the HomeWizard P1 that ha_signed reads. Their only coverage is test_p1.py and an end-to-end test against a fake Home Assistant. Deliberately not called "experimental". That word says the design is unfinished, which is not the defect and is vaguer than the truth; these are complete and reviewed, they have simply never had a real telegram through them. The failure this note is guarding against is a future session debugging a meter problem, treating those two paths as proven, and looking elsewhere. Placed where the mode is chosen rather than in a footnote, because the choice is the decision it should inform. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
e663e10245 |
TEL-04 review: unshadow the helper, validate config at startup, and record
what the rig proved about the age sensor
Review findings 1, 3, 5 and 6. Finding 2 is deliberately untouched - it is
its own ticket.
3. `built` was rebound at test_p1.py:816 by `built = build_source(...)`,
silently disarming the build() wrapper for anything appended below it.
Renamed to `sel`. Reproduced the reviewer's failure before fixing:
appending a check that calls built() after that line gives
`TypeError: 'HaSignedSource' object is not callable` and aborts at 163 of
180; with the rename the same probe reaches 180 and passes.
5. DOCS.md now states the "length must equal meter_phases" constraint that
config.yaml already carried, plus what leaving the list empty actually
costs: on the surveyed reading the phases carry 2769 W of import while the
connection nets 187 W, so the tariff quantity is understated ~15x.
6. build_source now checks the ha_signed wiring once at startup instead of
once per telegram: a blank p1_net_entity, or a phase list whose length
disagrees with meter_phases, logs an error and disables ingestion. Both
otherwise fail in the single way indistinguishable from a healthy source
nobody has fed yet - no samples, a climbing age, the watchdog holding the
battery at 0 W, and nothing in the log.
1. THE AGE SENSOR. Measured on the ENV-01 rig against the real HomeWizard
integration, meter frozen via hwsim's `?fault=freeze` seam (cleared in a
finally:, rig verified restored):
- websocket state_changed for the meter over 70 s : 0
- last_reported advanced (REST serialiser) : no
- last_reported advanced (websocket serialiser) : no
- subscribe_events(state_reported) : rejected,
"Event filter is required for event state_reported"
So Home Assistant exposes NO arrival signal for a repeated reading, and
the proposed fix - stamp from last_reported via subscribe_entities - is
not available. subscribe_entities listens only to EVENT_STATE_CHANGED, and
as_compressed_state carries no last_reported at all.
The age is therefore "time since the value changed", which on ha_dsmr is
mostly harmless (a telegram moves several entities) and on ha_signed is
not: one entity means a healthy meter under a flat load is
indistinguishable from a dead one. Recorded loudly in DOCS.md, in the
HaSignedSource docstring and in the CHANGELOG, with the measured 42.2 s
and 97.0 s gaps from our own capture.
meter_max_age_s is deliberately NOT widened. The two conditions produce an
identical signal, so a larger number does not separate them - it only
chooses which of the two errors you get, and it would disarm the watchdog
for a genuinely dead meter as well. The honest fix is an arrival stamp the
meter itself provides.
test_p1.py: 174 -> 179 checks, all green. Other three suites unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa
|
||
|
|
8b51a51e20 |
TEL-04: a third meter_source for a single signed entity
TEL-01 shipped ha_dsmr and mqtt_p1, and neither can read the meter that is
actually fitted here. The house has a HomeWizard P1 exposing ONE signed
entity, sensor.p1_meter_active_power (+ import, - export); ha_dsmr wants two
unsigned registers and refuses a negative one outright, which is every
exporting telegram. So sensor.p1_sample_age_s could not be produced at this
site, and FW-01's watchdog needs it - measured, not theoretical: the house P1
went 51.1 s and 36.2 s without a state change overnight, both past
meter_max_age_s 30, so without the age sensor the watchdog would false-trip
the battery to 0 W.
Adds meter_source: ha_signed, reading p1_net_entity (and optionally
p1_phase_net_entities in L1..L3 order for the capacity-tariff peak). The
derivation is split_signed(), sitting next to make_sample's subtraction for
the same reason it does - the moment a user is asked to write two template
sensors that split a signed value, the sign convention is back in unreviewed
YAML underneath a safety input, which is exactly what TEL-01 removed.
The transport is a subclass of HaDsmrSource overriding only _wanted() and
build(), so every rule TEL-01 established is inherited rather than
re-implemented: ingest timestamping, meter_max_age_s, the clock-recomputed
sensor.p1_sample_age_s republished ~1 Hz, the plausibility ceiling, the
"prime the cache from get_states but never build a sample out of it" rule,
"a reconnect emits nothing", and unavailable/unknown treated as a MISSING
reading and never as 0 W.
Defaults to off. An existing install is unaffected until it opts in.
test_p1.py: 122 -> 174 checks. Includes an end-to-end run of the new
transport against a fake Home Assistant websocket, and the sign convention
asserted against real captured readings from
sim/scenarios/ha-p1_meter_active_power-2026-08-{20,23}.json (-5710 W at
13:46 local under full sun is export; +775 W at midnight is import).
Non-vacuity: ten mutations of the new rules, each applied alone and reverted
byte-identical. Nine turn the suite red. The tenth - splitting the per-phase
signed values rather than passing them through - is an equivalent mutant,
because make_sample subtracts the two lists again and does not sign-check
per-phase figures. That is recorded in a ponytail: comment at the site rather
than left for the next reviewer to rediscover.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa
|
||
|
|
4bd659c499 |
TEL-01 review fixes: stop the age sensor tripping installs that have no meter
T-1, and it was a fleet-wide trip to zero. publish() emitted p1_age unconditionally, and published_age_s counts from P1Ingest.__init__ when no sample has ever arrived. With meter_source defaulting to off, every existing install would have published sensor.p1_sample_age_s climbing without bound; the ESP32 does `has_state() && state >= max_age_s` and forces the layer-1 failsafe, so each of them would have pinned its inverter at 0 W within 30 s. Exactly the opposite of the zero-regression the off default was for. The key is now omitted from the payload AND from MQTT discovery when P1 is off, so the entity does not exist at all - which is the status quo, and what has_state() is testing for. The predicate is one function, is_enabled(), because the grid reading, the task start and the discovery announcement have to agree or this comes back. T-2, connect no longer manufactures a sample. get_states returns whatever HA currently holds, which after a Core restart is a RestoreEntity value of unknown age; stamping it with ingest_ts=now reset the age and reported a fresh meter that could have been dead for an hour. run()'s own docstring already said a reconnect must emit nothing - the code disagreed with it, and a test asserted the violation. The cache is still primed, so the first real state_changed builds a complete sample; the age just stays honest until one arrives. T-3, gaps are no longer filled with the last held value. The averager held a sample forward across any interval, so a meter dying at 5 kW and returning ten minutes later credited 5 kW x 600 s to the capacity-tariff accumulator - a fabricated peak on a permanent record. The hold is capped at max_age_s: past that the stretch is walked so block boundaries still land correctly, but nothing accumulates and elapsed does not grow, which is what finally makes the comment about a gap dragging the billed average down true. Same threshold for control and billing: a reading too old to steer by is too old to bill by. T-4, the out-of-order/duplicate guard is covered. It was untested, and the reason is worth recording: the obvious assertion passes without the guard, because the negative interval is separately refused by the covered > 0 test. What the guard prevents is the timestamp REWIND, which only shows up one sample later as a re-integrated window. The test now goes one sample later. T-6, DOCS was wrong about latency. meter_max_age_s and stale_input_s stack, so meter death to 0 W is 45 s and not 30. Documented as a table with both clocks. Also documented the T-5 asymmetry rather than papering over it: the age measures arrival, not change, so a stuck MQTT bridge republishing its last telegram still looks fresh. Correct on ha_dsmr, not detectable on mqtt_p1 without a change-detector. Written up as a known limit. Writing the T-1 test caught a second defect in the test itself: it recorded only MQTT topics, and object_id lives in the payload, so "the age sensor is not announced" had been passing for the wrong reason. test_p1.py: 99 -> 122 checks. 14 mutations run, all 14 red, files restored byte-identical - including one per fix above. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
f47f1f0129 |
TEL-01: P1 ingestion, with the derivation and the age the EMS owns
A Belgian P1 meter publishes two UNSIGNED registers, not one signed figure. Until now the add-on asked the installer to bridge that gap with a template sensor, which put the sign convention of the whole control loop in a text box. This moves it into the EMS: net = import - export, derived once, in one place, with a test that fails if anyone inverts it. Two transports behind one contract, chosen by `meter_source`: the HA WebSocket subscribing to the DSMR integration's entities, and MQTT on a configurable topic. Everything downstream reads P1Ingest, so switching is a config edit. `meter_source: off` is the default and keeps the existing meter_entity path, so no installed system changes until it opts in. The other half is the timestamp. Every accepted sample is stamped at ingest with a monotonic clock, `meter_max_age_s` is applied to it, and the age is published as sensor.p1_sample_age_s for the ESP32's stale-input watchdog. That entity is recomputed against the clock every second rather than only when a telegram lands, because HA pushes state only on change: a meter frozen at a constant reading emits nothing and looks, to anything watching the value, exactly like a meter that has died. The age tells them apart. Deliberately absent: any fallback to an inverter-side power figure. The inverter's own AC power correlates 0.998 with battery power and 0.09 with the real meter, so failing over to it means regulating against your own output. A gap stays a gap - a reconnect emits no synthetic sample, and a rejected telegram never resolves to 0 W or refreshes the timestamp. Quarter-hour averages are time-weighted over clock-aligned blocks rather than a mean of samples, so a cadence change cannot bias the capacity-tariff figure, and only offtake is accumulated so a quarter of pure export averages to 0 kW. Per-phase import is kept separately: on an unbalanced three-phase load the phase sum and the connection net are different numbers, and only one of them is billed. test_p1.py: 99 checks, runnable with a bare interpreter and no meter. Includes an end-to-end run of the HA transport against a fake Home Assistant websocket. Stacked on SAFETY-04; nothing here touches control.py. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
53d301b920 |
SAFETY-04: exactly zero is its own case in the freeze tie-break
`min(moved, i_w) if i_w > 0 else max(moved, i_w)` files i_w == 0.0 under rising-only, so the first push toward charging from exactly zero was blocked permanently - the S-1 deadlock again, mirrored in sign. main.py resets i_w to exactly 0.0 on every stop and every reseed, so it is a normal state. Zero is now handled explicitly and both directions are allowed: nothing is wound, so "may not wind further" has no referent, and a first step from zero is bounded by the gain, the output clamp and the slew limit like any other. Measured before the fix, at i_w == 0.0 and frozen: 12 800 of 25 920 ticks held the integrator and 8 304 of those changed the emitted command, worst case abandoning a 2 kW charge into a 4 kW export. Note this is NOT the same as the reported symptom: at prev_w == 0 the command holds at 0 W either way, because the output freeze forbids starting a charge while saturated, and that rule is release/1.0's and unchanged. There is now a test asserting it deliberately. Tests. The durable part is a property rather than more points: over 13 041 frozen states the integrator may be held ONLY by a correction pushing it further from zero on the side it already sits, and any other hold fails. Both signs at exactly 0.0. Mirrors added everywhere the suite tested one direction of two - freeze wind/unwind while charging, i_w=-100, the export-direction runaway, the negative clamp and slew. DOCS: the cycles-vs-seconds deviation is now written down as a deviation - the "> 10 s" criterion is not met as literally written, a cycle is one CHANGED meter reading, and there is no guaranteed wall-clock window. test_control.py: 43 -> 55 checks, all passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
e46175559b |
SAFETY-04 review fixes: the freeze deadlocked, the bound was too loose
S-1. The frozen branch admitted a correction only if it shrank |i_w|. That is unsatisfiable for BOTH signs of error whenever |correction| > 2*|i_w|, i.e. whenever the integrator is near zero, so the loop stopped moving and the freeze could never clear - it clears when the inverter tracks, and not tracking is what saturation means. Measured: 0 W held into a 2 kW import indefinitely, where release/1.0 recovers on the next cycle. Re-encoded as the same asymmetric rule the output freeze has always used: may not wind further in the direction it is already pushing, may fall, cross zero or reverse. Same interpretation, an encoding that cannot deadlock. S-2. integrator_max_w defaulted to 1.5x max_w, which ADDED windup: in release/1.0 the accumulator was the post-clamp command and could never pass the rail. Default is now "follow max_w" (config 0 = unset). Measured on the 4000 W load-drop sim, first cycle after the drop: 1000 W at the new default, 1800 W at 3000. DOCS row inverted - the useful direction is below max_w, and the 14 768 W anecdote is a vendor controller, not evidence about this code. S-3. The claim that i_w=None preserved release/1.0 exactly was false, because the S-1 gate ran regardless of seeding. It is true again, and now asserted rather than asserted-about: 3024-case exhaustive comparison against a transcription of the old law, over both freeze states, both signs and either side of the deadband. Added the carried-i_w convergence/overshoot sim that the shipped configuration was missing. S-4. Cycles are distinct meter values, not seconds: cycle() runs only when the meter reading changes, so the window has no wall-clock bound. Comment and DOCS corrected; the stall is detection latency, not a windup hazard, because the same condition stalls the whole loop. test_control.py: 33 -> 41 checks, all passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
37bac79ad8 |
SAFETY-04: clamp the integrator, not only the output
The loop was in velocity form: the accumulator WAS the commanded power, so "clamp the integrator" and "clamp the output" were the same line of code and could not be set apart. This makes the accumulator an explicit carried value (`i_w`), bounds it with its own `integrator_max_w`, and keeps the output clamp where it was. Killing either mechanism now still leaves the other holding - which is the point of the ticket, and what the new regression test asserts. Freeze semantics: while saturated the integrator may unwind but not wind further. A strict freeze would strand the command at whatever it reached, because the condition that releases it is the inverter tracking again, and not tracking is exactly what saturation means. The integrator is re-seeded from the arbiter's actual output whenever the loop did not get what it asked for, so entering any failsafe (all of which resolve to 0 W) zeroes it, and the first cycle after release does not dump the stale period as power. test_control.py: 24 -> 33 checks, all passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa |
||
|
|
5184a2cfc2 |
Rest the meter just below zero, not at zero
The deadband is a one-way ratchet: any resting point inside it holds indefinitely. Import and export are separate registers on the meter, so a loop resting at +14 W bills 0.34 kWh/day while behaving perfectly. target_grid_w (default -10 W) moves that residue onto the export register. Worst billed rest point drops from 15 W to under 5 W. Behaviour is unchanged at target_grid_w: 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
0a1e61dbc9 |
Packaged as a Home Assistant add-on, with a field guide
Turns the reference RS485 controller into something a technician can install at a client site: a typed config form instead of YAML, an ingress UI that names misconfiguration in words, and persistent state that cannot be broken by a timezone. Why an add-on rather than YAML packages or blueprints: - Blueprints cannot create helpers, and the maintenance cycle is a state machine whose phase and completion date must survive restarts. - YAML packages need filesystem access, a configuration.yaml edit and a restart - none of which belong in a client install. - Add-ons authenticate with SUPERVISOR_TOKEN, so there is no long-lived token to generate, store or leak on someone else's machine. - Requires HA OS/Supervised. Container and Core installs cannot run add-ons at all, which is a market decision, not an oversight. The control law and the maintenance machine are pure functions with no Home Assistant imports, and both ship with runnable checks (22 and 22 assertions). Every assertion corresponds to a rule whose absence caused an observed failure on hardware - the saturation duration term, the clamp-before-slew ordering, the deadband, the sign convention. One behaviour deliberately differs from the implementation it replaces: when its inputs go missing this commands 0 W rather than replaying the last setpoint. The reference version kept replaying, which the hardware watchdog cannot catch - from the ESP32's side, Home Assistant is still talking to it. Includes the ESPHome firmware (now parameterised: node name, inverter rating, watchdog timeout) and the optional RS485 e-stop. FIELD-GUIDE.md carries the commissioning gates, all judged on the wire rather than on how Home Assistant looks, plus the written statement a site without an e-stop needs signed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016NckgXecasQb2eSsPYNSW6 |