Compare commits

...
24 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 7e77c723b9 Merge pull request 'TARIFF-24: battery modes start the tariff task; a forecast replaces the 1.5x widening' (#212) from TARIFF-24 into hotfix-0.19.1
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 51m58s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Reviewed head 9768631 (Opus review). CI run 1422 green on that sha.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 19:14:44 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 97686319f3 TARIFF-24 round 3: a run planned with a forecast keeps its gap to its end
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 51m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Losing the solar forecast mid-run used to widen the gap at once and stop a
grid charge (and a sensor that went unavailable for a minute stopped and
restarted it). A run under way when the forecast is lost now keeps the gap it
was planned with until it ends (Controller.weather_held(), recorded by
_wx_track() each cycle a forecast is read); the wider gap applies from the next
run. The plan key holds the hold state so the plan rebuilds when it ends. Home's
mirror (homeview.trade_verdict) asks the same weather_held(now).

Tests: test_tariff24_weather.py part 4 (going: the charge continues to the run's
end, the next run is not_worth; flap of one and two reads: no stop, no restart;
Home agrees) and a test_modes_p4.py scenario that runs a forecast day at a gap
between 1x and 1.5x the cycle cost. DECISIONS wording follows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 17:17:56 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude d424b862d8 TARIFF-24 round 2: test_modes_p4 scenarios keep the 0.30 gate they were written for
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 49m18s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
With a forecast read the gap needed is the cycle cost (0.20), not 1.5 x (0.30),
so a midday 0.21 gap now plans a grid top-up that four scenarios (sunny, Cheap
hours partly, forecast too high, refusal) are not about. They ask for cost 0.30
with the forecast; the no-forecast leg keeps 0.20 (= 0.30 widened).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 15:42:50 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 382b0ea411 TARIFF-24 round 2: a usable solar forecast replaces the "no weather" x1.5 (AUDIT-02 F1)
With battery modes on, the price gap a mode needs was always widened x1.5 by
Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER, even with a solar forecast read, so a 0.08 day/night
gap never traded at the shipped cycle cost. The doubt is now added only when
no usable forecast is read (solar_fc is None, the day plan's own test), in the
run plan (_price_runs), the charge gate (_mode_roles) and Home's mirror
(homeview.trade_verdict). The rule is one helper, arbitrage.weather_uncertainty();
the modes-off trade path (main.py cycle) keeps its literal NO_WEATHER.

DOCS "Battery modes" sentence, CHANGELOG 0.19.1 line and the DECISIONS note
follow. Tests: test_tariff24_weather.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 15:08:21 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 230ba0b57a TARIFF-24: test file follows the repo's suite rules (MUTATION.md pointer, named absence)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 49m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 01:09:39 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude d667f3f3a8 TARIFF-24: battery modes start the tariff task (hotfix 0.19.1)
With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed static_profile, no price feed and
arbitrage off, tariff_refresh_wanted() was false: no tariff task, no
tariff_plan, mode_runs None, so Leftover solar / Cheap hours never charged from
the grid and the Batteries screen said "No prices". packmode.enabled(opts) is
now a third term of the gate. With price_provider off the task is pure
arithmetic on static_profile, so no HTTPS call is added.

Also: version 0.19.1, CHANGELOG entry, DECISIONS note, test_tariff24.py, and a
shorter tariff_refresh_wanted() docstring (history stays in DECISIONS).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 01:02:32 +01:00
admin 793a67623c Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.19.0' (#208) from deploy-0.19.0 into master
Reviewed-on: #208
2026-10-26 08:47:42 +01:00
admin 514256923b Merge pull request 'Release 0.19.0' (#207) from release-0.18.3 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 48m38s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
2026-10-26 03:10:27 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 b7108e552d Release 0.19.0: review text fixes to the CHANGELOG section
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 48m2s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Battery modes on trade less, not longer; the wizard's Dutch checks need
UX-51; the SAFETY-121 limit as measured; the headline names every change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-26 02:19:44 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 31d09ebae2 Release 0.19.0: complete headline and the reason for the minor bump
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 47m48s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 01:15:16 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude ae9268835f Release 0.19.0: minor bump for changed price trading behaviour
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 48m3s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Owner chose 0.19.0 (2026-10-26) because PRICE-02 changes trading behaviour.
Version and CHANGELOG heading/first line only; no option changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-26 00:15:43 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude f8b3e23a46 Release 0.18.3
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 48m2s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Bump version to 0.18.3 and add the 0.18.3 CHANGELOG section: DOC-8, UX-45,
SAFETY-119, SAFETY-121, UX-46, PRICE-02. A patch bump: no option added,
removed or renamed, no default changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-25 16:53:30 +01:00
admin aa228062c5 Merge PR #206: PRICE-02 the price verdict skips ended periods
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
2026-10-22 18:57:37 +02:00
admin ad374ae208 Deploy 0.18.2 to master (#200) 2026-10-17 01:59:54 +02:00
admin ec2b0c3de4 Deploy 0.18.1 to master (#197) 2026-10-16 15:05:06 +02:00
admin 3b7d6b7f05 Deploy 0.18.0 to master (#193) 2026-10-16 00:42:54 +02:00
admin 1b6f16dba2 Deploy 0.17.0 to master (#186) 2026-10-11 01:37:01 +02:00
admin df154a26d1 Deploy 0.16.0 to master (#179) 2026-10-08 01:43:37 +02:00
admin 21599938ea Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.15.0 to master' (#174) from deploy-0.15.0 into master
Deploy 0.15.0 to master (#174)
2026-10-05 10:17:38 +02:00
admin 3a54b253cb Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.14.0 to master' (#170) from deploy-0.14.0 into master
Deploy 0.14.0 to master (#170)
2026-10-03 12:32:16 +02:00
admin 8b9680fc35 Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.13.0 to master' (#166) from deploy-0.13.0 into master
Reviewed-on: #166
2026-10-02 15:26:46 +02:00
admin 3ce18708b6 PKG-18: ship 0.12.0 to master, so TEL-12's pv_entities can reach an installed 0.11.0 (#118) 2026-09-24 23:22:34 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5 78acb558ff PKG-17: ship 0.11.0 to master, so SAFETY-56's wording fix and TEL-11's pv_entity can reach an installed 0.10.1 (#115)
master is what the Home Assistant Supervisor clones, and the Supervisor
compares config.yaml version strings - so 0.11.0 could not be offered to an
installed 0.10.1 without this bump reaching master.

Carries SAFETY-56 (#112), TEL-11 (#113), the CI-9 follow-up (#102) and SEC-2's
docs/RELEASE.md (#108), by way of the 0.11.0 cut (#114).

NOT A FAST-FORWARD. master was not an ancestor of release/1.0: 0f14c2a, the
pre-SEC-2 direct push, exists only on master. Its tree is the same object as
the merge base b0b24e5 (c1fef26), so it carries no content delta, and
`git merge-tree --write-tree` over the two branches returns a tree bit-identical
to cccb2fa's own (6670502). This merge commit therefore contributes exactly
release/1.0's tree - master synthesises nothing.

Reviewed as the release decision, not a re-review of content. Verified from the
remote: slug goodwe_controller and every identity key unchanged (cross-checked
against the live box's Supervisor export), version 0.10.1 -> 0.11.0, and the
green is this PR's own - run 828 / job 1953, path checks.yml@refs/pull/115/head,
PRNUM 115, GRADED refs/pull/115/head merged into master, run_attempt 1, 31 test
files all passing in 8m01s of real work.

predeploy_check.py re-run against the owner's current options (exported
2026-09-24 20:02, 75 keys, pv_entity unset): CLEARED, exit 0. That retires the
stale-2026-09-07-export warning in the pull request body. Option surface
75 -> 76 with only pv_entity added, str? defaulting to "", no key removed, no
default moved, no rule added to validate.py - no SystemExit(78) on this hop.

Merging is not installing. No tag is cut here and `ha store reload` /
`ha addons update` have not been run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-24 20:28:35 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 0f14c2a5de PKG-16: ship 0.10.1 to master, so the Supervisor can offer SAFETY-57's fix
master is what Home Assistant clones. SAFETY-57 fixed a deadlock that parked
the reference install's battery for ~13 minutes while the site exported
2.4 kW, and the Supervisor compares config.yaml version strings - so the fix
could not reach an installed 0.10.0 without this bump reaching master.

Brings SAFETY-57 (#104) and the 0.10.1 cut (#105). master was a strict
ancestor; no conflict was possible.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-22 15:54:29 +02:00
10 changed files with 1089 additions and 67 deletions
+99
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,104 @@
# Changelog
## 0.19.1
**A patch bump: two fixes for battery modes, and no option changes.**
No option was added, removed or renamed, and no default changed (86 options).
**Existing installs need no option change:** options that start 0.19.0 also
start 0.19.1. The changes below apply with one inverter or two.
**Battery modes now see a day/night or fixed tariff.** With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed tariff and no price service, the batteries never got the prices: "Cheap hours" never charged from the grid at the cheap rate, and the Batteries screen said "No prices". They get them now, with no price service and no internet call added.
**A solar forecast now counts for the price gap.** With battery modes on and a solar forecast read, a price mode needs a gap of at least *Battery cycle cost*, not 1.5 times that. Without a forecast it is still 1.5 times. A day/night gap of 0.08 now works at a cycle cost of 0.07 or less.
Contents of this release, in merge order since 0.19.0 (`793a676`):
| | |
|---|---|
| `TARIFF-24` | With battery modes on, the add-on now also resolves the tariff when no price service and no price trading are set, so a day/night or fixed tariff gives the batteries their price runs ([[TARIFF-24]]). With battery modes on and a solar forecast read, the price gap a mode needs is *Battery cycle cost* (widened only for a real-time feed), not 1.5 times that; Home and the Batteries screen use the same rule ([[AUDIT-02]] F1). |
### Known issues
The list under `## 0.19.0` below still applies.
### If you are crossing from a version older than 0.10.0
`## 0.10.0` below can refuse an old config: `slew_w` above its limit, and the
withdrawn `price_provider` ids `engie_dynamic`, `totalenergies_dynamic` and
`eneco_eddy`. Read it before you update. Run `tools/predeploy_check.py` with the
bare options (`jq '.data.options'`) first.
## 0.19.0
**A minor bump: price trading behaves differently, plus a fix for a false warning, the Home price chart in 15-minute bars, more Dutch text and EMS-port wording, and no option changes.**
No option was added, removed or renamed, and no default changed (86 options). It is a minor bump because price trading changes when the battery charges and gives power; every saved setting still starts.
**Existing installs need no option change:** options that start 0.18.2 also
start 0.19.0. The changes below apply with one inverter or two.
**Price trading skips periods that are over.** When the add-on trades on price, it now picks only from price periods that are not over yet. With battery modes off and 15-minute prices, the battery therefore trades for longer (about 1.5 to 2.5 times the minutes in a simulation of 16 real days), so it cycles more; with battery modes on, it no longer charges from the grid because of a cheap period that is over. Hourly and day/night sites change too: they no longer pause at the start of each hour.
Contents of this release, in merge order since 0.18.2 (`c67d0cd`):
| | |
|---|---|
| `243a756` | The docs, the add-on description and the field guide now say the add-on is wired to the inverter's EMS port, not a "meter bus". In Home Assistant the device's manufacturer text becomes "GoodWe (via RS485 EMS port)", and the device and its entities stay the same ([[DOC-8]], #201) |
| `75f0804` | The price chart on the Home page now shows one bar for each 15-minute price, the price the add-on decides on, where it showed hour averages. Its cheap and dear colours now show where the add-on will charge or give power, instead of thirds of the price range ([[UX-45]], #202) |
| `bee7431` | First half of the "not keeping up" fix, shipped with the next row and described there ([[SAFETY-119]], #203) |
| `e077ae7` | The false "Battery is not keeping up" warning, and its Home Assistant notification, no longer appear when the peak guard steps in and then gives control back near the start of a 15-minute period; battery commands do not change. A real overload still warns at the start of each 15-minute period, up to about 25 s later with the default 5 s meter, but with an uneven meter of about 15 to 20 s and a small overload, it can stay quiet for up to an hour ([[SAFETY-121]], #204, with [[SAFETY-119]]) |
| `90bc901` | On Dutch pages, the status rows, banners and settings notes now show Dutch text where they showed English, and so do the setup wizard's checks once [[UX-51]] is fixed. The settings label of the 15-minute demand forecast sensor no longer ends in "(W)", and English pages change only by that label ([[UX-46]], #205) |
| `aa22806` | Price trading, and the check for it with battery modes on, now ignore price periods that have already ended, so the add-on no longer aims at a 15-minute period that is over and then does nothing. Hourly and day/night sites also change: there is no pause at the start of each hour, as the owner accepted ([[PRICE-02]], #206) |
### Known issues
- A false "Battery is not keeping up" can still show when the peak guard pauses a maintenance charge ([[SAFETY-92]]).
- A battery capped at a low limit with a perfectly flat reading can still trip the stale check ([[SAFETY-74]]).
- A battery whose reading at rest is beyond about ±175 W is still not caught when it refuses ([[SAFETY-97]]).
- The peak guard can still back off near the end of a 15-minute period when a meter reading is late, by less than 30 s ([[SAFETY-99]]).
- Two inverters: the maintenance charge can switch on and off while the house is above the peak aim ([[SAFETY-88]]).
- Two inverters: the "circulating" figure counts a battery's reading at rest ([[SAFETY-98]]).
- Two inverters: a drain that starts during a big step in house use can send the other battery to full power, and about 1 kW goes to the grid for about 10 s ([[SAFETY-104]]).
- Two inverters: when a battery comes back during a maintenance charge, the grid can step by several kW at once ([[SAFETY-101]]).
- Two inverters: when a battery drops out during a solar surplus, the others can swing by up to 1.5 kW in a simulation ([[SAFETY-105]]).
- Two inverters: after a drain ends, a change in house use can go unanswered for about 9 s, because some readings are old ([[SAFETY-106]]).
- Two inverters: when one battery's level is missing, both batteries are held at 0 W, and for about 15 s the last command stays on ([[SAFETY-108]]).
- Two inverters: if one battery's level stays missing for 12 h, the other battery's cycle can be marked failed, with a 7-day wait and a notice, though it is healthy. This comes from reading the code; it has not been seen on a site ([[MAINT-17]]).
- When the 15-minute demand forecast sensor counts the battery's own charge, the maintenance charge runs at about half the power the peak limit leaves, so it takes about twice as long. Seen on a site: about 1.2 kW instead of 2.5 kW, and the peak limit was kept ([[SAFETY-111]]).
- One inverter: after a link drop, the battery's own safety stop to 0 W can be taken as a refusal, and the site stays at 0 W for up to 15 min ([[SAFETY-102]]).
- After a Home Assistant restart, control still waits until Home Assistant has finished starting, which can take several minutes, though the readings are already there ([[SAFETY-115]]).
- While Home Assistant is not answering, the page can list inverters as refusing commands and sensors as missing, and send you to Developer Tools, though they are fine ([[UX-37]]).
- If Home Assistant hangs or stops, the page keeps saying "Waiting for Home Assistant" and never turns into an alarm ([[SAFETY-113]]).
- Right after Home Assistant has started, the page can say for about 4 s that an inverter cannot be controlled, and the first command can come late ([[SAFETY-114]]).
- After a Home Assistant restart, the controller status sensor can still say "running" while the add-on cannot control. It was seen once, and the cause is not known ([[SAFETY-116]]).
- Battery modes on: after a planned top-up from the grid, the Batteries screen can say "Enough sun is forecast" ([[UX-32]]).
- Battery modes on: the forecast line "we count on" can show more sun than the plan counts, because the plan takes house use off first ([[UX-33]]).
- Battery modes on: before a planned top-up, the Today list shows a smaller "gives" amount than the plan will use; it grows as the charge happens ([[UX-34]]).
- Two inverters, battery modes on: while the other battery is in its maintenance charge, a battery's card can say it charges from the grid while it stays at 0 W ([[OPT-18]]).
- Two inverters, battery modes on: while a battery refuses to charge in a cheap run, the action log on the page gets about 8 lines an hour for its retries, and the page hint says "waiting for a better price" ([[UX-38]]).
- A battery in a safety stop, or one the add-on cannot reach, can still be started for a cycle, and its drain then waits about 12 h and ends in a failed-cycle notice. This comes from reading the code; it has not been seen on a site ([[MAINT-19]]).
- On the Settings page, the rows of the solar forecast lists are labelled "Phase 1", "Phase 2" instead of "Sensor 1", "Sensor 2" ([[UX-27]]).
- In the solar forecast list, a blank or repeated row makes "source 2 of 2" count differently from the rows on the Settings page ([[UX-28]]).
- The solar forecast message says "has no reading" also when the sensor shows a number that is too old or in the wrong unit ([[UX-29]]).
- If you use only the forecast lists, two Settings notes sit on the single-sensor field, and one of them tells you to set that field ([[UX-30]]).
- After a restart during a price outage, the "No prices" message can say "yet" when prices did come in earlier ([[UX-39]]).
- On the new settings page, you cannot see whether a price service token is set. Check the Configuration tab ([[UX-41]]).
- On the classic settings page, the first click on Save after editing a field can do nothing. Click again ([[UX-42]]).
- A steady overload on a 1 s meter can warn, and send the Home Assistant notification, 2 or 3 times at the start of each 15-minute period instead of once. The peak limit is still kept ([[SAFETY-122]]).
- A fixed tariff is priced once per hour, so a price window that starts or ends at :15, :30 or :45 gets the wrong price for part of that hour. Windows that start and end on the hour are right ([[TARIFF-23]]).
- Step 6 of the setup wizard stays empty because of an error in the page, in English and in Dutch ([[UX-51]]).
- On Dutch pages, refusal texts, the last-event line under the Home buttons, the installer details and the trading status sentences are still English, and a few Dutch texts read badly, such as "1 metingen geweigerd" ([[UX-52]]).
- Home can show a grid charge that the add-on will not take: the rest of a cheap run that the trade check refuses (battery modes on), or a charge after the last dear price period (battery modes off). The battery stays idle then ([[UX-53]]).
- Some price texts say "hour" where the add-on acts on a 15-minute period, such as "cheapest hour" ([[UX-47]]).
- After the add-on restarts, the Home price chart shows no price for the earlier part of today, and the setup check can say "12 of 24 hours", though the prices are known ([[UX-48]]).
- With battery modes on and only batteries on "Leftover solar", the Home price chart can mark a cheap period where no battery charges ([[UX-49]]).
- On a phone, the bars of the Home price chart are too thin to tap one 15-minute period. The arrow keys work ([[UX-50]]).
### If you are crossing from a version older than 0.10.0
`## 0.10.0` below can refuse an old config: `slew_w` above its limit, and the
withdrawn `price_provider` ids `engie_dynamic`, `totalenergies_dynamic` and
`eneco_eddy`. Read it before you update. Run `tools/predeploy_check.py` with the
bare options (`jq '.data.options'`) first.
## 0.18.2
**A patch bump: one fix to how the 15-minute demand forecast sensor is read, and no option changes.**
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
# TARIFF-24 - battery modes need the tariff task
**Status: FIXED in 0.19.1 (hotfix from 0.19.0, owner go 2026-10-28).**
Follows TARIFF-10 (fetching is not trading). Tests: `test_tariff24.py`.
**The defect.** The control cycle gets prices only from
`Controller.tariff_plan`, which only `run_tariff_refresh()` stores. `amain()`
starts that task when `tariff_refresh_wanted(opts)`, which was
`provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)`. Battery modes read the
plan but were not a term. With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed
`static_profile`, `price_provider: off` and `arbitrage_enabled: false` (the
site trade switch is not read with modes on) no task ran. Then
`fresh_tariff_plan()` was None, `_price_runs()` was None and `mode_runs` was
None, so Leftover solar and Cheap hours never charged from the grid. The
Batteries screen said "No prices, so it follows the house" while Home priced
the day from `static_plan()` itself (`homeview.build_plan()`).
**The fix** (`main.py`, `tariff_refresh_wanted()`). `packmode.enabled(opts)`
is a third term. The gate stays a widening: nothing that started the task
before stops. No HTTPS call is added: with `price_provider: off`,
`resolve_tariff()` is the pure `static_plan()`.
**Not changed.** Modes off, arbitrage off, no feed still starts no task. The
control law, the price runs and every message are untouched.
**One rule, not two.** Gating on "modes on and a static profile" was
considered. It saves one arithmetic pass every 30 min on a site with modes on
and no prices at all, and it adds a second condition that has to track what
`resolve_tariff()` accepts. With no profile and no feed the plan is `no_data`,
exactly what the cycle sees without the task.
**UX-55.** Home said "no prices have arrived" (`mode_runs` None) with every
battery on Solar first. The same cause, and this fix clears it for a site with
a static profile (`test_tariff24.py` part 5). A site with no profile and no
feed still has no prices, and Home still says so.
## Round 2 (AUDIT-02 F1): the forecast replaces the "no weather" doubt
**Decided 2026-10-28 (owner), in the same hotfix.** The price gap a mode needs
was `cycle_cost_threshold_eur` x 1.5 (`Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER`) whether or not
a solar forecast was read. At the shipped cost 0.10 that is 0.15, so a
day/night gap (0.08) and many dynamic days never traded, and the screens said
only "Prices differ too little".
**Why the doubt goes with a forecast.** The widening stands in for not knowing
the weather. The forecast is that knowledge, and the day plan already trusts it
for how much to charge. Trusting it for the plan but doubting it for the gap
was one input judged twice.
**The rule** (`arbitrage.weather_uncertainty()`). With battery modes on and a
usable forecast (`solar_fc` not None, the day plan's own test) the doubt is
not added: the gap needed is the cycle cost, widened by the price product only.
No forecast, or a stale or unusable one: 1.5 x, as before. It is read in three
places that must agree: the run plan (`_price_runs()`), the charge gate
(`_mode_roles()`) and Home's mirror (`homeview.trade_verdict()`). The forecast
is read at most every 60 s and the plan key already holds "forecast or not", so
the gap follows in the cycle the read changes, both ways, with one exception:
a run planned with a forecast that is under way keeps that gap to its end
(`Controller.weather_held()`), so a sensor that goes unavailable does not stop
or restart a charge. The wider gap applies from the next run.
**Not changed.** Modes off (the site trade) keeps the doubt always. The
shipped cost 0.10 still needs a gap of 0.10 even with a forecast: a 0.08
day/night site must set *Battery cycle cost* to 0.08 or less. Showing the two
numbers on the screens (AUDIT-02 F1 option b) is a separate card.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ With battery modes on, these choices replace the *Charging and selling on price*
**Cheap and expensive hours.** They come from the published day-ahead prices, as runs of consecutive 15-minute periods, not a single period.
- The cheap run is the cheapest stretch long enough to fill the batteries that may charge, at their power.
- An expensive hour costs at least *Battery cycle cost* (`cycle_cost_threshold_eur`, widened as for trading) more than the cheap run. The batteries hold their power until then.
- An expensive hour costs more than the cheap run by at least *Battery cycle cost* (`cycle_cost_threshold_eur`) when a solar forecast is read, and by 1.5 times that when none is (a real-time price feed widens it further). The batteries hold their power until then.
- The sale uses the most expensive stretch inside those hours, and never a period below 0.
- A carried (not yet published) price is never used. A run that has started runs to its end.
- With no prices, or too small a gap, every battery follows the house.
+16 -1
View File
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import datetime
from .arbiter import ACTUATOR_SITE, P_ARBITRAGE, Claim
from .price import Absence, price_option
from .price import Absence, Uncertainty, price_option
_LOG = logging.getLogger("goodwe.arbitrage")
@@ -267,6 +267,21 @@ def threshold_eur_kwh(opts: dict) -> float:
return v
def weather_uncertainty(modes_on: bool, solar_fc, held: bool = False) -> frozenset:
"""The "no weather" doubt (x1.5) a trade must clear. TARIFF-24.
Battery modes read a solar forecast; with one read (`solar_fc` not None) the
doubt is gone, and `held` (a run planned with a forecast is under way, see
`Controller.weather_held()`) keeps it gone until that run ends. Everything
else, and the modes without a forecast, keep it. One rule for the run plan,
the charge gate and Home's mirror. See
DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
if modes_on and (solar_fc is not None or held):
return frozenset()
return frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
def soc_bounds(opts: dict) -> tuple:
"""(floor, ceiling) in percent. The reserve arbitrage may not spend."""
return (float(price_option(opts, "arbitrage_soc_floor")),
+6 -2
View File
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ from . import arbitrage, messages, peakguard, uitext
from .maintenance import CHARGE as M_CHARGE, DRAIN as M_DRAIN, HOLD as M_HOLD
from .maintenance import IDLE as M_IDLE, next_slot_start
from .packmode import CHEAP_HOURS, GRID_CHARGE_MODES, LEFTOVER_SOLAR, SOLAR_FIRST
from .price import Absence, Uncertainty, brussels, _cover_table
from .price import Absence, brussels, _cover_table
from .static_tariff import static_plan
from .tariff import BILLING_TZ
from .uimodel import REGION_PRESETS, options_to_ui
@@ -277,7 +277,11 @@ def trade_verdict(c, plan, now):
return None, "no_prices"
verdict = plan.arbitrage(peak_guard_active=guard,
min_spread_eur_kwh=arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(c.o),
uncertainty=frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER}),
uncertainty=arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
bool(getattr(c, "modes_on", False)),
getattr(c, "solar_fc", None),
bool(getattr(c, "weather_held",
lambda _n: False)(now))),
now=now)
return verdict.match(
allowed=lambda v: (v, "allowed"),
+45 -58
View File
@@ -174,57 +174,17 @@ TARIFF_MAX_AGE_S = 3 * TARIFF_REFRESH_S
def tariff_refresh_wanted(opts: dict) -> bool:
"""TARIFF-10. Does this install need the background tariff refresh at all?
"""Does this install need the background tariff refresh? (TARIFF-10, TARIFF-24)
THE DEFECT THIS PREVENTS, and it shipped: the gate below used to be
`arbitrage.enabled(opts)` alone. That option defaults to `false`, and
`run_tariff_refresh` is the only caller of `resolve_tariff()`, which is the
only caller of `price_history.carry()` - so on a shipped install with a
provider configured NOTHING was ever fetched, no plan was ever resolved,
`/data/price_history.json` was never created, the *Price history* row read
`empty` forever, and TARIFF-09's short-horizon warning could not fire
because there was no fetch to warn about. Measured over a 40 h soak of two
instances side by side: zero feed requests and `present: false` across all
802 samples on the shipped default, against a resolved plan from the same
feed on the instance with arbitrage armed. ⚠️ AND `DOCS.md` HAS
DESCRIBED THE BEHAVIOUR BELOW SINCE THE COMMIT THAT WROTE THE GATE:
OPT-04 (bdd7f18) added the refresh task, the `arbitrage.enabled()` guard on
it, and the sentence saying a configured provider still fetches, all in one
change. config.yaml has said it since TARIFF-02 (852fc7c).
Two terms, and they answer two different questions:
provider_configured(opts) -> "the operator asked for a price feed", so
fetch it, validate it and record the day
(§8.3). This is the term TARIFF-10 ADDS.
arbitrage.enabled(opts) -> "the operator armed trading". This term is
what the gate USED to be, kept verbatim.
⚠️ IT IS AN `or`, SO THE GATE IS A STRICT WIDENING. Every configuration
that started this task before still starts it; none that did not start it
stops anything. That matters because the second term is not redundant:
`price_provider: off` + a `static_profile` + `arbitrage_enabled: true` is a
configuration validate.py explicitly ACCEPTS, and it trades - measured, at
`cycle_cost_threshold_eur: 0.05` on a 0.20/0.284 day/night profile,
`ARBITRAGE_CHARGE -5000 W`. Dropping that term to make the gate read
`provider_configured(opts)` alone would leave `self.tariff_plan` at None on
that site forever and `decide()` would answer "no tariff plan has been
resolved yet" on every cycle - silently disarming a strategy the UI says is
running, which is the exact failure validate.py's OPT-04 rules exist to
refuse.
⚠️ AND NO CONFIGURATION ACQUIRES A PERIODIC HTTPS CALL FROM THIS TICKET.
With `price_provider` off, `resolve_tariff()` returns `static_plan()` - pure
arithmetic, no socket - so the second term starts a task that fetches
nothing. The true shipped default (no provider, no arbitrage) starts no
task at all. What is fetched is decided by the FIRST term only.
⚠️ THIS IS NOT A TRADING SWITCH. It decides whether prices are LOOKED UP.
Whether they move energy is `arbitrage.enabled()` at the one call site in
`cycle()`, and TARIFF-10 did not touch it: `arbitrage_enabled: false` still
means no trade, ever, on any configuration.
Yes with a price feed, with trading on price armed, or with battery modes
on: the modes read `self.tariff_plan` for their price runs. With
`price_provider` off the refresh is pure arithmetic on `static_profile`, so
no term here adds an HTTPS call. It decides whether prices are looked up,
never whether energy moves. See DECISIONS/TARIFF-10-fetching-is-not-trading.md
and DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
return provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
return (provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
or packmode.enabled(opts))
def load_options() -> dict:
@@ -1000,6 +960,9 @@ class Controller:
# and whether last tick filed a mode trade (a run edge reseeds).
self.mode_runs = None
self._runs_key = None
# TARIFF-24: the end of the run that was under way while a forecast
# was read; until then losing the forecast does not widen the gap.
self._wx_free_to = None
self.mode_tick = None
self._run_done = {}
self._mode_trade_was = False
@@ -2266,6 +2229,28 @@ class Controller:
probing=probing))
return out
def _wx_track(self, now) -> None:
"""TARIFF-24, once per cycle, before the plan: with a forecast read,
remember when the run now under way (cheap, give or sell) ends."""
if self.solar_fc is None:
return
rp = self.mode_runs
ends = []
if rp is not None and rp.on:
ends = [r.end for r in (rp.cheap, rp.sell)
if r is not None and r.holds(now)]
g = rp.give_at(now)
if g is not None:
ends.append(g.end)
self._wx_free_to = max(ends) if ends else None
def weather_held(self, now) -> bool:
"""TARIFF-24: no forecast now, but a run planned with one is under
way: it keeps its gap to its end. The wider gap applies from the next
run. Pure; Home asks the same (`homeview.trade_verdict()`)."""
return (self.solar_fc is None and self._wx_free_to is not None
and now < self._wx_free_to)
def _price_runs(self, now, packs, floor_pct, ceiling_pct):
"""The kept run plan, rebuilt at most once per price slot (15 min) or
when the prices or a battery's choice change; a run under way is
@@ -2279,9 +2264,11 @@ class Controller:
slot = int(now.timestamp() // 900)
key = (id(plan), slot, tuple((p.name, p.use, p.mode, p.sell)
for p in packs))
held = self.weather_held(now)
if self.fc_entity is not None:
# P4: a forecast arriving or going rebuilds the plan at once.
key += (self.solar_fc is None,)
# P4: a forecast arriving or going rebuilds the plan at once (and
# so does the end of a run that held the gap, TARIFF-24).
key += (self.solar_fc is None, held)
if key != self._runs_key:
done_c = self._run_done.get("charge", (None, set()))[1]
done_s = self._run_done.get("sell", (None, set()))[1]
@@ -2290,7 +2277,7 @@ class Controller:
required = price_required_spread(
arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(self.o),
price_uncertainty_of(plan.read.product)
| {Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
| arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(True, self.solar_fc, held))
ref = self._ref_cheap
if ref is not None and now - ref.end > REF_CHEAP_KEEP:
ref = self._ref_cheap = None
@@ -2359,6 +2346,7 @@ class Controller:
quarter), exactly the gate `arbitrage.decide()` has."""
floor_pct, ceiling_pct = arbitrage.soc_bounds(self.o)
packs = self._mode_packs(maint_results)
self._wx_track(now)
runs = self._price_runs(now, packs, floor_pct, ceiling_pct)
guard = arbitrage.guard_state(self.peak_guard)
plan = self.fresh_tariff_plan(now)
@@ -2369,7 +2357,8 @@ class Controller:
return plan.arbitrage(
peak_guard_active=active,
min_spread_eur_kwh=arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(self.o),
uncertainty=frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER}),
uncertainty=arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
True, self.solar_fc, self.weather_held(now)),
now=now).match(
allowed=lambda _v: True, refused=lambda _v: False)
if guard is not None and plan is not None and runs is not None:
@@ -8051,11 +8040,9 @@ async def amain() -> None:
# ESP32 heartbeat. A fetch on that path is a supplier's TLS timeout able
# to push this add-on towards layer 1's 30 s veto. See TARIFF_REFRESH_S.
#
# ⚠️ STARTED WHEN A PROVIDER IS CONFIGURED, *OR* WHEN TRADING IS ARMED
# - TARIFF-10, and it used to be the second term alone. `arbitrage_
# enabled` ships `false`, so a site that had selected a price feed
# fetched nothing at all; the whole argument, the measurement and what
# the `or` is protecting are in `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above.
# ⚠️ STARTED FOR A PROVIDER, FOR ARMED TRADING OR FOR BATTERY MODES:
# see `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above and DECISIONS/TARIFF-10 and
# TARIFF-24 for why each term is there.
#
# ⚠️ IT DOES NOT ARM ANYTHING. Fetching a price and trading on one are
# two decisions; this is the first, and `cycle()`'s
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: GoodWe RS485 Controller
version: "0.18.2"
version: "0.19.1"
slug: goodwe_controller
description: >-
Drives a GoodWe ES/BP battery inverter over its RS485 EMS port by sending it a
+42 -4
View File
@@ -540,6 +540,12 @@ rp.Hass.state = _sensor
rp_start = [UTC0]
FC_OPTS = {"pv_forecast_entity": "sensor.energy_production_today_remaining",
"cycle_cost_threshold_eur": 0.20}
# TARIFF-24 round 2: with a forecast read, a price mode needs the cycle cost
# itself (0.20 here), no longer 1.5 times it (0.30). These scenarios were
# written for a 0.30 gap, and a midday 0.21 gap now plans a grid top-up they
# are not about, so they ask for 0.30 with the forecast; the no-forecast leg
# (`rows_nf`) keeps 0.20, which is 0.30 widened: the same gate on both sides.
GATE_030 = {"cycle_cost_threshold_eur": 0.30}
def seed_profile(c):
@@ -597,7 +603,8 @@ def invariants(tag, rows, c):
# Sunny: 40 kWh forecast. B (Leftover solar) at 30 % needs nothing.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0},
extra=GATE_030)
charge = invariants("sunny", rows, c)
_last = nth(rows, -1, "a cycle")
print(f" sunny: verdict {present(_last) and _last['plan'] and _last['plan'].verdict}, "
@@ -607,6 +614,35 @@ check("sunny: a day plan is made, and says sunny",
for r in rows))
check("sunny: no grid charge at all", not charge)
# TARIFF-24 round 2: the same day at the cycle cost 0.20 itself. With the
# forecast read the gap needed is 0.20 (not 1.5 x = 0.30), so the midday
# quarter 0.339 against the evening 0.551 (gap 0.21, between 1x and 1.5x) is
# a planned top-up for B (Leftover solar) up to its planned level.
rows_g, st_, c_g = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})
charge_g = invariants("gap between 1x and 1.5x", rows_g, c_g)
_first_g = nth(charge_g, 0, "a charge cycle")
_gaps = [min(g.mean_eur_kwh for g in r["runs"].give)
- r["runs"].cheap.mean_eur_kwh for r in charge_g
if r["runs"] is not None and r["runs"].give]
print(f" gap 0.20 <= gap < 0.30: {len(charge_g)} charge cycles, run gap "
f"{min(_gaps, default=0):.3f}, B to "
f"{max((r['soc']['b'] for r in rows_g), default=0):.1f} %")
check("a forecast day whose price gap lies between 1x and 1.5x the cycle "
"cost (0.20 < 0.21 < 0.30) plans a cheap run: B charges from the grid "
"inside it, only B, and only up to its planned level",
present(_first_g) and len(_gaps) == len(charge_g)
and all(0.20 <= g < 0.30 for g in _gaps)
and all(r["runs"].cheap.holds(r["now"]) for r in charge_g)
and all(r["roles"][B] == modetrade.CHARGE for r in charge_g)
and all(r["roles"][A] != modetrade.CHARGE for r in charge_g)
and max(r["soc"]["b"] for r in rows_g) <= 45.64 + 2.0)
check("...and the same day with no forecast read does not (it needs 0.30): "
"the old gate, kept for a day without a forecast",
not [r for r in run_day(SF_LS, fc=None,
soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})[0]
if r["action"] == arbitrage.CHARGE
and r["now"].astimezone(L).hour == 12])
# Dark: 1 kWh. B buys the evening's shortfall only, in the cheap run.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=1.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})
charge = invariants("dark", rows, c)
@@ -623,7 +659,8 @@ check("dark: A rests while B charges", all(r["roles"][A] == modetrade.REST
for r in charge))
# Cheap hours on a partly sunny day: ignores the plan, fills as in P3.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_CH, fc=14.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_CH, fc=14.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0},
extra=GATE_030)
charge = invariants("cheap hours, partly", rows, c)
top = max(r["soc"]["b"] for r in rows)
print(f" cheap hours partly: B reached {top:.1f} %")
@@ -648,7 +685,8 @@ check("forecast lost mid-run: Leftover solar was charging, and stops within "
# The forecast is far too high (40 kWh, and there is no sun at all): no grid
# charge, so B covers less of the evening - a money risk, never a safety one.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 30.0, "b": 30.0})
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 30.0, "b": 30.0},
extra=GATE_030)
invariants("forecast too high", rows, c)
check("forecast too high: no grid charge, and B still keeps its power for "
"the dear run", not [r for r in rows if r["action"]
@@ -658,7 +696,7 @@ check("forecast too high: no grid charge, and B still keeps its power for "
# A refusal wins over the plan.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=1.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0},
refuse=("b",))
refuse=("b",), extra=GATE_030)
invariants("refusal", rows, c)
check("refusal: B refuses to charge, so the plan's charge ends and B is "
"never a charger after it", rows and not [
+374
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
"""Runnable check for TARIFF-24. `python3 test_tariff24.py`
Battery modes on, a day/night `static_profile`, no price feed and the site trade
switch off used to start no tariff task: `Controller.tariff_plan` stayed None,
`mode_runs` stayed None, Leftover solar and Cheap hours never charged from the
grid, and the Batteries screen said "No prices" while Home priced the day from
the profile itself. DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
1. The startup gate: `tariff_refresh_wanted()` by configuration, and the guard
`amain()` really puts on the task (read from its source, not retyped).
2. End to end, on the real Controller and the real `run_tariff_refresh()` task,
started only if `amain()`'s own guard says so: night period, one battery
Leftover solar and one Cheap hours.
3. The same with a gap below the cycle cost.
4. Home and the Batteries screen agree.
5. UX-55: with every battery Solar first Home no longer says "no prices have
arrived" on a static profile, and still does with no profile and no feed.
6. Nothing else moved: modes off starts no task; the gate rows in part 1 keep
the arbitrage and feed cases as before.
Mutations (MUTATION.md, purged copies, graded over this file): the gate
reverted to `provider or arbitrage` fails 18 checks in parts 1 to 5; `True`
fails the modes-off rows; `bool(opts.get(...))` fails the exact-true row;
dropping the arbitrage term fails the arbitrage rows.
"""
import ast
import asyncio
import logging
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import time
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
sys.path.insert(0, HERE)
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(HERE, "tools"))
logging.disable(logging.WARNING)
import opt11p3_replay as rp # noqa: E402
from named_absence import first, nth, present # noqa: E402
import app.main as m # noqa: E402
from app import homeview, modetrade, packmode # noqa: E402
from app import price as _price, static_tariff as _st # noqa: E402
from app.main import Controller, tariff_refresh_wanted # noqa: E402
from app.p1 import make_sample, split_signed # noqa: E402
from app.store import unit_key # noqa: E402
fails = []
def check(name, cond):
print(f" {'ok ' if cond else 'FAIL'} {name}")
if not cond:
fails.append(name)
A, B = "inverter-a", "inverter-b"
# A Belgian-style day/night tariff, example values: dear 07:00-22:00, cheap
# 22:00-07:00, every day. The gap is 0.08 EUR/kWh.
PROFILE = ('{"periods": ['
'{"name": "night", "days": "all", "from": "22:00", "to": "07:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.22},'
'{"name": "day", "days": "all", "from": "07:00", "to": "22:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.30}]}')
# A Friday in winter time (+01:00), 23:00 local: inside the night period.
L = timezone(timedelta(hours=1))
NIGHT = datetime(2026, 10, 30, 23, 0, tzinfo=L).astimezone(timezone.utc)
def opts(*, modes=True, arb=False, profile=PROFILE, provider=None,
cost=0.05):
o = dict(rp.options(modes, arb, 2))
o["cycle_cost_threshold_eur"] = cost
if profile is not None:
o["static_profile"] = profile
if provider is not None:
o["price_provider"] = provider
return o
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# The guard amain() puts on the tariff task, read from amain()'s source.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
def _guards_of(node, guards=()):
"""[(guards, coroutine name)] for every create_task(...) under `node`."""
out = []
for child in ast.iter_child_nodes(node):
if isinstance(child, ast.If):
test = ast.unparse(child.test)
for stmt in child.body:
out += _guards_of(stmt, guards + (test,))
for stmt in child.orelse:
out += _guards_of(stmt, guards + (f"not ({test})",))
continue
if isinstance(child, ast.Call) and \
ast.unparse(child.func).endswith("create_task") and child.args:
arg = child.args[0]
name = (arg.func.attr if isinstance(arg, ast.Call)
and isinstance(arg.func, ast.Attribute)
else ast.unparse(arg))
out.append((guards, name))
continue
out += _guards_of(child, guards)
return out
_TREE = ast.parse(open(os.path.join(HERE, "app", "main.py"),
encoding="utf-8").read())
_AMAIN = first((n for n in ast.walk(_TREE)
if isinstance(n, ast.AsyncFunctionDef) and n.name == "amain"),
"amain() in main.py")
_TASK_GUARDS = [g for g, n in _guards_of(_AMAIN) if n == "run_tariff_refresh"]
def task_started(o) -> bool:
"""Would amain() start the tariff refresh task for options `o`?"""
if len(_TASK_GUARDS) != 1:
return False
return all(bool(eval(g, vars(m), {"opts": o})) for g in _TASK_GUARDS[0])
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("1. the startup gate")
check("amain() starts the tariff refresh from exactly one guard, and that "
"guard can be decided from the options alone",
len(_TASK_GUARDS) == 1 and len(_TASK_GUARDS[0]) >= 1
and all(isinstance(eval(g, vars(m), {"opts": opts()}), bool)
for g in _TASK_GUARDS[0]))
GATE = [
# label, options, task wanted
("modes on + static day/night only", opts(), True),
("modes on + a fixed price only",
opts(profile='{"periods": [{"name": "all", "days": "all", "from": '
'"00:00", "to": "24:00", "eur_per_kwh": 0.27}]}'), True),
("modes on, nothing else", opts(profile=None), True),
("modes off + arbitrage off + no feed (static profile)",
opts(modes=False), False),
("modes off + arbitrage off + no feed, no profile",
opts(modes=False, profile=None), False),
("modes off + arbitrage on", opts(modes=False, arb=True), True),
("modes off + a feed", opts(modes=False, provider="generic_dayahead"),
True),
("modes on + a feed", opts(provider="generic_dayahead"), True),
("modes on + arbitrage on", opts(arb=True), True),
]
for label, o, want in GATE:
got = tariff_refresh_wanted(o)
print(f" wanted={got!s:5} started={task_started(o)!s:5} {label}")
check(f"{label}: tariff_refresh_wanted() is {want}", got is want)
check(f"{label}: amain() starts the task exactly as that says",
task_started(o) is want)
check("battery_modes_enabled has to be exactly true (packmode.enabled()): "
"'true' as text or 1 does not start the task",
not tariff_refresh_wanted(dict(opts(), battery_modes_enabled="true"))
and not tariff_refresh_wanted(dict(opts(), battery_modes_enabled=1)))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# The real Controller over a few minutes of a night: the task starts only if
# amain()'s own guard says so; then read_inputs() + cycle() as the control
# loop runs them.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
CHOICE = {"a": (True, "leftover_solar", False),
"b": (True, "cheap_hours", False)}
FETCHES = []
async def _no_fetch(*a, **k):
FETCHES.append(a)
raise AssertionError("the tariff task reached for a price feed")
def drive(o, *, start=NIGHT, minutes=20, soc0=None, choice=CHOICE,
house_w=300.0, tick=5.0):
"""-> (controller, rows, task_was_started)."""
store = rp._Store()
for u, (use, mode, sell) in choice.items():
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_use")] = use
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_mode")] = mode
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_sell")] = sell
rows = []
async def go():
hass = rp.Hass(("a", "b"), lambda t: house_w,
soc0 or {"a": 40.0, "b": 40.0})
tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="t24-")
c = Controller(dict(o), hass, store, rp._Pub(),
stop=asyncio.Event(),
peak_db_path=os.path.join(tmp, "tariff.db"),
price_history_path=os.path.join(tmp, "ph.json"))
for i in c.inverters:
i.dev_min, i.dev_max = -5000.0, 5000.0
c.auto = True
real_dt, real_hv = m.datetime, homeview.datetime
clock = [start]
class _DT(real_dt):
@classmethod
def now(cls, tz=None):
return clock[0] if tz is None else clock[0].astimezone(tz)
m.datetime = homeview.datetime = _DT
_real_load = _price.load_prices, _st.load_prices
_price.load_prices = _st.load_prices = _no_fetch
started = task_started(o)
task = (asyncio.create_task(c.run_tariff_refresh())
if started else None)
try:
t = 0.0
while t < minutes * 60:
now = start + timedelta(seconds=t)
hass.t = t
clock[0] = now
if t == 0.0 and started:
for _ in range(500): # let the task do its first pass
if c.tariff_plan is not None:
break
await asyncio.sleep(0)
imp, exp = split_signed(hass.grid())
c.p1.submit(make_sample("ha_signed", imp, exp, phases=1,
ingest_ts=now,
ingest_mono=time.monotonic()))
await c.read_inputs(now_mono=t)
await c.cycle()
hass.advance(tick, 10.0)
rows.append(dict(
now=now, runs=c.mode_runs, tick=c.mode_tick,
plan=c.fresh_tariff_plan(now),
action=getattr(c.arb, "action", None),
p={u: p.p for u, p in hass.plants.items()},
soc={u: p.soc for u, p in hass.plants.items()}))
t += tick
# What the two screens say at the end, while the clock is still
# the simulated one.
c.home_plan = homeview.build_plan(c, clock[0], False, True)
c.battery_cards = homeview.battery_rows(c, False, True)
finally:
if task is not None:
task.cancel()
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
m.datetime, homeview.datetime = real_dt, real_hv
_price.load_prices, _st.load_prices = _real_load
return c, started
c, started = asyncio.run(go())
return c, rows, started
def charging_b(rows):
"""Cycles in which the Cheap hours battery was charging (grid: no sun and
a 300 W house in this scenario)."""
return [r for r in rows if r["p"]["b"] < -200.0]
def why_of(c, name):
card = first((b for b in c.battery_cards if b["name"] == name),
f"a card for {name}")
return card["why_key"]
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n2. end to end, night, modes on, static day/night, no feed, no arbitrage")
c1, r1, started1 = drive(opts())
_last = nth(r1, -1, "the last cycle")
_first1 = nth(r1, 0, "the first cycle")
print(f" tariff task started by amain's guard: {started1}")
print(f" tariff_plan: {None if c1.tariff_plan is None else c1.tariff_plan.words}")
print(f" mode_runs: {_last['runs']}")
print(f" mode_tick reason / roles: "
f"{None if _last['tick'] is None else (_last['tick'].why, dict(_last['tick'].roles))}")
print(f" Batteries screen why_key: A {why_of(c1, A)}, B {why_of(c1, B)}")
print(f" cycles with B charging: {len(charging_b(r1))} of {len(r1)}, "
f"B soc {_first1['soc']['b']:.1f} -> {_last['soc']['b']:.1f}")
check("the tariff refresh task is started", started1)
check("...and it adds no network call: with price_provider off the feed "
"loader is never reached (it is replaced by one that fails)",
not FETCHES and not _price.provider_configured(opts()))
check("a fresh tariff plan with prices is held", present(_last)
and _last["plan"] is not None and _last["plan"].has_prices)
check("the price runs exist (mode_runs is not None) and carry a cheap run "
"that holds in the night period",
present(_last) and _last["runs"] is not None and _last["runs"].on
and _last["runs"].cheap is not None
and _last["runs"].cheap.holds(_last["now"]))
check("the Cheap hours battery charges from the grid in the night period",
len(charging_b(r1)) > len(r1) // 2
and present(_last, _first1)
and _last["soc"]["b"] > _first1["soc"]["b"] + 0.3)
check("...and the Leftover solar battery does not (no sun, no forecast)",
not any(r["p"]["a"] < -200.0 for r in r1))
check("...the reason is not 'no prices': neither battery reads no_prices",
why_of(c1, A) != "no_prices" and why_of(c1, B) != "no_prices")
check("...only the Cheap hours battery got the grid charge role",
present(_last) and _last["tick"] is not None
and _last["tick"].roles.get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE
and _last["tick"].roles.get(A) != modetrade.CHARGE)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n3. the same with a gap below the cycle cost")
c3, r3, started3 = drive(opts(cost=0.20))
_l3 = nth(r3, -1, "the last cycle")
print(f" started {started3}; mode_runs {_l3['runs']}; "
f"why A {why_of(c3, A)}, B {why_of(c3, B)}")
check("the task is started and the plan is there, so mode_runs is not None",
started3 and present(_l3) and _l3["plan"] is not None
and _l3["runs"] is not None)
check("the reason is the gap: no_spread ('Prices differ too little'), "
"never no_prices, on both batteries",
why_of(c3, A) == "no_spread" and why_of(c3, B) == "no_spread"
and present(_l3) and _l3["runs"] is not None
and not _l3["runs"].on)
check("...and no battery charges from the grid",
not charging_b(r3) and not any(r["p"]["a"] < -200.0 for r in r3))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n4. Home and the Batteries screen agree")
hp = c1.home_plan
_bars = [b for b in hp["prices"] if b["eur_kwh"] is not None]
_words = {b["why_key"]: b["why"] for b in c1.battery_cards}
print(f" Home: has_prices {hp['has_prices']}, {len(_bars)} priced bars, "
f"verdict {hp['verdict_key']}, lines {hp['lines']}")
print(f" Batteries: {[(b['name'], b['why_key'], b['why']) for b in c1.battery_cards]}")
check("Home prices the day, and the Batteries screen does not say it has no "
"prices", hp["has_prices"] and _bars
and all(b["why_key"] != "no_prices" for b in c1.battery_cards))
check("Home's plan has the grid charge block for the Cheap hours battery "
"(the 'trade' verdict) and no 'no prices have arrived' line",
hp["verdict_key"] == "trade"
and any(r["kind"] == "grid" for r in hp["runs"])
and not any("no prices have arrived" in ln for ln in hp["lines"]))
hp3 = c3.home_plan
check("with the gap too small both say so: Home 'price gap is too small', "
"the batteries 'differ too little'; neither says no prices",
any("price gap is too small" in ln for ln in hp3["lines"])
and all(b["why_key"] == "no_spread" for b in c3.battery_cards))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n5. UX-55: every battery Solar first, static day/night, no feed")
SF = {"a": (True, "solar_first", False), "b": (True, "solar_first", False)}
c5, r5, s5 = drive(opts(), choice=SF, minutes=5)
print(f" Home lines: {c5.home_plan['lines']}")
check("Home no longer says 'no prices have arrived' with every battery Solar "
"first on a static profile",
s5 and not any("no prices have arrived" in ln
for ln in c5.home_plan["lines"]))
c5b, r5b, s5b = drive(opts(profile=None), choice=SF, minutes=5)
print(f" no profile, no feed: started {s5b}, Home lines "
f"{c5b.home_plan['lines']}")
check("...and with no profile and no feed there are truly no prices, and "
"Home still says so",
any("no prices have arrived" in ln for ln in c5b.home_plan["lines"]))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n6. nothing else moved")
c6, r6, s6 = drive(opts(modes=False), choice={}, minutes=5)
check("modes off, arbitrage off, no feed: no task, no plan, no price runs "
"(as before)", not s6 and c6.tariff_plan is None
and all(r["runs"] is None for r in r6))
print()
if fails:
print(f"{len(fails)} FAILED:")
for f in fails:
print(f" - {f}")
sys.exit(1)
print("all checks passed")
+439
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,439 @@
"""Runnable check for TARIFF-24 round 2 (AUDIT-02 F1). `python3 test_tariff24_weather.py`
With battery modes on, the price gap a mode needs was always widened x1.5
(`Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER`) even with a solar forecast read. Now the doubt is
added only when no usable forecast is read (`arbitrage.weather_uncertainty()`),
in the run plan (`_price_runs()`), the charge gate (`_mode_roles()`) and Home's
mirror (`homeview.trade_verdict()`). Modes off is untouched.
DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
1. The rule itself, and that modes off keeps the doubt.
2. Day/night 0.34/0.26 (gap 0.08), modes on, real Controller, night period:
with a forecast at cycle cost 0.07 the cheap run is planned and the Cheap
hours battery charges; without one, or with a stale one, the same cost needs
0.105 and the reason is `not_worth` / "Prices differ too little".
3. A dynamic day with a 0.12 gap at cost 0.10: on with a forecast, not worth
without.
4. The forecast coming (the gate follows in the same cycle) and going mid-run:
a run under way keeps its gap to its end, the next run needs the wider one;
a forecast unavailable for one or two reads mid-run does not stop or
restart the charge.
5. Home agrees with control in each case (Batteries Why, Home line, and
`trade_verdict()`, Home's mirror of the gate).
Mutations (MUTATION.md, purged copies, graded over this file): the doubt always
added (the old code) fails parts 2 to 5; never added fails the without-forecast
rows; Home's mirror left on the old rule fails part 5.
"""
import asyncio
import logging
import math
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import time
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
sys.path.insert(0, HERE)
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(HERE, "tools"))
logging.disable(logging.WARNING)
import opt11p3_replay as rp # noqa: E402
from named_absence import first, nth, present # noqa: E402
import app.main as m # noqa: E402
from app import arbitrage, homeview, modetrade # noqa: E402
from app.main import Controller # noqa: E402
from app.p1 import make_sample, split_signed # noqa: E402
from app.price import (PricePoint, PriceProduct, PriceRead, # noqa: E402
Uncertainty, brussels)
from app.static_tariff import TariffPlan # noqa: E402
from app.store import unit_key # noqa: E402
fails = []
def check(name, cond):
print(f" {'ok ' if cond else 'FAIL'} {name}")
if not cond:
fails.append(name)
A, B = "inverter-a", "inverter-b"
PROFILE = ('{"periods": ['
'{"name": "night", "days": "all", "from": "22:00", "to": "07:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.26},'
'{"name": "day", "days": "all", "from": "07:00", "to": "22:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.34}]}')
L = timezone(timedelta(hours=1))
NIGHT = datetime(2026, 10, 30, 23, 0, tzinfo=L).astimezone(timezone.utc)
CHOICE = {"a": (True, "leftover_solar", False),
"b": (True, "cheap_hours", False)}
FC_TODAY, FC_TOMORROW = "sensor.fc_today", "sensor.fc_tomorrow"
TARIFF_REFRESH_S = m.TARIFF_REFRESH_S
def opts(cost, *, arb=False, sensors=True):
o = dict(rp.options(True, arb, 2))
o.update(cycle_cost_threshold_eur=cost, static_profile=PROFILE)
if sensors:
o.update(pv_forecast_entity=FC_TODAY,
pv_forecast_tomorrow_entity=FC_TOMORROW)
return o
def dynamic_points(start):
"""A dynamic day-ahead shape, 0.16 .. 0.28 (gap 0.12), 15-minute points."""
out, t = [], start.replace(minute=0, second=0, microsecond=0)
for _ in range(48 * 4):
h = brussels(t).hour + brussels(t).minute / 60
p = 0.22 + 0.06 * math.cos((h - 19) / 24 * 2 * math.pi)
out.append(PricePoint(start=brussels(t), eur_per_kwh=round(p, 4),
provisional=False))
t += timedelta(minutes=15)
return out
def sensor(kwh, at):
return {"state": f"{kwh}", "attributes": {"unit_of_measurement": "kWh"},
"last_updated": at.isoformat(), "last_reported": at.isoformat()}
def forecast_mode(mode, t, now):
"""What the two forecast sensors read: 'fresh', 'stale', 'gone', or a
function of the simulated seconds that returns one of those."""
if callable(mode):
mode = mode(t)
if mode == "gone":
return {"state": "unavailable", "attributes": {}}
at = now if mode == "fresh" else now - timedelta(hours=5)
return at
def take(c, now):
"""What Home and the Batteries screen say now, and Home's mirror of the
gate (it reads the trade switch, so ask it as a site that has it on next
to the modes)."""
keep = c.o
c.o = dict(keep, arbitrage_enabled=True)
try:
mirror, why = homeview.trade_verdict(c, c.fresh_tariff_plan(now), now)
finally:
c.o = keep
return dict(home=homeview.build_plan(c, now, False, True),
cards=homeview.battery_rows(c, False, True),
mirror=mirror, mirror_why=why)
def drive(o, *, fc="fresh", points=None, minutes=20, tick=5.0,
house_w=300.0, soc0=None, snap_at=()):
"""-> (controller, rows). `points`: a feed-shaped plan injected every
cycle (no task); else the static profile via the real tariff task."""
store = rp._Store()
for u, (use, mode, sell) in CHOICE.items():
for k, val in (("pack_use", use), ("pack_mode", mode),
("pack_sell", sell)):
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", k)] = val
rows = []
snaps = {}
class H(rp.Hass):
async def state(self, e):
now = NIGHT + timedelta(seconds=self.t)
if fc is None:
return None
at = forecast_mode(fc, self.t, now)
if isinstance(at, dict):
return at
return sensor(0.0 if e == FC_TODAY else 12.0, at)
async def go():
hass = H(("a", "b"), lambda t: house_w, soc0 or {"a": 40.0, "b": 40.0})
tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="t24w-")
c = Controller(dict(o), hass, store, rp._Pub(), stop=asyncio.Event(),
peak_db_path=os.path.join(tmp, "tariff.db"),
price_history_path=os.path.join(tmp, "ph.json"))
for i in c.inverters:
i.dev_min, i.dev_max = -5000.0, 5000.0
c.auto = True
real_dt, real_hv = m.datetime, homeview.datetime
clock = [NIGHT]
class _DT(real_dt):
@classmethod
def now(cls, tz=None):
return clock[0] if tz is None else clock[0].astimezone(tz)
m.datetime = homeview.datetime = _DT
pts = None if points is None else points
task = None
if pts is None:
task = asyncio.create_task(c.run_tariff_refresh())
try:
t = 0.0
while t < minutes * 60:
now = NIGHT + timedelta(seconds=t)
hass.t = t
clock[0] = now
if pts is not None:
c.tariff_plan = TariffPlan(
PriceRead.series(pts, PriceProduct.DAY_AHEAD,
"generic_dayahead", now), None,
"provider")
c.tariff_at = now
elif t == 0.0 or t % TARIFF_REFRESH_S == 0.0:
# The task's own 30 min wait is wall clock, so the
# simulated clock restarts it: one refresh per period.
if task is not None and t > 0.0:
task.cancel()
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
task = asyncio.create_task(c.run_tariff_refresh())
for _ in range(500):
if c.tariff_plan is not None and (
c.tariff_at is not None and c.tariff_at >= now):
break
await asyncio.sleep(0)
imp, exp = split_signed(hass.grid())
c.p1.submit(make_sample("ha_signed", imp, exp, phases=1,
ingest_ts=now,
ingest_mono=time.monotonic()))
await c.read_inputs(now_mono=t)
await c.cycle()
hass.advance(tick, 10.0)
rp_ = c.mode_runs
rows.append(dict(
t=t, now=now, fc_none=c.solar_fc is None,
runs_on=None if rp_ is None else rp_.on,
reason=None if rp_ is None else rp_.reason,
roles=dict(c.mode_tick.roles) if c.mode_tick else {},
why=None if c.mode_tick is None else c.mode_tick.why,
charging=hass.plants["b"].p < -200.0,
soc_b=hass.plants["b"].soc,
cheap_end=None if rp_ is None or rp_.cheap is None
else rp_.cheap.end))
if t in snap_at:
snaps[t] = take(c, now)
t += tick
last = take(c, clock[0])
c.home_plan, c.cards = last["home"], last["cards"]
c.mirror, c.mirror_why = last["mirror"], last["mirror_why"]
c.snaps = snaps
finally:
if task is not None:
task.cancel()
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
m.datetime, homeview.datetime = real_dt, real_hv
return c
return asyncio.run(go()), rows
def why_of(c, name):
card = first((b for b in c.cards if b["name"] == name), f"card {name}")
return card["why_key"]
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("1. the rule")
NW = frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
check("modes on with a forecast read: no doubt", arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
True, object()) == frozenset())
check("modes on with no forecast (None): the doubt", arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
True, None) == NW)
check("modes off, forecast or not: the doubt, as before",
arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(False, object()) == NW
and arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(False, None) == NW)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n2. day/night 0.34 / 0.26 (gap 0.08), night period")
c1, r1 = drive(opts(0.07), fc="fresh")
l1 = nth(r1, -1, "last cycle")
print(f" forecast read, cost 0.07: mode_runs on={l1['runs_on']} "
f"reason={l1['reason']}; B charging {sum(r['charging'] for r in r1)} of "
f"{len(r1)}; Why A {why_of(c1, A)} B {why_of(c1, B)}")
check("with a forecast at cost 0.07 the cheap run is planned (needed 0.07 < "
"0.08) and the Cheap hours battery charges in the night period",
present(l1) and not l1["fc_none"] and l1["runs_on"] is True
and sum(r["charging"] for r in r1) > len(r1) // 2
and l1["roles"].get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE)
for label, mode in (("no forecast sensor reads", "gone"),
("a stale forecast", "stale")):
c, rr = drive(opts(0.07), fc=mode)
ll = nth(rr, -1, "last cycle")
print(f" {label}, cost 0.07: on={ll['runs_on']} reason={ll['reason']}; "
f"B charging {sum(r['charging'] for r in rr)}; Why A "
f"{why_of(c, A)} B {why_of(c, B)}")
check(f"{label}: the same cost needs 0.105 > 0.08, so not_worth and "
f"'Prices differ too little', no grid charge",
present(ll) and ll["fc_none"] and ll["runs_on"] is False
and ll["reason"] == "not_worth"
and why_of(c, A) == "no_spread" and why_of(c, B) == "no_spread"
and not any(r["charging"] for r in rr))
c0, r0 = drive(opts(0.07, sensors=False), fc=None)
check("no forecast sensor configured at all: not_worth too (as 0.19.0)",
present(nth(r0, -1)) and r0[-1]["runs_on"] is False)
c2, r2 = drive(opts(0.10), fc="fresh")
check("at the shipped cost 0.10 even a forecast does not make 0.08 enough "
"(needs 0.10): still not_worth, honestly",
present(nth(r2, -1)) and r2[-1]["runs_on"] is False
and r2[-1]["reason"] == "not_worth")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n3. a dynamic day, gap 0.12, cost 0.10")
pts = dynamic_points(NIGHT - timedelta(hours=1))
cd, rd = drive(opts(0.10), fc="fresh", points=pts)
cn, rn = drive(opts(0.10), fc="gone", points=pts)
_ld, _ln = nth(rd, -1, "last cycle"), nth(rn, -1, "last cycle")
print(f" with forecast: on={_ld['runs_on']} reason={_ld['reason']}; "
f"without: on={_ln['runs_on']} reason={_ln['reason']}")
check("with a forecast the run plan is on (needs 0.10 < 0.12)",
present(nth(rd, -1)) and rd[-1]["runs_on"] is True
and why_of(cd, A) != "no_spread")
check("without one it is not_worth (needs 0.15 > 0.12) and says so",
present(nth(rn, -1)) and rn[-1]["runs_on"] is False
and rn[-1]["reason"] == "not_worth"
and why_of(cn, B) == "no_spread")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n4. the forecast going and coming mid-run (a run under way keeps its gap)")
CUT = 600.0 # 10 min in
SOC = {"a": 40.0, "b": 60.0} # B's cheap run is then about 2 h
def going(t):
return "fresh" if t < CUT else "gone"
def coming(t):
return "gone" if t < CUT else "fresh"
def flap(n_reads):
"""Unavailable for `n_reads` forecast reads (60 s apart) from CUT."""
return lambda t: "gone" if CUT <= t < CUT + 60.0 * n_reads else "fresh"
MID, AFTER = 3000.0, 7800.0
cg, rg = drive(opts(0.07), fc=going, minutes=135, soc0=SOC,
snap_at=(MID, AFTER))
cc, rc = drive(opts(0.07), fc=coming, minutes=25)
_end = nth([r["cheap_end"] for r in rg if r["cheap_end"] is not None], 0,
"the cheap run's end")
_end_t = (_end - NIGHT).total_seconds() if present(_end) else 1e9
lost = [r for r in rg if r["fc_none"]]
print(f" going: cheap run ends at t={_end_t:.0f} s; forecast lost from "
f"t={lost[0]['t'] if lost else None}")
check("going: the run planned with the forecast ends before the snapshot "
"taken after it (the scenario is long enough)",
present(_end) and CUT + 300.0 < _end_t < AFTER - 300.0 and bool(lost)
and lost[0]["t"] - CUT <= 60.0)
check("going: the forecast read is lost mid-run and the run under way KEEPS "
"its gap: the plan stays on and B keeps charging, cycle after cycle, "
"until B is full or the run ends",
all(r["runs_on"] is True and (r["roles"].get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE
or r["soc_b"] >= 94.0)
for r in rg if r["fc_none"] and r["t"] < _end_t - 60.0)
and all(r["charging"] or r["soc_b"] >= 94.0 for r in rg
if 60.0 <= r["t"] < _end_t - 60.0)
and max(r["soc_b"] for r in rg if r["fc_none"]) >= 90.0)
check("going: from the run's end the wider gap is back: the next run is "
"not_worth (needs 0.105 at 0.07), no new run, and no grid charge",
all(r["runs_on"] is False and r["reason"] == "not_worth"
for r in rg if r["t"] >= _end_t + 30.0)
and not any(r["charging"] for r in rg if r["t"] >= _end_t + 60.0))
_sm, _sa = cg.snaps.get(MID), cg.snaps.get(AFTER)
check("going, Home agrees mid-run: its mirror still allows, the Batteries "
"screen says it charges from the grid, and Home does not say the gap "
"is too small",
_sm is not None and _sm["mirror"] is not None
and first((b for b in _sm["cards"] if b["name"] == B),
"a card")["why_key"] == "grid_charge"
and not any("price gap is too small" in ln
for ln in _sm["home"]["lines"]))
check("going, Home agrees after the run: its mirror refuses, the Batteries "
"screen says 'differ too little' and Home says the gap is too small",
_sa is not None and _sa["mirror"] is None
and first((b for b in _sa["cards"] if b["name"] == B),
"a card")["why_key"] == "no_spread"
and any("price gap is too small" in ln for ln in _sa["home"]["lines"]))
for n in (1, 2):
cf, rf = drive(opts(0.07), fc=flap(n), minutes=30, soc0=SOC,
snap_at=(CUT + 30.0,))
gone = [r for r in rf if r["fc_none"]]
print(f" flap, {n} read(s) lost: {len(gone)} cycles without a "
f"forecast; B charging in {sum(r['charging'] for r in rf)} of "
f"{len(rf)}")
check(f"flap: the forecast is unavailable for {n} read(s) mid-run: the "
f"plan stays on and B charges without a break (no stop, no "
f"restart)",
bool(gone) and all(r["runs_on"] is True for r in rf)
and all(r["charging"] and r["roles"].get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE
for r in rf if r["t"] >= 60.0))
sf = cf.snaps.get(CUT + 30.0)
check(f"flap, {n} read(s): Home agrees while the read is lost (mirror "
f"allows, Batteries 'charges from the grid')",
sf is not None and sf["mirror"] is not None
and first((b for b in sf["cards"] if b["name"] == B),
"a card")["why_key"] == "grid_charge")
def flips(rows):
"""Cycles where the forecast read changed, and whether the plan and the
charge gate changed in that very cycle."""
out = []
for i in range(1, len(rows)):
if rows[i]["fc_none"] != rows[i - 1]["fc_none"]:
out.append((i, rows[i]["t"], rows[i]["runs_on"],
rows[i]["charging"], rows[i - 1]["charging"]))
return out
fcm = flips(rc)
print(f" coming: forecast read arrives at cycle/t {fcm}")
check("coming (no run under way before): not_worth until the read is back, "
"then on in the same cycle, and the battery charges",
len(fcm) == 1 and fcm[0][1] - CUT <= 60.0 and fcm[0][2] is True
and all(r["runs_on"] is False for r in rc if r["fc_none"])
and all(r["runs_on"] is True for r in rc if not r["fc_none"])
and any(r["charging"] for r in rc if r["t"] >= fcm[0][1] + 40.0))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n5. Home agrees with control")
CASES = (("forecast, cost 0.07", c1, r1, True),
("no forecast, cost 0.07", *drive(opts(0.07), fc="gone"), False),
("dynamic, forecast", cd, rd, True),
("dynamic, no forecast", cn, rn, False))
for label, cx, rx, on in CASES:
last = nth(rx, -1, "last cycle")
hp = cx.home_plan
mirror_ok = cx.mirror is not None
print(f" {label}: control on={last['runs_on']}; Home mirror "
f"{'allows' if mirror_ok else 'refuses'} ({cx.mirror_why}); "
f"lines {hp['lines'][:1]}; Why B {why_of(cx, B)}")
check(f"{label}: Home's mirror of the gate allows exactly when control "
f"plans", present(last) and mirror_ok is on
and last["runs_on"] is on)
check(f"{label}: the Batteries screen and the Home line say the gap is "
f"too small exactly when control does",
(why_of(cx, B) == "no_spread") is (not on)
and any("price gap is too small" in ln for ln in hp["lines"])
is (not on))
if label.startswith("dynamic"):
continue # its cheap run is tomorrow morning: not on today's chart
check(f"{label}: Home draws a grid charge block exactly when control "
f"charges", any(r["kind"] == "grid" for r in hp["runs"]) is on)
print()
if fails:
print(f"{len(fails)} FAILED:")
for f in fails:
print(f" - {f}")
sys.exit(1)
print("all checks passed")