Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude 230ba0b57a TARIFF-24: test file follows the repo's suite rules (MUTATION.md pointer, named absence)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 49m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 01:09:39 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude d667f3f3a8 TARIFF-24: battery modes start the tariff task (hotfix 0.19.1)
With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed static_profile, no price feed and
arbitrage off, tariff_refresh_wanted() was false: no tariff task, no
tariff_plan, mode_runs None, so Leftover solar / Cheap hours never charged from
the grid and the Batteries screen said "No prices". packmode.enabled(opts) is
now a third term of the gate. With price_provider off the task is pure
arithmetic on static_profile, so no HTTPS call is added.

Also: version 0.19.1, CHANGELOG entry, DECISIONS note, test_tariff24.py, and a
shorter tariff_refresh_wanted() docstring (history stays in DECISIONS).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 01:02:32 +01:00
admin 793a67623c Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.19.0' (#208) from deploy-0.19.0 into master
Reviewed-on: #208
2026-10-26 08:47:42 +01:00
admin 514256923b Merge pull request 'Release 0.19.0' (#207) from release-0.18.3 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 48m38s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
2026-10-26 03:10:27 +01:00
admin ad374ae208 Deploy 0.18.2 to master (#200) 2026-10-17 01:59:54 +02:00
admin ec2b0c3de4 Deploy 0.18.1 to master (#197) 2026-10-16 15:05:06 +02:00
admin 3b7d6b7f05 Deploy 0.18.0 to master (#193) 2026-10-16 00:42:54 +02:00
admin 1b6f16dba2 Deploy 0.17.0 to master (#186) 2026-10-11 01:37:01 +02:00
admin df154a26d1 Deploy 0.16.0 to master (#179) 2026-10-08 01:43:37 +02:00
admin 21599938ea Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.15.0 to master' (#174) from deploy-0.15.0 into master
Deploy 0.15.0 to master (#174)
2026-10-05 10:17:38 +02:00
admin 3a54b253cb Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.14.0 to master' (#170) from deploy-0.14.0 into master
Deploy 0.14.0 to master (#170)
2026-10-03 12:32:16 +02:00
admin 8b9680fc35 Merge pull request 'Deploy 0.13.0 to master' (#166) from deploy-0.13.0 into master
Reviewed-on: #166
2026-10-02 15:26:46 +02:00
admin 3ce18708b6 PKG-18: ship 0.12.0 to master, so TEL-12's pv_entities can reach an installed 0.11.0 (#118) 2026-09-24 23:22:34 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5 78acb558ff PKG-17: ship 0.11.0 to master, so SAFETY-56's wording fix and TEL-11's pv_entity can reach an installed 0.10.1 (#115)
master is what the Home Assistant Supervisor clones, and the Supervisor
compares config.yaml version strings - so 0.11.0 could not be offered to an
installed 0.10.1 without this bump reaching master.

Carries SAFETY-56 (#112), TEL-11 (#113), the CI-9 follow-up (#102) and SEC-2's
docs/RELEASE.md (#108), by way of the 0.11.0 cut (#114).

NOT A FAST-FORWARD. master was not an ancestor of release/1.0: 0f14c2a, the
pre-SEC-2 direct push, exists only on master. Its tree is the same object as
the merge base b0b24e5 (c1fef26), so it carries no content delta, and
`git merge-tree --write-tree` over the two branches returns a tree bit-identical
to cccb2fa's own (6670502). This merge commit therefore contributes exactly
release/1.0's tree - master synthesises nothing.

Reviewed as the release decision, not a re-review of content. Verified from the
remote: slug goodwe_controller and every identity key unchanged (cross-checked
against the live box's Supervisor export), version 0.10.1 -> 0.11.0, and the
green is this PR's own - run 828 / job 1953, path checks.yml@refs/pull/115/head,
PRNUM 115, GRADED refs/pull/115/head merged into master, run_attempt 1, 31 test
files all passing in 8m01s of real work.

predeploy_check.py re-run against the owner's current options (exported
2026-09-24 20:02, 75 keys, pv_entity unset): CLEARED, exit 0. That retires the
stale-2026-09-07-export warning in the pull request body. Option surface
75 -> 76 with only pv_entity added, str? defaulting to "", no key removed, no
default moved, no rule added to validate.py - no SystemExit(78) on this hop.

Merging is not installing. No tag is cut here and `ha store reload` /
`ha addons update` have not been run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-24 20:28:35 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 0f14c2a5de PKG-16: ship 0.10.1 to master, so the Supervisor can offer SAFETY-57's fix
master is what Home Assistant clones. SAFETY-57 fixed a deadlock that parked
the reference install's battery for ~13 minutes while the site exported
2.4 kW, and the Supervisor compares config.yaml version strings - so the fix
could not reach an installed 0.10.0 without this bump reaching master.

Brings SAFETY-57 (#104) and the 0.10.1 cut (#105). master was a strict
ancestor; no conflict was possible.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-22 15:54:29 +02:00
5 changed files with 448 additions and 55 deletions
+26
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,31 @@
# Changelog
## 0.19.1
**A patch bump: one fix for battery modes on a day/night or fixed tariff, and no option changes.**
No option was added, removed or renamed, and no default changed (86 options).
**Existing installs need no option change:** options that start 0.19.0 also
start 0.19.1. The change below applies with one inverter or two.
**Battery modes now see a day/night or fixed tariff.** With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed tariff and no price service, the batteries never got the prices: "Cheap hours" never charged from the grid at the cheap rate, and the Batteries screen said "No prices". They get them now, with no price service and no internet call added.
Contents of this release, in merge order since 0.19.0 (`793a676`):
| | |
|---|---|
| `TARIFF-24` | With battery modes on, the add-on now also resolves the tariff when no price service and no price trading are set, so a day/night or fixed tariff gives the batteries their price runs ([[TARIFF-24]]). |
### Known issues
The list under `## 0.19.0` below still applies.
### If you are crossing from a version older than 0.10.0
`## 0.10.0` below can refuse an old config: `slew_w` above its limit, and the
withdrawn `price_provider` ids `engie_dynamic`, `totalenergies_dynamic` and
`eneco_eddy`. Read it before you update. Run `tools/predeploy_check.py` with the
bare options (`jq '.data.options'`) first.
## 0.19.0
**A minor bump: price trading behaves differently, plus a fix for a false warning, the Home price chart in 15-minute bars, more Dutch text and EMS-port wording, and no option changes.**
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# TARIFF-24 - battery modes need the tariff task
**Status: FIXED in 0.19.1 (hotfix from 0.19.0, owner go 2026-10-28).**
Follows TARIFF-10 (fetching is not trading). Tests: `test_tariff24.py`.
**The defect.** The control cycle gets prices only from
`Controller.tariff_plan`, which only `run_tariff_refresh()` stores. `amain()`
starts that task when `tariff_refresh_wanted(opts)`, which was
`provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)`. Battery modes read the
plan but were not a term. With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed
`static_profile`, `price_provider: off` and `arbitrage_enabled: false` (the
site trade switch is not read with modes on) no task ran. Then
`fresh_tariff_plan()` was None, `_price_runs()` was None and `mode_runs` was
None, so Leftover solar and Cheap hours never charged from the grid. The
Batteries screen said "No prices, so it follows the house" while Home priced
the day from `static_plan()` itself (`homeview.build_plan()`).
**The fix** (`main.py`, `tariff_refresh_wanted()`). `packmode.enabled(opts)`
is a third term. The gate stays a widening: nothing that started the task
before stops. No HTTPS call is added: with `price_provider: off`,
`resolve_tariff()` is the pure `static_plan()`.
**Not changed.** Modes off, arbitrage off, no feed still starts no task. The
control law, the price runs and every message are untouched.
**One rule, not two.** Gating on "modes on and a static profile" was
considered. It saves one arithmetic pass every 30 min on a site with modes on
and no prices at all, and it adds a second condition that has to track what
`resolve_tariff()` accepts. With no profile and no feed the plan is `no_data`,
exactly what the cycle sees without the task.
**UX-55.** Home said "no prices have arrived" (`mode_runs` None) with every
battery on Solar first. The same cause, and this fix clears it for a site with
a static profile (`test_tariff24.py` part 5). A site with no profile and no
feed still has no prices, and Home still says so.
+12 -54
View File
@@ -174,57 +174,17 @@ TARIFF_MAX_AGE_S = 3 * TARIFF_REFRESH_S
def tariff_refresh_wanted(opts: dict) -> bool:
"""TARIFF-10. Does this install need the background tariff refresh at all?
"""Does this install need the background tariff refresh? (TARIFF-10, TARIFF-24)
THE DEFECT THIS PREVENTS, and it shipped: the gate below used to be
`arbitrage.enabled(opts)` alone. That option defaults to `false`, and
`run_tariff_refresh` is the only caller of `resolve_tariff()`, which is the
only caller of `price_history.carry()` - so on a shipped install with a
provider configured NOTHING was ever fetched, no plan was ever resolved,
`/data/price_history.json` was never created, the *Price history* row read
`empty` forever, and TARIFF-09's short-horizon warning could not fire
because there was no fetch to warn about. Measured over a 40 h soak of two
instances side by side: zero feed requests and `present: false` across all
802 samples on the shipped default, against a resolved plan from the same
feed on the instance with arbitrage armed. ⚠️ AND `DOCS.md` HAS
DESCRIBED THE BEHAVIOUR BELOW SINCE THE COMMIT THAT WROTE THE GATE:
OPT-04 (bdd7f18) added the refresh task, the `arbitrage.enabled()` guard on
it, and the sentence saying a configured provider still fetches, all in one
change. config.yaml has said it since TARIFF-02 (852fc7c).
Two terms, and they answer two different questions:
provider_configured(opts) -> "the operator asked for a price feed", so
fetch it, validate it and record the day
(§8.3). This is the term TARIFF-10 ADDS.
arbitrage.enabled(opts) -> "the operator armed trading". This term is
what the gate USED to be, kept verbatim.
⚠️ IT IS AN `or`, SO THE GATE IS A STRICT WIDENING. Every configuration
that started this task before still starts it; none that did not start it
stops anything. That matters because the second term is not redundant:
`price_provider: off` + a `static_profile` + `arbitrage_enabled: true` is a
configuration validate.py explicitly ACCEPTS, and it trades - measured, at
`cycle_cost_threshold_eur: 0.05` on a 0.20/0.284 day/night profile,
`ARBITRAGE_CHARGE -5000 W`. Dropping that term to make the gate read
`provider_configured(opts)` alone would leave `self.tariff_plan` at None on
that site forever and `decide()` would answer "no tariff plan has been
resolved yet" on every cycle - silently disarming a strategy the UI says is
running, which is the exact failure validate.py's OPT-04 rules exist to
refuse.
⚠️ AND NO CONFIGURATION ACQUIRES A PERIODIC HTTPS CALL FROM THIS TICKET.
With `price_provider` off, `resolve_tariff()` returns `static_plan()` - pure
arithmetic, no socket - so the second term starts a task that fetches
nothing. The true shipped default (no provider, no arbitrage) starts no
task at all. What is fetched is decided by the FIRST term only.
⚠️ THIS IS NOT A TRADING SWITCH. It decides whether prices are LOOKED UP.
Whether they move energy is `arbitrage.enabled()` at the one call site in
`cycle()`, and TARIFF-10 did not touch it: `arbitrage_enabled: false` still
means no trade, ever, on any configuration.
Yes with a price feed, with trading on price armed, or with battery modes
on: the modes read `self.tariff_plan` for their price runs. With
`price_provider` off the refresh is pure arithmetic on `static_profile`, so
no term here adds an HTTPS call. It decides whether prices are looked up,
never whether energy moves. See DECISIONS/TARIFF-10-fetching-is-not-trading.md
and DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
return provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
return (provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
or packmode.enabled(opts))
def load_options() -> dict:
@@ -8051,11 +8011,9 @@ async def amain() -> None:
# ESP32 heartbeat. A fetch on that path is a supplier's TLS timeout able
# to push this add-on towards layer 1's 30 s veto. See TARIFF_REFRESH_S.
#
# ⚠️ STARTED WHEN A PROVIDER IS CONFIGURED, *OR* WHEN TRADING IS ARMED
# - TARIFF-10, and it used to be the second term alone. `arbitrage_
# enabled` ships `false`, so a site that had selected a price feed
# fetched nothing at all; the whole argument, the measurement and what
# the `or` is protecting are in `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above.
# ⚠️ STARTED FOR A PROVIDER, FOR ARMED TRADING OR FOR BATTERY MODES:
# see `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above and DECISIONS/TARIFF-10 and
# TARIFF-24 for why each term is there.
#
# ⚠️ IT DOES NOT ARM ANYTHING. Fetching a price and trading on one are
# two decisions; this is the first, and `cycle()`'s
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: GoodWe RS485 Controller
version: "0.19.0"
version: "0.19.1"
slug: goodwe_controller
description: >-
Drives a GoodWe ES/BP battery inverter over its RS485 EMS port by sending it a
+374
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
"""Runnable check for TARIFF-24. `python3 test_tariff24.py`
Battery modes on, a day/night `static_profile`, no price feed and the site trade
switch off used to start no tariff task: `Controller.tariff_plan` stayed None,
`mode_runs` stayed None, Leftover solar and Cheap hours never charged from the
grid, and the Batteries screen said "No prices" while Home priced the day from
the profile itself. DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
1. The startup gate: `tariff_refresh_wanted()` by configuration, and the guard
`amain()` really puts on the task (read from its source, not retyped).
2. End to end, on the real Controller and the real `run_tariff_refresh()` task,
started only if `amain()`'s own guard says so: night period, one battery
Leftover solar and one Cheap hours.
3. The same with a gap below the cycle cost.
4. Home and the Batteries screen agree.
5. UX-55: with every battery Solar first Home no longer says "no prices have
arrived" on a static profile, and still does with no profile and no feed.
6. Nothing else moved: modes off starts no task; the gate rows in part 1 keep
the arbitrage and feed cases as before.
Mutations (MUTATION.md, purged copies, graded over this file): the gate
reverted to `provider or arbitrage` fails 18 checks in parts 1 to 5; `True`
fails the modes-off rows; `bool(opts.get(...))` fails the exact-true row;
dropping the arbitrage term fails the arbitrage rows.
"""
import ast
import asyncio
import logging
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import time
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
sys.path.insert(0, HERE)
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(HERE, "tools"))
logging.disable(logging.WARNING)
import opt11p3_replay as rp # noqa: E402
from named_absence import first, nth, present # noqa: E402
import app.main as m # noqa: E402
from app import homeview, modetrade, packmode # noqa: E402
from app import price as _price, static_tariff as _st # noqa: E402
from app.main import Controller, tariff_refresh_wanted # noqa: E402
from app.p1 import make_sample, split_signed # noqa: E402
from app.store import unit_key # noqa: E402
fails = []
def check(name, cond):
print(f" {'ok ' if cond else 'FAIL'} {name}")
if not cond:
fails.append(name)
A, B = "inverter-a", "inverter-b"
# A Belgian-style day/night tariff, example values: dear 07:00-22:00, cheap
# 22:00-07:00, every day. The gap is 0.08 EUR/kWh.
PROFILE = ('{"periods": ['
'{"name": "night", "days": "all", "from": "22:00", "to": "07:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.22},'
'{"name": "day", "days": "all", "from": "07:00", "to": "22:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.30}]}')
# A Friday in winter time (+01:00), 23:00 local: inside the night period.
L = timezone(timedelta(hours=1))
NIGHT = datetime(2026, 10, 30, 23, 0, tzinfo=L).astimezone(timezone.utc)
def opts(*, modes=True, arb=False, profile=PROFILE, provider=None,
cost=0.05):
o = dict(rp.options(modes, arb, 2))
o["cycle_cost_threshold_eur"] = cost
if profile is not None:
o["static_profile"] = profile
if provider is not None:
o["price_provider"] = provider
return o
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# The guard amain() puts on the tariff task, read from amain()'s source.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
def _guards_of(node, guards=()):
"""[(guards, coroutine name)] for every create_task(...) under `node`."""
out = []
for child in ast.iter_child_nodes(node):
if isinstance(child, ast.If):
test = ast.unparse(child.test)
for stmt in child.body:
out += _guards_of(stmt, guards + (test,))
for stmt in child.orelse:
out += _guards_of(stmt, guards + (f"not ({test})",))
continue
if isinstance(child, ast.Call) and \
ast.unparse(child.func).endswith("create_task") and child.args:
arg = child.args[0]
name = (arg.func.attr if isinstance(arg, ast.Call)
and isinstance(arg.func, ast.Attribute)
else ast.unparse(arg))
out.append((guards, name))
continue
out += _guards_of(child, guards)
return out
_TREE = ast.parse(open(os.path.join(HERE, "app", "main.py"),
encoding="utf-8").read())
_AMAIN = first((n for n in ast.walk(_TREE)
if isinstance(n, ast.AsyncFunctionDef) and n.name == "amain"),
"amain() in main.py")
_TASK_GUARDS = [g for g, n in _guards_of(_AMAIN) if n == "run_tariff_refresh"]
def task_started(o) -> bool:
"""Would amain() start the tariff refresh task for options `o`?"""
if len(_TASK_GUARDS) != 1:
return False
return all(bool(eval(g, vars(m), {"opts": o})) for g in _TASK_GUARDS[0])
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("1. the startup gate")
check("amain() starts the tariff refresh from exactly one guard, and that "
"guard can be decided from the options alone",
len(_TASK_GUARDS) == 1 and len(_TASK_GUARDS[0]) >= 1
and all(isinstance(eval(g, vars(m), {"opts": opts()}), bool)
for g in _TASK_GUARDS[0]))
GATE = [
# label, options, task wanted
("modes on + static day/night only", opts(), True),
("modes on + a fixed price only",
opts(profile='{"periods": [{"name": "all", "days": "all", "from": '
'"00:00", "to": "24:00", "eur_per_kwh": 0.27}]}'), True),
("modes on, nothing else", opts(profile=None), True),
("modes off + arbitrage off + no feed (static profile)",
opts(modes=False), False),
("modes off + arbitrage off + no feed, no profile",
opts(modes=False, profile=None), False),
("modes off + arbitrage on", opts(modes=False, arb=True), True),
("modes off + a feed", opts(modes=False, provider="generic_dayahead"),
True),
("modes on + a feed", opts(provider="generic_dayahead"), True),
("modes on + arbitrage on", opts(arb=True), True),
]
for label, o, want in GATE:
got = tariff_refresh_wanted(o)
print(f" wanted={got!s:5} started={task_started(o)!s:5} {label}")
check(f"{label}: tariff_refresh_wanted() is {want}", got is want)
check(f"{label}: amain() starts the task exactly as that says",
task_started(o) is want)
check("battery_modes_enabled has to be exactly true (packmode.enabled()): "
"'true' as text or 1 does not start the task",
not tariff_refresh_wanted(dict(opts(), battery_modes_enabled="true"))
and not tariff_refresh_wanted(dict(opts(), battery_modes_enabled=1)))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# The real Controller over a few minutes of a night: the task starts only if
# amain()'s own guard says so; then read_inputs() + cycle() as the control
# loop runs them.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
CHOICE = {"a": (True, "leftover_solar", False),
"b": (True, "cheap_hours", False)}
FETCHES = []
async def _no_fetch(*a, **k):
FETCHES.append(a)
raise AssertionError("the tariff task reached for a price feed")
def drive(o, *, start=NIGHT, minutes=20, soc0=None, choice=CHOICE,
house_w=300.0, tick=5.0):
"""-> (controller, rows, task_was_started)."""
store = rp._Store()
for u, (use, mode, sell) in choice.items():
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_use")] = use
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_mode")] = mode
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_sell")] = sell
rows = []
async def go():
hass = rp.Hass(("a", "b"), lambda t: house_w,
soc0 or {"a": 40.0, "b": 40.0})
tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="t24-")
c = Controller(dict(o), hass, store, rp._Pub(),
stop=asyncio.Event(),
peak_db_path=os.path.join(tmp, "tariff.db"),
price_history_path=os.path.join(tmp, "ph.json"))
for i in c.inverters:
i.dev_min, i.dev_max = -5000.0, 5000.0
c.auto = True
real_dt, real_hv = m.datetime, homeview.datetime
clock = [start]
class _DT(real_dt):
@classmethod
def now(cls, tz=None):
return clock[0] if tz is None else clock[0].astimezone(tz)
m.datetime = homeview.datetime = _DT
_real_load = _price.load_prices, _st.load_prices
_price.load_prices = _st.load_prices = _no_fetch
started = task_started(o)
task = (asyncio.create_task(c.run_tariff_refresh())
if started else None)
try:
t = 0.0
while t < minutes * 60:
now = start + timedelta(seconds=t)
hass.t = t
clock[0] = now
if t == 0.0 and started:
for _ in range(500): # let the task do its first pass
if c.tariff_plan is not None:
break
await asyncio.sleep(0)
imp, exp = split_signed(hass.grid())
c.p1.submit(make_sample("ha_signed", imp, exp, phases=1,
ingest_ts=now,
ingest_mono=time.monotonic()))
await c.read_inputs(now_mono=t)
await c.cycle()
hass.advance(tick, 10.0)
rows.append(dict(
now=now, runs=c.mode_runs, tick=c.mode_tick,
plan=c.fresh_tariff_plan(now),
action=getattr(c.arb, "action", None),
p={u: p.p for u, p in hass.plants.items()},
soc={u: p.soc for u, p in hass.plants.items()}))
t += tick
# What the two screens say at the end, while the clock is still
# the simulated one.
c.home_plan = homeview.build_plan(c, clock[0], False, True)
c.battery_cards = homeview.battery_rows(c, False, True)
finally:
if task is not None:
task.cancel()
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
m.datetime, homeview.datetime = real_dt, real_hv
_price.load_prices, _st.load_prices = _real_load
return c, started
c, started = asyncio.run(go())
return c, rows, started
def charging_b(rows):
"""Cycles in which the Cheap hours battery was charging (grid: no sun and
a 300 W house in this scenario)."""
return [r for r in rows if r["p"]["b"] < -200.0]
def why_of(c, name):
card = first((b for b in c.battery_cards if b["name"] == name),
f"a card for {name}")
return card["why_key"]
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n2. end to end, night, modes on, static day/night, no feed, no arbitrage")
c1, r1, started1 = drive(opts())
_last = nth(r1, -1, "the last cycle")
_first1 = nth(r1, 0, "the first cycle")
print(f" tariff task started by amain's guard: {started1}")
print(f" tariff_plan: {None if c1.tariff_plan is None else c1.tariff_plan.words}")
print(f" mode_runs: {_last['runs']}")
print(f" mode_tick reason / roles: "
f"{None if _last['tick'] is None else (_last['tick'].why, dict(_last['tick'].roles))}")
print(f" Batteries screen why_key: A {why_of(c1, A)}, B {why_of(c1, B)}")
print(f" cycles with B charging: {len(charging_b(r1))} of {len(r1)}, "
f"B soc {_first1['soc']['b']:.1f} -> {_last['soc']['b']:.1f}")
check("the tariff refresh task is started", started1)
check("...and it adds no network call: with price_provider off the feed "
"loader is never reached (it is replaced by one that fails)",
not FETCHES and not _price.provider_configured(opts()))
check("a fresh tariff plan with prices is held", present(_last)
and _last["plan"] is not None and _last["plan"].has_prices)
check("the price runs exist (mode_runs is not None) and carry a cheap run "
"that holds in the night period",
present(_last) and _last["runs"] is not None and _last["runs"].on
and _last["runs"].cheap is not None
and _last["runs"].cheap.holds(_last["now"]))
check("the Cheap hours battery charges from the grid in the night period",
len(charging_b(r1)) > len(r1) // 2
and present(_last, _first1)
and _last["soc"]["b"] > _first1["soc"]["b"] + 0.3)
check("...and the Leftover solar battery does not (no sun, no forecast)",
not any(r["p"]["a"] < -200.0 for r in r1))
check("...the reason is not 'no prices': neither battery reads no_prices",
why_of(c1, A) != "no_prices" and why_of(c1, B) != "no_prices")
check("...only the Cheap hours battery got the grid charge role",
present(_last) and _last["tick"] is not None
and _last["tick"].roles.get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE
and _last["tick"].roles.get(A) != modetrade.CHARGE)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n3. the same with a gap below the cycle cost")
c3, r3, started3 = drive(opts(cost=0.20))
_l3 = nth(r3, -1, "the last cycle")
print(f" started {started3}; mode_runs {_l3['runs']}; "
f"why A {why_of(c3, A)}, B {why_of(c3, B)}")
check("the task is started and the plan is there, so mode_runs is not None",
started3 and present(_l3) and _l3["plan"] is not None
and _l3["runs"] is not None)
check("the reason is the gap: no_spread ('Prices differ too little'), "
"never no_prices, on both batteries",
why_of(c3, A) == "no_spread" and why_of(c3, B) == "no_spread"
and present(_l3) and _l3["runs"] is not None
and not _l3["runs"].on)
check("...and no battery charges from the grid",
not charging_b(r3) and not any(r["p"]["a"] < -200.0 for r in r3))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n4. Home and the Batteries screen agree")
hp = c1.home_plan
_bars = [b for b in hp["prices"] if b["eur_kwh"] is not None]
_words = {b["why_key"]: b["why"] for b in c1.battery_cards}
print(f" Home: has_prices {hp['has_prices']}, {len(_bars)} priced bars, "
f"verdict {hp['verdict_key']}, lines {hp['lines']}")
print(f" Batteries: {[(b['name'], b['why_key'], b['why']) for b in c1.battery_cards]}")
check("Home prices the day, and the Batteries screen does not say it has no "
"prices", hp["has_prices"] and _bars
and all(b["why_key"] != "no_prices" for b in c1.battery_cards))
check("Home's plan has the grid charge block for the Cheap hours battery "
"(the 'trade' verdict) and no 'no prices have arrived' line",
hp["verdict_key"] == "trade"
and any(r["kind"] == "grid" for r in hp["runs"])
and not any("no prices have arrived" in ln for ln in hp["lines"]))
hp3 = c3.home_plan
check("with the gap too small both say so: Home 'price gap is too small', "
"the batteries 'differ too little'; neither says no prices",
any("price gap is too small" in ln for ln in hp3["lines"])
and all(b["why_key"] == "no_spread" for b in c3.battery_cards))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n5. UX-55: every battery Solar first, static day/night, no feed")
SF = {"a": (True, "solar_first", False), "b": (True, "solar_first", False)}
c5, r5, s5 = drive(opts(), choice=SF, minutes=5)
print(f" Home lines: {c5.home_plan['lines']}")
check("Home no longer says 'no prices have arrived' with every battery Solar "
"first on a static profile",
s5 and not any("no prices have arrived" in ln
for ln in c5.home_plan["lines"]))
c5b, r5b, s5b = drive(opts(profile=None), choice=SF, minutes=5)
print(f" no profile, no feed: started {s5b}, Home lines "
f"{c5b.home_plan['lines']}")
check("...and with no profile and no feed there are truly no prices, and "
"Home still says so",
any("no prices have arrived" in ln for ln in c5b.home_plan["lines"]))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n6. nothing else moved")
c6, r6, s6 = drive(opts(modes=False), choice={}, minutes=5)
check("modes off, arbitrage off, no feed: no task, no plan, no price runs "
"(as before)", not s6 and c6.tariff_plan is None
and all(r["runs"] is None for r in r6))
print()
if fails:
print(f"{len(fails)} FAILED:")
for f in fails:
print(f" - {f}")
sys.exit(1)
print("all checks passed")