Commit Graph
320 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 8c6e5bca2e Release 0.15.0: correct the SAFETY-94/97 row, add the ±170 W known issue
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 29m6s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Review round 1 (F1-F3) on PR #173.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 01:23:03 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 f01152b113 Release 0.15.0: bump version and close the CHANGELOG section
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 29m1s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
config.yaml version 0.14.0 -> 0.15.0 (minor: behaviour change from
SAFETY-94/97, no option change). New `## 0.15.0` section with the contents
since 0.14.0 (cf705a9 #171, 3129dae #172) and the known issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 00:48:04 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 7d06aa674d SAFETY-97: centre the band on the idle reading clamped to 75 W
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 29m26s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
Owner decision 2026-10-04 (review R1). A wrong idle reading more than
about 100 W off hid every refusal on that battery. Clamped under the band,
the band keeps 0 W +-25 W, so a battery reading about 0 W while refusing is
caught whatever was learned or restored. Samples are still taken to 250 W.
Beyond about +-170 W of idle a battery behaves as in 0.14.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 16:57:16 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 88ebf3a5a6 SAFETY-97 review: tests for four surviving mutants
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 28m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
The N=1 stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's parked test are centred on the
idle reading; learning stops while control is stopped or the sign watchdog
has latched. Each had no check (review mutants X7, X8, X13, X14).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 14:29:27 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 3db2b6392f SAFETY-97: test the centred stale-path refusal (mutant S10 survived)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 29m7s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 1s
At a 5 s meter a register frozen at rest on B trips the stale gate before
the 12-cycle evidence; its refusal must be centred on B's idle reading,
or the site stops and re-trips instead of refusing B.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-04 13:07:06 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 80bfc5721e SAFETY-97: point test_safety97 at MUTATION.md; record the DC-entity option
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 29m9s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 1s
test_bytecode requires every suite to name MUTATION.md (CI run 1158).
DECISIONS: why the integration's DC battery power entity is not the fix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-04 12:51:52 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 6918e154c8 SAFETY-97: "gives nothing" is graded against each battery's idle reading
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 29m7s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
B's power reading shows -95 to -118 W at idle (standby draw), so the
|reading| < 100 W refusal band never held a refusing B: never at N=2,
and since SAFETY-94's shared rule not at N=1 either (review F1).

Each unit now learns its idle reading (app/idle.py): only while control
runs, the unit is not refused/stale/tripped and its command has stayed
within 50 W for 120 s; first value a 120 s mean, then a 30 min follow;
samples beyond 250 W dropped, value clamped to 250 W; saved per unit and
restored. The shared refusal evidence, compute()'s N=1 engage and end,
the unit refusal ends, the stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's "parked"
test are centred on it. Until learned it is 0 W, the rule as it was.

Refusing B caught at N=1 28/28/65 s and N=2 24/24/60 s (1/2/5 s
meters), before never; refusing A unchanged. Healthy B with its offset,
SAFETY-94's scenarios, 96 runs: 0 stale, 0 refused. Live replay: 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-04 12:21:24 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 dd5eb6fdc8 SAFETY-94 review: tests for three surviving mutants; record two gaps
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 28m7s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
- test_safety94 part 4: time under 250 W is not counted; a command that
  swaps direction every cycle is never refusal evidence; a reading moving
  away from the ask does not restart the evidence. These kill review
  mutants R1, R3 and R6, which survived the PR's tests.
- DECISIONS: at N=1 a battery with B's standby offset no longer latches
  a refusal (SAFETY-97 now covers N=1); a part-time ask is caught after
  35/d s of wall time.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 01:17:52 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 6759d21ea5 SAFETY-94: a healthy battery that lags or reverses is not flagged as frozen or refusing
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 28m10s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
The stale-reading gate counted its 35 s from the register's last change, so
after a rest the first read after a new command tripped it (SAFETY-58; live
2026-10-03, four trips 1 s after the command). It now counts only the time
the command asked the register to move.

At N=1 the refusal engaged after 12 frozen cycles if the reading was under
100 W at that moment, which a battery reversing through its lag passes at a
1 s meter. The refusal now needs the N>1 evidence at every roster size: under
100 W, one way, for 12 cycles spanning 22 s, restarting when the reading
moves 50 W towards the ask.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-94-lagging-battery.md; test_safety94.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 00:15:42 +02:00
Claude f13dab1407 Release 0.14.0: changelog review fixes
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Slew step not one house's 400 W; three two-inverter known issues, not
four; commissioning reference covers a new install; SoC example holds
for decimal sensors; SAFETY-95 states the jump, not the export.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-03 11:01:44 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 b307db1049 Release 0.14.0: version bump and changelog
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 27m2s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Two inverters are now supported for maintenance and the peak guard
(SAFETY-91, SAFETY-93). No option changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-03 10:30:25 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 214051d1a8 SAFETY-93 review: a charge that ends by a stale link or a refusal hands back smoothly too
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 27m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 1s
A battery still in CHARGE but dropped by the allocator (stale link, or a
SAFETY-73 refusal contradicting its charge) left its -2000 W in the loop's
start point, and B went 0 -> -1600 W in one cycle. The end is now noted
after the unit claims are filed: in CHARGE, live and not contradicted.
Tests: part 6 (stale link, refusal) and a spy on the guard suspension.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-03 00:10:21 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 05eb93f139 SAFETY-93: the maintenance charge end hands back smoothly, with no grid charging at a high house
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m55s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 1s
At N>=2, when a battery's maintenance charge ended, its watts stayed in the
loop's start point and landed on the other battery (B 0 -> -1600 W in one
cycle, charging from the grid at a 6000 W house). On the cycle a charge
ends, the loop now starts from what the others stood at plus that
battery's new command. N=1 and all identity digests unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 22:38:42 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 4cd604afcb SAFETY-91 review: a held-back battery is released 1 point above its reserve
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m26s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A SoC reading flipping across the reserve swapped ~1000 W between the
batteries on each flip (grid +-500 W with unequal lags). Also grades
next_quarter()'s staleness boundary (29.5 / 30.5 s).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:54:20 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 6872353e2e SAFETY-91: a held battery is drawn only after the others are full
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m19s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N>=2 a battery at or under its own peak reserve now weighs 0 whenever
the site gives (not only for the peak), a draining battery's pin becomes
a floor at its drain rate so it rises before the held one gives, and a
quarter's edge is graded on the next quarter when its first telegram is
late. SAFETY-25 option A stays: the held battery is still drawn once the
others are full. N=1 unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:03:54 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 b37b7f95dc REL-0.13.0 review: plainer, truer 0.13.0 changelog
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m52s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Crash, not stop, for SAFETY-61; Watchdog off by default; its own
warning for the 50 W peak margin (also under a higher month peak);
"refuses power" for SAFETY-52/73; no one-house options claim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 09:37:34 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 28cab03947 REL-0.13.0: cut 0.13.0
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m55s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Bump config.yaml version 0.12.0 -> 0.13.0 and close a ## 0.13.0
CHANGELOG section covering every merge since 0.12.0 (a45ed06), with the
known issues SAFETY-90/91/92/93/94. Option surface 77 -> 83, none removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 09:04:47 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 7b723a6cd5 SAFETY-85 review: grade discharge only, over the plant's settle time
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m47s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Rule 2 graded each battery against last cycle's command and graded charges
too. On plantsim's battery (10 s lag) at the 2 s meter it warned at every
drain or charge start and 15 times an hour under the peak guard at N=2; a
charge tapering near full warned 11 times in 50 min (SAFETY-42 section 7).
Now a discharge is graded against the least it stood at over SHORT_CYCLES /
SHORT_SPAN_S. DOCS lists `mode-bound` under Loop reason. test_safety85 part 7:
peak guard with a dead battery, lagging plant, taper; part 3: the bound ends
with maintenance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 20:25:41 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 4b81387908 SAFETY-85: no false 'not keeping up' while maintenance or the peak guard sets the battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m35s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
The loop's integrator bound counts only on a cycle the loop decided. A battery
another owner set (maintenance, the peak guard, a safety limit) alarms only
when it gives more than saturation_w less than told for saturation_cycles
cycles. At N>=2 the loop is bounded while maintenance holds a battery, so it
does not wind and control comes back one slew step a cycle. The status row
counts episodes, not cycles. Digests re-pinned where behaviour changed on
purpose; DECISIONS/SAFETY-85-no-false-not-keeping-up.md has the list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 19:05:27 +02:00
Claude b4d25dd485 SAFETY-87 review: DOCS, the drain rate may rise for the peak at N>=2
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 24m53s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 11:08:42 +02:00
Claude a4a04d203c SAFETY-87 review: grade the three surviving review mutants
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A battery refusing only to charge stays able; the reserve alarm is graded
on the real limit, not the aim; 'control still runs' is set on the two
peak rows only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 11:07:43 +02:00
Claude aa501ffec7 SAFETY-87 review: maintenance pins beside a held battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A draining battery that may still give is raised from its drain rate
towards its rating for the peak floor while another battery is held
(peak > drain); before, the floor's rest landed on the held battery. In a
HOLD, a held battery's own pin counts among the others: a held drain no
longer over-places the site, and a held charge probe no longer parks it.

Tests: test_safety87.py part 10 (drain beside a held battery, N=3 HOLD,
unknown cut-out and unread level at N=3, a stopping row outranks the
running peak alarm). DECISIONS entry updated, incl. the modes-on exception.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 10:50:01 +02:00
Claude d89c093318 SAFETY-87: grade the surviving mutants (dropped battery, own-floor naming, pair permission, latched row)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 24m56s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 09:55:29 +02:00
Claude d0db5b8c39 SAFETY-87: peak guard uses every battery that can still give
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m45s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N>=2 a battery at or under its own peak reserve is held: it gives
nothing for the peak (weight 0 while the site gives) and the guard's need
is placed on the live, non-refusing batteries above theirs. The guard is
floor-limited, and alarms, only when those cannot hold the limit at full
power for ALARM_HOLD_S. The peak alarms no longer read "Not ready" or hold
the Home page at 0 W, because control keeps running. N=1 is byte-identical.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-87-guard-uses-able-batteries.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 09:29:30 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 1c41a1e412 SAFETY-86 review: hold the site at the peak floor while a HOLD gives
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 24m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N>=2 the holding pack's pin follows the guard's floor while the loop
still asks for +5000 W, so the ALLOCATOR "could not be placed" row was
re-logged on every 1 W change and filled the 40-row action log. While the
pin is raised, cycle() now files a site `hold` ceiling at the floor
(P_MAINTENANCE), as SAFETY-84 does for a charge. Filed only when the
holding pack gives; hi == the floor, so it never clashes with it.

Tests: a noisy N=2 house logs no ALLOCATOR row and at most one clamp
row (20 and 20 without the ceiling); the ceiling is the floor itself;
a CHARGE is not refiled at N=1. The DECISIONS entry records the owner's
2026-10-01 decision: the HOLD ends on its clock, no top-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 02:00:20 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 ba31e7c8b1 SAFETY-86: peak guard outranks the maintenance hold
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 24m17s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
During a HOLD the holding battery gives what keeps the quarter at the peak
aim. N=1: the peak floor is refiled at P_MAINTENANCE, as for a drain
(SAFETY-83). N>=2: the hold's pin is raised to the floor minus what the
other live batteries may place, so they give first. A site stop still
decides alone. The hold ends on its clock even if the level dipped.
Below the aim nothing changes (rows identical).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 00:56:34 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 513183aba3 test_peak_margin: read the month peak on the runs' clock, not today's
Part 3 read the simulated September's peak with the wall clock, so from
2026-10-01 it read no peak and crashed on every tree (4ad8298 too).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 00:56:34 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 5c9f64d87a SAFETY-84 review: check the charging pack gives under the guard, and no-P1 at N=2
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m51s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A 6500 W house needs more than B alone: A must give (the N>=2 suspension),
with a non-vacuous run without it (banks over the cap, 'Load too high').
Without P1 the charge is not sized, as at N=1: A charges at 2000 W.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 20:36:46 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 43a52e7f60 SAFETY-84: maintenance charge at N=2 no longer stalls
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At N>=2 a cheap-window maintenance charge files a site `hi` (`charge`,
P_MAINT_SHAPE) equal to what the charging pack's own `hi` places, so the
other pack never has to give against it. The charge is sized to the
quarter's headroom under the peak aim so it yields to the peak guard, and
to 0 W under a site safety stop. N=1 byte-identical (safety84_identity).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 19:47:15 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 bc6d744c6c SAFETY-83 review: banked month peak and no false alarm during a drain
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
test_safety83 part 1: under a month peak banked above the limit the drain
is lifted to peak - margin, and a drain the guard raises (steady or with
5 s spikes that saturate it) gives no 'Load too high' alarm; the part 3
overload still does.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 13:41:47 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 79b94024cb Merge release/1.0 (OPT-11 P4, #156) into safety-83-peak-over-drain
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 13:35:28 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 56cafefa79 SAFETY-83: a refiled peak floor stays under a safety SET, graded directly
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m32s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Kills M5 (refiled at P_SAFETY) on its own sentence, not only through the
per-cycle claim check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:52:52 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 3f69c174af SAFETY-83: grade the refile at its boundary, and N=2 on its own
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m37s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A floor exactly at the drain rate stays at P_PEAK (kills `lo >= rate`), and
part 4's N=2 check no longer shares its failure list with N=1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:50:46 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 d77f1b1fdf SAFETY-83: peak guard outranks the maintenance drain at N=1
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16m54s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N=1 the drain is the site SET at P_MAINTENANCE (60), so the peak floor
(P_PEAK, 50) was not applied and the house imported what the drain left.
Where the floor asks for more than the drain rate, main.py now refiles the
peak claim at P_MAINTENANCE, so it wins; safety SETs still park everything.
Nothing else changes: safety78_identity --diff against 35cdffe changes only
cycles where the guard wanted more than the drain; N=2 is byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:40:14 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 b171ada894 Merge release/1.0 (SAFETY-78, #154) into opt11-p4-solar-forecast
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m54s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Conflicts: modetrade.decide() takes both the day plan (targets) and
SAFETY-78's draining flag; the Why line keeps SAFETY-78's other_cycle
ahead of the plan's word (test added).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:37:09 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 0b96e3191c OPT-11 P4 review: records and text
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 4s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
- DECISIONS: the Cheap hours change and why; the no-sun replay (the gain is
  Leftover solar buying the evening's shortfall; the forecast added 0.14
  EUR); the reconstruction bias stated plainly.
- DOCS: Cheap hours ignores the forecast; a reading from before midnight
  is stale.
- The forecast line: "Solar still to come today: ..." (it is what is
  left, and it stays within the 12-word limit).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:29:00 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 a692560960 Merge release/1.0 (SAFETY-81, #155) into opt11-p4-solar-forecast
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:08:52 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 fbd884797d OPT-11 P4 review: Cheap hours ignores the plan; midnight-stale forecast; stricter ids
- Cheap hours only fills to the ceiling with or without a forecast, as the
  design (section 1) says. Skipping the sun's share cost 0.31 EUR on real
  2026 prices (29.72 against P3's 29.41) and saved nothing on the P3 set.
- A forecast reading from before local midnight is stale: until the
  integration refreshes, "left today" is still yesterday's 0 and
  "tomorrow" is really today.
- Forecast entity ids must be sensor.[a-z0-9_]+ (they go into the
  /api/states/<id> path).
- House profile: a stored day that is not a date, or is after today, is
  dropped instead of kept forever.
- Text: the forecast line says "for the rest of today"; the learning line
  no longer promises "tomorrow" (a plan needs one full day).
- Tests for four surviving review mutants (hour sample floor, the dear run
  after the cheap run, share by room, daytime use) and the fixes above.
- Replay tool: `--fc zero` (a forecast of no sun).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:08:47 +02:00
goodwe-review 516bc8b4ec Merge release/1.0 into safety-78-drain-at-two
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18m49s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:53:47 +02:00
goodwe-review 044fc0d5bd SAFETY-78 review: card truth while the drain waits, more checks
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16m15s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
- homeview: no "This one does not charge" while the draining battery waits
  (no floor then, so the other battery may charge from solar).
- test_safety78: one wait line across a probe, a second episode logs again,
  the card while waiting, and a seeded sweep of the floor against every
  other claim (part 6).
- DECISIONS: the wait case, and the measured N=1 peak and N=2 charge
  follow-ups.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:13:31 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 f967073cfe SAFETY-81 review: 10 s hold, ERROR line per episode, more scenarios
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 20m31s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
- The alarm must hold for peakguard.ALARM_HOLD_S (10 s) on the projection's
  clock. A load that tops cap + battery for ~5 s every 30 s alarmed at every
  quarter start while the quarter landed under the aim (sine4500_fast).
- A cycle with no battery reading leaves the hold alone.
- Notified once per quarter, but the ERROR line is written per episode.
- New sim scenarios (sine4500_fast, twice7000, step6500_gap) with 5a4cdc2
  digests; control still byte-identical. Unit checks for export and the
  hold across a missing reading. test_peakguard's saturated fixture moves
  the hold start back instead of waiting it out.
- DECISIONS and DOCS updated: costs of the hold, tolerance reasoning, the
  double count in control left to a follow-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 20:58:37 +02:00
Claude aabc2a27fd OPT-11 P4: tests for eight surviving mutants; guarded reads
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m10s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 20:22:16 +02:00
Claude af39c10893 SAFETY-78: test_safety78 points at MUTATION.md (test_bytecode)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 20:14:33 +02:00
goodwe-agent 6eb67c0f9c SAFETY-81: no false 'Load too high' alarms
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16m11s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
The alarm now also needs peakguard.load_too_high(): with the battery at
full power, the quarter still ends more than 10 W over the real limit.
The battery reading is the lower of this cycle's and the last, so a meter
sample from before the battery's last increase is not counted twice.
At most one alarm per quarter. Control outputs unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 19:55:38 +02:00
Claude 5d27f8496f SAFETY-78: maintenance drain at N=2 no longer stalls
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 17m13s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At two inverters the drain pins its pack and the site target is split
around the pin. Below the pin the other pack had to charge, the allocator
refused the opposite directions, and the site sat at 0 W with an ARBITER
line every cycle (house below or above the drain rate, or a grid charge).

main.py now files a site limit `drain` (lo = what the pin places, at
P_MAINTENANCE) at N>=2 while a pack drains, so the other pack only adds
power in the same direction. A drain that cannot give power waits with
one log line. With battery modes on, no grid charge while a pack drains,
and the other battery's card says why. N=1 is byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 19:52:51 +02:00
Claude eb10537aee OPT-11 P4: solar forecast and day plan
A Home Assistant solar forecast (Forecast.Solar, Solcast or Open-Meteo
shapes) and the add-on's own hourly house use decide, before each cheap
run, whether the sun will fill each battery before the expensive hours.
Leftover solar then buys from the grid only the shortfall; Cheap hours only
skips the part the sun covers; Solar first never grid-charges. No, stale or
failed forecast: P3 option A exactly (12 digests pinned from 5a4cdc2).

Replay (16 recorded days, forecast errors from Elia's day-ahead BE solar):
year-earlier prices P4 19.15 vs P2 19.33 / option A 19.44 / old trade 18.14;
real 2026 prices P4 29.19 vs 32.26 / 32.01 / 31.40 EUR net.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 19:29:32 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 7104515229 OPT-11 P3 option A review: wizard no longer says modes come later
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15m14s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Step 5 said "Choosing a mode for each battery comes in a later update",
stale since P1. It now points to battery modes on the Batteries screen
(EN/NL); test_setup checks the new line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 11:21:32 +02:00
Claude dev agent 6dab4ec16b OPT-11 P3, owner option A: selling off, Leftover solar takes solar only
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15m12s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Owner decision 2026-09-29. Selling is off until it can be judged on the price
the grid pays: packmode.SELLING_ENABLED = False makes read() answer
sell=False whatever the store holds, pack_sell is refused ("Selling is off
for now."), and the page has no selling switch; the sell code stays. Until
the P4 forecast, only Cheap hours only charges from the grid
(packmode.GRID_CHARGE_MODES); Leftover solar holds and gives in the
expensive runs. Help, Today and plan lines, DOCS and DECISIONS follow.
Replay, 16 days: Solar first + Leftover solar 19.44 EUR net (P2 19.33).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 10:42:58 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 b014fd2e16 OPT-11 P3 review: sale shows no money, honest sell text, tests for four surviving mutants
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 14m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
- A sale block on the plan no longer says "Worth up to" at the import
  price: a sale earns the lower injection price.
- The selling switch help (EN/NL) and DOCS say the grid pays less than
  power costs; DECISIONS records why P3 loses on the replay.
- test_modes_p3 part 11: modes on ignore the site trade switch (R13), a
  battery in maintenance takes no part (R10), a headroom stop latches for
  the period (R8). All three mutants survived before and are red now.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 03:51:15 +02:00
Claude dev agent 902524ae5e OPT-11 P3: price runs per battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13m45s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Cheap and expensive hours as runs of consecutive firm price slots
(priceruns.py); each battery's role per tick from its mode (modetrade.py):
grid charging for Leftover solar / Cheap hours only, never Solar first;
holding for the expensive runs; selling per battery (pack_sell) above the
spread and the floor. The site trade is sized inside the modes (loop bound)
and the peak guard's headroom; a run edge reseeds the loop. Cheap hours only
and selling are enabled on the Batteries screen and in the HA select
(appended). The site Why row no longer says "held back" when the peak limit
pushes power up (F2). Modes off: byte-identical to 7a00f12 on the trade path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 02:37:44 +02:00