glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 04b3330def
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m16s
PKG-09: refuse a deploy that would be a no-op, or that the add-on would reject
Two ways a deploy of this add-on has gone wrong, and the Supervisor reports
both as success.

THE SILENT NO-OP. The Supervisor keys the built image by `version:`, so
`ha apps update` against an unchanged version installs nothing and says it
worked. PKG-06 recorded this on 2026-09-05 with six merges behind an unbumped
version; PKG-07 recorded it again on 2026-09-06 with six. Both times a human
noticed. Nothing else was going to.

THE REFUSED CONFIG. A config the shipped validator rejects is SystemExit(78) -
the add-on does not start. ⚠️ AND THE INGRESS PANEL GOES WITH IT, because the
add-on serving it is not running, so recovery means the Supervisor UI.

⚠️ IT CAUGHT A LIVE ONE ON ITS OWN PULL REQUEST. Run against release/1.0 while
this branch was in review: version 0.8.0 on both sides with UX-02's and
OPT-09's runtime commits already merged behind it. The class this exists to
catch had recurred, the same day, unnoticed - which is the argument for PKG-10,
a non-required post-merge check, since this script only helps someone who
remembers to run it.

⚠️ THE FIRST VERSION WAS BROKEN ON EVERY REAL REPOSITORY AND ITS TESTS COULD NOT
SEE IT. The "when did the version last change" lookup was `git log -S`, the
pickaxe, which finds commits that change the COUNT of a literal string. A bump
edits the line IN PLACE, so the count never moves and it returned only the
commit that first INTRODUCED the line. Measured here:

    -S  ->  0a1e61d  2026-08-23  Packaged as a Home Assistant add-on
    -G  ->  06661c5  2026-09-06  PKG-07: bump 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0

so a correctly bumped tree was reported as 87 COMMITS BEHIND AN UNBUMPED
VERSION, PKG-06's and PKG-07's own bump commits among the offenders. A tool
whose whole purpose is to be trusted cried wolf on every run.

⚠️ AND `-G` IS NOT THE FIX EITHER, ONLY A BETTER FILTER - it matches a reformat,
a quote change, a comment moved onto the line. `-G` narrows the candidates and
the VALUE is then compared against the parent's.

⚠️ THREE DISTINCT SHAPES OF HABIT 4 IN ONE FILE, each found by a different
means, which is the honest record of how this landed:
  1. Fixtures built fresh repositories whose version line is introduced once and
     never edited - the one shape in which `-S` looks correct. Found by review.
     Answered with a three-state history; the old lookup goes red on 4 checks.
  2. That three-state history still could not tell "value-compared" from
     "filtered-only": review swapped in `-G`'s newest raw hit and THE WHOLE
     SUITE STAYED GREEN, so the docstring's central claim was pinned by nothing.
     Answered with a cosmetic touch of the version line - `-G` matches it, the
     value comparison does not. That mutant now goes red on 3 checks.
  3. The counts below were claimed fixed and two of them had not landed at all.

Two git shapes it still gets wrong are recorded in the docstring rather than
fixed - a bump resolved inside a merge commit (false refusal) and a bump
reverted while the work is kept (false clearance, the dangerous direction).
Neither has ever occurred here; both were constructed in review. Card PKG-11.

⚠️ AND THE PROSE COUNTS, WHICH I REPORTED AS FIXED WHEN THEY WERE NOT. Round 1
found "PKG-06 ... four merges" (its own commit message says six) and "recorded
eleven times" (MUTATION.md:550 says TWELFTH). I replaced them without asserting
the replacement matched, said "all applied", and round 2 found both still in the
tree - one fixed in DOCS.md but not in the script, one not fixed anywhere. A
claim that a correction landed is itself a claim that needs checking, and this
is PROC-01's tenth instance.

WHAT IT DOES NOT DO. It does not read the live box: the options blob needs the
Supervisor API. Without --options the validator half SKIPS - loudly, exit 2 -
and never pretends. On a bare host `app/validate.py` needs aiohttp, so that half
skips too and names the container to re-run in. A missing or malformed --options
file is a REFUSAL with a sentence, not a traceback.

EXIT CODES: 0 cleared, 1 REFUSED, 2 NOT CLEARED. ⚠️ 2 IS NOT A PASS.

Suite: 26 files, all pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-06 23:57:51 +02:00

GoodWe RS485 Controller — Home Assistant add-on repository

Replaces a GoodWe battery inverter's vendor controller with a local one: holds net grid exchange at zero by emulating the inverter's smart meter over RS485, and runs the monthly battery maintenance cycle the vendor box was doing.

repository.yaml            add-on repository metadata
goodwe_controller/         the add-on
  config.yaml              manifest + options schema (the per-site config form)
  app/                     the controller
    control.py             the control law — pure functions, no I/O
    maintenance.py         the monthly cycle state machine
    hass.py                Supervisor/Core API access
    store.py               persistent state in /data
    mqtt.py                optional status entities
    web.py                 ingress UI — routes only, status and configuration
    config_page.py         the configuration page's markup, style and script
    configui.py            its field model, built from the Supervisor's own
                           schema + translations — owns no key, label or rule
    selfconfig.py          reading and writing this add-on's own options,
                           with the validate-first / compare-and-swap gate
    main.py                orchestration, heartbeat, failsafe behaviour
  test_control.py          runnable checks — no framework needed
  test_maintenance.py      runnable checks — walks a full cycle in fake time
  DOCS.md                  the add-on's documentation tab
  MUTATION.md              how to run a mutation so the result means something
  tools/mutation_run.sh    the mutation harness - purges bytecode, then grades
  tools/supervisor_selfapi_probe.py  what the Supervisor really permits and
                           returns, run against its own release image
firmware/goodwe-master.yaml  ESPHome config for the T-CAN485
estop/rs485_log.py           optional RS485 e-stop / bus witness
docs/GoodWe-RS485-Field-Guide.pdf  the guide techs carry (10pp, A4)
docs/build_guide.py          its single source - rebuilds the HTML and PDF
FIELD-GUIDE.md             how to edit and rebuild the guide

Picking this up after a break? Read HANDOVER.md first — current state, what is known broken, and what to do next.

Install

Settings → Add-ons → Add-on store → ⋮ → Repositories → add

https://gittea.kammenstraatha.duckdns.org/admin/goodwe-addon

then install GoodWe RS485 Controller.

⚠️ The repository must be PUBLIC for this to work. Home Assistant clones it anonymously; against a private repo the store shows nothing and gives no useful error. If it must stay private, install locally instead: copy goodwe_controller/ into the machine's /addons/ folder, then ha store reload — it appears as a Local add-on.

⚠️ Bump version: in goodwe_controller/config.yaml for every change. Supervisor keys the built image by that version, so without a bump it silently reuses the old image and your fix appears not to work — on your bench and on every client's machine.

Requires Home Assistant OS or Supervised. Add-ons cannot be installed on HA Container or Core.

Read this first

The inverter holds its last command forever. It has no meter-timeout of its own — a controller that dies mid-command leaves the battery running until a human intervenes. Measured on real hardware: 5 kW of discharge held for 113 seconds after a controller went silent.

Three layers exist because of that, and only the third covers the Home Assistant machine itself dying:

  1. ESP32 watchdog — no fresh setpoint for ~30 s → command 0 W, and keep commanding it.
  2. Wind-down before firmware updates — 0 W written before the update starts.
  3. RS485 e-stop (optional) — writes 0 W after 30 s of total bus silence.

Sites sold without the e-stop must have the acknowledgement in FIELD-GUIDE.md §10 signed.

Development

The control law and the maintenance machine are pure Python with no Home Assistant imports, so they run anywhere:

cd goodwe_controller
python3 test_control.py
python3 test_maintenance.py

Both must pass before shipping any change. To prove a check bites - the way almost every claim in this repository was established - mutate the module and run tools/mutation_run.sh, which clears __pycache__ first. It is not optional: a same-size edit reverted inside one second leaves CPython reusing the old bytecode, and the run grades code that is not there. goodwe_controller/MUTATION.md has the mechanism, the measurement, and what the flags do not do. They are not unit-test theatre — each assertion corresponds to a rule whose absence produced an observed failure on real hardware, and the comments in control.py say which.

Compatibility

Check the serial number, not the model name. Characters 6-8 of the serial are the platform tag:

tag platform verdict
ESU EMU ESA BPS BPU EMJ IJL 105 — ES/EM/BP, AA55-era meter bus supported
SPB SPN 745 — SBP G2 (GW…-SBP-20) no
ESN ESC 745 — ES G2 (GW…-ES-20) no
ETU EHU BTU … 205/745/753 — ET/EH/BT hybrids no
SDT DST MSU NSU … PV-only inverters — no battery to control no

A "-20" or "G2" suffix means a different platform with a different meter protocol. The tags come from the goodwe library's PLATFORM_105_MODELS, which is also what Home Assistant's own integration uses to pick a protocol.

  • GoodWe ES / BP family inverters (AA55 / RS485 meter-bus generation)
  • The protocol is reverse-engineered. There is no vendor contract, and a firmware change on GoodWe's side could break every installation at once. Say so when you sell it.
S
Description
No description provided
Readme
20 MiB
Languages
Python 98.2%
JavaScript 1.2%
CSS 0.3%
HTML 0.2%
Shell 0.1%