Deploy 0.16.0 to master #179

Merged
admin merged 21 commits from deploy-0.16.0 into master 2026-10-08 01:43:38 +02:00
21 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
admin 451729c9b5 Release 0.16.0 (#178)
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 32m56s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
2026-10-08 01:02:20 +02:00
goodwe-review 1c607a961a REL-0.16.0 review: CHANGELOG wording fixes
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 32m48s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
SAFETY-103 swing 'by about 800 W for about 5 s'; SAFETY-99 'late, by less
than 30 s'; MAINT-10 row: one-at-a-time is not new; SAFETY-96: drop the
test-only 800 W; SAFETY-90 and MAINT-10 rows trimmed to two sentences.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 00:09:08 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 756b50ddbb Release 0.16.0
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 32m41s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
version 0.15.0 -> 0.16.0 and a closed ## 0.16.0 CHANGELOG section.
No code change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 23:25:14 +02:00
admin 340c7eef42 Merge pull request 'SAFETY-95: a maintenance drain that ends hands back smoothly' (#177) from safety-95-drain-end-reseed into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
2026-10-07 17:48:53 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 4707d37019 SAFETY-95 review: test the stale-link and contradiction legs; refusal +1 only
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 32m34s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
F1: test_safety95 checks that a dropped draining battery is this rule's
(stale link, N=3, 4000 W: grid import 676 W vs base 786 W); kills R2.
F2: _charge_track tested directly with a contradicting drain (SAFETY-91's
pin as a floor against a closed pack); kills R3. Today a drain contradicts
only through a refusal; the clause stays, as a contradiction sends 0 W.
F3: a drain ends on a refusal only when the battery will not give
(refused > 0, as _held_back()); one that will not take still drains.
Tested both signs; kills R8.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 16:41:16 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 9c0314a826 SAFETY-95: N=1 identity for every drain end; plainer DOCS line
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 32m35s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
test_safety95.py: the N=1 byte-identity now covers all six drain ends
(Off and stale link were missing); end_at()/measure() read through a
default, so test_named_absence.py passes (it failed on bdec66e); a check
that a dropped battery's start is 0 W even under a pinned charge (it
kills a mutation that survived).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 14:36:36 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 bdec66e97a SAFETY-95: a maintenance drain that ends hands back smoothly (N>=2)
When a battery's drain ended (done, Off, timeout, abort, stale link,
refusal), its drain floor stayed in the site target and landed on the
others: B 0 -> +1600 W in one cycle at a 1200 W house, exporting; under a
solar surplus B gave into the export.

Now, on that cycle, the loop starts from what the others stood at plus the
battery's new command, raised to the house's own point when the house needs
more (never above last cycle's start). While the battery settles, the loop
counts the batteries at its start instead of chasing the drain's tail on
the meter. Then one slew step a cycle. N=1 is unchanged.

test_safety95.py; DECISIONS/SAFETY-95-drain-end.md; one DOCS line.
test_modes.py: opt11 n2_maint re-pinned on purpose (its drain ends by a
refusal at 1655 s; B now stays at the house's 1420 W instead of 2500 W).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 12:44:25 +02:00
admin b2f55732b6 Merge pull request 'SAFETY-96: a battery the loop cannot move does not freeze it' (#176) from safety-96-stale-unit-site-total into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
2026-10-06 06:19:12 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 956711b801 SAFETY-96 review: keep the refusal count over a refused write; test a fast board
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m53s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
F1: resetting the count on each refused write hid a battery that really
refuses behind a link refusing 1 write in 3 (never learned; learned at
358 s with the count kept). F2: a board at 0 W before its link is stale
learned no refusal untested (mutation R7 survived); now a 1 s-lag case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 05:46:32 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 88b9cd470a SAFETY-96: a battery the loop cannot move does not freeze it
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m44s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At N>=2 a battery out of the split (stale link), with refused writes, or
settling after a step the loop did not make (a charge end, a rejoin) now
counts in the freeze test at its command, not its reading. Its real power
still reaches the loop through the meter. At a drop its share leaves the
loop's start point (the others take over one slew step a cycle); at a
rejoin it enters at its reading. No refusal is learned while a battery's
writes are refused. N=1 and the 46 identity digests are byte-identical.

test_safety78 part 2: the dropped-drain case now rests at B 1510 W (grid at
its -10 W aim) instead of 1500 W; the drop no longer sends B to 2500 W.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 04:02:03 +02:00
admin 1bf6b7f9a7 Merge pull request 'MAINT-10: maintenance start hour in local time, default 19:00' (#159) from maint-10-local-start-hour into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 2s
2026-10-05 23:56:19 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 1d28daf8a0 MAINT-10 review: warn when HA did not answer and TZ is UTC; test the 3 s budget
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m18s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
HA can take minutes to start (2026-10-05, 502 from the proxy). Then TZ holds,
which the Supervisor sets from HA's zone, so the hour stays right; only a TZ
of UTC there now logs a WARNING asking for a restart. A test pins the 3 s
budget on the zone request (a mutant without it survived).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 23:24:02 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 0b6b34f563 MAINT-10: every pack at N=2, the next DST days, plainer upgrade note
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m20s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
test_maint10.py part 10: at two inverters both packs get the site zone, the
real Controller is identical for 11 UTC and 13 Brussels, and two due packs
across 24/25 Oct 2026 and 27/28 Mar 2027 start at the local hour on
successive days; a pack freed in the repeated hour does not start there.
Part 3 adds 28 Mar 2027. DOCS: an existing install keeps its saved hour, now
read as local time; an hour set to make up for UTC goes back to 19.
DECISIONS: the SAFETY-83 gate is met; section on two inverters.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 21:51:15 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 08fb1235fc Merge release/1.0 (0.15.0 + SAFETY-90) into maint-10-local-start-hour
Conflicts: main.py's maintenance import (base added CHARGE, HOLD; branch added
site_zone) - both kept. DOCS maintenance table: base's longer drain-rate row
kept, start hour row at 19 / local.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 21:51:04 +02:00
admin 7ef73474dc Merge pull request 'SAFETY-90: the peak guard goes on after a P1 meter gap' (#175) from safety-90-peak-guard-gap into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 2s
SAFETY-90: the peak guard goes on after a P1 meter gap (#175)
2026-10-05 13:23:32 +02:00
Claude (SAFETY-90 review) 24dbbd18ad SAFETY-90 review: test that a second gap does not price the first one down
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m12s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 12:39:28 +02:00
Claude (SAFETY-90 review) 8dfe91e1d2 SAFETY-90 review: count the start-up seconds like a gap
While the add-on is down the batteries are at 0 W (it sets 0 W when it
stops; the ESP32 watchdog after 30 s), so the import before its first
reading was the house, not the aim. Those seconds now count at
gap_w(limit, the import seen first), and after a restart the restored
reading's held 30 s is topped up the same way. Status row: "counted as
high use". Tests take the pre-start import as the house (batteries at
0 W) and add restarts of 10/60/150 s with a restored averager.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 12:24:33 +02:00
Claude (SAFETY-90 dev) 9d3fbe1be9 SAFETY-90: the peak guard goes on after a P1 meter gap
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m10s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A meter gap past meter_max_age_s left seconds the quarter average never
counted, so the guard was blind for the rest of the quarter (rig case 7b:
3964.8 W against a 3450 W aim). Once readings are back, the missed seconds
now count at the higher of the limit and the import seen just before and
just after the gap with the batteries at 0 W (peakguard.gap_w/fill_gaps);
the gap's first meter_max_age_s is topped up to that too. Seconds before
the add-on's first reading count at the aim, and the page says part of the
period was not measured (EN/NL). The bill record is unchanged; no option.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-90-peak-guard-after-a-gap.md, test_safety90.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 11:46:58 +02:00
goodwe-agent 2f5ab1f378 MAINT-10: DECISIONS says where the release note lives
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m8s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 23:09:06 +02:00
goodwe-agent fbdd552555 MAINT-10: CHANGELOG draft line moves to the PR (version gate refuses an Unreleased block)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 23:08:46 +02:00
goodwe-agent 02c0a3dd7b MAINT-10: maintenance start hour in local time, default 19:00
The start hour was compared with the UTC hour, so the shipped 10 started at
12:00 in a Belgian summer. It is now read in Home Assistant's time zone
(fallback: the container's TZ, then UTC, one log line says which), and the
default moves to 19. DST: a missing hour starts at the first hour after the
jump; a repeated hour starts only in its first pass. Stored options are not
rewritten: a saved 10 now means 10:00 local (DOCS, CHANGELOG).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:52:05 +02:00