An Opus-run dev got no verification and no message, so silence meant
both "still verifying" and "will never verify" (SAFETY-135 waited
overnight, SAFETY-126 8 h). Verdicts were also labelled with the
routing choice, not the model the run used.
- Every dev hand-back posts one line at once:
"[model-router] Tn verifying on Opus..." (a verdict follows), or
"[model-router] Tn no verification: dev ran on Opus. Go straight to
review." A run that ends with an error or names no clone says so.
- Each round is decided and labelled by the model the run reported
(its end usage), the routing choice only as fallback. A difference
is shown as "(routed to X, ran on Y)", also on later rounds.
- 8 new tests; each new rule was also broken on purpose and caught,
apart from one equivalent change.
Version 0.4.6.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MdqPWvuDpbpRvDEdURoAwo
The verdict reader matched from the first { to the last } in the whole
reply, so a fenced JSON verdict followed by prose containing a } failed
to parse, counted as FAIL and triggered a rewrite (SAFETY-129, T192).
- Read a ```json fenced block first, then the first balanced {...} that
parses and has a PASS or FAIL verdict. Braces inside strings are
ignored.
- An unreadable reply is re-asked once for the JSON only. Still
unreadable: NOT VERIFIED, "verdict unreadable", handed back to the
manager with the start of the first reply. No fail counted, no
resume, no rewrite.
- 10 new tests; each new rule was also broken on purpose and caught.
Version 0.4.5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MdqPWvuDpbpRvDEdURoAwo
adminandClaude Opus 5.5