Files
goodwe-addon/goodwe_controller/config.yaml
T
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 e709554857
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m29s
SAFETY-24: an energy floor under the peak guard's forced discharge
SAFETY-07 can command a discharge to hold a billed quarter down, and
nothing below it consulted the state of charge. On the 2026-08-20 replay
it asks for 878 Wh in a day. Relying on the BMS is not absurd - it is a
real floor and it works - but it is the pack's protection rather than the
operator's, and a month of aggressive quarters leaves the battery
repeatedly at that cut-out with no EMS-side record of why. The first
symptom is a pack never available when wanted, which is indistinguishable
from the SoC drift MAINT-01 exists to correct.

decide() now takes soc and soc_floor, both required and neither
defaulted, and discharge_permitted() is the one place the question is
answered. Above the floor nothing changes. At or below it the guard files
a 0 W floor instead of a sized one - one-directional, so charging stays
blocked and no discharge is capped - and reports floor_limited with the
reason it bound. It is not a trip: every stop in 11.2's table still
outranks the claim, and the floor is never negative, so 9.1's asymmetry
survives as a property of the object (0 negative floors over 1296 swept
combinations, SoC included).

The SoC is graded only after `wanted > 0` is established, so it is never
evaluated where it governs nothing. An unreadable SoC is floor-limited,
not a full battery - a full battery is exactly the value that would
disarm the floor, and this project shipped that defaulting once already.

Failing to shave is not silent: one notification per episode
(goodwe_peak_soc_floor), distinct from the saturation alarm because the
two ask for opposite operator actions, plus its own status row and an
action-log line.

Verified by replay. The 2026-08-20 capture is driven against a modelled
pack sized from the day's own measured appetite, so it genuinely
exhausts: without the floor it reaches the BMS cut-out and holds there
for 1227 guard cycles; with it the pack stops at 20.0 % and never touches
the BMS. The energy withheld equals the energy between the two floors to
within one cycle at the rail. The honest half is reported too - the worst
quarter goes 4338 W -> 5030 W, because a floor-limited guard shaves less
on purpose.

Two new options, mirrored once in peakguard.PEAK_OPTION_DEFAULTS
(TARIFF-02's pattern), imported by validate.py and main.py rather than
typed as literals and pinned to config.yaml by a check that reads the
file - so CFG-03 still tracks three places. validate.py rule 8 refuses
peak_soc_floor <= bms_soc_floor at startup, in CFG-01/MAINT-04's manner.
maintenance_soc_floor is deliberately not reused and not renamed: it is a
drain target, not a spend limit, and the rename is recorded as a decision
to revisit if a third floor appears.

Eleven mutations of the shipped source were run against the checks; all
eleven go red and there are no survivors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC
2026-08-31 00:29:36 +02:00

379 lines
17 KiB
YAML

name: GoodWe RS485 Controller
version: "0.5.2"
slug: goodwe_controller
description: >-
Drives a GoodWe ES/BP battery inverter over RS485 by emulating its smart
meter, holding net grid exchange at zero and running a monthly battery
maintenance cycle.
url: https://gittea.kammenstraatha.duckdns.org/admin/goodwe-addon
arch:
- aarch64
- amd64
- armv7
init: false
startup: application
boot: auto
# Needed to read the meter and to write the ESPHome setpoint number.
homeassistant_api: true
hassio_api: true
# Own diagnostics/operations UI inside HA. This is what a field tech and a
# remote supporter both look at, so it is not optional.
ingress: true
ingress_port: 8099
panel_icon: mdi:battery-sync
panel_title: GoodWe
# Optional: publish status entities by MQTT discovery. `want` rather than
# `need` - the add-on runs fine with no broker, it just publishes nothing.
services:
- mqtt:want
options:
# --- sources (required) ---------------------------------------------------
meter_entity: sensor.p1_meter_active_power
meter_invert: false
soc_entity: ""
batt_entity: ""
batt_invert: false
setpoint_entity: ""
# --- P1 meter ingestion (specs §5.2 / §14 `meter:`) -------------------------
# `off` keeps the original single meter_entity path above, so an existing
# install is untouched until it opts in. ha_dsmr subscribes to the DSMR
# integration's entities over the HA WebSocket; mqtt_p1 reads the topic below;
# ha_signed reads ONE signed HA entity (+ import / - export), which is what a
# HomeWizard P1 publishes and what ha_dsmr cannot consume.
# homewizard_local skips Home Assistant entirely and polls the meter's own
# local API. ⚠️ It is the ONLY mode whose sensor.p1_sample_age_s measures when
# the meter REPORTED rather than when the value last CHANGED - HA emits
# nothing at all for a repeated reading - so it is the only mode a firmware
# watchdog may threshold. See DOCS.md.
meter_source: "off"
meter_phases: 1
meter_max_age_s: 30
meter_mqtt_topic: ""
# homewizard_local only. The meter's own address, `host` or `host:port`.
p1_host: ""
# homewizard_local only. Seconds between polls. Must be well under
# meter_max_age_s - the age is never fresher than this interval - and there is
# nothing to gain below the meter's own ~5.0 s update rate (NOTES.md:640).
meter_poll_s: 5
# The two UNSIGNED Belgian registers. The EMS derives net power from them
# (import - export); do NOT point these at a signed template sensor.
p1_import_entity: ""
p1_export_entity: ""
# Optional, in L1..L3 order. Required for the capacity-tariff peak on a
# three-phase connection; the list length must equal meter_phases.
p1_phase_import_entities: []
p1_phase_export_entities: []
# ha_signed only. ONE signed net-power sensor: positive = import from the
# grid, negative = export to it. Do NOT split it into two template sensors -
# the split is done in the add-on (p1.split_signed) precisely so the sign
# convention is tested rather than living in unreviewed YAML.
p1_net_entity: ""
# Optional, in L1..L3 order, each one signed the same way. Same role as
# p1_phase_import_entities: the capacity-tariff peak on a three-phase
# connection. The list length must equal meter_phases.
p1_phase_net_entities: []
# --- control ---------------------------------------------------------------
max_w: 2000
gain: 0.6
slew_w: 1000
deadband_w: 15
target_grid_w: -10
step_w: 10
saturation_w: 500
saturation_cycles: 3
integrator_max_w: 0
heartbeat_s: 10
stale_input_s: 15
cycle_floor_s: 15
auto_start: false
# --- SAFETY-02 sign-disagreement watchdog ----------------------------------
# Trips when the emitted setpoint and the P1 net figure point OPPOSITE ways,
# both over sign_disagree_w, continuously for sign_disagree_s. Action: 0 W and
# a failsafe that latches until an operator starts control again.
#
# Both defaults are measured, not chosen. On the captured healthy day
# (2026-08-23) the longest legitimate opposed run - a load step the loop has
# not caught up with - is 30 s, and sign agreement over the gated samples is
# 93.4 %. On the captured fault day (2026-08-20) the clusters run 0.0-10.5 %
# agreement with opposed runs up to 1752 s. 300 W / 180 s sits in the middle of
# a very wide gap: at 60 s the healthy day still trips nothing, at 300 s the
# fault day still trips 13 times. There is no reason to move either number
# without a capture that says so. They are options because the AC says
# thresholds are defaults rather than constants - not because they are knobs
# anyone is expected to turn.
#
# ⚠️ sign_disagree_w must stay BELOW max_w or the watchdog can never fire (the
# arbiter bounds the command to +-max_w). validate.py refuses that config.
sign_disagree_w: 300
sign_disagree_s: 180
# --- SAFETY-18 frozen-but-fresh meter detector -----------------------------
# Seconds the meter may keep answering with an UNCHANGED measurement while the
# command stands at the rail before the add-on raises an alarm. Both halves
# are required: neither one alone is safe, and app/freeze.py carries why.
#
# ALARM ONLY. It does not command 0 W and does not latch. A false trip parks
# the battery; a false notification costs an alert.
#
# ⚠️ Only `meter_source: homewizard_local` can see this at all - it is the
# only transport that reads the meter's own document. On every other source
# the status page says NOT COVERED rather than "armed".
#
# 300 s is measured, not chosen. Over 2399 s of the live house at the
# converged operating point (sim/scenarios/p1-age-2026-08-26.jsonl.gz, mean
# grid -14.2 W, 1194 polls, 735 of them repeating the previous reading) the
# LONGEST run without a distinct reading is 15.4 s (the largest unchanged_s any
# sample observes is 8.0 s). 300 s is 19.5x the pessimistic figure, and
# still inside the 900 s quarter that bills the capacity tariff.
meter_freeze_s: 300
# --- maintenance -----------------------------------------------------------
maintenance_enabled: false
maintenance_interval_days: 28
maintenance_start_hour: 10
# ⚠️ BOTH MUST STAY AT OR BELOW max_w, and that is why they are 2000 rather
# than the 2500 they shipped as. The cheap-window charge shaping asks the
# arbiter for `hi = -maintenance_charge_w` against the supervised `lo =
# -max_w`: above the ceiling that is `lo > hi`, a contradiction resolved to
# 0 W, so maintenance would SILENTLY NEVER CHARGE in a cheap window on a
# default install. validate.py refuses that config (rule 6), so these
# defaults had to become self-consistent with the max_w above rather than
# ship a configuration the validator rejects.
#
# The discharge side is clamped rather than contradicted - it drains at max_w
# and the arbiter says so - so it is only warned about; it is 2000 here for
# symmetry and to keep the shipped config warning-free.
#
# Raising max_w (the live reference install runs 5000) is what unlocks a
# faster maintenance cycle. Raise max_w FIRST, then these.
maintenance_discharge_w: 2000
maintenance_charge_w: 2000
maintenance_soc_floor: 11
maintenance_soc_target: 99
maintenance_hold_min: 120
# --- tariff / capacity tariff (all optional) ------------------------------
peak_forecast_entity: ""
peak_cap_w: 3500
# --- SAFETY-24: the energy backstop under SAFETY-07's forced discharge -----
# The peak guard can COMMAND a discharge to hold a billed quarter under
# peak_cap_w. Until this card it was bounded from below by nothing but the
# pack's own BMS cut-out - a real floor, but the PACK's protection rather than
# the OPERATOR's. On the 2026-08-20 replay the guard asks for 878 Wh in a day.
#
# peak_soc_floor is the percent below which that discharge is not sized. When
# it binds the guard reports FLOOR-LIMITED, keeps charging blocked (a 0 W
# floor), and the add-on raises ONE notification saying the quarter will be
# exceeded - failing to shave is never silent, because the euro figure is the
# whole point of the guard.
#
# ⚠️ THIS IS NOT maintenance_soc_floor AND MUST NOT BE MERGED WITH IT.
# maintenance_soc_floor is the DRAIN TARGET of the monthly recalibration: the
# depth the cycle deliberately goes to, once a month, on purpose. This is the
# depth a money-saving discharge may never reach on any day. The right values
# differ, and sharing one key would couple two features that want to move
# independently.
#
# ⚠️ 20 IS DERIVED, NOT PICKED. The reference pack is 13.8 kWh usable and the
# worst modelled guard day is 878 Wh, i.e. 6.4 % - so 10 points above the
# pack's own cut-out leaves the guard ~1.6 of its worst observed days of room
# and still never reaches the BMS.
peak_soc_floor: 20
# The pack's OWN cut-out percent - what the BMS enforces whatever is set
# above. Register 0x0560 reads 10 on the reference GW5000S-BP, consistent with
# DoD 90. It is here so validate.py can REFUSE a peak_soc_floor at or below
# it: such a floor can never bind, the BMS wins, and the status page would
# report an energy backstop that does not exist.
bms_soc_floor: 10
# ⚠️ THE OLD PRICE PATH, AND IT IS NOT DEAD YET. These two entities are the
# add-on delegating the whole price question to Home Assistant: main.py reads
# both and derives ONE BOOLEAN, `cheap = now <= avg`, which is consumed by
# nothing except the maintenance cycle's cheap-window charge floor. That is
# all they have ever done. They are kept, because retiring them would take
# the maintenance cycle's only price signal away on a live install before
# anything replaces it - TARIFF-03 (static profile) and OPT-04 (arbitrage)
# are the cards that replace it, and neither has landed.
#
# ⚠️ They may NOT be combined with price_provider below. Two price sources on
# one site, one of which silently wins, is exactly the "double up" the PM
# named; validate.py rule 7 refuses that configuration at startup rather than
# letting an operator believe the provider they configured is driving
# something. See app/validate.py.
price_now_entity: ""
price_avg_entity: ""
# --- price providers (TARIFF-02, specs §9.3 / §14 `tariffs:`) --------------
# `off` is the shipped default and means the §11.4 no-price-data row applies:
# static profile, plan provisional, NO ARBITRAGE. Nothing in 0.5.x consumes
# the series yet - OPT-04 is the consumer - so turning this on today fetches,
# validates and publishes prices and changes no energy decision.
#
# ⚠️ THESE DEFAULTS ARE MIRRORED ONCE, IN app/price.py's
# PRICE_OPTION_DEFAULTS, and test_price.py reads THIS FILE and asserts the two
# agree key for key. Do not add a third copy in main.py - CFG-03 is open
# because that has already happened three times.
#
# markup/taxes are the §14 `tariffs.energy_price.*` figures and are added by
# the FRAMEWORK, only for the components the chosen plugin declares its feed
# does not already contain. engie_dynamic, totalenergies_dynamic, eneco_eddy
# and manual_csv publish a figure that already carries the markup, so setting
# it under those is ignored - and logged as ignored, never applied twice.
price_provider: "off"
price_markup_eur_kwh: 0.03
price_taxes_eur_kwh: 0.06
price_csv_path: "/share/goodwe_prices.csv"
price_feed_url: ""
price_horizon_h: 48
price_timeout_s: 10
# --- static / fully-fixed tariffs (TARIFF-03, specs §9.2 / §11.4) ----------
# §14's `tariffs.static_profile`, and "" is its `null`. §9.2: "a large share
# of the installed base is on [a static profile]" - this is what makes those
# sites first-class rather than "price_provider: off, good luck".
#
# A JSON object, on one line, whose periods must tile every day type exactly
# once - no gap and no overlap. A gap is REFUSED at startup rather than
# defaulted, because an invented price is one an optimiser would trade on.
# A fully-fixed tariff is ONE period covering 00:00-24:00, all days; the
# add-on derives "fixed" from there being one distinct price, so there is no
# box to tick and none to tick wrongly.
#
# {"periods": [
# {"name":"day", "from":"07:00","to":"22:00","days":"mon-fri","eur_per_kwh":0.34},
# {"name":"night","from":"22:00","to":"07:00","days":"mon-fri","eur_per_kwh":0.26},
# {"name":"night","from":"00:00","to":"24:00","days":"sat,sun", "eur_per_kwh":0.26}]}
#
# ⚠️ A window written "22:00-07:00 mon-fri" does NOT cover Saturday morning -
# a period applies on the day the CLOCK reads, so the weekend row above is
# required, not decorative. See DOCS.md.
#
# eur_per_kwh is ALL-IN (energy + markup + taxes, §9.3), the same basis the
# dynamic providers are assembled onto. price_markup_eur_kwh and
# price_taxes_eur_kwh are NOT added to it.
#
# ⚠️ RECOMMENDED EVEN ON A DYNAMIC SITE. §11.4's degradation row is "no price
# data -> fall back to the static profile"; with this empty there is nothing
# to fall back to and a dead feed leaves the site with no tariff at all.
# validate.py warns about exactly that.
static_profile: ""
# §9.3: injection is priced SEPARATELY, and in Belgium it is often near zero -
# which by itself strongly favours self-consumption over export. A scalar, not
# a second series: no shipped supplier publishes a dynamic injection curve.
export_price_eur_kwh: 0.04
# --- site ------------------------------------------------------------------
estop_fitted: false
log_level: info
schema:
meter_entity: str
meter_invert: bool
soc_entity: str
batt_entity: str
batt_invert: bool
setpoint_entity: str
meter_source: list(off|ha_dsmr|mqtt_p1|ha_signed|homewizard_local)
# ⚠️ 2 is accepted by this range but is not a real Belgian connection. A
# telegram whose phase count disagrees is rejected at ingest and logged, so a
# mis-set 2 shows up immediately as "0 telegrams accepted" rather than as a
# quietly wrong number.
meter_phases: int(1,3)
meter_max_age_s: int(5,300)
meter_poll_s: int(1,60)
meter_mqtt_topic: str?
p1_host: str?
p1_import_entity: str?
p1_export_entity: str?
p1_phase_import_entities:
- str
p1_phase_export_entities:
- str
p1_net_entity: str?
p1_phase_net_entities:
- str
max_w: int(100,5000)
gain: float(0.05,1.0)
slew_w: int(50,5000)
deadband_w: int(0,500)
target_grid_w: float(-200,200)
step_w: int(1,100)
saturation_w: int(100,2000)
saturation_cycles: int(1,10)
integrator_max_w: int(0,15000)
heartbeat_s: int(2,25)
stale_input_s: int(5,120)
cycle_floor_s: int(5,60)
auto_start: bool
# No "off" value, deliberately: this is a P0 safety check and the schema is
# not the place to make disarming it a supported configuration.
sign_disagree_w: int(50,5000)
sign_disagree_s: int(30,1800)
# No "off" value, for SAFETY-02's reason: disarming a safety alarm is not a
# supported configuration. ⚠️ THE FLOOR OF 60 IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION. At 300 s
# the slowest a HEALTHY meter's 1 Wh register can tick and still look unchanged
# is 12 W, which is inside the 15 W deadband, so the two terms of the
# conjunction are mutually exclusive rather than merely far apart. At 60 s that
# figure is 60 W and the argument is gone - only the margin is left. See
# app/freeze.py.
meter_freeze_s: int(60,3600)
maintenance_enabled: bool
maintenance_interval_days: int(1,90)
maintenance_start_hour: int(0,23)
maintenance_discharge_w: int(500,5000)
maintenance_charge_w: int(500,5000)
maintenance_soc_floor: int(5,30)
maintenance_soc_target: int(50,100)
maintenance_hold_min: int(5,480)
peak_forecast_entity: str?
peak_cap_w: int(500,15000)
# SAFETY-24. No "off" value: a guard that can command a discharge does not get
# a supported way to have no energy bound at all. The ranges OVERLAP on
# purpose - the schema cannot express "above bms_soc_floor", so validate.py
# rule 8 is what refuses the pair, with a message naming both numbers.
peak_soc_floor: int(5,60)
bms_soc_floor: int(0,50)
price_now_entity: str?
price_avg_entity: str?
# ⚠️ The provider list is written out rather than left as `str`, so the
# Supervisor rejects a typo in the UI. validate.py ALSO refuses an unknown id
# against app/price.py's PROVIDERS registry, because sim/inject.py and the
# checks reach validate_startup_config() with a dict the Supervisor never saw.
# Adding a sixth plugin means adding it here and to PROVIDERS - and nowhere
# else, which is AC2.
price_provider: list(off|generic_dayahead|engie_dynamic|totalenergies_dynamic|eneco_eddy|manual_csv)
price_markup_eur_kwh: float(0,1)
price_taxes_eur_kwh: float(0,1)
price_csv_path: str?
price_feed_url: str?
price_horizon_h: int(1,72)
price_timeout_s: int(2,60)
# A JSON string rather than a nested schema, deliberately: it is ONE option
# key (§14 has one), it survives config.yaml's flat options block, and
# parse_static_profile() accepts an already-parsed dict too, so a future
# nested schema is a config.yaml change and no code change at all.
static_profile: str?
# ⚠️ The lower bound is NEGATIVE on purpose. Belgian injection tariffs have
# gone below zero (you pay to export at midday in summer), and a schema that
# bottoms out at 0 would make that site inexpressible.
export_price_eur_kwh: float(-1,1)
estop_fitted: bool
log_level: list(trace|debug|info|warning|error)