Files
goodwe-addon/goodwe_controller/DOCS.md
T
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 616b62d3e9
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m7s
SAFETY-07: cap the loop before it sets the month's billed capacity peak
TARIFF-01 measured the quarter and said the consumer would be this card. It is
one new module, app/peakguard.py, and one new claim.

THE MECHANISM. Every cycle the guard projects the open 900 s block to its
end-of-interval average - from P1 telegrams only, never from the command - and
compares it to a ceiling. Over the ceiling it files ONE arbiter claim: a lower
bound on the setpoint at P_PEAK. That single shape is both behaviours 10.1 asks
for, a hard clamp on charging and pre-emptive discharge, and it cannot cap
discharge or export, because a floor cannot. 9.1's asymmetry becomes a property
of the object instead of a rule to remember.

    excess = 900 x (projected - ceiling) / seconds remaining
    floor  = MEASURED battery power + excess

The 900/remaining gain is 1.0 at the top of the quarter and grows, so the guard
is gentlest where its projection rests on the least evidence. The floor is sized
from delivered battery power, not the standing command: a floor built on intent
re-adds its own unmet ask every cycle and winds to the rail whenever the inverter
fails to follow, and test_peakguard.py part 1 shows the two diverging.

IT TRIPS, AND THE CAPTURES DECIDED THAT. On the healthy reference day it engages
on zero of 95 quarters. The action is level-triggered, unlatched and re-derived
every cycle, so a false engagement costs one cycle of discharge rather than a
parked battery - the cost SAFETY-18 could not bound and this one can. Replayed on
2026-08-20 the billed quarter goes from 5029.8 W, above the inverter's own 5000 W
rating, to 3485 W, under the soft limit and without saturating. Quarters under
the limit across both committed days: 189/190 -> 190/190. Two days is not thirty
and AC 3 remains TARIFF-01's open item.

BLINDNESS IS CHECKED BEFORE THE PROJECTION IS GRADED, and it is a different
action. A fresh averager projects a confident 0 W, which is under every ceiling
there is; a meter gap longer than meter_max_age_s makes the projection read LOW;
a frozen meter reading export projects 0 W at full coverage. All three become a
floor of 0 W - no importing while the billed quantity is unobservable - which is
one-directional and cannot cost pack energy. That is the backstop SAFETY-18 could
not be: its alarm arrives at 300 s of a 900 s quarter and commands nothing. The
frozen term is freeze.looks_frozen() itself, on this cycle's standing command.

THE CEILING IS peak_cap_w, RAISED ONLY BY AN OBSERVED READING. NO_RECORD and
NOT_OBSERVED both leave it at the cap, so an unreadable peak store makes the
guard stricter and never looser. The gate is the reading's STATE, not whether a
number happens to be attached: today a `peak_w is not None` test behaves
identically, and depending on that coincidence is how a future last-known-peak
field would raise the ceiling off a read that failed. headroom_w() is
deliberately not consumed - cap minus peak turns a zero peak into FULL freedom.

TWO DEFECTS FOUND BUILDING IT, both in the interaction rather than the
arithmetic, and both caught by running the thing rather than by reading it:

  * A LIMIT does not out-vote another LIMIT. arbiter.resolve() applies every
    limit at or above the winner's priority and takes the most restrictive, so
    the peak floor (lo >= 0) and the maintenance charge-only shaping (hi <= 0)
    resolved to a CONTRADICTION and 0 W - the battery parked in the exact quarter
    it should shave. Fixed by suppression, not priority: main.py drops the
    maintenance shaping while the guard is engaged, which is what that branch
    already did for the optional peak_forecast_entity - a key empty on a default
    install, so until now the suspension could not fire on the site that needed
    it.
  * Thresholding `excess > 0` released the claim the instant it began working,
    producing seventeen engage/release cycles in one 900 s quarter and leaving
    that quarter 49 W over the limit it had spent fifteen minutes holding. That
    is 10.2's oscillation. The threshold is now the floor itself, which is the
    same arithmetic read as a level rather than as a switch.

PeakTracker.project() no longer reads a private name with a default.
getattr(averager, "_last_net", 0.0) failed quiet AND disarming - a rename credits
0 W held, the projection reads low, the money guard does not engage.
QuarterAverager.held_net_w is a documented public property now, read without a
default, and Projection carries it. TEST-13 item 4.

NO NEW OPTION AND NO FOURTH DEFAULTS SITE. The ceiling is peak_cap_w, the
coverage threshold is meter_max_age_s, the freeze predicate is meter_freeze_s,
and the achievable discharge comes from max_w and the device rating. config.yaml
and validate.py are untouched; 14's capacity_peak_limit_kw stays declined. On
meter_source: off there are no telegrams, so the guard does not run at all and
the status page says NOT COVERED - running it there blinded it permanently and
stopped every legacy install from charging, which is what the first cut did until
test_clamp.py's export case caught it.

test_peakguard.py: eight parts, all figures derived from the shipped config.yaml
and the committed captures. Part 8 runs seven one-line defeats of the guard and
reports which check bites; six do, and the seventh is reported as NOT caught,
because max(cap, peak) makes a zero peak the strictest ceiling there is and there
is nothing left to catch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015VXjA3LWccN1rJsk3okyPC
2026-08-30 23:05:05 +02:00

665 lines
39 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# GoodWe RS485 Controller
Drives a GoodWe ES/BP battery inverter over its RS485 meter bus: holds net grid
exchange at zero, and runs a monthly battery maintenance cycle so the BMS can
balance cells and recalibrate its coulomb counter.
Installers: read `FIELD-GUIDE.md` in the repository. It is not optional reading —
it contains the commissioning gates and the failure modes.
## Before you start
You need:
- A GoodWe **ES / BP family** inverter (AA55 / RS485 meter-bus generation)
- The vendor's meter-emulating controller **disconnected** from the bus
- A T-CAN485 (ESP32) flashed with `firmware/goodwe-master.yaml`
- A grid-power sensor already working in Home Assistant, updating every ~5–10 s
## The safety model, in short
The inverter **holds its last command forever** — it has no meter-timeout. So:
- The ESP32 commands 0 W if this add-on stops refreshing for ~30 s, and keeps
commanding it.
- This add-on commands 0 W when its inputs go missing, when you stop control,
and when it shuts down.
- This add-on commands 0 W **and latches there** if what it is commanding and
what the meter reads point opposite ways for three minutes — see "The
sign-disagreement failsafe" below.
- The **optional RS485 e-stop** is the only thing that covers this machine
dying. Without it, a failed host leaves the battery latched at its last
command until someone intervenes.
- This add-on **raises an alarm — and nothing more —** when the meter keeps
answering with a reading that never changes while the command sits at the
rail. See "The frozen-meter alarm" and, before you rely on it, "Capacity-tariff
exposure of the grid-following loop".
**If anything looks wrong: stop the add-on.** That commands 0 W and the
hardware holds it there.
## Configuration
### Sources
| option | required | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `meter_entity` | yes | Net grid power. **Positive must mean importing** |
| `meter_invert` | | Flip the sign if the meter reports the other way |
| `soc_entity` | yes | Battery state of charge — use the **ESP32's own read** |
| `batt_entity` | yes | Battery power — again the ESP32's read, `+` = discharging |
| `batt_invert` | | Flip if needed |
| `setpoint_entity` | yes | The ESPHome `number.*_goodwe_setpoint_w` |
Use the ESP32's readings rather than the inverter's cloud or dongle sensors:
those serve cached values, and a stale reading here ends the maintenance charge
phase having charged nothing.
### P1 meter ingestion
`meter_entity` above expects one signed sensor, which usually means a template
someone wrote by hand. Setting `meter_source` moves the whole derivation into
the add-on, where it is done once and tested, and replaces `meter_entity`
entirely.
Which mode you want depends on what your P1 reader publishes, and there are two
shapes in the wild:
- **Two unsigned registers**, consumption and injection, which is what a Belgian
P1 read over DSMR gives you → `ha_dsmr`, or `mqtt_p1` for a bridge. The add-on
subtracts them.
- **One signed figure**, positive = import and negative = export, which is what
a HomeWizard P1 gives you (`sensor.p1_meter_active_power`) → `ha_signed`. The
add-on splits it. `ha_dsmr` **cannot** read this: it wants two registers and
rejects a negative one outright, which is every exporting telegram.
Either way, do not build the missing shape out of template sensors. The point of
`meter_source` is that the sign convention is derived in one tested place rather
than in YAML nobody reviews underneath a safety input.
> ✅ **If your meter is a HomeWizard P1, use `homewizard_local`, not
> `ha_signed`.** It reads the same meter and produces the same numbers, but it
> polls the meter directly instead of watching a Home Assistant entity — and
> that is the difference between an age sensor a watchdog can threshold and one
> it cannot. See "`sensor.p1_sample_age_s`" below; `ha_signed` remains for
> installs where the meter is only reachable through Home Assistant.
> ⚠️ **`ha_dsmr` and `mqtt_p1` have never processed a telegram from real
> hardware.** No meter in this installation uses either one. Both were written
> to the assumption in `specs.md` §5.2 that a Belgian P1 exposes two unsigned
> registers, and the meter actually fitted here does not — it is the HomeWizard
> P1 that `ha_signed` reads. They are covered by the unit checks in `test_p1.py`
> and by an end-to-end test against a fake Home Assistant, and nothing more.
>
> This is recorded because the realistic way it bites is someone debugging a
> meter problem months from now treating those two paths as proven and looking
> for the fault elsewhere. If you are the first person to point one at a real
> meter, expect to find something, and please update this note when you do.
| option | default | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `meter_source` | `off` | `off` keeps `meter_entity`. `ha_dsmr` subscribes to the DSMR integration over the HA WebSocket; `mqtt_p1` reads a topic; `ha_signed` subscribes to one signed entity over the HA WebSocket; `homewizard_local` polls a HomeWizard P1's own local API, bypassing Home Assistant |
| `meter_phases` | 1 | 1 or 3. Must match the telegram, or every telegram is rejected and logged |
| `meter_max_age_s` | 30 | Beyond this the reading is stale and grid power reads as *missing*. On its own it does **not** command 0 W — see the timing note below. It is also the longest a reading is held forward into the 15-minute average |
| `meter_poll_s` | 5 | `homewizard_local` only. Seconds between polls. **Must be well under `meter_max_age_s`** — see below |
| `p1_host` | | `homewizard_local` only. The meter's own address, `host` or `host:port` (e.g. `192.168.2.250`) |
| `meter_mqtt_topic` | | `mqtt_p1` only |
| `p1_import_entity` | | The **unsigned** consumption sensor. Do not point this at a signed template |
| `p1_export_entity` | | The **unsigned** injection sensor |
| `p1_phase_import_entities` | `[]` | L1..L3, in order. Needed for the capacity-tariff peak on a three-phase connection |
| `p1_phase_export_entities` | `[]` | L1..L3, in order |
| `p1_net_entity` | | `ha_signed` only. The **signed** net-power sensor: `+` import, `-` export |
| `p1_phase_net_entities` | `[]` | `ha_signed` only. L1..L3, in order, each signed the same way. Needed for the capacity-tariff peak on a three-phase connection. **The list length must equal `meter_phases`** |
Both per-phase lists are checked against `meter_phases` **once at startup**: a
list of the wrong length disables P1 ingestion with an error in the log, rather
than letting every telegram fail its phase-count check one at a time. Leaving
the list empty is fine and is not an error — you simply get no per-phase
figures, and therefore no capacity-tariff peak. On a three-phase connection
that is a much bigger omission than it looks: on a surveyed reading here the
phases carried 2769 W of import while the connection netted 187 W, so the
billed quantity is understated roughly fifteenfold if the phases are missing.
#### How long a dead meter takes to reach 0 W
`meter_max_age_s` and `stale_input_s` **stack**. They are two different clocks
and neither one is the whole answer:
| step | option | default |
|---|---|---|
| telegrams stop, P1 sample goes stale, grid power starts reading *missing* | `meter_max_age_s` | 30 s |
| inputs have been missing long enough for the loop to command 0 W | `stale_input_s` | 15 s |
| **total, meter death → 0 W commanded by this add-on** | | **45 s** |
So in P1 mode `stale_input_s` is *not* "how long inputs may be missing before
commanding 0 W" measured from the meter dying — it is measured from the moment
the P1 sample already went stale. Size the pair together: the ESP32's own
watchdog commands 0 W after ~30 s of silence from this add-on regardless, and
that layer is unaffected by either option.
There is **no fallback to an inverter-side power figure**, deliberately. The
inverter's own AC power tracks its battery almost perfectly and the real meter
hardly at all, so a controller that failed over to it would be regulating
against its own output while looking healthy.
The `mqtt_p1` payload is one JSON object per telegram, and the schema is strict —
a key it does not recognise is a telegram from something other than what was
tested, and guessing a key here means guessing a kilowatt:
```json
{"import_w": 1234.0,
"export_w": 0.0,
"phases": [{"import_w": 500, "export_w": 0},
{"import_w": 400, "export_w": 0},
{"import_w": 334, "export_w": 0}],
"timestamp": "2026-08-24T18:00:05+02:00"}
```
`phases` and `timestamp` are optional; `timestamp` must carry a UTC offset. Where
it is present it is used for the age, which is what stops a retained message
replayed on reconnect from presenting a ten-minute-old reading as current.
#### `homewizard_local` — polling the meter instead of Home Assistant
Set `p1_host` to the meter's address and the add-on does `GET /api/v1/data` on
it every `meter_poll_s` seconds, reading `active_power_w` (signed, same
convention as `ha_signed`) and the three `active_power_l{1,2,3}_w` fields. Home
Assistant is not involved: no entity, no WebSocket, no integration to
mis-configure. Per-phase figures are used only when the meter serves all
`meter_phases` of them — a single-phase meter returns `null` for L2/L3, and the
connection-level reading is still accepted on its own.
**Why this mode exists:** every HTTP response is an *arrival*. The meter
answered, now, with its current reading — whether or not the number moved. That
is the signal `sensor.p1_sample_age_s` needs and the one Home Assistant cannot
give it at all (see the note below). It is also simply fewer moving parts: the
five-second cadence is the meter's own, rather than an integration's polling of
it re-published as a state change.
**Cadence.** The age is never fresher than the poll interval, so:
| | |
|---|---|
| meter's own update rate | ~5.0 s (measured 4.97 s) |
| `meter_poll_s` default | 5 s — nothing to gain below the meter's own rate |
| `meter_max_age_s` default | 30 s, i.e. six polls of headroom |
| `meter_poll_s >= meter_max_age_s` | **refused at startup** — every reading would be stale before its successor arrived |
| `meter_poll_s > meter_max_age_s / 2` | warned — one missed poll makes the reading stale |
A failed poll — timeout, connection refused, non-200, unparseable body — is a
**missing** reading. It submits nothing, so the reading does not become 0 W, the
last good value and its timestamp are left alone, and the age goes on climbing.
That is exactly what a dead meter should look like.
**What it still cannot see: a frozen meter.** A meter that answers `200 OK`
forever with a stale number is arriving, so no arrival detector — this one
included — can tell it from a healthy one. The local API does expose the raw
material the HA path never had (the `total_power_*_kwh` registers stop
advancing), and the transport tracks it as `unchanged_s`, but it is deliberately
*not* folded into the age and *not* thresholded: this controller regulates grid
power toward ~0 W, and at a converged −10 W the export register needs six
minutes to move by its 1 Wh resolution while the power figure legitimately
repeats. Thresholding that at 30 s would rebuild the false-trip limit cycle at
the exact operating point the controller aims for. Freeze detection is a
separate problem and needs the low-power case solved first.
You read it yourself instead: the add-on's status page shows it on the P1 line,
as `… 4 rejected, measurement unchanged for 312 s`. On a house drawing real
power that figure stays in the seconds; minutes of it while the load is clearly
not near zero is the meter to go and look at.
#### `sensor.p1_sample_age_s`
Published over MQTT discovery whenever a broker is available: **seconds since the
newest accepted telegram**, refreshed every second rather than only when a
telegram lands. The ESP32's stale-input watchdog subscribes to this exact entity
id, so do not rename it.
The reason it is recomputed against the clock is that Home Assistant only pushes
a state when the state *changes*. A meter sitting at a genuinely constant reading
emits nothing, which is indistinguishable — to anything watching the value — from
a meter that has died. Watching the age instead separates the two: it climbs when
telegrams stop and resets when they arrive, whatever the reading says.
The entity is only created when `meter_source` is not `off`. With P1 ingestion
disabled there is nothing feeding it, and an age sensor climbing with no ingester
behind it would trip the firmware watchdog on a system that is working fine.
> **Known limit, `mqtt_p1`.** The age measures *arrival*. On the MQTT path a
> bridge that is stuck republishing its last telegram keeps arriving, so the age
> stays near zero and a frozen meter still looks fresh. Detecting *that* needs a
> change-detector rather than an arrival-detector, and it is not in this version.
> ⚠️ **Known limit, `ha_signed` — do not drive a watchdog off this age yet.**
> On the HA WebSocket paths the age is stamped when a `state_changed` arrives,
> which means it measures *time since the value last changed*, not time since
> the meter last reported. Home Assistant offers nothing better: a repeated
> reading produces no `state_changed`, does **not** advance `last_reported` on
> either the REST or the WebSocket serialiser, and `state_reported` cannot be
> subscribed to over the WebSocket at all (`Event filter is required for event
> state_reported`). All three measured on the ENV-01 rig against the real
> HomeWizard integration with the meter frozen: 0 `state_changed` in 70 s and no
> timestamp movement anywhere.
>
> `ha_dsmr` mostly escapes this because a DSMR telegram updates several entities
> and something in the set almost always moves. **`ha_signed` has exactly one
> entity, so a healthy meter under a flat load is indistinguishable from a dead
> one.** This is not hypothetical: in our own captures
> (`sim/scenarios/ha-p1_meter_active_power-2026-08-20.json`) the real house meter
> went **42.2 s and 97.0 s** between changes, and 23 Aug peaks at 29.1 s — all
> past the default `meter_max_age_s` of 30.
>
> So `sensor.p1_sample_age_s` on `ha_signed` is safe to *read*, and it is
> correct whenever the value is moving, but it must not yet be thresholded by
> the ESP32 stale-input watchdog: a quiet house would trip the battery to 0 W.
> Raising `meter_max_age_s` is **not** the fix — the two conditions produce an
> identical signal, so a bigger number only chooses which of the two errors you
> get. The real fix is an arrival stamp the meter itself provides — and that now
> exists: **`meter_source: homewizard_local`**. If you have a HomeWizard P1,
> switch to it. If your meter is only reachable through Home Assistant, this
> limit still applies to you and the watchdog threshold still must not be armed.
**Where the age is trustworthy:**
| mode | the age measures | safe to threshold from firmware |
|---|---|---|
| `homewizard_local` | time since the meter **answered** | **yes** — every HTTP response is an arrival |
| `ha_dsmr` | time since one of several entities changed | no — statistically usually fine, which is a masked bug, not an absent one |
| `ha_signed` | time since the one entity changed | **no** — see above |
| `mqtt_p1` | time since a message arrived | arrivals yes, but a stuck bridge republishing keeps arriving |
### Control
| option | default | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `max_w` | 2000 | Hard limit on what may be commanded. Start low, raise after commissioning |
| `gain` | 0.6 | Correction per cycle. **At the limit — do not raise** |
| `slew_w` | 1000 | Maximum change per cycle |
| `deadband_w` | 15 | Ignore errors smaller than this |
| `target_grid_w` | -10 | What the meter should rest at. Negative = a slight export |
| `step_w` | 10 | Quantisation |
| `saturation_w` | 500 | Divergence that counts as "the inverter is at a limit" |
| `saturation_cycles` | 3 | How many consecutive cycles before freezing. A cycle is one meter update or `cycle_floor_s`, whichever comes first - see the note below. **Do not set to 1** |
| `integrator_max_w` | 0 | Bound on the loop's accumulator, and 0 means "same as `max_w`". Caps how much stale error can be waiting to unwind when the sign flips. **Do not raise it above `max_w`** - the output clamp already bounds what is commanded, so the only thing extra headroom buys is more cycles of wrong-direction power after every saturation event. Lowering it below `max_w` is the useful direction |
| `heartbeat_s` | 10 | Refresh interval; must stay well under the firmware watchdog |
| `cycle_floor_s` | 15 | The longest the loop may go without evaluating. A deadline on the gap between cycles, reset by every cycle — on a healthy meter it never elapses and changes nothing. Raise it only if your meter is slower than ~10 s; it must stay under `meter_max_age_s`, past which there is no reading to evaluate anyway |
| `stale_input_s` | 15 | How long inputs may be missing before commanding 0 W. In P1 mode this clock starts only *after* `meter_max_age_s` has already expired — the two stack, see "How long a dead meter takes to reach 0 W" |
| `auto_start` | false | Start controlling on boot (only after commissioning) |
| `sign_disagree_w` | 300 | Both the command and the meter must exceed this before a sign difference counts. Must stay **below `max_w`** or the watchdog can never fire, and the add-on refuses to start |
| `sign_disagree_s` | 180 | How long they must stay opposed, continuously, before the failsafe trips |
#### The sign-disagreement failsafe
If the setpoint this add-on is emitting and the grid figure it is regulating on
point **opposite ways** — charging the battery while the house imports, or
discharging it while the house exports — with both over `sign_disagree_w`, for
`sign_disagree_s` **continuously**, the add-on commands **0 W** and holds it
there. The banner reads `FAILSAFE`, the commissioning list says which two
numbers disagreed and for how long, and the `Controller status` entity reports
`failsafe`.
**It does not clear itself, and restarting the add-on does not clear it either.**
Pressing *Start / stop control* twice — stop, then start — is the only thing that
does. That is deliberate on both counts:
- Commanding 0 W removes the command side of the comparison, so the disagreement
always vanishes the instant the trip works. A watchdog that took that as proof
the fault was over would hand the inverter straight back to the loop that was
driving the wrong way, three minutes later, forever.
- The trip is written to `/data/state.json` and restored on startup. Restarting
the add-on is the first thing most people try when they see a red banner, and
a latch that a restart clears would bring the controller back **armed, into the
same fault, unattended** — and under a Supervisor that restarts a crashed add-on
automatically, would do so in a loop. After a restart the banner, the 0 W and
the recorded reason are all still there.
**What it is for.** This is a loop-integrity check: it asks whether the loop's
output direction still matches the input state it was regulating. It catches a
polarity error anywhere between the meter and the wire, and an integrator so far
wound up that unwinding takes minutes. It is the check that would have caught all
four episodes of 2026-08-20, when a commercial controller charged the battery out
of the grid, four times, for up to 77 minutes at a time.
**What it is not for.** It does not detect an inverter that acts opposite to what
it was told — that moves the meter *further* the same way, so command and meter
agree while everything runs away. That is the saturation freeze's job
(`saturation_w` / `saturation_cycles`), which compares the command against the
battery's actual power. The two checks are complementary and neither replaces the
other.
**Why it will not false-trip on ordinary operation.** A battery that refuses a
command (empty, full, standby) leaves the meter where it was, so command and
meter agree. A frozen meter drives the loop into agreeing with it. Around the
resting point both signals are inside the 300 W gate, so the deadband can never
produce one. A load step does flip the meter's sign before the loop catches up —
measured on a full captured day, the longest such crossing is 30 s, against a
180 s window. And the watchdog is **disarmed whenever the grid-following loop is
not what is driving**: a maintenance grid charge opposes the meter by design and
must not be mistaken for a fault.
Both numbers are measured rather than chosen, and are exposed only because the
ticket requires defaults rather than constants. On the captured healthy day sign
agreement is 93.4 %; on the four captured fault clusters it is 0.3 %, 0.9 %,
10.5 % and 0.0 %. There is no reason to move either value without a capture that
says so.
#### Saturation is counted in cycles, not seconds
The specification states the saturation window as **"> 10 s"**. This add-on counts
**cycles** instead, and that is a deliberate, accepted deviation rather than an
oversight - the acceptance criterion is not met as literally written.
A cycle here is one meter update **or `cycle_floor_s` elapsing, whichever comes
first**. At the reference P1's ~5 s update rate the default of 3 cycles is usually
around 15 s, and the worst case is bounded at `3 x cycle_floor_s` = 45 s. It is still
not the 10 s the specification asks for, so the deviation stands - but it is now a
bounded number rather than an open one.
⚠️ **This passage used to say something different, and the second half of it was
wrong.** Until SAFETY-12 the loop ran only when the meter value *changed*, so a meter
that repeated a value stalled the counter for as long as it repeated, with no upper
bound at all. That was defended here on the grounds that "a stalled counter is a
detection-latency limit and not a runaway risk - the condition that stalls it stops the
whole loop, so nothing accumulates while it is stalled". That argument covers
**integrator windup and nothing else**. The hazard it misses is **staleness**: while the
loop was stopped the heartbeat kept re-emitting the last command and the firmware kept
putting it on the wire every 2 s, so a command computed from an old reading went on
being executed through a real load change, with every indicator reading healthy.
Measured on the rig during TEL-05: 70 s at a literally constant 350.0 W, 14 arrivals,
zero control cycles.
The half that survives is the first one: the control law is still a pure function with
no clock, and the wall-clock window still lives in `Controller`, which has one - see
`run_control()`. What changed is that the controller now enforces a floor on the gap
between cycles, so `saturation_cycles` finally means a bounded number of seconds.
If a tighter window matters on your site, lower `cycle_floor_s` (not below your meter's
update interval, or the floor starts firing on a healthy meter) or raise
`saturation_cycles` for a fast meter.
**This is not a freeze detector, and it deliberately cannot be one.** Nothing here
decides whether a repeated reading is true — see `unchanged_s` in the meter section for
why no threshold on that is safe at the converged operating point. The floor only stops
"the number is the same" from meaning "do not think". The consequence is worth stating
plainly: against a meter that is genuinely frozen at a wrong value, the loop will now
correct toward that wrong value instead of holding a stale command. It is bounded by
`max_w`, the arbiter and the device rating, and it is the same thing that already
happened to a lying meter whose value merely jittered — bit-exact repetition was never a
safety property.
#### Why `target_grid_w` is not zero
The deadband is a one-way ratchet: any resting point inside it holds until
something disturbs it. Import and export are **separate registers on the
meter**, so a rest point of +14 W is billed for every second it holds and no
amount of export cancels it - 14 W all day is 0.34 kWh.
Biasing the target below zero moves that residue into the export register,
which is not billed. The resting band becomes `target ± deadband`, so:
| `target_grid_w` | resting band | worst billed leak | export given away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | -15 … +15 W | ~15 W (0.35 kWh/day) | none |
| **-10** | -25 … +5 W | ~5 W (0.12 kWh/day) | ~10 W |
| -15 | -30 … 0 W | none | ~15 W (0.36 kWh/day) |
Set it to `-deadband_w` if injection is worth nothing to you and you would
rather give the energy away than buy it back. Set it to `0` if you are paid
properly for export, or if you are debugging and want the loop centred.
⚠️ This is a **billing** knob, not a speed knob. If import is arriving in
bursts rather than as a trickle, the cause is tracking lag, and this will not
help - see "Why the tuning is what it is".
### Maintenance
| option | default | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `maintenance_enabled` | false | Enable the monthly cycle |
| `maintenance_interval_days` | 28 | Minimum gap between cycles |
| `maintenance_start_hour` | 10 | Hour of day a due cycle begins |
| `maintenance_discharge_w` | 2000 | Drain rate (exports the surplus). Above `max_w` it is **clamped** to `max_w` — the drain phase SETs the setpoint and the arbiter bounds it, saying so on the status page (`limited by supervised(max_w)`). Warned about, not refused: the cycle still completes, just slower |
| `maintenance_charge_w` | 2000 | Charge ceiling, capped again by peak headroom. Must stay **at or below `max_w`** or the cheap-window shaping (`hi = -maintenance_charge_w`) contradicts the supervised limit (`lo = -max_w`), the arbiter resolves it to **0 W**, and maintenance silently never charges in a cheap window — **the add-on refuses to start** |
| `maintenance_soc_floor` | 11 | Drain target — stay just above the inverter's own floor |
| `maintenance_soc_target` | 99 | Charge target |
| `maintenance_hold_min` | 120 | Hold at full so the BMS can balance |
### Tariff (all optional)
| option | meaning |
|---|---|
| `peak_forecast_entity` | Quarter-hour demand forecast, for capacity-tariff markets. Empty = no cap |
| `peak_cap_w` | The site's capacity-tariff target |
| `price_now_entity`, `price_avg_entity` | Dynamic tariff. Empty = never force a paid grid top-up |
On a capacity-tariff site the maintenance charge is capped by the headroom left
under `peak_cap_w`, and if the forecast goes over the cap the charge-only clamp
is dropped so the battery can shave the peak instead. Money outranks the
maintenance schedule.
#### Capacity-tariff exposure of the grid-following loop
⚠️ **This section described the exposure BEFORE SAFETY-07. The loop is now
capped — see "The capacity-peak guard" below — and what follows is kept because it
is still the clearest statement of WHAT is being guarded and why the number is
worth what it is.**
⚠️ **`peak_cap_w` caps MAINTENANCE charging. It does not cap the loop.** The
grid-following loop is bounded by `max_w` and by the device rating, and by
nothing else. That is deliberate — the loop exists to *reduce* what crosses the
meter, so under every healthy condition it lowers the peak rather than raising
it — but it means one thing is true and worth writing down:
**If the meter lies, the loop will happily buy `max_w` from the grid for as long
as the lie lasts, and no cap in this add-on stops it.** A meter frozen at a large
export reads as "the house is exporting hard", the loop charges the battery to
correct it, and the correction is a grid import. At the schema maximum
`max_w: 5000` — which is what this house runs, and is also the device rating —
that is a 5 kW unattended import.
The bill is not the energy. In the Belgian capaciteitstarief the month is billed
on its highest quarter-hour average, so **fifteen minutes of this sets the whole
month's peak.** A measured case: one 4998 W quarter moved a monthly peak from
4832 W to 5013 W, and every day of that month was billed at the higher figure.
What exists today, and what does not:
| | |
|---|---|
| `max_w` bounds the magnitude | ✅ — but the exposure IS the magnitude |
| Maintenance charging capped under `peak_cap_w` | ✅ |
| **Loop capped under `peak_cap_w`** | ✅ — SAFETY-07, on every `meter_source` but `off` |
| Frozen meter detected | ✅ on `homewizard_local` only, **alarm only** |
| Frozen meter *stopped* | ✅ — SAFETY-07 forbids importing while the meter is frozen |
| SoC guard on the loop | ❌ — the BMS is the only energy backstop |
On the legacy `meter_source: off` path there are no P1 telegrams, so there is no
quarter-hour average to guard, and the status page says **NOT COVERED**. There
the mitigation is still operational: set `max_w` no higher than the loop actually
needs (the tuning was measured at 2000 W and a 1.78 kW load step is tracked fine
there), fit the e-stop, and watch for the alarm.
### The capacity-peak guard
**What it does.** Every cycle the add-on projects the open quarter to its
end-of-interval average — from P1 telegrams only, never from the command — and
compares it to a ceiling. Over the ceiling it files one claim: a **lower bound on
the setpoint**, at `P_PEAK`. That single shape is both behaviours §10.1 asks for:
a hard clamp on charging while the bound sits above the standing charge, and
pre-emptive discharge while it sits above zero. It can never cap discharge or
export, because a floor cannot.
**The number.** `excess = 900 × (projected − ceiling) ÷ seconds remaining`, and
the floor is the **measured** battery power plus that. The 900/remaining factor
is the design rather than an accident: it is 1.0 at the top of the quarter and
grows, so the guard is gentlest when its projection rests on the least evidence
and becomes aggressive only once the quarter is nearly measured.
**The ceiling** is `peak_cap_w`, raised to the month's banked peak when that
already stands higher — once a month's bill is set at 5013 W, holding later
quarters to 3500 W buys nothing and costs real charging. **That relaxation is
granted only by an OBSERVED reading:** a peak store that cannot be read leaves the
ceiling at the cap, so a broken instrument makes the guard stricter, never looser.
**When it cannot see, it forbids importing.** Three states are not evidence and
are checked before the projection is graded: no open quarter (a fresh averager
projects a confident 0 W, which is under every ceiling there is), a meter gap
longer than `meter_max_age_s`, and SAFETY-18's frozen-meter conjunction. In all
three the claim becomes a floor of **0 W**. That is the backstop for the frozen
meter: the alarm arrives at `meter_freeze_s` (300 s) of a 900 s billing quarter
and commands nothing, and this stops the import.
**It trips, where the freeze detector only notifies,** and the captures are why.
On the healthy reference day (2026-08-23) it engages on **zero** of 95 quarters.
The action is level-triggered and unlatched — re-derived from a fresh projection
every cycle, released the instant the projection drops back — so a false
engagement costs one cycle of discharge rather than a parked battery. And it is a
LIMIT, so every stop in the watchdog table still outranks it.
**Replayed on 2026-08-20**, the day the vendor controller failed: the billed
quarter measured **5029.8 W**, above the inverter's own 5000 W rating, and the
guard brings it to **3485 W** — under the soft limit, without ever asking for more
than the inverter can give. Across both committed days the quarters under the
limit go from 189/190 to 190/190. Two days is not thirty and does not close AC 3;
it is the comparison two days can support.
**What it alarms on is saturation, not engagement.** An engagement is an ordinary
control action and goes to the action log and the status page. A *saturated*
guard — asking for everything the inverter has while the quarter is still
projected over — raises one notification (`goodwe_peak_saturated`), because that
is the one state where the money will be spent and shedding load is the only
thing left that changes the bill.
**No new option.** The ceiling is `peak_cap_w`, which already shipped. The
coverage threshold is `meter_max_age_s`, the freeze predicate is
`meter_freeze_s`, and the achievable discharge comes from `max_w` and the device
rating — every one of them a key that already exists.
### The winding-loop alarm (the output clamp)
Every setpoint this add-on writes is clamped to `max_w` before it leaves the
process, and **when that clamp actually engages, it alarms.** The clamp on its
own is not the feature - this project already clipped, and the clipping is what
hid the defect the guard exists for: with the inverter switched off entirely an
unclamped integrator climbed ~130 W per 4 s past 10 kW and, pinned at the 5 kW
rail, reported **14 768 W**. Clipped silently, that is a flat, legal-looking
5000 W hold on every dashboard, and nothing anywhere says the loop asked for
three times it.
**What "the rating" is.** The bound is `max_w`, and only `max_w`. It is already
validated against the setpoint device's own range at startup - the add-on
*refuses to start* if `max_w` exceeds what the device accepts (and again once
ESPHome is up and the real rating is known), so by the time the loop runs the two
numbers agree. The device range is applied a second time inside the write as
defence in depth; after a successful validation it cannot bite, and if it ever
does, that engagement alarms too and names the bound.
**Clamping is not saturation, and the two never share a channel.**
| | what it means | what happens |
|---|---|---|
| **clamp** | the *computed* value exceeded the rating | a software bug signal - something upstream is winding. **Alarm.** |
| **saturation** | the inverter is not following a perfectly *legal* command | a hardware condition - freeze the integrator. **No alarm.** |
A loop can be legally saturated all day: a cold pack, a curtailed inverter, an
export limit. Routing the clamp through a saturation-shaped alarm puts the bug
signal inside the noise, which is the same silence as clipping quietly. They
share no reason code, no notification id, no status row and no counter.
**It is an alarm, not a trip.** The clamped value is written and the loop keeps
running - this is not the sign-disagreement failsafe, which commands 0 W. You
get a persistent notification (`goodwe_output_clamp`, replaced rather than
stacked), an `ERROR` in the log with the reason code `OUTPUT_CLAMP`, a row in
the event list, and a red status banner while it is engaged. Once it clears, a
warning row keeps the engagement count so the evidence does not vanish with the
condition. Consecutive engagements share one event row carrying the exact count,
because the event list keeps only 40 rows and a row per cycle would flush every
other guard's entries out of it.
**There is nothing to configure**, deliberately. The bound is `max_w`, which you
already set; giving the guard a limit of its own would be a second number that
can disagree with the first, which is exactly the failure the startup validation
exists to prevent. The alarm's cadence - first engagement, then re-asserted every
30 s while it persists, cleared after 3 clean cycles - is fixed for the same
reason `RAIL_FRAC` is: it describes the notification bus, not the plant.
WARNING: **on a default install the engagement you will see is the integrator's,
not the output's.** The control law bounds the integrator to `max_w` and *then*
derives the command from it, so the command itself can never come out over the
rating unless `integrator_max_w` has been deliberately raised above `max_w`.
Both are watched. A guard that watched only the emitted value would be silent on
every standard configuration.
### The frozen-meter alarm
A meter that has died is easy — it stops answering, the sample age climbs past
`meter_max_age_s`, the reading becomes missing, and the add-on and the ESP32 both
command 0 W. A meter that keeps answering `200 OK` with a document that never
changes is the hard one: **every freshness mechanism in the stack reads it as
healthy**, because it really is arriving on every poll. The loop then integrates
a constant error and winds to the rail, in 75–360 s at `max_w: 5000`.
The add-on alarms when **both** of these are true at once:
- the meter's own document (power figure *and* both kWh registers) has not
changed for `meter_freeze_s` — 300 s by default; **and**
- the command standing on the wire is at the rail, within 5 % of `max_w`.
Neither half is usable alone. A bare "unchanged for N seconds" rule false-trips
at the exact operating point this controller aims for — at a converged −10 W a
1 Wh register legitimately takes about six minutes to move — and a bare "at the
rail" rule fires on any genuinely large load. Together they are safe in both
directions, because a real railed condition means kilowatts still crossing the
meter, and a kilowatt advances a 1 Wh register every 3.6 s.
**It is an alarm and nothing else.** It does not command 0 W, does not latch, and
does not claim the actuator. A false trip here parks the battery; a false
notification costs an alert. Turning it into a trip is a separate decision that
needs data from a real install — and an answer to "what should the loop do
instead", given that 0 W is itself an import of whatever the house is drawing.
When it fires you get a Home Assistant persistent notification
(`goodwe_meter_frozen`, replaced rather than stacked on a repeat), an `ERROR` in
the add-on log, an entry in the UI's event list, and a red banner on the status
page. **The loop keeps running.** If the meter really is stuck, stop control from
the add-on UI.
⚠️ **Only `meter_source: homewizard_local` is covered.** It is the only transport
that reads the meter's own document; on `ha_dsmr`, `mqtt_p1`, `ha_signed` and
`off` there is no signal to threshold and the status page says **NOT COVERED**
rather than pretending the guard is armed.
| option | default | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| `meter_freeze_s` | 300 | Seconds of an unchanged measurement, *while the command is at the rail*, before the alarm |
Why 300 s: over 2399 s of this house at the converged operating point (mean grid
−14.2 W, 1194 polls, 735 of them repeating the previous reading) the largest
`unchanged_s` any sample sees is **8.0 s**, and the longest interval serving no
distinct reading at all is **15.4 s**. There is also a structural reason not to
lower it much: at 300 s the slowest a *healthy* register can tick and still look
unchanged is 12 W, which is inside the 15 W deadband — so the command there is
parked at 0 W and the two halves of the rule cannot both be true. At the schema
floor of 60 s that figure is 60 W and only the margin is left.
### Site
| option | meaning |
|---|---|
| `estop_fitted` | Whether the RS485 e-stop is installed. Drives the warning banner |
| `log_level` | `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warning`/`error` |
## The Web UI
The ingress panel shows live values, why the controller is commanding what it
is, and a **Commissioning** checklist that names any problem in words. It also
carries the three buttons: start/stop control, force a maintenance cycle, and
abort one.
## Status entities
If an MQTT broker is available the add-on publishes setpoint, grid power,
battery power, state of charge, maintenance phase and controller status by MQTT
discovery. This is observability only — the controller works fine without a
broker, and MQTT problems can never affect control.