Compare commits

...
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude d424b862d8 TARIFF-24 round 2: test_modes_p4 scenarios keep the 0.30 gate they were written for
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Waiting to run
checks / unit (pull_request) In progress
With a forecast read the gap needed is the cycle cost (0.20), not 1.5 x (0.30),
so a midday 0.21 gap now plans a grid top-up that four scenarios (sunny, Cheap
hours partly, forecast too high, refusal) are not about. They ask for cost 0.30
with the forecast; the no-forecast leg keeps 0.20 (= 0.30 widened).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 15:42:50 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 382b0ea411 TARIFF-24 round 2: a usable solar forecast replaces the "no weather" x1.5 (AUDIT-02 F1)
With battery modes on, the price gap a mode needs was always widened x1.5 by
Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER, even with a solar forecast read, so a 0.08 day/night
gap never traded at the shipped cycle cost. The doubt is now added only when
no usable forecast is read (solar_fc is None, the day plan's own test), in the
run plan (_price_runs), the charge gate (_mode_roles) and Home's mirror
(homeview.trade_verdict). The rule is one helper, arbitrage.weather_uncertainty();
the modes-off trade path (main.py cycle) keeps its literal NO_WEATHER.

DOCS "Battery modes" sentence, CHANGELOG 0.19.1 line and the DECISIONS note
follow. Tests: test_tariff24_weather.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 15:08:21 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 230ba0b57a TARIFF-24: test file follows the repo's suite rules (MUTATION.md pointer, named absence)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 49m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 01:09:39 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude d667f3f3a8 TARIFF-24: battery modes start the tariff task (hotfix 0.19.1)
With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed static_profile, no price feed and
arbitrage off, tariff_refresh_wanted() was false: no tariff task, no
tariff_plan, mode_runs None, so Leftover solar / Cheap hours never charged from
the grid and the Batteries screen said "No prices". packmode.enabled(opts) is
now a third term of the gate. With price_provider off the task is pure
arithmetic on static_profile, so no HTTPS call is added.

Also: version 0.19.1, CHANGELOG entry, DECISIONS note, test_tariff24.py, and a
shorter tariff_refresh_wanted() docstring (history stays in DECISIONS).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 01:02:32 +01:00
10 changed files with 867 additions and 65 deletions
+28
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,33 @@
# Changelog
## 0.19.1
**A patch bump: two fixes for battery modes, and no option changes.**
No option was added, removed or renamed, and no default changed (86 options).
**Existing installs need no option change:** options that start 0.19.0 also
start 0.19.1. The changes below apply with one inverter or two.
**Battery modes now see a day/night or fixed tariff.** With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed tariff and no price service, the batteries never got the prices: "Cheap hours" never charged from the grid at the cheap rate, and the Batteries screen said "No prices". They get them now, with no price service and no internet call added.
**A solar forecast now counts for the price gap.** With battery modes on and a solar forecast read, a price mode needs a gap of at least *Battery cycle cost*, not 1.5 times that. Without a forecast it is still 1.5 times. A day/night gap of 0.08 now works at a cycle cost of 0.07 or less.
Contents of this release, in merge order since 0.19.0 (`793a676`):
| | |
|---|---|
| `TARIFF-24` | With battery modes on, the add-on now also resolves the tariff when no price service and no price trading are set, so a day/night or fixed tariff gives the batteries their price runs ([[TARIFF-24]]). With battery modes on and a solar forecast read, the price gap a mode needs is *Battery cycle cost* (widened only for a real-time feed), not 1.5 times that; Home and the Batteries screen use the same rule ([[AUDIT-02]] F1). |
### Known issues
The list under `## 0.19.0` below still applies.
### If you are crossing from a version older than 0.10.0
`## 0.10.0` below can refuse an old config: `slew_w` above its limit, and the
withdrawn `price_provider` ids `engie_dynamic`, `totalenergies_dynamic` and
`eneco_eddy`. Read it before you update. Run `tools/predeploy_check.py` with the
bare options (`jq '.data.options'`) first.
## 0.19.0
**A minor bump: price trading behaves differently, plus a fix for a false warning, the Home price chart in 15-minute bars, more Dutch text and EMS-port wording, and no option changes.**
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# TARIFF-24 - battery modes need the tariff task
**Status: FIXED in 0.19.1 (hotfix from 0.19.0, owner go 2026-10-28).**
Follows TARIFF-10 (fetching is not trading). Tests: `test_tariff24.py`.
**The defect.** The control cycle gets prices only from
`Controller.tariff_plan`, which only `run_tariff_refresh()` stores. `amain()`
starts that task when `tariff_refresh_wanted(opts)`, which was
`provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)`. Battery modes read the
plan but were not a term. With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed
`static_profile`, `price_provider: off` and `arbitrage_enabled: false` (the
site trade switch is not read with modes on) no task ran. Then
`fresh_tariff_plan()` was None, `_price_runs()` was None and `mode_runs` was
None, so Leftover solar and Cheap hours never charged from the grid. The
Batteries screen said "No prices, so it follows the house" while Home priced
the day from `static_plan()` itself (`homeview.build_plan()`).
**The fix** (`main.py`, `tariff_refresh_wanted()`). `packmode.enabled(opts)`
is a third term. The gate stays a widening: nothing that started the task
before stops. No HTTPS call is added: with `price_provider: off`,
`resolve_tariff()` is the pure `static_plan()`.
**Not changed.** Modes off, arbitrage off, no feed still starts no task. The
control law, the price runs and every message are untouched.
**One rule, not two.** Gating on "modes on and a static profile" was
considered. It saves one arithmetic pass every 30 min on a site with modes on
and no prices at all, and it adds a second condition that has to track what
`resolve_tariff()` accepts. With no profile and no feed the plan is `no_data`,
exactly what the cycle sees without the task.
**UX-55.** Home said "no prices have arrived" (`mode_runs` None) with every
battery on Solar first. The same cause, and this fix clears it for a site with
a static profile (`test_tariff24.py` part 5). A site with no profile and no
feed still has no prices, and Home still says so.
## Round 2 (AUDIT-02 F1): the forecast replaces the "no weather" doubt
**Decided 2026-10-28 (owner), in the same hotfix.** The price gap a mode needs
was `cycle_cost_threshold_eur` x 1.5 (`Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER`) whether or not
a solar forecast was read. At the shipped cost 0.10 that is 0.15, so a
day/night gap (0.08) and many dynamic days never traded, and the screens said
only "Prices differ too little".
**Why the doubt goes with a forecast.** The widening stands in for not knowing
the weather. The forecast is that knowledge, and the day plan already trusts it
for how much to charge. Trusting it for the plan but doubting it for the gap
was one input judged twice.
**The rule** (`arbitrage.weather_uncertainty()`). With battery modes on and a
usable forecast (`solar_fc` not None, the day plan's own test) the doubt is
not added: the gap needed is the cycle cost, widened by the price product only.
No forecast, or a stale or unusable one: 1.5 x, as before. It is read in three
places that must agree: the run plan (`_price_runs()`), the charge gate
(`_mode_roles()`) and Home's mirror (`homeview.trade_verdict()`). The forecast
is read at most every 60 s and the plan key already holds "forecast or not", so
the gap follows in the cycle the read changes, both ways. A run already under
way is kept to its end (`priceruns.keep_started()`), as for any change.
**Not changed.** Modes off (the site trade) keeps the doubt always. The
shipped cost 0.10 still needs a gap of 0.10 even with a forecast: a 0.08
day/night site must set *Battery cycle cost* to 0.08 or less. Showing the two
numbers on the screens (AUDIT-02 F1 option b) is a separate card.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ With battery modes on, these choices replace the *Charging and selling on price*
**Cheap and expensive hours.** They come from the published day-ahead prices, as runs of consecutive 15-minute periods, not a single period.
- The cheap run is the cheapest stretch long enough to fill the batteries that may charge, at their power.
- An expensive hour costs at least *Battery cycle cost* (`cycle_cost_threshold_eur`, widened as for trading) more than the cheap run. The batteries hold their power until then.
- An expensive hour costs more than the cheap run by at least *Battery cycle cost* (`cycle_cost_threshold_eur`) when a solar forecast is read, and by 1.5 times that when none is (a real-time price feed widens it further). The batteries hold their power until then.
- The sale uses the most expensive stretch inside those hours, and never a period below 0.
- A carried (not yet published) price is never used. A run that has started runs to its end.
- With no prices, or too small a gap, every battery follows the house.
+14 -1
View File
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import datetime
from .arbiter import ACTUATOR_SITE, P_ARBITRAGE, Claim
from .price import Absence, price_option
from .price import Absence, Uncertainty, price_option
_LOG = logging.getLogger("goodwe.arbitrage")
@@ -267,6 +267,19 @@ def threshold_eur_kwh(opts: dict) -> float:
return v
def weather_uncertainty(modes_on: bool, solar_fc) -> frozenset:
"""The "no weather" doubt (x1.5) a trade must clear. TARIFF-24.
Battery modes read a solar forecast; with one read (`solar_fc` not None) the
doubt is gone. Everything else, and the modes without a forecast, keep it.
One rule for the run plan, the charge gate and Home's mirror of it. See
DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
if modes_on and solar_fc is not None:
return frozenset()
return frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
def soc_bounds(opts: dict) -> tuple:
"""(floor, ceiling) in percent. The reserve arbitrage may not spend."""
return (float(price_option(opts, "arbitrage_soc_floor")),
+4 -2
View File
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ from . import arbitrage, messages, peakguard, uitext
from .maintenance import CHARGE as M_CHARGE, DRAIN as M_DRAIN, HOLD as M_HOLD
from .maintenance import IDLE as M_IDLE, next_slot_start
from .packmode import CHEAP_HOURS, GRID_CHARGE_MODES, LEFTOVER_SOLAR, SOLAR_FIRST
from .price import Absence, Uncertainty, brussels, _cover_table
from .price import Absence, brussels, _cover_table
from .static_tariff import static_plan
from .tariff import BILLING_TZ
from .uimodel import REGION_PRESETS, options_to_ui
@@ -277,7 +277,9 @@ def trade_verdict(c, plan, now):
return None, "no_prices"
verdict = plan.arbitrage(peak_guard_active=guard,
min_spread_eur_kwh=arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(c.o),
uncertainty=frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER}),
uncertainty=arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
bool(getattr(c, "modes_on", False)),
getattr(c, "solar_fc", None)),
now=now)
return verdict.match(
allowed=lambda v: (v, "allowed"),
+14 -56
View File
@@ -174,57 +174,17 @@ TARIFF_MAX_AGE_S = 3 * TARIFF_REFRESH_S
def tariff_refresh_wanted(opts: dict) -> bool:
"""TARIFF-10. Does this install need the background tariff refresh at all?
"""Does this install need the background tariff refresh? (TARIFF-10, TARIFF-24)
THE DEFECT THIS PREVENTS, and it shipped: the gate below used to be
`arbitrage.enabled(opts)` alone. That option defaults to `false`, and
`run_tariff_refresh` is the only caller of `resolve_tariff()`, which is the
only caller of `price_history.carry()` - so on a shipped install with a
provider configured NOTHING was ever fetched, no plan was ever resolved,
`/data/price_history.json` was never created, the *Price history* row read
`empty` forever, and TARIFF-09's short-horizon warning could not fire
because there was no fetch to warn about. Measured over a 40 h soak of two
instances side by side: zero feed requests and `present: false` across all
802 samples on the shipped default, against a resolved plan from the same
feed on the instance with arbitrage armed. ⚠️ AND `DOCS.md` HAS
DESCRIBED THE BEHAVIOUR BELOW SINCE THE COMMIT THAT WROTE THE GATE:
OPT-04 (bdd7f18) added the refresh task, the `arbitrage.enabled()` guard on
it, and the sentence saying a configured provider still fetches, all in one
change. config.yaml has said it since TARIFF-02 (852fc7c).
Two terms, and they answer two different questions:
provider_configured(opts) -> "the operator asked for a price feed", so
fetch it, validate it and record the day
(§8.3). This is the term TARIFF-10 ADDS.
arbitrage.enabled(opts) -> "the operator armed trading". This term is
what the gate USED to be, kept verbatim.
⚠️ IT IS AN `or`, SO THE GATE IS A STRICT WIDENING. Every configuration
that started this task before still starts it; none that did not start it
stops anything. That matters because the second term is not redundant:
`price_provider: off` + a `static_profile` + `arbitrage_enabled: true` is a
configuration validate.py explicitly ACCEPTS, and it trades - measured, at
`cycle_cost_threshold_eur: 0.05` on a 0.20/0.284 day/night profile,
`ARBITRAGE_CHARGE -5000 W`. Dropping that term to make the gate read
`provider_configured(opts)` alone would leave `self.tariff_plan` at None on
that site forever and `decide()` would answer "no tariff plan has been
resolved yet" on every cycle - silently disarming a strategy the UI says is
running, which is the exact failure validate.py's OPT-04 rules exist to
refuse.
⚠️ AND NO CONFIGURATION ACQUIRES A PERIODIC HTTPS CALL FROM THIS TICKET.
With `price_provider` off, `resolve_tariff()` returns `static_plan()` - pure
arithmetic, no socket - so the second term starts a task that fetches
nothing. The true shipped default (no provider, no arbitrage) starts no
task at all. What is fetched is decided by the FIRST term only.
⚠️ THIS IS NOT A TRADING SWITCH. It decides whether prices are LOOKED UP.
Whether they move energy is `arbitrage.enabled()` at the one call site in
`cycle()`, and TARIFF-10 did not touch it: `arbitrage_enabled: false` still
means no trade, ever, on any configuration.
Yes with a price feed, with trading on price armed, or with battery modes
on: the modes read `self.tariff_plan` for their price runs. With
`price_provider` off the refresh is pure arithmetic on `static_profile`, so
no term here adds an HTTPS call. It decides whether prices are looked up,
never whether energy moves. See DECISIONS/TARIFF-10-fetching-is-not-trading.md
and DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
return provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
return (provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
or packmode.enabled(opts))
def load_options() -> dict:
@@ -2290,7 +2250,7 @@ class Controller:
required = price_required_spread(
arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(self.o),
price_uncertainty_of(plan.read.product)
| {Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
| arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(True, self.solar_fc))
ref = self._ref_cheap
if ref is not None and now - ref.end > REF_CHEAP_KEEP:
ref = self._ref_cheap = None
@@ -2369,7 +2329,7 @@ class Controller:
return plan.arbitrage(
peak_guard_active=active,
min_spread_eur_kwh=arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(self.o),
uncertainty=frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER}),
uncertainty=arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(True, self.solar_fc),
now=now).match(
allowed=lambda _v: True, refused=lambda _v: False)
if guard is not None and plan is not None and runs is not None:
@@ -8051,11 +8011,9 @@ async def amain() -> None:
# ESP32 heartbeat. A fetch on that path is a supplier's TLS timeout able
# to push this add-on towards layer 1's 30 s veto. See TARIFF_REFRESH_S.
#
# ⚠️ STARTED WHEN A PROVIDER IS CONFIGURED, *OR* WHEN TRADING IS ARMED
# - TARIFF-10, and it used to be the second term alone. `arbitrage_
# enabled` ships `false`, so a site that had selected a price feed
# fetched nothing at all; the whole argument, the measurement and what
# the `or` is protecting are in `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above.
# ⚠️ STARTED FOR A PROVIDER, FOR ARMED TRADING OR FOR BATTERY MODES:
# see `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above and DECISIONS/TARIFF-10 and
# TARIFF-24 for why each term is there.
#
# ⚠️ IT DOES NOT ARM ANYTHING. Fetching a price and trading on one are
# two decisions; this is the first, and `cycle()`'s
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: GoodWe RS485 Controller
version: "0.19.0"
version: "0.19.1"
slug: goodwe_controller
description: >-
Drives a GoodWe ES/BP battery inverter over its RS485 EMS port by sending it a
+13 -4
View File
@@ -540,6 +540,12 @@ rp.Hass.state = _sensor
rp_start = [UTC0]
FC_OPTS = {"pv_forecast_entity": "sensor.energy_production_today_remaining",
"cycle_cost_threshold_eur": 0.20}
# TARIFF-24 round 2: with a forecast read, a price mode needs the cycle cost
# itself (0.20 here), no longer 1.5 times it (0.30). These scenarios were
# written for a 0.30 gap, and a midday 0.21 gap now plans a grid top-up they
# are not about, so they ask for 0.30 with the forecast; the no-forecast leg
# (`rows_nf`) keeps 0.20, which is 0.30 widened: the same gate on both sides.
GATE_030 = {"cycle_cost_threshold_eur": 0.30}
def seed_profile(c):
@@ -597,7 +603,8 @@ def invariants(tag, rows, c):
# Sunny: 40 kWh forecast. B (Leftover solar) at 30 % needs nothing.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0},
extra=GATE_030)
charge = invariants("sunny", rows, c)
_last = nth(rows, -1, "a cycle")
print(f" sunny: verdict {present(_last) and _last['plan'] and _last['plan'].verdict}, "
@@ -623,7 +630,8 @@ check("dark: A rests while B charges", all(r["roles"][A] == modetrade.REST
for r in charge))
# Cheap hours on a partly sunny day: ignores the plan, fills as in P3.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_CH, fc=14.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0})
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_CH, fc=14.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0},
extra=GATE_030)
charge = invariants("cheap hours, partly", rows, c)
top = max(r["soc"]["b"] for r in rows)
print(f" cheap hours partly: B reached {top:.1f} %")
@@ -648,7 +656,8 @@ check("forecast lost mid-run: Leftover solar was charging, and stops within "
# The forecast is far too high (40 kWh, and there is no sun at all): no grid
# charge, so B covers less of the evening - a money risk, never a safety one.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 30.0, "b": 30.0})
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=40.0, soc0={"a": 30.0, "b": 30.0},
extra=GATE_030)
invariants("forecast too high", rows, c)
check("forecast too high: no grid charge, and B still keeps its power for "
"the dear run", not [r for r in rows if r["action"]
@@ -658,7 +667,7 @@ check("forecast too high: no grid charge, and B still keeps its power for "
# A refusal wins over the plan.
rows, st_, c = run_day(SF_LS, fc=1.0, soc0={"a": 60.0, "b": 30.0},
refuse=("b",))
refuse=("b",), extra=GATE_030)
invariants("refusal", rows, c)
check("refusal: B refuses to charge, so the plan's charge ends and B is "
"never a charger after it", rows and not [
+374
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
"""Runnable check for TARIFF-24. `python3 test_tariff24.py`
Battery modes on, a day/night `static_profile`, no price feed and the site trade
switch off used to start no tariff task: `Controller.tariff_plan` stayed None,
`mode_runs` stayed None, Leftover solar and Cheap hours never charged from the
grid, and the Batteries screen said "No prices" while Home priced the day from
the profile itself. DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
1. The startup gate: `tariff_refresh_wanted()` by configuration, and the guard
`amain()` really puts on the task (read from its source, not retyped).
2. End to end, on the real Controller and the real `run_tariff_refresh()` task,
started only if `amain()`'s own guard says so: night period, one battery
Leftover solar and one Cheap hours.
3. The same with a gap below the cycle cost.
4. Home and the Batteries screen agree.
5. UX-55: with every battery Solar first Home no longer says "no prices have
arrived" on a static profile, and still does with no profile and no feed.
6. Nothing else moved: modes off starts no task; the gate rows in part 1 keep
the arbitrage and feed cases as before.
Mutations (MUTATION.md, purged copies, graded over this file): the gate
reverted to `provider or arbitrage` fails 18 checks in parts 1 to 5; `True`
fails the modes-off rows; `bool(opts.get(...))` fails the exact-true row;
dropping the arbitrage term fails the arbitrage rows.
"""
import ast
import asyncio
import logging
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import time
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
sys.path.insert(0, HERE)
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(HERE, "tools"))
logging.disable(logging.WARNING)
import opt11p3_replay as rp # noqa: E402
from named_absence import first, nth, present # noqa: E402
import app.main as m # noqa: E402
from app import homeview, modetrade, packmode # noqa: E402
from app import price as _price, static_tariff as _st # noqa: E402
from app.main import Controller, tariff_refresh_wanted # noqa: E402
from app.p1 import make_sample, split_signed # noqa: E402
from app.store import unit_key # noqa: E402
fails = []
def check(name, cond):
print(f" {'ok ' if cond else 'FAIL'} {name}")
if not cond:
fails.append(name)
A, B = "inverter-a", "inverter-b"
# A Belgian-style day/night tariff, example values: dear 07:00-22:00, cheap
# 22:00-07:00, every day. The gap is 0.08 EUR/kWh.
PROFILE = ('{"periods": ['
'{"name": "night", "days": "all", "from": "22:00", "to": "07:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.22},'
'{"name": "day", "days": "all", "from": "07:00", "to": "22:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.30}]}')
# A Friday in winter time (+01:00), 23:00 local: inside the night period.
L = timezone(timedelta(hours=1))
NIGHT = datetime(2026, 10, 30, 23, 0, tzinfo=L).astimezone(timezone.utc)
def opts(*, modes=True, arb=False, profile=PROFILE, provider=None,
cost=0.05):
o = dict(rp.options(modes, arb, 2))
o["cycle_cost_threshold_eur"] = cost
if profile is not None:
o["static_profile"] = profile
if provider is not None:
o["price_provider"] = provider
return o
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# The guard amain() puts on the tariff task, read from amain()'s source.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
def _guards_of(node, guards=()):
"""[(guards, coroutine name)] for every create_task(...) under `node`."""
out = []
for child in ast.iter_child_nodes(node):
if isinstance(child, ast.If):
test = ast.unparse(child.test)
for stmt in child.body:
out += _guards_of(stmt, guards + (test,))
for stmt in child.orelse:
out += _guards_of(stmt, guards + (f"not ({test})",))
continue
if isinstance(child, ast.Call) and \
ast.unparse(child.func).endswith("create_task") and child.args:
arg = child.args[0]
name = (arg.func.attr if isinstance(arg, ast.Call)
and isinstance(arg.func, ast.Attribute)
else ast.unparse(arg))
out.append((guards, name))
continue
out += _guards_of(child, guards)
return out
_TREE = ast.parse(open(os.path.join(HERE, "app", "main.py"),
encoding="utf-8").read())
_AMAIN = first((n for n in ast.walk(_TREE)
if isinstance(n, ast.AsyncFunctionDef) and n.name == "amain"),
"amain() in main.py")
_TASK_GUARDS = [g for g, n in _guards_of(_AMAIN) if n == "run_tariff_refresh"]
def task_started(o) -> bool:
"""Would amain() start the tariff refresh task for options `o`?"""
if len(_TASK_GUARDS) != 1:
return False
return all(bool(eval(g, vars(m), {"opts": o})) for g in _TASK_GUARDS[0])
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("1. the startup gate")
check("amain() starts the tariff refresh from exactly one guard, and that "
"guard can be decided from the options alone",
len(_TASK_GUARDS) == 1 and len(_TASK_GUARDS[0]) >= 1
and all(isinstance(eval(g, vars(m), {"opts": opts()}), bool)
for g in _TASK_GUARDS[0]))
GATE = [
# label, options, task wanted
("modes on + static day/night only", opts(), True),
("modes on + a fixed price only",
opts(profile='{"periods": [{"name": "all", "days": "all", "from": '
'"00:00", "to": "24:00", "eur_per_kwh": 0.27}]}'), True),
("modes on, nothing else", opts(profile=None), True),
("modes off + arbitrage off + no feed (static profile)",
opts(modes=False), False),
("modes off + arbitrage off + no feed, no profile",
opts(modes=False, profile=None), False),
("modes off + arbitrage on", opts(modes=False, arb=True), True),
("modes off + a feed", opts(modes=False, provider="generic_dayahead"),
True),
("modes on + a feed", opts(provider="generic_dayahead"), True),
("modes on + arbitrage on", opts(arb=True), True),
]
for label, o, want in GATE:
got = tariff_refresh_wanted(o)
print(f" wanted={got!s:5} started={task_started(o)!s:5} {label}")
check(f"{label}: tariff_refresh_wanted() is {want}", got is want)
check(f"{label}: amain() starts the task exactly as that says",
task_started(o) is want)
check("battery_modes_enabled has to be exactly true (packmode.enabled()): "
"'true' as text or 1 does not start the task",
not tariff_refresh_wanted(dict(opts(), battery_modes_enabled="true"))
and not tariff_refresh_wanted(dict(opts(), battery_modes_enabled=1)))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# The real Controller over a few minutes of a night: the task starts only if
# amain()'s own guard says so; then read_inputs() + cycle() as the control
# loop runs them.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
CHOICE = {"a": (True, "leftover_solar", False),
"b": (True, "cheap_hours", False)}
FETCHES = []
async def _no_fetch(*a, **k):
FETCHES.append(a)
raise AssertionError("the tariff task reached for a price feed")
def drive(o, *, start=NIGHT, minutes=20, soc0=None, choice=CHOICE,
house_w=300.0, tick=5.0):
"""-> (controller, rows, task_was_started)."""
store = rp._Store()
for u, (use, mode, sell) in choice.items():
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_use")] = use
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_mode")] = mode
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", "pack_sell")] = sell
rows = []
async def go():
hass = rp.Hass(("a", "b"), lambda t: house_w,
soc0 or {"a": 40.0, "b": 40.0})
tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="t24-")
c = Controller(dict(o), hass, store, rp._Pub(),
stop=asyncio.Event(),
peak_db_path=os.path.join(tmp, "tariff.db"),
price_history_path=os.path.join(tmp, "ph.json"))
for i in c.inverters:
i.dev_min, i.dev_max = -5000.0, 5000.0
c.auto = True
real_dt, real_hv = m.datetime, homeview.datetime
clock = [start]
class _DT(real_dt):
@classmethod
def now(cls, tz=None):
return clock[0] if tz is None else clock[0].astimezone(tz)
m.datetime = homeview.datetime = _DT
_real_load = _price.load_prices, _st.load_prices
_price.load_prices = _st.load_prices = _no_fetch
started = task_started(o)
task = (asyncio.create_task(c.run_tariff_refresh())
if started else None)
try:
t = 0.0
while t < minutes * 60:
now = start + timedelta(seconds=t)
hass.t = t
clock[0] = now
if t == 0.0 and started:
for _ in range(500): # let the task do its first pass
if c.tariff_plan is not None:
break
await asyncio.sleep(0)
imp, exp = split_signed(hass.grid())
c.p1.submit(make_sample("ha_signed", imp, exp, phases=1,
ingest_ts=now,
ingest_mono=time.monotonic()))
await c.read_inputs(now_mono=t)
await c.cycle()
hass.advance(tick, 10.0)
rows.append(dict(
now=now, runs=c.mode_runs, tick=c.mode_tick,
plan=c.fresh_tariff_plan(now),
action=getattr(c.arb, "action", None),
p={u: p.p for u, p in hass.plants.items()},
soc={u: p.soc for u, p in hass.plants.items()}))
t += tick
# What the two screens say at the end, while the clock is still
# the simulated one.
c.home_plan = homeview.build_plan(c, clock[0], False, True)
c.battery_cards = homeview.battery_rows(c, False, True)
finally:
if task is not None:
task.cancel()
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
m.datetime, homeview.datetime = real_dt, real_hv
_price.load_prices, _st.load_prices = _real_load
return c, started
c, started = asyncio.run(go())
return c, rows, started
def charging_b(rows):
"""Cycles in which the Cheap hours battery was charging (grid: no sun and
a 300 W house in this scenario)."""
return [r for r in rows if r["p"]["b"] < -200.0]
def why_of(c, name):
card = first((b for b in c.battery_cards if b["name"] == name),
f"a card for {name}")
return card["why_key"]
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n2. end to end, night, modes on, static day/night, no feed, no arbitrage")
c1, r1, started1 = drive(opts())
_last = nth(r1, -1, "the last cycle")
_first1 = nth(r1, 0, "the first cycle")
print(f" tariff task started by amain's guard: {started1}")
print(f" tariff_plan: {None if c1.tariff_plan is None else c1.tariff_plan.words}")
print(f" mode_runs: {_last['runs']}")
print(f" mode_tick reason / roles: "
f"{None if _last['tick'] is None else (_last['tick'].why, dict(_last['tick'].roles))}")
print(f" Batteries screen why_key: A {why_of(c1, A)}, B {why_of(c1, B)}")
print(f" cycles with B charging: {len(charging_b(r1))} of {len(r1)}, "
f"B soc {_first1['soc']['b']:.1f} -> {_last['soc']['b']:.1f}")
check("the tariff refresh task is started", started1)
check("...and it adds no network call: with price_provider off the feed "
"loader is never reached (it is replaced by one that fails)",
not FETCHES and not _price.provider_configured(opts()))
check("a fresh tariff plan with prices is held", present(_last)
and _last["plan"] is not None and _last["plan"].has_prices)
check("the price runs exist (mode_runs is not None) and carry a cheap run "
"that holds in the night period",
present(_last) and _last["runs"] is not None and _last["runs"].on
and _last["runs"].cheap is not None
and _last["runs"].cheap.holds(_last["now"]))
check("the Cheap hours battery charges from the grid in the night period",
len(charging_b(r1)) > len(r1) // 2
and present(_last, _first1)
and _last["soc"]["b"] > _first1["soc"]["b"] + 0.3)
check("...and the Leftover solar battery does not (no sun, no forecast)",
not any(r["p"]["a"] < -200.0 for r in r1))
check("...the reason is not 'no prices': neither battery reads no_prices",
why_of(c1, A) != "no_prices" and why_of(c1, B) != "no_prices")
check("...only the Cheap hours battery got the grid charge role",
present(_last) and _last["tick"] is not None
and _last["tick"].roles.get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE
and _last["tick"].roles.get(A) != modetrade.CHARGE)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n3. the same with a gap below the cycle cost")
c3, r3, started3 = drive(opts(cost=0.20))
_l3 = nth(r3, -1, "the last cycle")
print(f" started {started3}; mode_runs {_l3['runs']}; "
f"why A {why_of(c3, A)}, B {why_of(c3, B)}")
check("the task is started and the plan is there, so mode_runs is not None",
started3 and present(_l3) and _l3["plan"] is not None
and _l3["runs"] is not None)
check("the reason is the gap: no_spread ('Prices differ too little'), "
"never no_prices, on both batteries",
why_of(c3, A) == "no_spread" and why_of(c3, B) == "no_spread"
and present(_l3) and _l3["runs"] is not None
and not _l3["runs"].on)
check("...and no battery charges from the grid",
not charging_b(r3) and not any(r["p"]["a"] < -200.0 for r in r3))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n4. Home and the Batteries screen agree")
hp = c1.home_plan
_bars = [b for b in hp["prices"] if b["eur_kwh"] is not None]
_words = {b["why_key"]: b["why"] for b in c1.battery_cards}
print(f" Home: has_prices {hp['has_prices']}, {len(_bars)} priced bars, "
f"verdict {hp['verdict_key']}, lines {hp['lines']}")
print(f" Batteries: {[(b['name'], b['why_key'], b['why']) for b in c1.battery_cards]}")
check("Home prices the day, and the Batteries screen does not say it has no "
"prices", hp["has_prices"] and _bars
and all(b["why_key"] != "no_prices" for b in c1.battery_cards))
check("Home's plan has the grid charge block for the Cheap hours battery "
"(the 'trade' verdict) and no 'no prices have arrived' line",
hp["verdict_key"] == "trade"
and any(r["kind"] == "grid" for r in hp["runs"])
and not any("no prices have arrived" in ln for ln in hp["lines"]))
hp3 = c3.home_plan
check("with the gap too small both say so: Home 'price gap is too small', "
"the batteries 'differ too little'; neither says no prices",
any("price gap is too small" in ln for ln in hp3["lines"])
and all(b["why_key"] == "no_spread" for b in c3.battery_cards))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n5. UX-55: every battery Solar first, static day/night, no feed")
SF = {"a": (True, "solar_first", False), "b": (True, "solar_first", False)}
c5, r5, s5 = drive(opts(), choice=SF, minutes=5)
print(f" Home lines: {c5.home_plan['lines']}")
check("Home no longer says 'no prices have arrived' with every battery Solar "
"first on a static profile",
s5 and not any("no prices have arrived" in ln
for ln in c5.home_plan["lines"]))
c5b, r5b, s5b = drive(opts(profile=None), choice=SF, minutes=5)
print(f" no profile, no feed: started {s5b}, Home lines "
f"{c5b.home_plan['lines']}")
check("...and with no profile and no feed there are truly no prices, and "
"Home still says so",
any("no prices have arrived" in ln for ln in c5b.home_plan["lines"]))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n6. nothing else moved")
c6, r6, s6 = drive(opts(modes=False), choice={}, minutes=5)
check("modes off, arbitrage off, no feed: no task, no plan, no price runs "
"(as before)", not s6 and c6.tariff_plan is None
and all(r["runs"] is None for r in r6))
print()
if fails:
print(f"{len(fails)} FAILED:")
for f in fails:
print(f" - {f}")
sys.exit(1)
print("all checks passed")
+354
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,354 @@
"""Runnable check for TARIFF-24 round 2 (AUDIT-02 F1). `python3 test_tariff24_weather.py`
With battery modes on, the price gap a mode needs was always widened x1.5
(`Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER`) even with a solar forecast read. Now the doubt is
added only when no usable forecast is read (`arbitrage.weather_uncertainty()`),
in the run plan (`_price_runs()`), the charge gate (`_mode_roles()`) and Home's
mirror (`homeview.trade_verdict()`). Modes off is untouched.
DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
1. The rule itself, and that modes off keeps the doubt.
2. Day/night 0.34/0.26 (gap 0.08), modes on, real Controller, night period:
with a forecast at cycle cost 0.07 the cheap run is planned and the Cheap
hours battery charges; without one, or with a stale one, the same cost needs
0.105 and the reason is `not_worth` / "Prices differ too little".
3. A dynamic day with a 0.12 gap at cost 0.10: on with a forecast, not worth
without.
4. The forecast going and coming mid-run: the gate follows in the same cycle
the forecast read changes, both ways.
5. Home agrees with control in each case (Batteries Why, Home line, and
`trade_verdict()`, Home's mirror of the gate).
Mutations (MUTATION.md, purged copies, graded over this file): the doubt always
added (the old code) fails parts 2 to 5; never added fails the without-forecast
rows; Home's mirror left on the old rule fails part 5.
"""
import asyncio
import logging
import math
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import time
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
sys.path.insert(0, HERE)
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(HERE, "tools"))
logging.disable(logging.WARNING)
import opt11p3_replay as rp # noqa: E402
from named_absence import first, nth, present # noqa: E402
import app.main as m # noqa: E402
from app import arbitrage, homeview, modetrade # noqa: E402
from app.main import Controller # noqa: E402
from app.p1 import make_sample, split_signed # noqa: E402
from app.price import (PricePoint, PriceProduct, PriceRead, # noqa: E402
Uncertainty, brussels)
from app.static_tariff import TariffPlan # noqa: E402
from app.store import unit_key # noqa: E402
fails = []
def check(name, cond):
print(f" {'ok ' if cond else 'FAIL'} {name}")
if not cond:
fails.append(name)
A, B = "inverter-a", "inverter-b"
PROFILE = ('{"periods": ['
'{"name": "night", "days": "all", "from": "22:00", "to": "07:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.26},'
'{"name": "day", "days": "all", "from": "07:00", "to": "22:00",'
' "eur_per_kwh": 0.34}]}')
L = timezone(timedelta(hours=1))
NIGHT = datetime(2026, 10, 30, 23, 0, tzinfo=L).astimezone(timezone.utc)
CHOICE = {"a": (True, "leftover_solar", False),
"b": (True, "cheap_hours", False)}
FC_TODAY, FC_TOMORROW = "sensor.fc_today", "sensor.fc_tomorrow"
def opts(cost, *, arb=False, sensors=True):
o = dict(rp.options(True, arb, 2))
o.update(cycle_cost_threshold_eur=cost, static_profile=PROFILE)
if sensors:
o.update(pv_forecast_entity=FC_TODAY,
pv_forecast_tomorrow_entity=FC_TOMORROW)
return o
def dynamic_points(start):
"""A dynamic day-ahead shape, 0.16 .. 0.28 (gap 0.12), 15-minute points."""
out, t = [], start.replace(minute=0, second=0, microsecond=0)
for _ in range(48 * 4):
h = brussels(t).hour + brussels(t).minute / 60
p = 0.22 + 0.06 * math.cos((h - 19) / 24 * 2 * math.pi)
out.append(PricePoint(start=brussels(t), eur_per_kwh=round(p, 4),
provisional=False))
t += timedelta(minutes=15)
return out
def sensor(kwh, at):
return {"state": f"{kwh}", "attributes": {"unit_of_measurement": "kWh"},
"last_updated": at.isoformat(), "last_reported": at.isoformat()}
def forecast_mode(mode, t, now):
"""What the two forecast sensors read: 'fresh', 'stale', 'gone', or a
function of the simulated seconds that returns one of those."""
if callable(mode):
mode = mode(t)
if mode == "gone":
return {"state": "unavailable", "attributes": {}}
at = now if mode == "fresh" else now - timedelta(hours=5)
return at
def drive(o, *, fc="fresh", points=None, minutes=20, tick=5.0,
house_w=300.0, soc0=None):
"""-> (controller, rows). `points`: a feed-shaped plan injected every
cycle (no task); else the static profile via the real tariff task."""
store = rp._Store()
for u, (use, mode, sell) in CHOICE.items():
for k, val in (("pack_use", use), ("pack_mode", mode),
("pack_sell", sell)):
store.data[unit_key(f"inverter-{u}", k)] = val
rows = []
class H(rp.Hass):
async def state(self, e):
now = NIGHT + timedelta(seconds=self.t)
if fc is None:
return None
at = forecast_mode(fc, self.t, now)
if isinstance(at, dict):
return at
return sensor(0.0 if e == FC_TODAY else 12.0, at)
async def go():
hass = H(("a", "b"), lambda t: house_w, soc0 or {"a": 40.0, "b": 40.0})
tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="t24w-")
c = Controller(dict(o), hass, store, rp._Pub(), stop=asyncio.Event(),
peak_db_path=os.path.join(tmp, "tariff.db"),
price_history_path=os.path.join(tmp, "ph.json"))
for i in c.inverters:
i.dev_min, i.dev_max = -5000.0, 5000.0
c.auto = True
real_dt, real_hv = m.datetime, homeview.datetime
clock = [NIGHT]
class _DT(real_dt):
@classmethod
def now(cls, tz=None):
return clock[0] if tz is None else clock[0].astimezone(tz)
m.datetime = homeview.datetime = _DT
pts = None if points is None else points
task = None
if pts is None:
task = asyncio.create_task(c.run_tariff_refresh())
try:
t = 0.0
while t < minutes * 60:
now = NIGHT + timedelta(seconds=t)
hass.t = t
clock[0] = now
if pts is not None:
c.tariff_plan = TariffPlan(
PriceRead.series(pts, PriceProduct.DAY_AHEAD,
"generic_dayahead", now), None,
"provider")
c.tariff_at = now
elif t == 0.0:
for _ in range(500):
if c.tariff_plan is not None:
break
await asyncio.sleep(0)
imp, exp = split_signed(hass.grid())
c.p1.submit(make_sample("ha_signed", imp, exp, phases=1,
ingest_ts=now,
ingest_mono=time.monotonic()))
await c.read_inputs(now_mono=t)
await c.cycle()
hass.advance(tick, 10.0)
rp_ = c.mode_runs
rows.append(dict(
t=t, now=now, fc_none=c.solar_fc is None,
runs_on=None if rp_ is None else rp_.on,
reason=None if rp_ is None else rp_.reason,
roles=dict(c.mode_tick.roles) if c.mode_tick else {},
why=None if c.mode_tick is None else c.mode_tick.why,
charging=hass.plants["b"].p < -200.0))
t += tick
c.home_plan = homeview.build_plan(c, clock[0], False, True)
c.cards = homeview.battery_rows(c, False, True)
# Home's mirror of the gate (it reads the trade switch, so ask it
# as a site that has it on next to the modes).
c2 = c
c2.o = dict(c.o, arbitrage_enabled=True)
c.mirror, c.mirror_why = homeview.trade_verdict(
c2, c.fresh_tariff_plan(clock[0]), clock[0])
c.o = dict(c.o, arbitrage_enabled=o.get("arbitrage_enabled",
False))
finally:
if task is not None:
task.cancel()
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
m.datetime, homeview.datetime = real_dt, real_hv
return c
return asyncio.run(go()), rows
def why_of(c, name):
card = first((b for b in c.cards if b["name"] == name), f"card {name}")
return card["why_key"]
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("1. the rule")
NW = frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
check("modes on with a forecast read: no doubt", arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
True, object()) == frozenset())
check("modes on with no forecast (None): the doubt", arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
True, None) == NW)
check("modes off, forecast or not: the doubt, as before",
arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(False, object()) == NW
and arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(False, None) == NW)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n2. day/night 0.34 / 0.26 (gap 0.08), night period")
c1, r1 = drive(opts(0.07), fc="fresh")
l1 = nth(r1, -1, "last cycle")
print(f" forecast read, cost 0.07: mode_runs on={l1['runs_on']} "
f"reason={l1['reason']}; B charging {sum(r['charging'] for r in r1)} of "
f"{len(r1)}; Why A {why_of(c1, A)} B {why_of(c1, B)}")
check("with a forecast at cost 0.07 the cheap run is planned (needed 0.07 < "
"0.08) and the Cheap hours battery charges in the night period",
present(l1) and not l1["fc_none"] and l1["runs_on"] is True
and sum(r["charging"] for r in r1) > len(r1) // 2
and l1["roles"].get(B) == modetrade.CHARGE)
for label, mode in (("no forecast sensor reads", "gone"),
("a stale forecast", "stale")):
c, rr = drive(opts(0.07), fc=mode)
ll = nth(rr, -1, "last cycle")
print(f" {label}, cost 0.07: on={ll['runs_on']} reason={ll['reason']}; "
f"B charging {sum(r['charging'] for r in rr)}; Why A "
f"{why_of(c, A)} B {why_of(c, B)}")
check(f"{label}: the same cost needs 0.105 > 0.08, so not_worth and "
f"'Prices differ too little', no grid charge",
present(ll) and ll["fc_none"] and ll["runs_on"] is False
and ll["reason"] == "not_worth"
and why_of(c, A) == "no_spread" and why_of(c, B) == "no_spread"
and not any(r["charging"] for r in rr))
c0, r0 = drive(opts(0.07, sensors=False), fc=None)
check("no forecast sensor configured at all: not_worth too (as 0.19.0)",
present(nth(r0, -1)) and r0[-1]["runs_on"] is False)
c2, r2 = drive(opts(0.10), fc="fresh")
check("at the shipped cost 0.10 even a forecast does not make 0.08 enough "
"(needs 0.10): still not_worth, honestly",
present(nth(r2, -1)) and r2[-1]["runs_on"] is False
and r2[-1]["reason"] == "not_worth")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n3. a dynamic day, gap 0.12, cost 0.10")
pts = dynamic_points(NIGHT - timedelta(hours=1))
cd, rd = drive(opts(0.10), fc="fresh", points=pts)
cn, rn = drive(opts(0.10), fc="gone", points=pts)
_ld, _ln = nth(rd, -1, "last cycle"), nth(rn, -1, "last cycle")
print(f" with forecast: on={_ld['runs_on']} reason={_ld['reason']}; "
f"without: on={_ln['runs_on']} reason={_ln['reason']}")
check("with a forecast the run plan is on (needs 0.10 < 0.12)",
present(nth(rd, -1)) and rd[-1]["runs_on"] is True
and why_of(cd, A) != "no_spread")
check("without one it is not_worth (needs 0.15 > 0.12) and says so",
present(nth(rn, -1)) and rn[-1]["runs_on"] is False
and rn[-1]["reason"] == "not_worth"
and why_of(cn, B) == "no_spread")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n4. the forecast going and coming mid-run")
CUT = 600.0 # 10 min in
def going(t):
return "fresh" if t < CUT else "gone"
def coming(t):
return "gone" if t < CUT else "fresh"
cg, rg = drive(opts(0.07), fc=going, minutes=25)
cc, rc = drive(opts(0.07), fc=coming, minutes=25)
def flips(rows):
"""Cycles where the forecast read changed, and whether the plan and the
charge gate changed in that very cycle."""
out = []
for i in range(1, len(rows)):
if rows[i]["fc_none"] != rows[i - 1]["fc_none"]:
out.append((i, rows[i]["t"], rows[i]["runs_on"],
rows[i]["charging"], rows[i - 1]["charging"]))
return out
fg, fcm = flips(rg), flips(rc)
print(f" going: forecast read lost at cycle/t {fg}; coming: {fcm}")
check("going: the plan is on with the forecast and not_worth the cycle the "
"read is lost (within one forecast read, 60 s, of the sensor change)",
len(fg) == 1 and fg[0][1] - CUT <= 60.0 and fg[0][2] is False
and all(r["runs_on"] is True for r in rg if not r["fc_none"])
and all(r["runs_on"] is False for r in rg if r["fc_none"]))
check("...and the grid charge stops with it: no charging after the cycle "
"that lost the forecast, plus the 15 s the inverter ramp takes",
len(fg) == 1 and not any(
r["charging"] for r in rg if r["t"] >= fg[0][1] + 40.0))
check("coming: not_worth until the read is back, then on in the same cycle, "
"and the battery charges",
len(fcm) == 1 and fcm[0][1] - CUT <= 60.0 and fcm[0][2] is True
and all(r["runs_on"] is False for r in rc if r["fc_none"])
and all(r["runs_on"] is True for r in rc if not r["fc_none"])
and any(r["charging"] for r in rc if r["t"] >= fcm[0][1] + 40.0))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
print("\n5. Home agrees with control")
CASES = (("forecast, cost 0.07", c1, r1, True),
("no forecast, cost 0.07", *drive(opts(0.07), fc="gone"), False),
("dynamic, forecast", cd, rd, True),
("dynamic, no forecast", cn, rn, False))
for label, cx, rx, on in CASES:
last = nth(rx, -1, "last cycle")
hp = cx.home_plan
mirror_ok = cx.mirror is not None
print(f" {label}: control on={last['runs_on']}; Home mirror "
f"{'allows' if mirror_ok else 'refuses'} ({cx.mirror_why}); "
f"lines {hp['lines'][:1]}; Why B {why_of(cx, B)}")
check(f"{label}: Home's mirror of the gate allows exactly when control "
f"plans", present(last) and mirror_ok is on
and last["runs_on"] is on)
check(f"{label}: the Batteries screen and the Home line say the gap is "
f"too small exactly when control does",
(why_of(cx, B) == "no_spread") is (not on)
and any("price gap is too small" in ln for ln in hp["lines"])
is (not on))
if label.startswith("dynamic"):
continue # its cheap run is tomorrow morning: not on today's chart
check(f"{label}: Home draws a grid charge block exactly when control "
f"charges", any(r["kind"] == "grid" for r in hp["runs"]) is on)
print()
if fails:
print(f"{len(fails)} FAILED:")
for f in fails:
print(f" - {f}")
sys.exit(1)
print("all checks passed")