4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude	c70eeb6916	SAFETY-129 round 3: the real reason for the 16 s limit, a slow-start check, the row's tail ... Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-07 00:12:33 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude	03541a1eee	SAFETY-129 round 2: next() with a default in test_safety129 ... Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-06 22:12:39 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude	85433edac6	SAFETY-129 round 2: shorter test_safety129, pinned 5 s row, 100 s bound ... Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-06 21:24:37 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude	5b6cb0bf08	SAFETY-129: find readings 30 s late within about 90 s at a 5 s meter ... The meter's delay fit needed 16 new values in 60 s, so at the owner's 5 s P1 only the batteries' fit ran and 30 s late was found after about 3 minutes (export to -420 W). A meter that slow is now also fitted over 120 s; it calls a delay late only over 16 s, on two fits in a row, with the same corroboration as before, and never ends a verdict, so a slow battery (R2-1) runs as before. Found about 90 s after the start, export above -200 W. 10 s late at a 5 s meter is not found (nothing swings; it cannot be told from a 10 s battery). Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-06 19:38:21 +01:00