Commit Graph
150 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 fd059126cb MAINT-11 review: test an empty unit at the web layer and the page's own refusal words; drop a stale comment
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 38m45s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Two reviewer mutations survived the suite: the web layer routing only a
truthy unit (an empty unit then started the bare pick), and the page
showing the server's English instead of its own sentence by code. Both
are now checked. The bare maint_start comment that said a per-battery
unit would ship half a surface is replaced by a pointer to
_maint_unit_action(). No behaviour change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 23:06:47 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 21d8a944bc MAINT-11: start or stop the maintenance cycle per battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 38m46s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
maint_start and maint_abort take an optional unit. With two or more batteries
each Batteries card has Start cycle and Stop cycle buttons. One slot per site
stays: a start while a battery cycles is refused and names it (no queue). A
battery that is switched off, an unknown unit, and a stop on a battery that is
not cycling are refused with a plain message. A request with no unit is the
old call. The scheduler and the phase machine are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-13 21:37:36 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 065792aad3 Merge release/1.0 (e3e4ba6) into opt15-price-run-fixes
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 3s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 39m30s
Conflicts (5 files, 9 hunks) resolved keeping both sides:
- p1.py: held_t (OPT-15) beside held_since (SAFETY-90).
- modetrade.py: chargers() takes targets (P4) and probe (OPT-15); decide()
  clears the chargers, a probing refuser included, while a battery drains
  (SAFETY-78); the docstring lists both rules.
- main.py: the roll goes into the SAFETY-90/91 projection chain
  (`_peak_proj`); the SAFETY-95 drain-tail grid_w keeps the run-edge hold on
  its other branch; the P4 forecast state and the hold state both stay.
- DOCS.md, DECISIONS: both lines kept, OPT-15 item refreshed.

Adaptations the merge needs:
- SAFETY-81 x F1: a rolled projection is not graded by the saturation alarm
  until the quarter's first sample, as the old edge tick was not, so a
  standing overload is still notified once per quarter.
- test_safety81, test_modes_p4: modes-on pins re-pinned (with a note), modes
  off pinned to e3e4ba6; test_price_run_fixes: identity pins on e3e4ba6,
  F1 reproduced at one inverter (SAFETY-91 already holds two), tests for the
  drain and the day plan against the probe.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 12:15:44 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 d94cb0c263 SAFETY-112: say plainly that control waits for Home Assistant to start
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 36m38s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
The Supervisor proxy answers 502 to every add-on read, write and websocket
until Core is RUNNING (proxy.py api()/websocket() -> check_api_state()), so
the add-on cannot control while a slow integration holds HA's start, even
with its entities live. Measured on a safety112 repro stack with the
2026.08.0 proxy code: first write 1.0-4.4 s after RUNNING, 238-300 s after
live readings. Not routed around (DECISIONS/SAFETY-112-...).

While the API does not answer, the first status row is red and is the
banner ("Waiting for Home Assistant to finish starting"), Home shows a
"waiting" state in EN/NL instead of "Needs you now", and the log adds a
"still waiting" line every 5 minutes and the wait's length at the end.
A safety stop, a stalled loop or shadow mode keeps its own headline.
Control, writes, heartbeat and the stand-down are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 01:07:51 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 9b1fa758ad OPT-17: the solar forecast can come from several entities, summed
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 36m13s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
New list options pv_forecast_entities and pv_forecast_tomorrow_entities
(same shape as pv_entities); the single-entity keys are unchanged.

- Each member is read in its own unit (Wh/kWh/MWh) in one gather and the
  day is summed. Hourly splits are merged when every member has one, else
  the total goes on the bell.
- A member missing, unavailable, stale, non-energy or bad makes that
  day's forecast unusable (no partial sum). A caution row names it by
  position; the action log names the entity once per change.
- Single key and list both set for one day: refused at start.
- A one-member list behaves exactly like the single key (test_opt17.py);
  the single-key path is byte-identical to e36565f over 24 scenarios.
- Supervisor shape measured: tools/supervisor_shape_probe.py section J.

DECISIONS/OPT-17-several-forecast-entities.md has the rules.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-11 02:55:58 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 d12228d986 SAFETY-107: a refusal held under another writer is learned once
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 35m8s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At one inverter SAFETY-52's "another writer" end tested target != loop_w.
A held refusal makes the loop ask 0 W, so any binding claim (maintenance
charge, peak guard, trade) ended it every cycle, and compute() learned it
again in the same cycle: "BATTERY REFUSES" / "ENDED: another writer" each
second on the rig. Now the held refusal is judged afresh against the
writer's ask (compute() gets the same inputs as before); it ends only if
compute() no longer finds it. Commands unchanged: 300-seed differential
trace against release/1.0, N=1 and N=2, every command and refusal state
identical. DECISIONS/SAFETY-107.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-09 03:03:06 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 6836f61bd4 MAINT-13 round 3: provider site, hourly fixed-tariff check, faster tests
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 34m52s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
- A price-provider site with no fixed tariff is not a gate (its plan never
  sets `cheap`); DECISIONS §3 says so and a test pins it.
- The fixed-tariff check is worked out once an hour, not every tick.
- test_maint13: run() steps really are `step` minutes; the long loops use
  5-minute steps (the per-tick cap); wall backstop checked "not before".
- test_safety93: the drain bound is the rig's configured drain rate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 12:03:55 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Sonnet 5.5 f7b83cc75c MAINT-13 round 2: read the price gate without a new main.py option read
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 34m35s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
test_static_tariff forbids main.py reading `static_profile`; a small
static_gated() in static_tariff.py answers it, and the Controller keeps the
answer in `_price_gated` beside `cheap`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-08 11:10:33 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Sonnet 5.5 6f05b2e4be MAINT-13 round 2: gate open when nothing holds the charge back; safety93 scenario restored
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 34m45s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
- gate_open is true with no price gate set up, in a cheap window, or while the
  pack is taking charge; the stall rule and timeout now work on a no-tariff site.
- reset the save timer on a phase change; exact 5 min gap-cap test.
- test_safety93: original timeout scenario kept (B finished) plus a case where a
  due B takes the slot after A's failure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-08 10:29:46 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 28eff568b5 MAINT-13: a full pack that stops at 98-99 % is not a failed charge
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 34m21s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A charge is complete at SoC >= target, or at >= target - 3 once the SoC has
made no new high for 60 min of allowed charging, or when the charging time
runs out at >= target - 3. The 36 h timeout counts only the minutes the price
gate let the pack charge (plus a 7 day wall-clock backstop). A cycle that
fails (stuck drain, charge below target - 3) backs off 7 days, tells the
operator once (EN + NL), and no cycle starts on that pack in that time unless
the operator forces one. State survives a restart; old state files load.

No option added. DECISIONS/MAINT-13-full-pack-is-complete.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 09:36:06 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 138e45b53f SAFETY-103: no swing on old battery readings after a drain ends
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 35m9s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
While a battery settles from its ended drain (SAFETY-95), the house point
was grid + every battery's reading. A register can be 10 s older than the
meter, so B swung 860 -> 1650 -> 870 W on A's old reading (rig check 5).

Now the house point is held and moved only as far as the meter proves:
each battery is between its last changed reading and its commands since
(a reading that changed this cycle, or a refused side, as it reads).
N=1 and 1 s registers are byte-identical to release/1.0.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-103-old-readings-after-a-drain.md, test_safety103.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 02:25:55 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 4707d37019 SAFETY-95 review: test the stale-link and contradiction legs; refusal +1 only
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 32m34s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
F1: test_safety95 checks that a dropped draining battery is this rule's
(stale link, N=3, 4000 W: grid import 676 W vs base 786 W); kills R2.
F2: _charge_track tested directly with a contradicting drain (SAFETY-91's
pin as a floor against a closed pack); kills R3. Today a drain contradicts
only through a refusal; the clause stays, as a contradiction sends 0 W.
F3: a drain ends on a refusal only when the battery will not give
(refused > 0, as _held_back()); one that will not take still drains.
Tested both signs; kills R8.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 16:41:16 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 bdec66e97a SAFETY-95: a maintenance drain that ends hands back smoothly (N>=2)
When a battery's drain ended (done, Off, timeout, abort, stale link,
refusal), its drain floor stayed in the site target and landed on the
others: B 0 -> +1600 W in one cycle at a 1200 W house, exporting; under a
solar surplus B gave into the export.

Now, on that cycle, the loop starts from what the others stood at plus the
battery's new command, raised to the house's own point when the house needs
more (never above last cycle's start). While the battery settles, the loop
counts the batteries at its start instead of chasing the drain's tail on
the meter. Then one slew step a cycle. N=1 is unchanged.

test_safety95.py; DECISIONS/SAFETY-95-drain-end.md; one DOCS line.
test_modes.py: opt11 n2_maint re-pinned on purpose (its drain ends by a
refusal at 1655 s; B now stays at the house's 1420 W instead of 2500 W).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 12:44:25 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 956711b801 SAFETY-96 review: keep the refusal count over a refused write; test a fast board
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m53s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
F1: resetting the count on each refused write hid a battery that really
refuses behind a link refusing 1 write in 3 (never learned; learned at
358 s with the count kept). F2: a board at 0 W before its link is stale
learned no refusal untested (mutation R7 survived); now a 1 s-lag case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 05:46:32 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 88b9cd470a SAFETY-96: a battery the loop cannot move does not freeze it
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m44s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At N>=2 a battery out of the split (stale link), with refused writes, or
settling after a step the loop did not make (a charge end, a rejoin) now
counts in the freeze test at its command, not its reading. Its real power
still reaches the loop through the meter. At a drop its share leaves the
loop's start point (the others take over one slew step a cycle); at a
rejoin it enters at its reading. No refusal is learned while a battery's
writes are refused. N=1 and the 46 identity digests are byte-identical.

test_safety78 part 2: the dropped-drain case now rests at B 1510 W (grid at
its -10 W aim) instead of 1500 W; the drop no longer sends B to 2500 W.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 04:02:03 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 1d28daf8a0 MAINT-10 review: warn when HA did not answer and TZ is UTC; test the 3 s budget
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m18s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
HA can take minutes to start (2026-10-05, 502 from the proxy). Then TZ holds,
which the Supervisor sets from HA's zone, so the hour stays right; only a TZ
of UTC there now logs a WARNING asking for a restart. A test pins the 3 s
budget on the zone request (a mutant without it survived).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 23:24:02 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 08fb1235fc Merge release/1.0 (0.15.0 + SAFETY-90) into maint-10-local-start-hour
Conflicts: main.py's maintenance import (base added CHARGE, HOLD; branch added
site_zone) - both kept. DOCS maintenance table: base's longer drain-rate row
kept, start hour row at 19 / local.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 21:51:04 +02:00
Claude (SAFETY-90 review) 8dfe91e1d2 SAFETY-90 review: count the start-up seconds like a gap
While the add-on is down the batteries are at 0 W (it sets 0 W when it
stops; the ESP32 watchdog after 30 s), so the import before its first
reading was the house, not the aim. Those seconds now count at
gap_w(limit, the import seen first), and after a restart the restored
reading's held 30 s is topped up the same way. Status row: "counted as
high use". Tests take the pre-start import as the house (batteries at
0 W) and add restarts of 10/60/150 s with a restored averager.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 12:24:33 +02:00
Claude (SAFETY-90 dev) 9d3fbe1be9 SAFETY-90: the peak guard goes on after a P1 meter gap
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 31m10s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A meter gap past meter_max_age_s left seconds the quarter average never
counted, so the guard was blind for the rest of the quarter (rig case 7b:
3964.8 W against a 3450 W aim). Once readings are back, the missed seconds
now count at the higher of the limit and the import seen just before and
just after the gap with the batteries at 0 W (peakguard.gap_w/fill_gaps);
the gap's first meter_max_age_s is topped up to that too. Seconds before
the add-on's first reading count at the aim, and the page says part of the
period was not measured (EN/NL). The bill record is unchanged; no option.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-90-peak-guard-after-a-gap.md, test_safety90.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 11:46:58 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 6918e154c8 SAFETY-97: "gives nothing" is graded against each battery's idle reading
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 29m7s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
B's power reading shows -95 to -118 W at idle (standby draw), so the
|reading| < 100 W refusal band never held a refusing B: never at N=2,
and since SAFETY-94's shared rule not at N=1 either (review F1).

Each unit now learns its idle reading (app/idle.py): only while control
runs, the unit is not refused/stale/tripped and its command has stayed
within 50 W for 120 s; first value a 120 s mean, then a 30 min follow;
samples beyond 250 W dropped, value clamped to 250 W; saved per unit and
restored. The shared refusal evidence, compute()'s N=1 engage and end,
the unit refusal ends, the stale-path refusal and SAFETY-42's "parked"
test are centred on it. Until learned it is 0 W, the rule as it was.

Refusing B caught at N=1 28/28/65 s and N=2 24/24/60 s (1/2/5 s
meters), before never; refusing A unchanged. Healthy B with its offset,
SAFETY-94's scenarios, 96 runs: 0 stale, 0 refused. Live replay: 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-04 12:21:24 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 6759d21ea5 SAFETY-94: a healthy battery that lags or reverses is not flagged as frozen or refusing
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 28m10s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 2s
The stale-reading gate counted its 35 s from the register's last change, so
after a rest the first read after a new command tripped it (SAFETY-58; live
2026-10-03, four trips 1 s after the command). It now counts only the time
the command asked the register to move.

At N=1 the refusal engaged after 12 frozen cycles if the reading was under
100 W at that moment, which a battery reversing through its lag passes at a
1 s meter. The refusal now needs the N>1 evidence at every roster size: under
100 W, one way, for 12 cycles spanning 22 s, restarting when the reading
moves 50 W towards the ask.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-94-lagging-battery.md; test_safety94.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 00:15:42 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 214051d1a8 SAFETY-93 review: a charge that ends by a stale link or a refusal hands back smoothly too
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 27m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 1s
A battery still in CHARGE but dropped by the allocator (stale link, or a
SAFETY-73 refusal contradicting its charge) left its -2000 W in the loop's
start point, and B went 0 -> -1600 W in one cycle. The end is now noted
after the unit claims are filed: in CHARGE, live and not contradicted.
Tests: part 6 (stale link, refusal) and a spy on the guard suspension.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-03 00:10:21 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 05eb93f139 SAFETY-93: the maintenance charge end hands back smoothly, with no grid charging at a high house
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m55s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Failing after 1s
At N>=2, when a battery's maintenance charge ended, its watts stayed in the
loop's start point and landed on the other battery (B 0 -> -1600 W in one
cycle, charging from the grid at a 6000 W house). On the cycle a charge
ends, the loop now starts from what the others stood at plus that
battery's new command. N=1 and all identity digests unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 22:38:42 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 4cd604afcb SAFETY-91 review: a held-back battery is released 1 point above its reserve
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m26s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A SoC reading flipping across the reserve swapped ~1000 W between the
batteries on each flip (grid +-500 W with unequal lags). Also grades
next_quarter()'s staleness boundary (29.5 / 30.5 s).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:54:20 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 6872353e2e SAFETY-91: a held battery is drawn only after the others are full
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m19s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N>=2 a battery at or under its own peak reserve now weighs 0 whenever
the site gives (not only for the peak), a draining battery's pin becomes
a floor at its drain rate so it rises before the held one gives, and a
quarter's edge is graded on the next quarter when its first telegram is
late. SAFETY-25 option A stays: the held battery is still drawn once the
others are full. N=1 unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:03:54 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 7b723a6cd5 SAFETY-85 review: grade discharge only, over the plant's settle time
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m47s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Rule 2 graded each battery against last cycle's command and graded charges
too. On plantsim's battery (10 s lag) at the 2 s meter it warned at every
drain or charge start and 15 times an hour under the peak guard at N=2; a
charge tapering near full warned 11 times in 50 min (SAFETY-42 section 7).
Now a discharge is graded against the least it stood at over SHORT_CYCLES /
SHORT_SPAN_S. DOCS lists `mode-bound` under Loop reason. test_safety85 part 7:
peak guard with a dead battery, lagging plant, taper; part 3: the bound ends
with maintenance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 20:25:41 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 4b81387908 SAFETY-85: no false 'not keeping up' while maintenance or the peak guard sets the battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m35s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
The loop's integrator bound counts only on a cycle the loop decided. A battery
another owner set (maintenance, the peak guard, a safety limit) alarms only
when it gives more than saturation_w less than told for saturation_cycles
cycles. At N>=2 the loop is bounded while maintenance holds a battery, so it
does not wind and control comes back one slew step a cycle. The status row
counts episodes, not cycles. Digests re-pinned where behaviour changed on
purpose; DECISIONS/SAFETY-85-no-false-not-keeping-up.md has the list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 19:05:27 +02:00
Claude aa501ffec7 SAFETY-87 review: maintenance pins beside a held battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 26m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A draining battery that may still give is raised from its drain rate
towards its rating for the peak floor while another battery is held
(peak > drain); before, the floor's rest landed on the held battery. In a
HOLD, a held battery's own pin counts among the others: a held drain no
longer over-places the site, and a held charge probe no longer parks it.

Tests: test_safety87.py part 10 (drain beside a held battery, N=3 HOLD,
unknown cut-out and unread level at N=3, a stopping row outranks the
running peak alarm). DECISIONS entry updated, incl. the modes-on exception.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 10:50:01 +02:00
Claude d0db5b8c39 SAFETY-87: peak guard uses every battery that can still give
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m45s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N>=2 a battery at or under its own peak reserve is held: it gives
nothing for the peak (weight 0 while the site gives) and the guard's need
is placed on the live, non-refusing batteries above theirs. The guard is
floor-limited, and alarms, only when those cannot hold the limit at full
power for ALARM_HOLD_S. The peak alarms no longer read "Not ready" or hold
the Home page at 0 W, because control keeps running. N=1 is byte-identical.

DECISIONS/SAFETY-87-guard-uses-able-batteries.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 09:29:30 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 1c41a1e412 SAFETY-86 review: hold the site at the peak floor while a HOLD gives
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 24m23s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N>=2 the holding pack's pin follows the guard's floor while the loop
still asks for +5000 W, so the ALLOCATOR "could not be placed" row was
re-logged on every 1 W change and filled the 40-row action log. While the
pin is raised, cycle() now files a site `hold` ceiling at the floor
(P_MAINTENANCE), as SAFETY-84 does for a charge. Filed only when the
holding pack gives; hi == the floor, so it never clashes with it.

Tests: a noisy N=2 house logs no ALLOCATOR row and at most one clamp
row (20 and 20 without the ceiling); the ceiling is the floor itself;
a CHARGE is not refiled at N=1. The DECISIONS entry records the owner's
2026-10-01 decision: the HOLD ends on its clock, no top-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 02:00:20 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 ba31e7c8b1 SAFETY-86: peak guard outranks the maintenance hold
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 24m17s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
During a HOLD the holding battery gives what keeps the quarter at the peak
aim. N=1: the peak floor is refiled at P_MAINTENANCE, as for a drain
(SAFETY-83). N>=2: the hold's pin is raised to the floor minus what the
other live batteries may place, so they give first. A site stop still
decides alone. The hold ends on its clock even if the level dipped.
Below the aim nothing changes (rows identical).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 00:56:34 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 43a52e7f60 SAFETY-84: maintenance charge at N=2 no longer stalls
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At N>=2 a cheap-window maintenance charge files a site `hi` (`charge`,
P_MAINT_SHAPE) equal to what the charging pack's own `hi` places, so the
other pack never has to give against it. The charge is sized to the
quarter's headroom under the peak aim so it yields to the peak guard, and
to 0 W under a site safety stop. N=1 byte-identical (safety84_identity).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 19:47:15 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 79b94024cb Merge release/1.0 (OPT-11 P4, #156) into safety-83-peak-over-drain
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 13:35:28 +02:00
goodwe-agent 02c0a3dd7b MAINT-10: maintenance start hour in local time, default 19:00
The start hour was compared with the UTC hour, so the shipped 10 started at
12:00 in a Belgian summer. It is now read in Home Assistant's time zone
(fallback: the container's TZ, then UTC, one log line says which), and the
default moves to 19. DST: a missing hour starts at the first hour after the
jump; a repeated hour starts only in its first pass. Stored options are not
rewritten: a saved 10 now means 10:00 local (DOCS, CHANGELOG).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:52:05 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 d77f1b1fdf SAFETY-83: peak guard outranks the maintenance drain at N=1
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16m54s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
At N=1 the drain is the site SET at P_MAINTENANCE (60), so the peak floor
(P_PEAK, 50) was not applied and the house imported what the drain left.
Where the floor asks for more than the drain rate, main.py now refiles the
peak claim at P_MAINTENANCE, so it wins; safety SETs still park everything.
Nothing else changes: safety78_identity --diff against 35cdffe changes only
cycles where the guard wanted more than the drain; N=2 is byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:40:14 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 b171ada894 Merge release/1.0 (SAFETY-78, #154) into opt11-p4-solar-forecast
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m54s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Conflicts: modetrade.decide() takes both the day plan (targets) and
SAFETY-78's draining flag; the Why line keeps SAFETY-78's other_cycle
ahead of the plan's word (test added).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:37:09 +02:00
Claude review c38dd1e969 OPT-15 review: bound unmeasured charge stops, test the hold's rules and M15
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 3s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
- A second unmeasured-headroom stop in a quarter latches the charge: a
  headroom missing every other cycle flipped it 1799 times in 30 min.
- Unit test of the run-edge hold's end conditions and of a small step.
- Outside its probe a refuser does not make the others rest (M15 red).
- DECISIONS: one review line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:31:52 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 a692560960 Merge release/1.0 (SAFETY-81, #155) into opt11-p4-solar-forecast
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 22:08:52 +02:00
goodwe-review 516bc8b4ec Merge release/1.0 into safety-78-drain-at-two
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18m49s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:53:47 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 f967073cfe SAFETY-81 review: 10 s hold, ERROR line per episode, more scenarios
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 20m31s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
- The alarm must hold for peakguard.ALARM_HOLD_S (10 s) on the projection's
  clock. A load that tops cap + battery for ~5 s every 30 s alarmed at every
  quarter start while the quarter landed under the aim (sine4500_fast).
- A cycle with no battery reading leaves the hold alone.
- Notified once per quarter, but the ERROR line is written per episode.
- New sim scenarios (sine4500_fast, twice7000, step6500_gap) with 5a4cdc2
  digests; control still byte-identical. Unit checks for export and the
  hold across a missing reading. test_peakguard's saturated fixture moves
  the hold start back instead of waiting it out.
- DECISIONS and DOCS updated: costs of the hold, tolerance reasoning, the
  double count in control left to a follow-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 20:58:37 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 fae6681e19 OPT-15: price-run fixes (quarter edge, charge-end overshoot, refusal probe)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18m49s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
F1: with battery modes on, the peak guard projects the quarter `now` is in
even before its first P1 sample (PeakTracker.project(roll=True)), and only
a measured stop latches the period. The edge tick no longer reads "no
seconds left", so a charge is not stopped and latched at a quarter edge.

F2: after a run edge the loop is held at E until the meter shows the step
(EDGE_HOLD_S, longer while the battery still moves). The replay gained a
lag model (dead time, reading age, P1 debounce, 1 s cycles) that shows
TEST-23's overshoot without the hold.

F3: a charge refuser's SAFETY-73 probe inside a cheap run is a charger
pinned at PROBE_W, the others rest, so the probe actually runs.

Modes off stays byte-identical to 5a4cdc2 (new late-P1 identity scenarios).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 20:22:32 +02:00
goodwe-agent 6eb67c0f9c SAFETY-81: no false 'Load too high' alarms
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16m11s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
The alarm now also needs peakguard.load_too_high(): with the battery at
full power, the quarter still ends more than 10 W over the real limit.
The battery reading is the lower of this cycle's and the last, so a meter
sample from before the battery's last increase is not counted twice.
At most one alarm per quarter. Control outputs unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 19:55:38 +02:00
Claude 5d27f8496f SAFETY-78: maintenance drain at N=2 no longer stalls
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 17m13s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At two inverters the drain pins its pack and the site target is split
around the pin. Below the pin the other pack had to charge, the allocator
refused the opposite directions, and the site sat at 0 W with an ARBITER
line every cycle (house below or above the drain rate, or a grid charge).

main.py now files a site limit `drain` (lo = what the pin places, at
P_MAINTENANCE) at N>=2 while a pack drains, so the other pack only adds
power in the same direction. A drain that cannot give power waits with
one log line. With battery modes on, no grid charge while a pack drains,
and the other battery's card says why. N=1 is byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 19:52:51 +02:00
Claude eb10537aee OPT-11 P4: solar forecast and day plan
A Home Assistant solar forecast (Forecast.Solar, Solcast or Open-Meteo
shapes) and the add-on's own hourly house use decide, before each cheap
run, whether the sun will fill each battery before the expensive hours.
Leftover solar then buys from the grid only the shortfall; Cheap hours only
skips the part the sun covers; Solar first never grid-charges. No, stale or
failed forecast: P3 option A exactly (12 digests pinned from 5a4cdc2).

Replay (16 recorded days, forecast errors from Elia's day-ahead BE solar):
year-earlier prices P4 19.15 vs P2 19.33 / option A 19.44 / old trade 18.14;
real 2026 prices P4 29.19 vs 32.26 / 32.01 / 31.40 EUR net.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 19:29:32 +02:00
Claude dev agent 6dab4ec16b OPT-11 P3, owner option A: selling off, Leftover solar takes solar only
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15m12s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Owner decision 2026-09-29. Selling is off until it can be judged on the price
the grid pays: packmode.SELLING_ENABLED = False makes read() answer
sell=False whatever the store holds, pack_sell is refused ("Selling is off
for now."), and the page has no selling switch; the sell code stays. Until
the P4 forecast, only Cheap hours only charges from the grid
(packmode.GRID_CHARGE_MODES); Leftover solar holds and gives in the
expensive runs. Help, Today and plan lines, DOCS and DECISIONS follow.
Replay, 16 days: Solar first + Leftover solar 19.44 EUR net (P2 19.33).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 10:42:58 +02:00
Claude dev agent 902524ae5e OPT-11 P3: price runs per battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13m45s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Cheap and expensive hours as runs of consecutive firm price slots
(priceruns.py); each battery's role per tick from its mode (modetrade.py):
grid charging for Leftover solar / Cheap hours only, never Solar first;
holding for the expensive runs; selling per battery (pack_sell) above the
spread and the floor. The site trade is sized inside the modes (loop bound)
and the peak guard's headroom; a run edge reseeds the loop. Cheap hours only
and selling are enabled on the Batteries screen and in the HA select
(appended). The site Why row no longer says "held back" when the peak limit
pushes power up (F2). Modes off: byte-identical to 7a00f12 on the trade path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 02:37:44 +02:00
Review AgentandClaude Opus 5.5 e6096d3e17 Merge release/1.0 (7337b79, OPT-11 P2) into safety-79-peak-margin
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 00:23:14 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 c664e38ef4 OPT-11 P2 review: refusals stay counted, removals survive a start with no broker
- A refusal past the log-once set or the 32 cap is counted in the log at
  1, 10, 100 and so on, so a repeated attack stays visible.
- The logged topic is printable only (no forged log lines).
- mode_announcement(): the start-up store logic, now tested with a real
  Store. A removed config topic stays stored, so a start with no broker
  cannot forget it (rename case tested).
- A test ties each HA mode option to the page's English name.
- packmode.enabled() is tested for "true", 1 and "false".
- Retained-command text, DOCS and DECISIONS updated to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-28 23:58:34 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 b310282729 OPT-11 P2: HA entities for battery modes
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11m12s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Each battery gets an MQTT-discovered Mode select and Use switch, only while
battery_modes_enabled is true. Commands go through handle_action(), the
/action path; refusals are logged once. Retained commands are never applied.
Turning modes off removes exactly the configs announced (kept in the store).
With modes off the announcement is byte-identical to ed739d4.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-28 23:12:04 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 7c4c8f5c66 SAFETY-79: peak guard keeps a margin below the limit
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 11m34s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
New option peak_margin_w (default 50 W, 0-500 W). The peak guard, the
forecast checks and the maintenance charge sizing aim at
peak_cap_w - peak_margin_w; the month peak, the bill, headroom, warnings
and every notice keep the real cap. Owner decision 2026-09-28.

peak_margin_w 0 is byte-identical to ed739d4 (tools/safety79_identity.py,
test_peak_margin.py part 1). validate.py rule 12 refuses a value outside
0-500, not whole, or not below the peak limit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UBtqPrG1mDLXzTEBnhEkkV
2026-09-28 23:09:39 +02:00