UX-54's Forecast tab (release/1.0) re-plans tomorrow's cheap run as control
will, with the gap `required`. It still added the "no weather" x1.5 always,
while control (TARIFF-24, from master) drops it when a forecast is read. In
the UX-54 scenarios the tab asked 0.225 where control needs 0.15. It now asks
`arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(True, c.solar_fc)`, so the two agree again, as
they did on release/1.0 alone. Display only; no control change. The tab's
blocks in every UX-54 scenario, every 2 h, are identical to release/1.0.
test_ux54.py pins it (the old line fails it). The TARIFF-24 DECISIONS note
names the tab as the fourth place that reads the rule.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- TARIFF-24 DECISIONS: the hold keeps a Cheap hours charge; a Leftover solar
battery still stops without a forecast (it has no planned level, still true
after OPT-28: `dayplan.plan()` returns None and `charge_to()` gives None).
Adds "a run that has started runs to its end" for a give run begun in a hold.
- CHANGELOG 0.19.2: "when the period is over" -> "when the period would go
over the limit".
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings in 0.19.1 (TARIFF-24) and 0.19.2 (SAFETY-125). Git merged every file
without a text conflict. config.yaml's version becomes 0.19.2, the newest
CHANGELOG section: test_version_gate.py (PKG-14, 11b) requires the two to be
equal, and release/1.0 took 0.19.0 the same way (#207). The 0.19.1 and 0.19.2
CHANGELOG sections come in as history.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
With A on Leftover solar and B on Cheap hours (the dynamic scenario, and the
owner's planned setup), the line said "The batteries cannot hold it all. The
grid covers N kWh", while B holds a full charge for the same hours. It now
says "The expensive hours need more than Leftover solar can hold. The rest,
N kWh, comes from another battery or the grid." (NL likewise). DOCS,
DECISIONS and the dayplan/homeview docstrings say the same. Text only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
OPT-23: a state-only forecast is read from now for every span
(Forecast.between since=), so the plan's per-hour sun adds up to the day's
figure, today and tomorrow. Hourly splits are unchanged. The Forecast tab
reads spans the same way.
OPT-28: a Leftover solar battery buys, from the floor, the sum over the
expensive hours of max(0, house - trust x sun), / EFF. Several Leftover
solar batteries hold it together by capacity, the ceiling passes the rest
on, and what none can hold is said (Plan.uncovered_kwh). Home's grid block,
the Batteries line and the mode help (EN + NL) say the level, what it
covers, and that Leftover solar buys only what the sun will not give.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Owner 2026-10-29: fix N=1 in this hotfix. _charge_headroom() no longer
returns early at one inverter, so the N=1 cheap-window maintenance charge
is held to charge_room_w() as at N=2; SAFETY-84's site-stop rule stays N>=2
only (at N=1 such a stop outranks the shaping anyway). The guard no longer
steps in and gives power at each quarter's end during that charge.
test_safety125.py: N=1 maintenance on 5 s and 10 s meters with late
readings, with and without a banked peak; the row in an N=2 maintenance
charge and in shadow mode; edge cases (blind past the hold, a start
mid-quarter, the summer-time change, the forecast in W, a 10 s meter, the
last second). test_safety84/87: three N=1 pins move. test_safety119: its
quarter-edge hand-back runs keep the old N=1 sizing as a fixture, plus a
check that with the new sizing nothing hands back. CHANGELOG, DECISIONS,
DOCS follow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- The over-the-limit rows ran over STYLE's 15 words (EN 16/19, NL 16/21)
and two Dutch Home sentences over 12 words; they were not in the samples,
so test_messages/test_ux46 never saw them. Now:
"Peak guard: grid charge limited, at this rate 5 814 W, over 5 413 W" /
"Piekbewaking: laden beperkt, aan dit tempo 5 814 W, boven 5 413 W",
"...idle, at this rate ..., over ..." / "...in rust, aan dit tempo ...",
NL Home "Laadt minder van het net om onder 5,4 kW te blijven." and
"Zou minder van het net laden om onder 5,4 kW te blijven."
The rows and the line are added to the samples. The under row is unchanged.
- CHANGELOG known issues and the DECISIONS note: at N=1 the maintenance
charge is not sized to the room, so SAFETY-99 still applies to it.
- DOCS: the peak guard row's new words.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A meter reading late near a quarter's end left seconds the projection did
not count (SAFETY-99), and charge_headroom_w() read them as room: the cheap
run (and price trading, and the N=2 maintenance charge) went back to full
power in the quarter's last seconds and the quarter could land over a banked
month peak or the cap. peakguard.charge_room_w() counts those seconds at the
held reading for the charge only; the guard's floor is unchanged.
The guard row said "idle, heading for 5 814 W, under this month's 5 413 W
peak". Over the limit at the current rate the row and the month-peak line
now say so, and that the grid charge is cut back.
Version 0.19.2, CHANGELOG, DECISIONS. test_safety125.py new; the lag pins
in test_price_run_fixes.py and test_opt20.py and the AST pin in
test_arbitrage.py follow the change (see the pull request).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Losing the solar forecast mid-run used to widen the gap at once and stop a
grid charge (and a sensor that went unavailable for a minute stopped and
restarted it). A run under way when the forecast is lost now keeps the gap it
was planned with until it ends (Controller.weather_held(), recorded by
_wx_track() each cycle a forecast is read); the wider gap applies from the next
run. The plan key holds the hold state so the plan rebuilds when it ends. Home's
mirror (homeview.trade_verdict) asks the same weather_held(now).
Tests: test_tariff24_weather.py part 4 (going: the charge continues to the run's
end, the next run is not_worth; flap of one and two reads: no stop, no restart;
Home agrees) and a test_modes_p4.py scenario that runs a forecast day at a gap
between 1x and 1.5x the cycle cost. DECISIONS wording follows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
With battery modes on, the price gap a mode needs was always widened x1.5 by
Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER, even with a solar forecast read, so a 0.08 day/night
gap never traded at the shipped cycle cost. The doubt is now added only when
no usable forecast is read (solar_fc is None, the day plan's own test), in the
run plan (_price_runs), the charge gate (_mode_roles) and Home's mirror
(homeview.trade_verdict). The rule is one helper, arbitrage.weather_uncertainty();
the modes-off trade path (main.py cycle) keeps its literal NO_WEATHER.
DOCS "Battery modes" sentence, CHANGELOG 0.19.1 line and the DECISIONS note
follow. Tests: test_tariff24_weather.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
With battery modes on, a day/night or fixed static_profile, no price feed and
arbitrage off, tariff_refresh_wanted() was false: no tariff task, no
tariff_plan, mode_runs None, so Leftover solar / Cheap hours never charged from
the grid and the Batteries screen said "No prices". packmode.enabled(opts) is
now a third term of the gate. With price_provider off the task is pure
arithmetic on static_profile, so no HTTPS call is added.
Also: version 0.19.1, CHANGELOG entry, DECISIONS note, test_tariff24.py, and a
shorter tariff_refresh_wanted() docstring (history stays in DECISIONS).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
daycurve._floor_cut() set a cut from a battery already at the floor (its
cap 0 is below its rating), so a give run with one battery empty and the
other held to its rating was cut until MAX_FLOOR_CUTS ran out: 2,800 cuts
and 460 ms a build, and give blocks back at the hour edge after that.
The shortfall in a step is now shared as control shares it (by what each
battery holds above the floor, packshare.weights(), each at most its
rating, the rest passed on), in the step and in the cut. A battery giving
v kW that holds h kWh is empty at h / v; one at the floor holds nothing and
never sets a cut. The cut lands where the step then comes out exact, so it
is placed once. curve(stats=) reports the floor cuts and whether the bound
stopped one.
test_ux54.py: _floor_cut() checked to the second against floor times worked
out by hand (one battery, a group with one held to its rating, the second
group, the split by what they hold), a battery at the floor sets no cut,
the bound is reported; own_walk() with the reviewer's two cases (30/80 %,
guard, 7 kW house; 2 x 3 kW, 3.5 kW house) and, per build, the floor cuts,
the level points and the time.
No decision, command, timing or option key changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
daycurve.curve() puts a point where a giving battery reaches the floor
inside a step (_floor_cut(), as it already does for a grid charge reaching
its level), so _stops() ends a give block in the quarter control stops. A
walk where control moves the packs with its own model (not the curve's
levels) matches the tab quarter by quarter in 11 cases; 25/45 % with the
peak guard: control 17:00-20:15, block 17:00-20:06.
SolarToday keys an hour by its start taken back from the UTC instant, so
the two 02:00 hours of the autumn change stay apart. test_ux54_dst.py builds
the tab (forecast_payload()) at every quarter of 27-29 March and
30 October-1 November 2027, modes on and off, in the no-tzdata zone and,
where the host has tzdata, ZoneInfo, every call under a time limit raised
as a BaseException that forecast_payload() cannot swallow.
give_later: "No block shows while a battery has no energy to give." /
"Er verschijnt geen blok zolang een batterij niets kan leveren."
DECISIONS: what the walks prove, the modes-off charge drawn on a sunny day,
the clock-change days.
No decision, command, timing or option key changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
dayplan._hour_slices() added an hour to the local wall clock and read it
back. Without tzdata (tariff._EUTimezone) 02:00 on the spring change reads
as 00:00 UTC again, so the loop never advanced and the list grew until the
process died. Each step now adds the time left in the local hour to the UTC
instant. Ordinary days give the old slices; the spring day gives 23 slices
and the autumn day 25. No option, no text change.
test_safety123.py: every quarter of 27-29 March and 30 Oct-1 Nov 2027 (and
the US change days) for the slices, dayplan.plan() and
Controller._mode_roles(), each call under a hard time limit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Modes off has no curve (no forecast is read, no house profile kept), so
dayview._levels() never ran there and tomorrow's legs were drawn from the
bound. homeview.trade_runs(ahead=f) now reads each leg at f(name, kind,
start), as mode_runs() does: no give while the emptiest battery is at the
floor, each share sized from that level. dayview._counted() gives a give
the level by Home's own count (the level now, plus what the blocks before
it put in, less what they take out); a charge is read from the floor,
because a full battery covers the house before the cheap hour.
The battery line says a give is planned when one is and the battery has
no give block, also with modes off.
test_ux54.py: the modes-on walk no longer relabels a GIVE role at the
floor; it asks control's own discharge envelope (packshare.envelope())
with each pack's cut-out at the floor. The peak-guard 20 % case asserts
the curve is at the floor at the 17:00 give start. A modes-off walk on a
cloudy day (arbitrage.decide() with the cycle's inputs, the packs moved by
what control does and by the house), cases A-D: control charges and gives
in exactly the quarters the tab has a block. trade_runs(ahead=f) unit
check. _stops() ends a give block where the level the tab shows is at the
floor (LEVEL_DP).
No decision, command, timing or option key changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
- Tomorrow's grid block is drawn to where control stops charging. A cheap run
is sized for all batteries together; a slower one is still below
`charge_to()` when it ends and control plans the next cheap slots. The tab
asks `modetrade.energy()` and `priceruns.plan()` with the packs at the
curve's level and extends the run, so the curve charges as long.
- Each battery's block ends where it is at its own level (grid) or at the
floor (give). The curve puts a point where a battery reaches its charge
level inside a step.
- `homeview.mode_runs(ahead=f, rp=...)` reads each block at the level the
curve has when it starts, with Home's own filter and MIN_KWH: no give block
at the floor, no grid block at the planned level. Home never passes either.
- `no_tomorrow` names the hour from `solarfc.BELL_FROM_H`, where the curve
stops.
- test_ux54.py part 7 compares control (`_mode_roles()` every 15 minutes) with
the tab with no tolerance, and adds the cloudy / floor case.
No decision, command, timing or option key changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
F1: tomorrow's blocks no longer depend on the battery's level now. Home sizes
a block from the level now (`room()`, `plan_need()` in mode_runs, the leg
sizing in trade_runs) and draws none when there is no room or energy. For a
day that has not started the builders take `ahead=True` (Home never passes
it): a charge is read from the floor, a give from the ceiling. A grid block is
then kept only where `modetrade.chargers()` would charge at the curve's level
when the run starts. The UX-53 gate is unchanged. Today still equals Home; a
give run in the plan with no block (empty battery) has its own sentence
instead of "No charge or give blocks planned".
F2: test_ux54.py part 7 walks the real `_mode_roles()` every 15 minutes
through tomorrow and compares the roles with the tab's blocks (modes on, the
peak gate, part-full batteries), and the control cycle's verdict at 07:00
(modes off).
F3: the curve counts spare solar as trust x max(0, sun - house), stored at
EFF, as `dayplan.plan()` does (10 kWh sun, 2 kWh house, 70 %: 5.32 kWh).
Strings: cycle, no_tomorrow, ahead, no_level, measured; new give_later.
No decision, command, timing or option key changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
A new tab beside Home and Batteries for today and tomorrow: the solar
forecast, the solar measured so far, the house's expected use and each
battery's expected level, with the plan's own charge and give blocks under it.
- Blocks are Home's: today's are the plan's `runs`, tomorrow's come from the
same builders (`homeview.runs_for()`), in the plan lines' words.
- The sun is what solarfc reads; a daily total is spread over the bell and the
tab says so. The house is HouseProfile.estimator(), as the plan reads it.
- The level is new: `daycurve.curve()` gives each battery the role
`modetrade.decide()` gives it and moves it hour by hour inside the plan's
floor and ceiling. It is an estimate and counts on `solar_trust_pct`.
- Built on request (`GET forecast`), no Home Assistant call. Measured solar is
kept per hour in memory from the reading control already takes.
- A part not known yet is a note: modes off, no forecast, learning, no
forecast for tomorrow, a monthly cycle, no level, stopped, shadow.
No decision, command, timing or option key changes. Found, not changed:
`dayplan.plan()` over-counts a state-only forecast (DECISIONS/UX-54).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Modes on: Controller._mode_roles() files the trade gate it just asked as
mode_gate; while it refuses, Home draws no grid charge and marks no cheap
quarter. Modes off: a charge after the last dear period is asked of the same
gate at its own start (homeview.leg_taken) and dropped when refused there.
Words: "Lowest/Highest price left" (EN, NL); a flat remainder on a dynamic or
day/night site is no longer called a fully fixed product.
No change to control decisions, commands or options.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The production-shaped plan sees tomorrow from 13:00, so most buys are sold
the next day or later. The ledger forgot the open buy at each midnight and
booked 46 of 51 sales as holdings: 5 trips, +1.21 EUR. Carried over, the
same decisions give 51 trips, +13.81 EUR, all clearing the threshold.
Decisions are unchanged and identical on the old and new verdict. No
assertion changed.
DECISIONS: 27.5 -> 42.6 kWh is the refresh-:00, tomorrow-known variant; give
the range of the other three.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
- TariffPlan.arbitrage(now=...) is required (keyword-only, no default); so are
homeview.trade_verdict/refusal_key's now. Existing test calls pass one.
- test_arbitrage.py: no module-level decide wrapper. Fixtures that probed a
one-day plan after its extremes now hold two days (as a site does); the
flap day gets a unique cheapest and dearest hour; the replay breaks its
ties without direction. The flap bound is <= 4 and the replay check is
len(_trades) < 365 again. 228 checks pass on the old and the new code.
- test_price02.py part 6: ties (equal quarters, a real 15-minute day,
alternating hourly prices) and the required now.
- Identity pins: the masked digest is only for the older-tree comparison;
this tree's own digests are pinned with nothing hidden.
- DECISIONS: the tie analysis with numbers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
TariffPlan.arbitrage(now=...) drops the points whose period has ended
(end <= now), so the cheapest and dearest point can still be traded.
decide() (modes off), the modes-on allowed() gate and the Home verdict
all pass their own now. Hourly feeds and the static tariff are unchanged.
The off-peak sentence and the charge/discharge sentences say "price
period". Tests: test_price02.py; test_arbitrage.py rolls its whole-day
plans to start at now; test_modes_p3.py part 1 digests leave the trade
sentence out (commands unchanged on 7a00f12, 90bc901 and this tree).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The jittery-meter numbers depend on the draw (review: 4, 4, 5 of 11 at the
quarter edge; up to 4 quiet quarters at 20 s; first warning up to 61 min
later). Above about 40 s per cycle, a short bound can still use up the
budget when the wire changes hands every few cycles. Text only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
TEST-23 F-1: on a 5 s meter a steady overload warned once in 70 min. The
loop was at its bound 4-5 cycles a quarter, all inside SAFETY-119's settle
of 12 cycles (60 s) and under its budget of 8 per 900 s. The simulation
fed the meter a cycle behind the battery reading, so the guard and the
charge chased each other and gave ~20 bound cycles a quarter.
The settle is now 4 cycles and 22 s (HANDBACK_CYCLES, SHORT_SPAN_S), and
the rolling budget one number, 11 per 900 s, at every cycle length. The
cycle length is no longer tracked. Commands unchanged; the re-pinned
digests of test_safety84/87 differ from bee7431 in OUTPUT_CLAMP rows only.
test_safety119 runs the rig's shape (meter in the same cycle) at 1-15 s
and checks a stop keeps the budget (review F2, X3).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The quarter-edge numbers were measured with one cycle per reading at a
steady interval. With the default 15 s cycle floor, a meter that is
sometimes slower adds cycles on an old reading and the false alarm can
come back (reviewer's runs, 11 seeds). Text only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
No single rolling budget met both cases in the sweep (8 false-alarmed on
2 s seed 25 and warned in 1 to 3 of 7 quarters at 15 s). The budget is
now 10 cycles up to a 3.5 s cycle, 8 up to 11 s, 6 up to 16 s, 4 beyond,
per rolling 15 minutes; 8 while the cycle length is unknown. A stop or a
gap over two minutes is not a cycle length. The unsourced "owner
accepted N=8" paragraph is removed from DECISIONS. test_safety119 part 4
now runs 2 s seed 25 and shows a fixed budget of 8 warns there; the
never case runs at 2 s and checks every other quarter at 15 s.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The rolling budget now holds without a monotonic clock (it never refills).
Quarter-edge tests use seeds 1-3 at 2, 5, 10 and 15 s (no hand-picked seeds).
Re-pin comments point at part 6. DECISIONS lists the limits the owner
accepted with N=8 on 2026-10-20.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
At most 8 hidden bound cycles in any 900 s across all hand-backs, replacing
the per-run budget. Chosen from a sweep (N 3 to 10, 1 to 15 s meters, both
cases); DECISIONS has the table. Tests: never case at 5, 10, 15 s, quarter
edge at 2, 10, 15 s, the rolling budget at its boundaries.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
A hand-back used to restart the window, so a guard and a charge taking
turns hid the loop's integrator bound for good (0 warnings in 2 h; 28
before the fix). A run of hand-backs (the wire away less than a settle
between them) now hides the bound for at most 11 bound cycles and 22 s in
all, then it counts. The quarter-edge kick stays hidden. No command or text
changes. Tests for the two reviewer mutants that only unit checks caught
(a restart counted as a hand-back; span only), DECISIONS gives the delay at
2 s, 5 s and 60 s. test_safety87.py:543 shortened.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
The delay is 11 cycles, so up to 11 min at a 60 s cycle. A loop that loses
the wire again within 11 cycles is never counted; review measured one such
case (N=2, cheap-window charge, no forecast, house just over the rating).
The over-rating rule applies on cycles the loop decided. Text only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
The re-pinned digests differ only in OUTPUT_CLAMP log rows; every command
and claim is the same as without the fix (test_safety119.py part 5).
DECISIONS: the delay at a 5 s meter and the open swap case.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
When the peak guard or a maintenance charge hands the wire back, the loop's
integrator is re-seeded from that owner's command and kicked by a meter that
does not show it yet. It crossed its rail for a cycle or two and raised
goodwe_integrator_bound while the battery gave what it was told.
The loop's integrator bound is not counted until the plant's settle
(SHORT_CYCLES, SHORT_SPAN_S) has passed since the hand-back. An over-rating
always counts; a bound that lasts warns after the settle. No command
changes and no text changes. test_safety119.py; DECISIONS entry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
A missing reading (unavailable, unknown, failed read, non-numeric) no longer
clears the fault: no false 'used again' INFO, no repeated WARNING, the status
row stays. Adds pv.has_reading(). DECISIONS wording fixed; tests added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
peak_forecast_entity is read through pv.watts() by its unit_of_measurement;
the abs(raw) < 50 size rule is gone. No unit or a non-power unit means the
forecast is not used, with one warning per cause. The validator no longer
claims a kW sensor is taken as watts for this entity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The probe's trade was sized at the probing battery's rating. Its SAFETY-73
pin held 200 W of that, and the allocator put the rest on a battery with no
mode range (one in a maintenance phase): TEST-23 OPT-15 g7, -2300 W on A in
its maintenance charge for 34 s, grid 3100 W.
modetrade.decide() now asks PROBE_W for the probing battery plus what the
other chargers would have had without the probe; size() adds the probe on top
of their share, or files PROBE_W exactly, or nothing. _mode_trade() carries
the pin only on the ticks it is filed, so the window's first and last cycle
do not move another battery's share either. Modes off and modes on with no
probe are unchanged (bf9019e digests). Tests: test_opt20.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- test_price_secret.py: the fixed-tariff note on the real /config/validate
route, EN and NL, and none for a spaces-only profile (web.py lang wiring).
- test_price_service.py: the start line is INFO, not WARNING; a dismiss that
raises does not stop the cycle.
- test_maint13/test_setup_only/test_watchdog: ignore only the dismiss of the
old card, so a create with that id is still counted.
- DECISIONS rule 7 quotes the settings note as it is; messages.py comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
G1: remove the false 'Fixed tariff not used' notification. One INFO line at
start and an info note beside the setting (EN/NL) when price_service has a
non-blank static_profile; the old notification id is dismissed at start.
DOCS, migration step 5 and DECISIONS rule 7 now say what the code does.
S05: whitespace-only static_profile counts as not set.
G2: maintenance_enabled read through MaintConfig.from_options().
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
F1: every password option is shown as ******** (set) or empty in /config/model
(options, running, ui) and in a stale refusal; the classic page draws it as a
password field; a save or validate that sends ******** or nothing keeps the
stored value. F2: a static_profile beside price_service is said once at start
(notification and log), not refused. F3 (owner, 2026-10-14): the no-price row,
Home line and notification only while maintenance_enabled is on. F4: tests for
the reviewer's R01 and R10. F5: price_service_token must be 16+ characters.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
A new price source, `price_provider: price_service`: the owner's price server,
one fixed HTTPS host, a bearer token (new password option
`price_service_token`), wholesale energy only so markup and taxes are added as
for generic_dayahead.
The chain is server, then energy-charts, then the prices the history store
kept. A step counts only if it has a price for now. Each step down and back up
is one log line. With every source down a site plans from what it saved.
No price for now: one status row, one Home plan line and one notification, in
English and Dutch, cleared when a price returns. With this provider the
maintenance charge gate reads the provider's prices and keeps the Home
Assistant rule: the current 15-minute price is at or below today's average.
The token is hidden on the settings page, refused when missing, and taken out
of any error text. Other providers, `off` and the Home Assistant pair take the
road they always took (scripted-day probe against 0ce7d35: one line differs,
the refusal that lists the known providers). See
DECISIONS/PRICE-01-own-price-server.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Stop cycle is disabled on a battery that is not cycling. Start cycle is
disabled while any battery cycles and on a switched-off battery. Page only;
the add-on still refuses each of these. DECISIONS notes the one-battery case.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
maint_start and maint_abort take an optional unit. With two or more batteries
each Batteries card has Start cycle and Stop cycle buttons. One slot per site
stays: a start while a battery cycles is refused and names it (no queue). A
battery that is switched off, an unknown unit, and a stop on a battery that is
not cycling are refused with a plain message. A request with no unit is the
old call. The scheduler and the phase machine are unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Two survivors of the review's mutations get a check each in
test_price_run_fixes.py (X1: a held export credited negative in the rolled
quarter; X4: the hold extended by a reading already past E). DECISIONS: the
slow-battery quarter (3456 W, same on e3e4ba6) and the replay of a
maintenance phase starting during the hold.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
Conflicts (5 files, 9 hunks) resolved keeping both sides:
- p1.py: held_t (OPT-15) beside held_since (SAFETY-90).
- modetrade.py: chargers() takes targets (P4) and probe (OPT-15); decide()
clears the chargers, a probing refuser included, while a battery drains
(SAFETY-78); the docstring lists both rules.
- main.py: the roll goes into the SAFETY-90/91 projection chain
(`_peak_proj`); the SAFETY-95 drain-tail grid_w keeps the run-edge hold on
its other branch; the P4 forecast state and the hold state both stay.
- DOCS.md, DECISIONS: both lines kept, OPT-15 item refreshed.
Adaptations the merge needs:
- SAFETY-81 x F1: a rolled projection is not graded by the saturation alarm
until the quarter's first sample, as the old edge tick was not, so a
standing overload is still notified once per quarter.
- test_safety81, test_modes_p4: modes-on pins re-pinned (with a note), modes
off pinned to e3e4ba6; test_price_run_fixes: identity pins on e3e4ba6,
F1 reproduced at one inverter (SAFETY-91 already holds two), tests for the
drain and the day plan against the probe.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- a 502 or refused read turns waiting on, the next good read off, and a
read timeout never (two mutants survived without this)
- the flag changes no write with live readings, not only with 502 ones
- the page script's amber dot and batteries-tab banner for "waiting"
- DECISIONS: about 5 minutes per start stage, not "at most"
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
