Commit Graph
711 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude 3d31b679eb MAINT-20 part 2: main.py: keep whole sentences, no truncated warnings; refresh archive
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 24m55s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 03:33:54 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 6889667fcd MAINT-20 part 2: main.py comments and docstrings cut to a line and a pointer; DECISIONS MAIN-orchestration and its archive
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 03:32:54 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 0fb4c2b5e2 MAINT-20 part 2: same-code script checks -OO code, added/removed files, allowed paths, docstring list
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 03:27:45 +01:00
admin d4c01daca5 Merge pull request 'MAINT-20 part 1: comments and docstrings in peakguard and the price files' (#223) from MAINT-20-1 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
MAINT-20 part 1: comments and docstrings in peakguard.py and the price files cut to one line + a DECISIONS pointer (#223)
2026-11-01 03:24:54 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 63dda4b0d3 MAINT-20 part 1 review: restore three lost lines, rewrap ragged comments
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 19m51s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Comment, docstring and DECISIONS only (same-code script OK; python -OO
bytecode now identical for all six files).
- peakguard.charge_room_w: one-line docstring + SAFETY-125 pointer (cut whole).
- peakguard.shaping_suspended: keep 'the one place this conjunction is
  written; do not inline it'.
- price_forecast module note: an hour with no price and no yesterday is left
  out, never filled (test_price.py 14d cites the module note for it).
- Refill comment blocks the cut left ragged; DECISIONS pointers on one line.
- FCST-04 note: _yesterday_of(), not _previous_day(); FCST-03 note: the 49
  stronger cases are why the rule is a real change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-11-01 03:02:51 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 6e2fde63ff MAINT-20 part 1: peakguard.py keeps the reference-pack sentence a test pins
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m32s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:55:59 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 72ccfd788c MAINT-20 part 1: price_chain.py comments trimmed
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 38m0s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:19:29 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude c432d4e419 MAINT-20 part 1: price_forecast.py comments and docstrings cut
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:19:29 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 50332d4190 MAINT-20 part 1: DECISIONS note for the forecast fill (FCST-03)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:19:29 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude eda6d0aed1 MAINT-20 part 1: custom_formula.py comments cut; new TARIFF-16 note
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:17:46 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude a3f725e8a4 MAINT-20 part 1: price_history.py comments cut; FCST-04 note gets the store details
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:16:53 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude c08eb124c8 MAINT-20 part 1: price.py comments and docstrings cut to a line and a pointer
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:15:46 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 194efac98d MAINT-20 part 1: DECISIONS note for the price provider plugins (TARIFF-02)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:15:46 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 96ca66fc38 MAINT-20 part 1: peakguard.py comments and docstrings cut to a line and a pointer
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:13:48 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude e0db3b0e8a MAINT-20 part 1: DECISIONS note for the peak guard (SAFETY-07, -24, CFG-03)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:13:48 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude f31307105a MAINT-20 part 1: same-code and ratio script
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-01 01:13:48 +01:00
admin 8afadbdd9a OPT-34: the night charge keeps its level when the kept forecast ends (#222)
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 2s
2026-11-01 00:19:09 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude bb57a85b35 OPT-34 round 3: the latch ends on time, with the run, with the mode, and with the night
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 20m15s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
- F1: an expired latch is dropped whatever the run state; plan_targets() and the
  store loader ignore one that has ended (no stale latch after a restart).
- F2: the "charge goes on" line only while a cheap run is on.
- F3: a battery that is off or no longer Leftover solar leaves the latch.
- F4: a run carries the latch on only if it starts by the bell start (06:00
  local) after the latch began (manager's call, 2026-10-31).
Tests: test_opt34 scenarios stale/stale_live and part 5; test_modes_p4 asks at a
moment inside the latch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-31 23:04:36 +01:00
Claude (OPT-34 review) 57b0eb2f20 OPT-34 review: read the inverter in part 4 with a default
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
test_named_absence.py flagged next() without a default (CI run 1473).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-31 21:18:59 +01:00
Claude (OPT-34 review) 8f0af9f318 OPT-34 review: test that a battery leaving the plan leaves the latch
checks / unit (pull_request) Failing after 19m32s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
test_opt34.py part 4 drives Controller._latch_charge() directly: a battery
that leaves the plan is dropped at once, does not rejoin while nothing
charges, an empty latch is cleared from the store, and the screen says the
charge goes on only while the latched battery is below its level. Catches
two reviewer mutants that survived the round-2 tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-31 20:50:02 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude eee7616022 OPT-34 round 2: the latch follows the plan, up or down, and drops what left it
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18m37s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
While a forecast is present and the cheap run holds, the night-charge latch is
rebuilt from the plan: a latched battery takes its current level whatever its
role this tick (a fresh figure may lower it below the SoC), one that left the
plan is dropped, a new one comes in only while it charges from the grid.
Test: a fresh brighter figure lowers A below its SoC, the sensors go quiet, A
does not charge back up. CHANGELOG summary says two fixes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-31 19:17:20 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 412e47f111 OPT-34: the night charge keeps its level when the kept forecast ends
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18m59s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
With the forecast sensors silent from 17:05 the kept evening figure ended at
midnight + 3 h, in the middle of the night grid charge, and Leftover solar's
planned level went with it (rig: A 49.8 % against 79.9 %).

- A night grid charge that has started keeps its planned level when the forecast
  goes (Controller._latch_charge, store key night_charge_latch), and the narrow
  price gap with it (weather_held). A fresh figure still moves the level.
- The evening's tomorrow figure is today's until the bell starts (06:00 local),
  up to 15 h old but only if it was usable at midnight (solarfc.Hold.stand_in).
- Screen: "No solar forecast now. The charge under way goes on to its planned
  level." (EN/NL) while a latched battery is below its level.
- test_opt34.py (whole nights through the real control cycle, mutants), test_opt27
  and test_modes_p4 adjusted to the new window and the kept level.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-31 17:00:31 +01:00
admin deee98d352 Merge pull request 'SAFETY-126: no false peak reserve alarm during the night grid charge' (#221) from SAFETY-126 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 2s
2026-10-31 12:26:03 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude a66a7f1a0f SAFETY-126 round 2: state what the 10 W tolerance costs; test the latch reset
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18m11s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Text only (DECISIONS, DOCS, CHANGELOG): a step load alarms on the same cycle
as before; a steadily rising load alarms a little later; with peak_margin_w 0
a period can end up to 10 W over the limit without this alarm, as for 'Load
too high' (SAFETY-81). Owner accepted 2026-10-31.

test_safety126.py part 2: after a real overrun ends, _peak_landing()'s latch
is reset and the night's later landings are quiet (review F3).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-31 11:52:27 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 8e2463bc32 SAFETY-126: test reads through named_absence; points at MUTATION.md
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 19m25s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-31 01:54:16 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 40595e42ae SAFETY-126: a landing error on the aim is not an overrun
During the night grid charge under the peak reserve the guard alarmed
(ERROR PEAK_GUARD_FLOOR_LIMITED, "Battery stopped limiting the peak") and the
Batteries "Why" said "The peak limit needs power" at quarter ends, while every
quarter landed on the aim. The charge lands the period 0-7 W over the aim and
excess_w()'s 900 / remaining turns that into tens of kW in the last second;
with nothing able to give, check_peak_floor_limited() alarmed on any
wanted > 0.

Each cycle the guard wants power, _peak_landing() asks misses_aim(): with the
batteries at 0 W, does the period end more than ALARM_MISS_W over the aim? If
not, the decision is within_aim: no reserve alarm, no red peak row, no "Why"
peak. The claim and the commands are unchanged. A real overrun under the
reserve alarms on the same cycle as before.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-31 01:26:02 +01:00
admin cc9bbeb73e Merge pull request 'OPT-27: the night cheap run is judged with the last fresh forecast' (#219) from OPT-27 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 2s
2026-10-30 22:16:32 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude b9dea6d90d OPT-27 round 3: the kept-forecast wording states the 12 h limit (text only)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15m27s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 21:29:29 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 13b61d586a OPT-27 round 3: a kept figure is at most 12 h old; DST-safe midnight bound; pruning test
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15m37s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
F1: the evening rule has an age limit (KEPT_MAX_AGE_S).
F2: the evening bound is the next local midnight (_bounds), right on 25 h and 23 h days.
F5: test that old days are dropped from the stored hold.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 20:41:34 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 307cb47caf OPT-27 review: the kept forecast line says "kept for tonight"
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 17m20s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
With battery modes off the forecast is still read and shown (Settings,
Simple, and the Forecast tab), but no plan uses it, so "used for tonight's
plan" was not true there (UX-53). "Kept for tonight" is true in every
shape. NL "vanavond" read wrong after midnight; "vannacht" covers the
whole night. DECISIONS' "modes off: nothing reads the sensors" corrected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-30 19:59:29 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 60aa7f310c OPT-27: a kept figure sizes the night under OPT-28's shortfall, as a fresh one does
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 17m22s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 18:57:37 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude bf842997c1 OPT-27 round 2: a kept tomorrow figure is bounded on both sides
Hold.stand_in(): day0 <= now < day0 + 3 h. A tomorrow sensor is asked with
day0 = the next midnight, so the upper bound alone was true all day and a
figure stood in at any hour. test_opt27.py covers daytime tomorrow outages.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 18:54:41 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 4fde0b177c OPT-27: test_modes_p4 says what a covered sensor does; test_opt27 guards
test_modes_p4.py: 'the forecast is lost mid-run' now loses it for good (a hold
that never covers); a second scenario is the same loss with the hold, which
keeps Leftover solar charging. test_opt27.py: a failing check no longer hides
the ones after it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 18:54:41 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 50b567d6d1 OPT-27: the night plan keeps the last fresh solar forecast
Forecast.Solar's sensors stop updating in the evening, so at night every such
site had no forecast: the night cheap run needed 1.5x the cycle cost and
Leftover solar planned nothing. One missed poll also dropped it at once.

solarfc.Hold keeps the last fresh reading of each sensor, for the day it is
for. A missing or stale sensor is covered by it for up to FRESH_S (a short
outage), and from the end of the bell (20:00) until local midnight + 3 h
however old. A tomorrow figure is tomorrow's until midnight and then today's;
a today figure is only today's. Stored in the controller's store
(solar_fc_hold), so an evening restart keeps it. The forecast line says
'Solar forecast read 17:05, used for tonight's plan.' (EN, NL).

test_tariff24_weather.py runs with a hold that never covers: it tests what the
plan does when the forecast IS lost.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 18:54:41 +01:00
admin f1b72443ff Merge pull request 'Sync 0.19.x into release/1.0: TARIFF-24 and SAFETY-125, with the forward-port fixes' (#220) from sync-0.19 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 2s
2026-10-30 18:51:53 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 60a3fa615e TARIFF-24 forward-port: part 6 reads its last row through nth() (test_named_absence)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 28m5s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 08:30:25 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 1c9fefd9dd Sync 0.19: the Forecast tab extends a cheap run with control's gap (TARIFF-24)
UX-54's Forecast tab (release/1.0) re-plans tomorrow's cheap run as control
will, with the gap `required`. It still added the "no weather" x1.5 always,
while control (TARIFF-24, from master) drops it when a forecast is read. In
the UX-54 scenarios the tab asked 0.225 where control needs 0.15. It now asks
`arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(True, c.solar_fc)`, so the two agree again, as
they did on release/1.0 alone. Display only; no control change. The tab's
blocks in every UX-54 scenario, every 2 h, are identical to release/1.0.

test_ux54.py pins it (the old line fails it). The TARIFF-24 DECISIONS note
names the tab as the fourth place that reads the rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 08:11:42 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 8cca671a05 TARIFF-24 / SAFETY-125 forward-port: record text (review F2, F3, CHANGELOG nit)
- TARIFF-24 DECISIONS: the hold keeps a Cheap hours charge; a Leftover solar
  battery still stops without a forecast (it has no planned level, still true
  after OPT-28: `dayplan.plan()` returns None and `charge_to()` gives None).
  Adds "a run that has started runs to its end" for a give run begun in a hold.
- CHANGELOG 0.19.2: "when the period is over" -> "when the period would go
  over the limit".

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 08:09:44 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 9dc22fb987 TARIFF-24 forward-port: pin the hold's edges (review F1, F2)
Part 6 of test_tariff24_weather.py, the review's probes R4 and R5:
- R4: a forecast lost while only the day's give run is under way holds to
  that run's end (22:00) and no further; the night's cheap run then needs the
  wider gap. Pins the `solar_fc is None` return in `_wx_track()`: without it
  the hold chains into the cheap run and B charges (mutant M2, now red).
- R5: a give run that starts during a hold runs to its end (`keep_started()`),
  with no grid charge after the hold. Behaviour unchanged; a give run not kept
  goes red.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 08:09:44 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 5ac1017eed UX-54 scenarios keep the gate they were written for (cycle cost 0.15 with a forecast)
With master merged in (TARIFF-24), a forecast replaces the 1.5x widening, so
the shipped cost 0.10 is now the whole gap with a forecast. test_ux54.py's
modes-on scenarios were written for 0.15 and 21 of its checks failed on
release/1.0 + master (they pass on release/1.0 alone). They now set the cost
to 0.15 where they have a forecast: the same gate as before. Scenarios with no
forecast (nofc, stale) and modes off keep 0.10, widened as before.
(cherry picked from commit 665653517c, branch OPT-27)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 08:09:44 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 8bf54ece3d Merge master (0.19.2, f1c9733) into sync-0.19: TARIFF-24 and SAFETY-125 reach release/1.0
Brings in 0.19.1 (TARIFF-24) and 0.19.2 (SAFETY-125). Git merged every file
without a text conflict. config.yaml's version becomes 0.19.2, the newest
CHANGELOG section: test_version_gate.py (PKG-14, 11b) requires the two to be
equal, and release/1.0 took 0.19.0 the same way (#207). The 0.19.1 and 0.19.2
CHANGELOG sections come in as history.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-30 08:09:44 +01:00
admin f1c9733c32 Merge pull request 'Release 0.19.2: SAFETY-125 grid charge stays under the month peak' (#217) from hotfix-0.19.2 into master
Merge hotfix-0.19.2 (SAFETY-125): release 0.19.2
v0.19.2
2026-10-30 07:44:25 +01:00
admin b6be31286a Merge pull request 'OPT-23, OPT-28: the day plan counts the sun right, and the night charge covers the expensive-hour shortfall' (#218) from OPT-23-28 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
2026-10-30 02:55:55 +01:00
admin 6be7e41de1 Merge pull request 'CI-15: run the add-on's test files in parallel' (#215) from CI-15 into release/1.0
infra-pin / fresh (push) Successful in 1s
2026-10-30 00:29:18 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 ae0cd542c0 OPT-23-28 review: the unheld-shortfall line says another battery or the grid
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 50m6s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
With A on Leftover solar and B on Cheap hours (the dynamic scenario, and the
owner's planned setup), the line said "The batteries cannot hold it all. The
grid covers N kWh", while B holds a full charge for the same hours. It now
says "The expensive hours need more than Leftover solar can hold. The rest,
N kWh, comes from another battery or the grid." (NL likewise). DOCS,
DECISIONS and the dayplan/homeview docstrings say the same. Text only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-29 23:21:31 +01:00
Claude a645d899f4 CI-15: test_safety87.py joins the serial group (real-clock meter freshness)
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16m3s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Its status page says "Meter: no reading for N seconds, limit 30 seconds" when
N passes 30; N is about half the file's run time. It failed alone under
--cpus 0.15 (94 s), in a loaded local parallel run (103 s) and in a loaded CI
run (112 s, run 1434). Idle it takes ~25 s. No test file changed, so it runs
alone after the parallel batch, like test_loop.py and test_freeze.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-29 21:52:58 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 995028bc5d OPT-23, OPT-28: the day plan counts the sun right, and the night charge covers the expensive-hour shortfall
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 55m9s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
OPT-23: a state-only forecast is read from now for every span
(Forecast.between since=), so the plan's per-hour sun adds up to the day's
figure, today and tomorrow. Hourly splits are unchanged. The Forecast tab
reads spans the same way.

OPT-28: a Leftover solar battery buys, from the floor, the sum over the
expensive hours of max(0, house - trust x sun), / EFF. Several Leftover
solar batteries hold it together by capacity, the ceiling passes the rest
on, and what none can hold is said (Plan.uncovered_kwh). Home's grid block,
the Batteries line and the mode help (EN + NL) say the level, what it
covers, and that Leftover solar buys only what the sun will not give.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC
2026-10-29 21:02:18 +01:00
Claude ffb0d61d5b CI-15: run the add-on's test files six at a time, the wall-clock ones alone after
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 19m52s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 3s
The serial loop summed 3 557 s on SAFETY-125's run and passed the runner's
60-minute cap. The loop moves to .gitea/ci/run-tests.sh: xargs -P 6, longest
files first, then test_loop.py and test_freeze.py (TEST-30 / CI-06) alone on an
idle machine. Same PASS/FAIL lines, CI: echo, tail -40, :ro mount,
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1, GOODWE_REQUIRE_HWSIM=1 and NO test_*.py FOUND guard;
one output file per test file; any failing or unreported file fails the job.
timeout-minutes 70 -> 40, comment corrected. No test file changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-29 20:39:20 +01:00
admin 8966867968 Merge pull request 'SAFETY-125: a grid charge stays under the peak aim (hotfix 0.19.2)' (#214) from SAFETY-125 into hotfix-0.19.2
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1h3m7s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
2026-10-29 18:21:15 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 2929ece7da SAFETY-125 round 2: the one-inverter maintenance charge is sized to the room too
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1h0m42s
Owner 2026-10-29: fix N=1 in this hotfix. _charge_headroom() no longer
returns early at one inverter, so the N=1 cheap-window maintenance charge
is held to charge_room_w() as at N=2; SAFETY-84's site-stop rule stays N>=2
only (at N=1 such a stop outranks the shaping anyway). The guard no longer
steps in and gives power at each quarter's end during that charge.

test_safety125.py: N=1 maintenance on 5 s and 10 s meters with late
readings, with and without a banked peak; the row in an N=2 maintenance
charge and in shadow mode; edge cases (blind past the hold, a start
mid-quarter, the summer-time change, the forecast in W, a 10 s meter, the
last second). test_safety84/87: three N=1 pins move. test_safety119: its
quarter-edge hand-back runs keep the old N=1 sizing as a fixture, plus a
check that with the new sizing nothing hands back. CHANGELOG, DECISIONS,
DOCS follow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-29 14:57:39 +01:00