SAFETY-73: a battery that refuses, per inverter, with two or more

SAFETY-52's hold applied per unit at N>1 (owner, 2026-09-27, option R).
A unit that gives < 100 W for 12 cycles in one direction while asked
> 200 W, or trips its stale-reading gate on a ~0 W reading, gets a
P_SAFETY `refused` unit limit closing that direction, so the allocator
hands its share to the others within their own limits. Probe: a +-200 W
pin every 15 min, one unit at a time, only while the site asks 200 W that
way. All units refusing: the site law holds 0 W. Exits reseed the site
target from the wire. INFO plus one WARNING (REFUSES_ABOVE_CUT_OUT) above
the configured cut-out; SAFETY-42/43 no longer report a refusing unit.
N=1 unchanged.

test_refusal_units.py: cases a/b/c on flat and jitter registers against
the old behaviour, probes, recovery, exits; mutations U1-U13 all red.
TEST-19 no-fault campaign: 0 engagements in 5280 runs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

goodwe_controller/test_arbiter.py

@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ check("...and `source` is still the first positional argument, which is what "
       Claim.limit("device", P_SAFETY, -1, 1).source == "device")
 
 print()
-print("ARB-03 2. the split: eleven sources, each classified where it is BUILT")
+print("ARB-03 2. the split: twelve sources, each classified where it is BUILT")
 # The classification is graded against what each claim is ABOUT, restated here
 # so that the table in arbiter.py and the expectation in a test are not the same
 # sentence read twice. test_peakguard.py part 10f pins this set against main.py's
@@ -189,16 +189,20 @@ UNIT_SOURCES = {
                   "is added, `peak_soc_floor` is not consulted, the SITE target "
                   "is untouched, and main.py does not file it at all at a "
                   "roster of one",
+    # SAFETY-73.
+    "refused":    "THIS battery's own reading gave nothing against THIS unit's "
+                  "own standing command, so that direction is closed on THIS "
+                  "unit and its share goes to the others. Filed at N>1 only",
 }
 for _src, _why in sorted(SITE_SOURCES.items()):
     print(f"    site  {_src:<11} {_why}")
 for _src, _why in sorted(UNIT_SOURCES.items()):
     print(f"    unit  {_src:<11} {_why}")
-check("all ELEVEN claim sources are classified, and only those eleven",
+check("all TWELVE claim sources are classified, and only those twelve",
       set(CLAIM_SCOPE) == set(SITE_SOURCES) | set(UNIT_SOURCES))
 check("the six that are about the GRID CONNECTION are site claims",
       {s for s, v in CLAIM_SCOPE.items() if v == SCOPE_SITE} == set(SITE_SOURCES))
-check("the five that are about a PACK, a DEVICE or one write are per-inverter",
+check("the six that are about a PACK, a DEVICE or one write are per-inverter",
       {s for s, v in CLAIM_SCOPE.items() if v == SCOPE_UNIT} == set(UNIT_SOURCES))
 check("a source nobody classified cannot be routed at all - actuator_for() "
       "raises rather than defaulting to the site, because defaulting to the "
@@ -216,7 +220,7 @@ check("with one inverter every source routes to the site, per-inverter ones "
       all(actuator_for(s, "inverter-a", ONE) == ACTUATOR_SITE for s in CLAIM_SCOPE))
 check("...and with none configured at all, likewise",
       all(actuator_for(s, "inverter-a", ()) == ACTUATOR_SITE for s in CLAIM_SCOPE))
-check("with TWO the identity breaks and the split becomes real: the five "
+check("with TWO the identity breaks and the split becomes real: the six "
       "per-inverter sources route to the unit this controller drives, the six "
       "site sources stay on the grid connection",
       {s: actuator_for(s, "inverter-a", TWO) for s in CLAIM_SCOPE}