Verifier judges against the original brief only; scope added later by the manager (SendMessage) or the owner is flagged as out of scope #6

Open
opened 2026-11-14 00:13:42 +01:00 by admin · 0 comments
Owner

Seen in a goodwe session on 2026-11-12/13.

  • MAINT-24 T302: the owner added MAINT-25 to the same PR ("Add 25 to 24"); the manager sent it to the dev with SendMessage and added it to the brief file. The verifier failed two rounds mainly on MAINT-25 being out of scope. The owner overruled and skipped the rewrite.
  • MAINT-28 T325 round 3: the owner had decided on a cap ("1"); the verifier flagged the changed cap semantics as lacking owner sign-off, since it could not see the later decision. (This point was reasonable; it shows the verifier lacks the later messages.)

Expected: the verifier sees the SendMessage follow-ups to that agent (and/or the current brief file), so later owner-approved scope is judged as in scope.

Seen in a goodwe session on 2026-11-12/13. - **MAINT-24 T302:** the owner added MAINT-25 to the same PR ("Add 25 to 24"); the manager sent it to the dev with SendMessage and added it to the brief file. The verifier failed two rounds mainly on MAINT-25 being out of scope. The owner overruled and skipped the rewrite. - **MAINT-28 T325 round 3:** the owner had decided on a cap ("1"); the verifier flagged the changed cap semantics as lacking owner sign-off, since it could not see the later decision. (This point was reasonable; it shows the verifier lacks the later messages.) Expected: the verifier sees the SendMessage follow-ups to that agent (and/or the current brief file), so later owner-approved scope is judged as in scope.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: admin/model-router#6