A fourth meter_source, `homewizard_local`, polling a HomeWizard P1's own local API (GET /api/v1/data) instead of watching an HA entity. The point is the age sensor. sensor.p1_sample_age_s is FW-01's watchdog input, and on every transport we had it measured "time since the value CHANGED", not "time since the meter REPORTED". Home Assistant offers nothing better: a repeated reading emits no state_changed, advances last_reported on neither serialiser, and state_reported cannot be subscribed to at all. Measured twice - 70 s of a frozen meter on the ENV-01 rig, and ten repeated readings against the live house. Our own capture of this house's meter goes 42.2 s and 97.0 s between changes, both past the default meter_max_age_s of 30, so the age sensor would have commanded 0 W on a perfectly healthy meter. Here every HTTP response is an arrival. The meter answered, now, with its current reading; whether the number moved is not consulted. Five identical readings are five arrivals. Reuses TEL-01's pipeline rather than restructuring it: same split_signed sign convention as ha_signed, same make_sample, same ingest stamping, meter_max_age_s, clock-recomputed age, plausibility bounds and the §20 unsigned-decode rejection. A failed or timed-out poll submits nothing, so it is a missing reading - never 0 W - and does not reset the age. meter_poll_s (default 5 s, the meter's own rate) is checked against meter_max_age_s once at startup, like the ha_signed entity ids. ⚠️ An arrival stamp cannot see a FROZEN meter, and no arrival detector can - one answering 200 OK with a stale number is arriving. The local API does expose what HA never had (the total_power_*_kwh registers stop advancing) and the transport tracks it as `unchanged_s`, but it is deliberately not folded into the age and not thresholded: this controller regulates grid toward ~0 W, and at a converged -10 W the export register needs six minutes to move by its 1 Wh resolution while the power figure legitimately repeats. Thresholding that would rebuild the false-trip limit cycle at the exact operating point we aim for. test_p1.py 179 -> 236 checks. Still defaults to off. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa
12 KiB
Changelog
Unreleased
TEL-05. A fourth meter_source, homewizard_local, which polls a
HomeWizard P1's own local API (GET /api/v1/data) instead of watching a
Home Assistant entity. Set p1_host to the meter's address; meter_poll_s
(default 5 s, the meter's own update rate) sets the cadence.
✅ This is the first transport whose sensor.p1_sample_age_s measures when
the meter reported, and therefore the first one a firmware watchdog may
threshold. Every HTTP response is an arrival: the meter answered, now, with
its current reading, and whether the number moved is not consulted. Home
Assistant cannot express that at all — a repeated reading emits no
state_changed, advances last_reported on neither serialiser, and
state_reported is not subscribable ("Event filter is required"). On
ha_signed that made a healthy meter under a flat load indistinguishable from
a dead one, and our own capture of this house's meter goes 42.2 s and 97.0 s
between changes — both past the default meter_max_age_s of 30, i.e. a false
trip to 0 W on a meter that is fine. If you have a HomeWizard P1, move to this
mode.
Everything TEL-01 established is reused, not re-implemented: ingest
timestamping, meter_max_age_s, the clock-recomputed age, the plausibility
bounds and the §20 unsigned-decode rejection, and the same split_signed sign
convention ha_signed uses. A failed or timed-out poll submits nothing, so it
is a missing reading — never 0 W — and it does not reset the age.
Verified on the ENV-01 rig against sim/hwsim.py, steady and with --fault freeze injected. Still defaults to off.
⚠️ An arrival stamp still cannot see a frozen meter, and no arrival
detector can: a meter answering 200 OK forever with a stale number is
arriving. The local API does expose what the HA path never had — the
total_power_*_kwh registers stop advancing — and the transport tracks it as
unchanged_s, but that is deliberately not folded into the age and not
thresholded: this controller regulates grid power toward ~0 W, and at a
converged −10 W the export register needs six minutes to move by its 1 Wh
resolution while the power figure legitimately repeats. Thresholding it at 30 s
would rebuild the false-trip limit cycle at the exact operating point we aim
for. Freeze detection needs the low-power case solved first, separately.
TEL-04. A third meter_source, ha_signed, reading one signed Home
Assistant entity: positive = import, negative = export. That is the shape a
HomeWizard P1 publishes (sensor.p1_meter_active_power), and it is the meter
actually fitted here - which neither TEL-01 transport can read, because
ha_dsmr needs two unsigned registers and refuses a negative one, i.e. every
exporting telegram. Set p1_net_entity, and p1_phase_net_entities for the
per-phase capacity-tariff figures on a three-phase connection.
Everything TEL-01 established is inherited rather than re-implemented - the
new transport is a subclass of the ha_dsmr one overriding only which
entities it wants and how they become a sample. So ingest timestamping,
meter_max_age_s, sensor.p1_sample_age_s recomputed against the clock and
republished once a second, the plausibility bounds, and unavailable /
unknown treated as a missing reading and never 0 W all behave identically
across the three sources.
Still defaults to off; an existing install is unaffected until it opts in.
⚠️ sensor.p1_sample_age_s is published on ha_signed, but must not yet be
thresholded by the ESP32 stale-input watchdog. On the HA WebSocket paths the
age is stamped from state_changed, so it measures time since the value
changed, not since the meter reported - and Home Assistant exposes no
arrival signal for a repeated reading (no state_changed, no last_reported
movement on either serialiser, and state_reported is not subscribable over
the WebSocket). Measured on the ENV-01 rig against the real HomeWizard
integration. ha_dsmr mostly escapes it because a telegram moves several
entities at once; ha_signed has one, so a healthy meter under a flat load is
indistinguishable from a dead one. Our own capture has the house meter going
42.2 s and 97.0 s between changes. Raising meter_max_age_s does not fix that,
it only chooses which error you get; the fix is an arrival stamp from the meter
itself and is a separate ticket. Full detail in DOCS.md.
0.3.0
SAFETY-04. The control law's integrator is now an explicit accumulator,
bounded independently of the output clamp instead of inheriting whatever
headroom the clamp happened to leave. It also freezes while the inverter is
not tracking, rather than continuing to wind up against a command nothing is
acting on. integrator_max_w (default 0) governs the bound; 0 means
"follow max_w", which is the existing behaviour.
Behaviour is unchanged at the defaults - a 4,928-case equivalence sweep
against the previous control law confirms it decides identically at
integrator_max_w: 0.
TEL-01. P1 meter ingestion, so a Belgian P1's two unsigned registers
(consumption, injection) no longer need a hand-written signed template
sensor: the subtraction moves into the add-on, done once and tested. Two
transports, chosen with the new meter_source option: ha_dsmr subscribes
to the DSMR integration over the HA WebSocket, mqtt_p1 reads a topic.
Defaults to off, which keeps the existing meter_entity path untouched -
nothing changes for an install that does not opt in.
Enabling it publishes sensor.p1_sample_age_s: seconds since the newest
accepted telegram, recomputed against the clock and republished roughly once
a second rather than only when a telegram lands. That is deliberate - Home
Assistant only pushes a state on change, so a meter sitting at a genuinely
constant reading would otherwise look identical to a dead one. Watching the
age instead means a frozen meter shows a climbing age, not a flat line. The
firmware watchdog subscribes to this exact entity id.
Known limits, both already in DOCS.md: on mqtt_p1, a bridge stuck
republishing its last telegram still "arrives", so the age cannot detect
that particular failure - prefer ha_dsmr where both are available. And a
dead P1 meter takes 45 s to reach 0 W commanded (30 s for meter_max_age_s
to call the reading stale, then 15 s of stale_input_s on top), which is
meter_max_age_s and stale_input_s stacking, not either one alone.
0.2.1
target_grid_w (default -10 W): what the meter should rest at. The deadband
holds any resting point inside it indefinitely, and the meter bills import and
export on separate registers, so resting at +14 W import costs 0.34 kWh/day
with the loop behaving perfectly. Biasing the target slightly negative moves
that residue onto the export register. Configurable in the Configuration tab;
see DOCS.md for the trade-off table.
Behaviour is unchanged at target_grid_w: 0.
0.2.0
Precedence between strategies is now a first-class object instead of an if/else ladder, ahead of there being more than three of them.
Every strategy returns a CLAIM each cycle - set ("I want X") or limit ("the
result must stay within these bounds") - and arbiter.py resolves them by one
rule:
- Highest-priority
setwins; no claim at all means 0 W. - Then every
limitwhose priority is >= that set's priority applies, most restrictive first. - Contradictory limits are a BUG: command 0 W and say so.
Clause 2 is why "money outranks maintenance" is now a consequence of the priorities rather than a special case in a Jinja template: the maintenance charge-only limit binds the loop, but will not bind a higher-priority peak shaving claim when one exists.
- Maintenance shaping (charge-only, cheap-window floor) moved out of the control
law.
control.pyis once again only a controller that tracks the meter. - The loop computes from the ARBITER's last output, not its own last wish. If something outranked it, that is what the hardware actually did, and tracking anything else makes it jump when it regains control.
- Every decision is explainable: "loop -> 0 W, limited by maintenance (charge-only)" now appears in the UI and the log, instead of a bare number.
- Safety limits (device rating, supervised max_w) bind every strategy including the highest, and are still enforced a second time at the point of writing.
0.1.6
Findings from installing this on a live system, replacing a working YAML implementation. Every one of these was silent - the add-on looked healthy while being completely unable to do its job.
run.shmust use#!/usr/bin/with-contenv sh. The HA base images run s6-overlay, which starts services with a SANITISED environment. With a plain shebang, SUPERVISOR_TOKEN is simply absent and every Home Assistant call returns 401 - whilehomeassistant_api: truemakes the permissions look correctly granted. Startup now logs the token length and probes the Core API, so the next person sees it in one line.- Bump
version:for every change. Supervisor keys the built image by version, so editing source and rebuilding silently reuses the old image. Two fixes appeared not to work because of this. - Dependencies come from apk, not pip. Alpine is musl and there are no musl wheels for aiohttp; pip would compile it on the client's Pi.
- paho-mqtt 1.x and 2.x are both supported. Alpine ships 1.x, which has no
CallbackAPIVersion; that raised and took the whole add-on down with it. - MQTT can no longer take down control. Publisher construction is wrapped - observability must never stop the controller.
- MQTT discovery is published from
on_connect. paho drops QoS-0 publishes issued before the CONNACK, so announcing straight afterconnect()published nothing at all while logging "MQTT connected". - Repeated failures log at most once a minute. The control loop retries every second; unthrottled warnings rolled the log buffer and destroyed the startup diagnostics needed to debug the 401 above.
auto_startworks. The store's defaults suppliedauto: False, so the fallback to the option could never fire.
Known issue: after deleting the MQTT entities from the registry during development, Home Assistant would not re-adopt them from retained discovery - not even after clearing the retained topics and reconnecting. The add-on publishes correct discovery and live state (verified on the broker); this is an HA-side adoption problem and affects status entities only, never control.
0.1.0
First packaged release. Ports the control loop and the monthly maintenance cycle from the reference Home Assistant implementation into an add-on.
- Grid-following control: gain/slew/clamp/deadband with anti-windup, all tuned against measured hardware behaviour (see FIELD-GUIDE.md §14).
- Saturation freeze with the duration term — three consecutive diverging cycles, not one. The instantaneous test fires on every large correction, because the plant itself needs 3-6 s to settle.
- Monthly maintenance cycle as an ownership state machine: drain / charge / hold, with exactly one writer of the setpoint at any moment.
- Capacity-tariff awareness: the maintenance charge is capped by quarter-hour peak headroom, and peak shaving outranks the maintenance schedule.
- Failsafe behaviour: commands 0 W on missing inputs, on stop, and on shutdown. Never replays a stale setpoint - the reference implementation did, and the hardware watchdog cannot catch that.
- Ingress UI with a commissioning checklist that names problems in words.
- Optional MQTT discovery for status entities.
Known limits:
- Home Assistant OS / Supervised only (add-ons cannot run on Container/Core).
- The inverter protocol is reverse-engineered; no vendor contract.
- Without the optional RS485 e-stop, nothing covers the host machine dying.