Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude 2929ece7da SAFETY-125 round 2: the one-inverter maintenance charge is sized to the room too
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1h0m42s
Owner 2026-10-29: fix N=1 in this hotfix. _charge_headroom() no longer
returns early at one inverter, so the N=1 cheap-window maintenance charge
is held to charge_room_w() as at N=2; SAFETY-84's site-stop rule stays N>=2
only (at N=1 such a stop outranks the shaping anyway). The guard no longer
steps in and gives power at each quarter's end during that charge.

test_safety125.py: N=1 maintenance on 5 s and 10 s meters with late
readings, with and without a banked peak; the row in an N=2 maintenance
charge and in shadow mode; edge cases (blind past the hold, a start
mid-quarter, the summer-time change, the forecast in W, a 10 s meter, the
last second). test_safety84/87: three N=1 pins move. test_safety119: its
quarter-edge hand-back runs keep the old N=1 sizing as a fixture, plus a
check that with the new sizing nothing hands back. CHANGELOG, DECISIONS,
DOCS follow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-29 14:57:39 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude 8bf25696cb SAFETY-121: a recurring overload warns every quarter
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 44m51s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
TEST-23 F-1: on a 5 s meter a steady overload warned once in 70 min. The
loop was at its bound 4-5 cycles a quarter, all inside SAFETY-119's settle
of 12 cycles (60 s) and under its budget of 8 per 900 s. The simulation
fed the meter a cycle behind the battery reading, so the guard and the
charge chased each other and gave ~20 bound cycles a quarter.

The settle is now 4 cycles and 22 s (HANDBACK_CYCLES, SHORT_SPAN_S), and
the rolling budget one number, 11 per 900 s, at every cycle length. The
cycle length is no longer tracked. Commands unchanged; the re-pinned
digests of test_safety84/87 differ from bee7431 in OUTPUT_CLAMP rows only.
test_safety119 runs the rig's shape (meter in the same cycle) at 1-15 s
and checks a stop keeps the budget (review F2, X3).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-21 10:09:14 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude e27e62ff72 SAFETY-119 round 3b: no-clock budget, fixed-seed tests, accepted limits
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 43m1s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
The rolling budget now holds without a monotonic clock (it never refills).
Quarter-edge tests use seeds 1-3 at 2, 5, 10 and 15 s (no hand-picked seeds).
Re-pin comments point at part 6. DECISIONS lists the limits the owner
accepted with N=8 on 2026-10-20.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-20 20:46:14 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude b0c2e5977d SAFETY-119: re-pin test_safety84/87 digests (log only); prove it
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 41m47s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
The re-pinned digests differ only in OUTPUT_CLAMP log rows; every command
and claim is the same as without the fix (test_safety119.py part 5).
DECISIONS: the delay at a 5 s meter and the open swap case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-19 15:30:18 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 4b81387908 SAFETY-85: no false 'not keeping up' while maintenance or the peak guard sets the battery
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 25m35s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
The loop's integrator bound counts only on a cycle the loop decided. A battery
another owner set (maintenance, the peak guard, a safety limit) alarms only
when it gives more than saturation_w less than told for saturation_cycles
cycles. At N>=2 the loop is bounded while maintenance holds a battery, so it
does not wind and control comes back one slew step a cycle. The status row
counts episodes, not cycles. Digests re-pinned where behaviour changed on
purpose; DECISIONS/SAFETY-85-no-false-not-keeping-up.md has the list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr
2026-10-01 19:05:27 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5 5c9f64d87a SAFETY-84 review: check the charging pack gives under the guard, and no-P1 at N=2
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m51s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 1s
A 6500 W house needs more than B alone: A must give (the N>=2 suspension),
with a non-vacuous run without it (banks over the cap, 'Load too high').
Without P1 the charge is not sized, as at N=1: A charges at 2000 W.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 20:36:46 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 43a52e7f60 SAFETY-84: maintenance charge at N=2 no longer stalls
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 23m57s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
At N>=2 a cheap-window maintenance charge files a site `hi` (`charge`,
P_MAINT_SHAPE) equal to what the charging pack's own `hi` places, so the
other pack never has to give against it. The charge is sized to the
quarter's headroom under the peak aim so it yields to the peak guard, and
to 0 W under a site safety stop. N=1 byte-identical (safety84_identity).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 19:47:15 +02:00