2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5	dd5eb6fdc8	SAFETY-94 review: tests for three surviving mutants; record two gaps ... - test_safety94 part 4: time under 250 W is not counted; a command that swaps direction every cycle is never refusal evidence; a reading moving away from the ask does not restart the evidence. These kill review mutants R1, R3 and R6, which survived the PR's tests. - DECISIONS: at N=1 a battery with B's standby offset no longer latches a refusal (SAFETY-97 now covers N=1); a part-time ask is caught after 35/d s of wall time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-04 01:17:52 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5.5	6759d21ea5	SAFETY-94: a healthy battery that lags or reverses is not flagged as frozen or refusing ... The stale-reading gate counted its 35 s from the register's last change, so after a rest the first read after a new command tripped it (SAFETY-58; live 2026-10-03, four trips 1 s after the command). It now counts only the time the command asked the register to move. At N=1 the refusal engaged after 12 frozen cycles if the reading was under 100 W at that moment, which a battery reversing through its lag passes at a 1 s meter. The refusal now needs the N>1 evidence at every roster size: under 100 W, one way, for 12 cycles spanning 22 s, restarting when the reading moves 50 W towards the ask. DECISIONS/SAFETY-94-lagging-battery.md; test_safety94.py. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-04 00:15:42 +02:00