2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5	1c41a1e412	SAFETY-86 review: hold the site at the peak floor while a HOLD gives ... At N>=2 the holding pack's pin follows the guard's floor while the loop still asks for +5000 W, so the ALLOCATOR "could not be placed" row was re-logged on every 1 W change and filled the 40-row action log. While the pin is raised, cycle() now files a site `hold` ceiling at the floor (P_MAINTENANCE), as SAFETY-84 does for a charge. Filed only when the holding pack gives; hi == the floor, so it never clashes with it. Tests: a noisy N=2 house logs no ALLOCATOR row and at most one clamp row (20 and 20 without the ceiling); the ceiling is the floor itself; a CHARGE is not refiled at N=1. The DECISIONS entry records the owner's 2026-10-01 decision: the HOLD ends on its clock, no top-up. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-01 02:00:20 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5	ba31e7c8b1	SAFETY-86: peak guard outranks the maintenance hold ... During a HOLD the holding battery gives what keeps the quarter at the peak aim. N=1: the peak floor is refiled at P_MAINTENANCE, as for a drain (SAFETY-83). N>=2: the hold's pin is raised to the floor minus what the other live batteries may place, so they give first. A site stop still decides alone. The hold ends on its clock even if the level dipped. Below the aim nothing changes (rows identical). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-01 00:56:34 +02:00