3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5	a9993aeda2	SPIKE-04a: inverter B is 4600 W FROM ITS DATASHEET, and the copies are pinned ... The desk half of SPIKE-04. No control behaviour changes; this is documentation and the check that stops it drifting again. Three places stated inverter B's rating - config.yaml's commented roster example, DOCS.md's, and tools/supervisor_shape_probe.py's "a blob an operator would POST" - and all three said 3000 W, a number nobody had measured or read off anything. The owner supplied B's model and serial on 2026-09-04: a GoodWe GW5048D-ES, serial `55048ESU22AW0992`, max charging and discharging power 4600 W. Serial characters 6-8 are `ESU`, platform 105 / AA55, so SPIKE-01 does not gate this site. All three copies now read 4600. ⚠️ 4600 W IS FROM A DATASHEET AND IS NOT A MEASUREMENT, and the one ambiguity is recorded rather than guessed. The datasheet prints it under BATTERY INPUT DATA, so it is probably DC, while max_w is graded against 0x0518 - the inverter's own AC power. If it is DC the AC ceiling is nearer 4324 W. Neither reading is written in as fact; SAFETY-20's min(max_w, dev_max) already bounds it correctly under either, once dev_max is read off the unit, so `max_w: 4600` is what an operator should configure today. goodwe/NOTES.md §1.1b carries the full record with the date and the method on every figure. A NEW CHECK, BECAUSE A DOCUMENTATION FIX WITHOUT ONE DRIFTS AGAIN. test_validate.py now pins all three documented rosters: findable, in agreement, and equal to 4600 - with an explicit len(...) == 3 guard so that a regex which stopped matching cannot leave "they all agree" green on the two sites still read. It also grades the PROVENANCE beside the number (the datasheet, the 0x0518 it is graded against, and the 4324 W the DC reading would make it) WITHIN 2500 characters of the roster rather than file-wide. ⚠️ The first version of that provenance check searched whole files and was ALREADY VACUOUS on two of them: 0x0518 appeared once in config.yaml and once in DOCS.md before this card, for unrelated reasons, so `"0x0518" in src` was green no matter what happened next to B's rating. That is a check whose data cannot reach the failure it names, in the file that exists to complain about them. It is fixed, and the window is what fixes it - deleting the caveat beside the number now goes red even where the same token survives elsewhere in the file. The windowed version immediately found that the DOCS.md caveat did not name 0x0518 at all; DOCS.md now says it. Four mutations, bytecode purged and counted at 0 before and after each, all RED (two of them 0-byte deltas that change a printed answer): M1 probe's operator blob 4600 -> 3000 0 B RED (value + agreement) M2 DOCS.md's DC/AC caveat deleted -157 B RED (provenance) M3 config.yaml alone 4600 -> 4324 0 B RED (agreement) M4 probe entity renamed, regex finds nothing RED (the vacuity guard) Restored, green again. The probe itself was re-run against Supervisor 2026.08.0's own AppOptions validator with the 4600: all cases passed, exit 0. ⚠️ THE TEST FIXTURES KEEP 3000 W ON PURPOSE AND NOW SAY WHY AT THE LINE. test_inverter.py, test_maintenance.py, test_peakguard.py and test_watchdog.py build a second inverter at 3000 W against A's 5000 W. The only property those checks consume is that B's number is unmistakably not A's, and the real pair is a 400 W gap - narrower than slew_w, inside the range where an off-by-one-unit bug and ordinary control arithmetic produce indistinguishable numbers. Collapsing them onto the real values would buy realism those checks do not use and cost them their separating power, which is exactly what test_peakguard.py's own §10g PRECONDITION exists to prevent. Their comments no longer call 3000 W a hypothesis about B's rating; they call it illustrative, and not a placeholder either - the placeholder era ended on 2026-09-04. Also recorded in the changelog for the cards that own them: 94 % battery-to-AC => ~88 % round trip => ~360 W burned continuously to circulate 3 kW, which is the number SAFETY-31 argues its threshold from without having one; < 13 W night self-consumption per unit, which nothing accounts for; and the A/B asymmetry in opposite directions (~33 % more energy, ~8 % less power), which means MAINT-05's 12 h drain timeout was derived on A and should be re-checked against B. ⚠️ Honest survivors: - goodwe/NOTES.md §1.1b, where all of this is actually recorded, is graded by nothing here. Rewriting its 16 occurrences of 4600 to 3000 and turning every FROM DATASHEET label into MEASURED ON THE UNIT leaves all 19 files GREEN. This CI cannot fetch admin/goodwe - private, and GITHUB_TOKEN is minted for this repository only, as .gitea/workflows/checks.yml already states - so the cross-repo check is not buildable here. - No check can see whether 4600 is the RIGHT number. Everything above pins a datasheet reading against itself. Only the bench half of SPIKE-04 can say whether the unit agrees, and the DC-vs-AC ambiguity is the live example. - The constant is still named B_RATING_HYPOTHESIS in four test files, which reads as a hypothesis about B's rating when it is now an illustrative fixture. It is left alone deliberately: renaming ~20 sites across test_peakguard.py and test_inverter.py would collide hard with the open SAFETY-32 pull request, which rewrites 1255 lines of the first. The comment directly above each definition says what the value is and is not. Suite: 19/19 green in goodwe-addon-ci, mounted :ro, bytecode purged and verified 0 before and after. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU	2026-09-04 22:19:31 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5	22c016fadd	CFG-04 fix round: the probe now measures the key it is cited for ... Review blocked this on ONE finding, and it was in the EVIDENCE, not the code. The design and the shipped behaviour are unchanged. THE INSTRUMENT DID NOT MEASURE WHAT FOUR DOCUMENTS SAID IT MEASURED tools/supervisor_shape_probe.py section B validated the RECONSTRUCTED LIVE options blob - which is missing many required keys that have nothing to do with this card. Its refusal therefore named whichever of THOSE the validator reached first: the committed transcript recorded `meter_freeze_s`, the reviewer's run printed `p1_phase_export_entities`, and a run today printed `sign_disagree_w`. The string those documents quoted - `Missing option 'inverters' in root` - was never produced by the instrument. And section B asserted a bare `not ok`. Any refusal at all satisfied it, so deleting `inverters: []` from config.yaml left it printing PASS: the probe could not detect the one regression it is the committed evidence for. THE UNDERLYING CLAIM IS TRUE AND IS NOW MEASURED PROPERLY Section B is an ISOLATED COUNTERFACTUAL now: the full shipped `options:` block (expect accept), and the SAME block with `inverters` removed and nothing else varying (expect refusal). One key differs, so the refusal has nowhere else to come from - and the assertion is on the KEY NAME IN THE REFUSAL STRING, so the line goes red if the refusal is ever about a different key. The probe also exits non-zero when any case fails; without that a transcript is only evidence to someone who reads it. The old live-blob case survives as section B2, relabelled for what it is: an incomplete reconstruction whose RAW half is refused for unrelated missing keys, kept because its MERGED half genuinely demonstrates what App.options is. VERIFIED BY BREAKING IT, WHICH IS THE WHOLE POINT `inverters: []` deleted from config.yaml, probe re-run against ghcr.io/home-assistant/amd64-hassio-supervisor:2026.08.0: == B. THE LOAD-BEARING ONE: an options blob with no `inverters` key == FAIL the shipped `options:` block validates AS IT STANDS - ... Missing option 'inverters' in root in GoodWe RS485 Controller ... == 2 CASE(S) FAILED == exit 1. Key restored, same image, same command: `== all cases passed ==`, exit 0. The transcript in DECISIONS is that restored run, re-run today, not the old one. THE FOUR MIS-CITATIONS DECISIONS/CFG-04-inverter-roster.md section 4's "section B shows both halves" sentence and its line-103 transcript; CHANGELOG.md; test_inverter.py's part-9 comment and its part-12 mutation row; and the PR description. All now attribute the string to section B and say plainly what section B2 does not show. The part-12 row additionally records that the probe was blind to that mutation until review, because a mutation table that lists a defeat nothing catches is the failure this repository keeps finding. MUTATION.md gains it as the sixth instance of "the check's data cannot reach the failure it names" - the first found OUTSIDE the suite, in a committed evidence artifact, because nothing in that document had ever been pointed at tools/. Three habits with it: assert on the CONTENT of a refusal rather than that one happened; vary ONE thing, from an ACCEPTED baseline; and treat a committed transcript as a check subject to the mutation battery. TWO NON-BLOCKING FINDINGS, ALSO FIXED validate.py rules 5 and 6 NAMED THE WRONG INVERTER. `unit_caps()` SKIPS an entry with no usable `max_w`, so caps position i stops being roster position i the moment one entry is malformed - and rule 5 fed `caps.index(weakest)` to `_unit_label()`, which indexes the roster, while rule 6 paired `caps[0]` with a hard-wired `_unit_label(opts, 0)`. Right number, another inverter's name: an operator sent to the wrong device by the message that exists to stop that. New `unit_caps_indexed()` carries the roster index with the cap. It is latent - rule 9(d) refuses such a config in the same pass - but that was a property of today's rule ordering, not of the code, and validate_startup_config() is also sim/inject.py's entry point. Part 10 gains a check that asserts the fixture really does desynchronise the two lists, then that both messages name the right unit, then the counterfactual: the OLD expressions, on that same config, still evaluate to the wrong names. DOCS.md called a downgrade "safe". True of the SCHEMA - the older schema drops the key with a warning - and incomplete about the ADD-ON: rule 9(e) requires the flat `setpoint_entity` be cleared when a roster is declared, so a config that downgrades cleanly is by construction one whose flat actuator is blank, and the older version has nothing to write to. Confirmed by running release/1.0's own validate_startup_config() on that blob: one refusal, naming setpoint_entity. Recoverable and loud, but an outage until a field is refilled. The note says so now, and tells the operator to write the entity down before downgrading. 19/19 green in the goodwe-addon-ci image. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU	2026-09-04 10:33:51 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5	6b85acb0f1	CFG-04: an operator can declare a second inverter, and the shape was measured ... DEV-02 made every per-device value per-instance - rating, SoC, watchdogs, heartbeat, store keys - so the code stopped assuming one inverter. The options schema did not. `build_roster()` returned a list of exactly one and said so in its own docstring, and there was no `inverters:` key for an operator to write, so the roster could only ever be a roster of one. THE SHAPE, AND WHY IT WAS MEASURED RATHER THAN CHOSEN config.yaml had no list-of-objects anywhere, and `static_profile` carries a whole tariff structure as a JSON string in a `str?` precisely because a nested schema was doubted. That is a question about somebody else's software, so it was answered by running it: `tools/supervisor_shape_probe.py` (committed) runs Supervisor 2026.08.0's OWN `AppOptions` validator and `SCHEMA_APP_CONFIG`, out of the release image, against this repository's config.yaml. 2026.08.0 is the version the live install reports. The full transcript and the argument are in DECISIONS/CFG-04-inverter-roster.md. It accepts the list, enforces per-entry types, refuses a missing `name` / `setpoint_entity` / `max_w` BY NAME, renders the option in the UI as a repeatable section, and drops the key with a warning under an older schema - so a downgrade is not the forward trap in reverse. ⚠️ AND THE `inverters: []` DEFAULT IS LOAD-BEARING, WHICH IS THE MEASUREMENT THAT MATTERED MOST. Supervisor answers `Missing option 'inverters' in root` for an options blob that has no such key - which every existing install's has, since the key did not exist when they were written. `App.options` is the shipped `options:` block deep-merged with the operator's stored one, so the empty default is the difference between an upgrade nobody notices and an add-on that cannot start with a schema pinned to the version that would fix it. That is docs/deploy-rollback.md §4's trap in the FORWARD direction, found before it was sprung. The merger was checked too: lists override rather than concatenate, so a non-empty default could not have grown a roster behind the operator's back. NOTHING IS INHERITED, WHICH IS DEV-02 RESTATED AS A CONFIG RULE `name`, `setpoint_entity` and `max_w` are required of every entry. An entry that omits `soc_entity` has no SoC sensor; it does not borrow the flat one. A three-line fallback would have rebuilt the sibling-grading defect DEV-02 spent a card removing, in YAML. Defaults still live in exactly one place (CFG-03): there is no per-entry default anywhere, because there is no optional per-entry number. A flat `setpoint_entity` left set beside a declared roster is refused rather than ignored - it names an actuator nothing will write. TWO PERMISSIVE READERS IN SHIPPED CODE, AND THREE MORE IN THE CHECKS validate.py rules 5 and 6 compared their thresholds against the FLAT `max_w`. At a roster of two 2000 W units with `max_w: 5000` left over from a single-inverter install, `sign_disagree_w: 3000` passed rule 5 while SAFETY-02's watchdog could fire on NEITHER unit - rule 5's own failure mode, reached through rule 5. They read `unit_caps()` now, which at one inverter is `[max_w]` exactly. main.py's `run_control()` re-ran the device-rating check behind `if self.o.get("setpoint_entity")` - the flat key, which a roster leaves blank - so on a two-inverter site no inverter's `max_w` was graded against the device it is written to, and the skip was silent. `validate_unit_ranges()` grades each unit against its own ESPHome and runs unconditionally. test_peakguard.py's `read_option()` and `_schema_bound()` and test_inverter.py's `read_schema_max()` matched a STRIPPED line and took the first hit, so the nested per-inverter `max_w:` began outranking the flat one - silently, and correctly, because the two bounds are the same int(100,5000) today. A reader that is right by coincidence is this project's named failure mode. All three are anchored at exactly two spaces now; the file's two halves disambiguate `peak_cap_w` instead of first-match, and an ambiguous key raises rather than picking one. test_tariff.py's copy of the idiom went with them. THE AUDIT IS A CHECK, NOT A PROMISE test_inverter.py part 11 finds every config.yaml-reading function in the suite - transitively, because two of the readers CFG-04 had to change never name the file - EXECUTES each against a synthetic two-inverter config.yaml whose per-inverter numbers differ from its flat ones, and fails if any answers with the per-inverter value. The table is not maintained by hand: the signature decides, so the eleventh reader is named on its first run. config.yaml declares `inverters:` BEFORE `max_w:` on purpose and part 11 asserts that ordering, so the trap stays baited. SAFETY-28's `actuator_writers()` needed no change - it was already a structural, case-folding census - but until now there was no configuration in which two writers on one actuator could be WRITTEN DOWN. There is now, and it is refused. VERIFIED BY BREAKING IT Ten mutations run through tools/mutation_run.sh and observed red, listed in test_inverter.py part 12 with the check that bites each. Two survived the first run and the CHECKS were changed, not the table: the inheritance check had blank flat keys, so "inherited" and "not inherited" were the same empty string; and the `run_control()` check asserted a SOURCE LINE was present, which re-indenting it does not remove. Both are recorded in MUTATION.md's "the check's data cannot reach the failure it names" section, which now carries two more habits: assert on behaviour rather than on source text, and give a check whose failure mode is a hang a deadline. 19/19 green in the goodwe-addon-ci image. The one-inverter path is byte- identical: the whole existing suite runs unmodified against it. Version bumped to 0.6.0 - the Supervisor keys the built image by `version:`, so a schema change without a bump is a schema nobody reads. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU	2026-09-04 04:29:45 +02:00