Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5 2c516a032c UX-08 2c: short refusals, error texts and option texts
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 8m50s
infra-pin / fresh (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Validator refusals name the setting by its label and key, say what is
wrong and what to change, and keep the rejected value and limit. Option
names and descriptions are short in en and nl; citations moved to DOCS
"For installers" and the test_translations citation check now pins the
instruction on the tab and the record in DOCS. No rule, key, schema,
default or exit code changed. Allowlist 167 -> 43 (log lines only).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LyR88rXETvwhTgx6yHE39p
2026-09-27 05:55:45 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 bcee2356e0 UX-02: pin both halves of the max_w fix, because neither was graded
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m16s
Review of the fix commit found that BOTH halves reverted with the whole 24-file
suite still green - including the half that turns a crash into a SILENT
ACCEPTANCE, which was my own wrong first attempt at this fix. A fix nothing
grades is a fix that comes back. MUTATION.md habit 4.

⚠️ AND THE OBVIOUS PIN HAD THE SAME DEFECT IT WAS WRITTEN TO CATCH. "problems_
and_ranges does not raise" is ALSO satisfied by the backstop swallowing the
exception and returning [] - the silent acceptance half two exists to prevent.
MEASURED: with both halves reverted, every max_w check reported `ok` and only
the forced-boom pins went red. So half one is now pinned on `build_roster`
ITSELF, where the backstop cannot answer for it. That is the same defect as the
one being fixed - a check whose data cannot reach the failure it names - written
into the check for it, and it is the twelfth recorded instance.

New section 2b of test_selfconfig.py:
  - `_flat_max_w` agrees with `_number()` across ten shapes, so composition
    tolerates exactly what rule 9 tolerates.
  - ⭐ `build_roster(max_w="")` does not raise - half one, standing alone.
  - a cleared box answers with the validator's own verdict; an unparseable one
    answers "max_w 'abc' is not a number".
  - ⭐ clearing max_w on the LIVE shape (5000 W rail, explicit slew_w 400) is
    REFUSED by rule 10 "against a site rail of 2000 W". `unit_caps_indexed`
    reads the flat rail through the same `_number`, so the rail collapses in
    lockstep and rule 10 catches the collapse. This is what makes the fix safe
    rather than merely non-crashing: the box cannot be emptied into a quietly
    halved rail.
  - ⭐ the backstop never returns an empty list, forced by monkeypatching
    build_roster to raise; and the patch is shown undone.

DRIVEN, all four arms through the real harness:
  clean            rc=0  fails=0
  revert half one  rc=1  fails=2     (_flat_max_w -> bare float())
  revert half two  rc=1  fails=2     (backstop returns [] again)
  revert BOTH      rc=1  fails=3
Each half is caught on its own, which is the property the earlier draft lacked.

Suite: 24 files, all pass.

Not addressed here, filed instead: N3 (`/config/` 404s), N4 (undeclared keys on
a hand-crafted POST, which the page cannot produce and Supervisor drops), N5
(saving pins every default as an explicit option), the page reporting "would
start" for a blob Supervisor's own schema refuses, and 2000.0 hardcoded in three
places that agree today with nothing pinning them together.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-06 22:38:54 +02:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5 fdaf3fb54f UX-02: the validator's refusals, next to the field, before the save
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
The Configuration tab can only render types and ranges. `validate.py`'s most
useful refusals are CROSS-FIELD - two inverters naming one `setpoint_entity`, a
`maintenance_charge_w` above `max_w`, a flat `setpoint_entity` left set beside a
declared roster - and the Supervisor's UI has no way to express a rule spanning
two keys. Today the operator meets those as exit 78 in a log, after saving and
restarting. This puts them on the screen beside the field they name, before
anything is written.

WHAT IT ADDS
  app/configui.py     the field model, built from `GET /addons/self/info`'s own
                      `schema` + `translations`. No option key, no label, no
                      rule of its own. UX-01's `Group · ` label prefix becomes a
                      real section heading, in whichever language resolved.
  app/selfconfig.py   the Supervisor conversation and the write gate.
  app/config_page.py  the page. Its longest function decides which HTML input a
                      type deserves; it contains no rule.
  app/web.py          five routes. Still the only file a reviewer has to read to
                      answer "does anything here reach the inverter".

THE FOUR THINGS THAT COULD HURT SOMEBODY, AND HOW EACH IS HELD
  1. A blob the SHIPPED validator refuses is never written - not warned about,
     not written. An invalid blob plus a restart is exit 78, and the panel is
     gone with the add-on that serves it.
  2. A blob that moved underneath is refused, not clobbered. Read hands out a
     sha256 of the canonical blob, save hands it back, and the stored blob is
     re-read IMMEDIATELY BEFORE the write. This is SAFETY-28's discipline
     applied to configuration - "a blob reaches the Supervisor only if it was
     derived from the blob stored right now" - with the honest weakening stated
     in the decision record: a second writer is DETECTED, not made
     inexpressible.
  3. Every message is the validator's own, byte for byte. test_selfconfig.py
     part 6 inserts ONE new rule into a COPY of validate.py, hashes every file
     under app/ to show validate.py is the only one that differs, and serves the
     real /config/validate route out of that copy in a subprocess. The new
     sentence arrives, filed under the key it names.
  4. Nothing on the surface commands an inverter or clears a latch. Saving does
     not restart: applying costs a control interruption - the wind-down commands
     0 W on every inverter - so that is a separate, confirmed button that says
     so first.

MEASURED, NOT CITED (tools/supervisor_selfapi_probe.py, run against
Supervisor 2026.08.0's own code; it contacts nothing)
  - the three self-paths are permitted, and `/addons/self/info` is admitted by
    the `default` role too while `options` and `restart` rest on the bypass
    ALONE. The probe's first draft claimed the role admitted none of the three
    and went red.
  - `/addons/self/options/validate` is NOT reachable from inside an add-on, so
    the only validator this panel can call is ours - which is the one with the
    cross-field rules.
  - a POST that omits a key does not preserve it: the key reverts to
    config.yaml's default. Hence whole-blob read-modify-write.
  - the Configuration tab CAN be removed, and doing so drops 0-of-71 options
    through and takes the add-on down. The card said it could not be; it stays
    by decision, which is a better reason.

DOES NOT TOUCH config.yaml, main.py or any control path. UX-01 is a dependency,
not something this supersedes: its translations are where every label,
description and section heading on this page comes from, and the Configuration
tab is still the recovery surface. DECISIONS/UX-02-two-config-surfaces.md
records which surface is authoritative (neither: the stored blob is) and what
the second surface costs.

Also corrects a stale "70 options" in three prose spots to the 71 the probe
counts - config.yaml grew a key in SAFETY-42 and the sentences did not follow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU

---

⚠️ REBASED ONTO release/1.0 @ 3368231, AND HISTORY DELIBERATELY FLATTENED.
The original branch carried `653874d` - an ORPHANED first attempt at PKG-07
whose commit message justified the version bump with a claim that was FALSE
(that `slew_w: 0` used to mean "no limit"; the schema was `int(50,5000)` from
the repo's first commit, so 0 was never legal). That commit's CONTENT was
superseded when release/1.0 was merged in, and the merge resolved correctly -
one 0.8.0 section, no fabricated text. But the retracted claim would have
entered release/1.0's history as a commit message with no retraction attached
to it, where PKG-07's own merged commit is the thing that retracts it.

So the branch is replayed as a single commit on top of the corrected PKG-07
rather than merged with the bad one trailing behind. The tree is byte-identical
to the reviewed branch tip; only the ancestry changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
2026-09-06 21:38:31 +02:00