2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
glenn schrooyenandClaude Opus 5.5	ae0cd542c0	OPT-23-28 review: the unheld-shortfall line says another battery or the grid ... With A on Leftover solar and B on Cheap hours (the dynamic scenario, and the owner's planned setup), the line said "The batteries cannot hold it all. The grid covers N kWh", while B holds a full charge for the same hours. It now says "The expensive hours need more than Leftover solar can hold. The rest, N kWh, comes from another battery or the grid." (NL likewise). DOCS, DECISIONS and the dayplan/homeview docstrings say the same. Text only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC	2026-10-29 23:21:31 +01:00
glenn schrooyenandClaude	995028bc5d	OPT-23, OPT-28: the day plan counts the sun right, and the night charge covers the expensive-hour shortfall ... OPT-23: a state-only forecast is read from now for every span (Forecast.between since=), so the plan's per-hour sun adds up to the day's figure, today and tomorrow. Hourly splits are unchanged. The Forecast tab reads spans the same way. OPT-28: a Leftover solar battery buys, from the floor, the sum over the expensive hours of max(0, house - trust x sun), / EFF. Several Leftover solar batteries hold it together by capacity, the ceiling passes the rest on, and what none can hold is said (Plan.uncovered_kwh). Home's grid block, the Batteries line and the mode help (EN + NL) say the level, what it covers, and that Leftover solar buys only what the sun will not give. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC	2026-10-29 21:02:18 +01:00