CI-12 round 2: INFRA_READ_TOKEN for admin/goodwe; the pin tracks release/1.0

- checks.yml's infra checkout and infra-pin.yml's admin/goodwe ls-remote use
  the INFRA_READ_TOKEN secret; the self fetch keeps GITHUB_TOKEN.
- infra-pin.yml compares against admin/goodwe refs/heads/release/1.0; STALE
  message, comments and README follow.
- test_control.py / test_alloc.py: drop the claim that CI cannot reach
  admin/goodwe.
- .gitea/infra-pin is DELIBERATELY one release/1.0 merge behind (d84ac01) for
  the "infra-pin / fresh goes red" proof; the next commit sets it to HEAD.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

goodwe_controller/test_alloc.py

@@ -10,12 +10,10 @@ IN FULL.
 ⚠️ WHAT THIS FILE CAN AND CANNOT CLAIM, SAID BEFORE THE FIRST CHECK.
 The two-master rig lives in admin/goodwe (TEST-19, `sim/sitesim.py`), where
 `compute()` closes the loop against `plantsim.Plant` with the firmware's own
-encoder on the wire. That repository is PRIVATE and this repository's CI token
-is minted for this one, so the rig is not reachable from the gate - and a test
-file that needed it would either fail the gate or, like test_freeze.py's hwsim
-section, pass SILENTLY having checked nothing.
+encoder on the wire. CI checks admin/goodwe out at `.gitea/infra-pin` (CI-12),
+but this file does not import the rig.
 
-So the split is deliberate:
+The split:
 
   * `tools/alloc_sim.py` drives the REAL rig, and its output is quoted in the
     pull request. It is where "no limit cycle" is a claim about the shipped

goodwe_controller/test_control.py

@@ -990,13 +990,11 @@ check("⭐ RESTORING slew_w 1000 AT max_w 5000 IS FASTER THAN THE PLANT, and by
 #
 # ⚠️ THE PLANT BELOW IS MODELLED HERE AND IS NOT THE RIG. admin/goodwe's
 # `plantsim.Plant` is the battery model this project grades control changes
-# against, and this repository's CI cannot reach it - that repository is private
-# and this job's token is minted for this one (see .gitea/workflows/checks.yml).
-# So the rig evidence lives in `tools/slew_sim.py`, is quoted in the pull
-# request and in DECISIONS/SAFETY-39-slew-against-the-rail.md, and what runs
-# HERE is a first-order lag with the time constant that reproduces §5.10's
-# measured ~18 s to the deadband. test_alloc.py makes the same split for the
-# same reason and says so in the same words.
+# against. CI checks admin/goodwe out at `.gitea/infra-pin` (CI-12), but this
+# file does not import `plantsim`. The rig evidence lives in `tools/slew_sim.py`,
+# is quoted in the pull request and in DECISIONS/SAFETY-39-slew-against-the-rail.md,
+# and what runs HERE is a first-order lag with the time constant that reproduces
+# §5.10's measured ~18 s to the deadband. test_alloc.py makes the same split.
 #
 # ⚠️ AND IT CANNOT SHOW A BATTERY ABOVE ITS RATING, WHICH IS SAID BEFORE THE
 # RESULT RATHER THAN AFTER IT. Neither this model nor `plantsim.Plant` lets the