INSTR-01: restore M12 on the leg I generalised past, and measure the clause that had no row
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m6s
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m6s
Review found two things this PR asserted about itself that were false. Both are mine and both are worse than the defect the card was filed for. ⚠️ "NO FIXTURE CAN RESTORE IT, MEASURED BOTH WAYS" WAS NOT TRUE, AND TWO MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT AN IMPOSSIBILITY PROOF. I deleted M12 - SAFETY-44's working end-to-end control for the off-roster narrowing - on the argument that the provenance clause made it unrestorable. The structural claim behind it, that `run()` builds both snapshots from one state file so "already latched" and "made by this transition" are incompatible, IS TRUE OF SAME-STEP AND FALSE OF STAGED: `snapshot_over()` starts the after-leg over the file the BEFORE-leg wrote, so a transition-made destination is available there. Both arrangements I measured were same-step shaped. Review found the third. RESTORED, and it discriminates with all six clauses in: staged leg, legacy+shed, shipped _m12_new = VANISHED unit/shed/sign_tripped ...C5 narrowing removed _m12_new = [] ⚠️ suppressed ⚠️ AND MY FIRST RESTORATION DIDN'T DISCRIMINATE EITHER, for a reason worth recording: `data.pop(k, False)` RETURNS the value, so shed lost the KEY and kept the LATCH - `_grade_store_migration()` saw `on_roster_latched`, never re-armed garage, and there was no transition-made destination. The finding was reported whether or not C5 existed and the control looked restored. `and False` is the difference between "the key is gone" and "the LATCH is gone", and only the second reaches the re-arm this arrangement needs. ⚠️ WHAT ACTUALLY BROKE WAS M12's exit-0 PRECONDITION, NOT M12. A legacy-shaped fixture is never clean. That precondition is the one SAFETY-44's own commit called "belt-and-braces, load-bearing only if the exit-0 requirement is ever relaxed", saying what closed the gap is `_m12_new` BEING A SET DIFFERENCE - and a stable dirty baseline is fine for a set difference. So I deleted a control on the strength of a precondition the same commit had already called not load-bearing. That is removing coverage rather than failing to add it, which is the worse of the two directions. ⭐ AND THE BARE-KEY CLAUSE HAD NO ROW AT ALL. Review deleted `k.rsplit("/", 1)[-1] == bare` and the whole 28-file suite stayed GREEN. 5e mutated five clauses; the comprehension carries more, and this one is load-bearing: a vanished SAFETY-02 `sign_tripped` was suppressed by a SAFETY-42 `delivery_tripped` on a roster unit - a DIFFERENT FAILSAFE's key. The rule's own comment says "THE TEST IS NOT 'the name appears somewhere'. It is: the SAME bare key", and nothing measured that sentence. `unit/*/delivery_tripped` is machine-read, so it is reachable on any real two-latch store. R7 added; C2 now flips exactly R7. All six clause-removals now flip exactly their own row: C1 machine_read -> ['R6-machine-read'] C5 off-roster -> ['R2-narrowing'] C2 same bare key -> ['R7-bare-key'] C6 injectivity -> ['R5-injectivity'] C3 same value -> ['R4-value'] C7 provenance -> ['R3-provenance'] THREE DANGLING CITATIONS TO A CONTROL THIS PR HAD DELETED, one of them in the shipped tool eight lines below the paragraph condemning exactly that ("a citation is the worst possible carrier, because it reads as having been checked"). The tool no longer names a check; it states the property - every clause has a row, and each removal flips its own. A STALE SAFETY-44 BLOCK saying both fixes were "REVERTED OUT OF THIS CARD, because THIS SUITE CANNOT MEASURE EITHER ONE" - describing a tree this PR replaced. Rewritten as a map of where each clause is now measured. A comment that outlives its subject is the same defect as a citation that outlives its check. AND A SELF-CONTRADICTION about the driver, in the file and in the last commit message: "THE DRIVER IS WRITTEN INTO THE TREE UNDER TEST" eight lines above "THE DRIVER GOES IN A TEMPDIR, NOT IN THE TREE". The code does the tempdir; the first sentence stated the read-only-CI bug the same commit says it fixed, as if it were the design. It now says the driver IMPORTS the tree and is WRITTEN to a tempdir. ONE HOLE REMAINS OPEN AND IS STATED AS UNMEASURED: attribution. `sorted()` decides which vanished key claims a destination, so a deleted key can sort first and be named as the one that migrated while the key that really moved is reported VANISHED. Review measured that `sorted(` -> `list(` leaves the suite green - every 5e case has at most one candidate, so no row can see ordering. Still exit 1, so a wrong sentence rather than a hidden loss. Recorded rather than left looking guarded. 28/28 files pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
91b0d5e4dc
commit
f6f3f227c1
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"_comment": "INSTR-01 SYNTHETIC FIXTURE - `state-legacy.json` with a SECOND roster unit already latched. Not a copy of any live state file. It exists to restore M12 END-TO-END on the STAGED leg, which is the arrangement SAFETY-44 and INSTR-01's first draft both missed: `snapshot_over()` starts the after-leg over the file the BEFORE-leg wrote, so a transition-made destination is available there and the two questions the provenance clause and the narrowing ask are NOT incompatible. Every same-step arrangement makes them incompatible; that is what was measured and over-generalised to 'no fixture can'.",
|
||||
"phase": "idle",
|
||||
"phase_started": "2026-08-07T10:00:00+00:00",
|
||||
"last_completed": "2026-08-07T18:42:00+00:00",
|
||||
"last_start_attempt": "2026-08-07T10:00:00+00:00",
|
||||
"sign_tripped": true,
|
||||
"sign_reason": "SIGN_DISAGREEMENT: commanded -1800 W against a meter reading -1450 W for 190 s",
|
||||
"auto": true,
|
||||
"unit/shed/sign_tripped": true,
|
||||
"unit/shed/sign_reason": "SIGN_DISAGREEMENT: shed, latched before the switch"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -579,8 +579,15 @@ def diff(before: Snapshot, after: Snapshot) -> list:
|
||||
# here. Neither mutation exercises this branch. The sentence "what keeps
|
||||
# this from being a softening of the check" was not supported by the
|
||||
# thing it named - and a citation is the worst possible carrier for that,
|
||||
# because it reads as having been checked. The branch is now bounded by
|
||||
# M12, written for it, in test_rehearse.py.
|
||||
# because it reads as having been checked.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# ⚠️ AND THE REPLACEMENT CITATION WENT STALE THE SAME WAY. It read "the
|
||||
# branch is now bounded by M12" through a card that DELETED M12 and a
|
||||
# card that restored it on a different leg - eight lines below the
|
||||
# paragraph condemning exactly this. Every clause of this comprehension
|
||||
# is now graded by a row in test_rehearse.py part 5e, one case per
|
||||
# clause, and each clause-removal must flip exactly its own row. That
|
||||
# is a property of the section, not a pointer at a named check.
|
||||
# ⚠️ AND THE DESTINATION MUST BE ONE **THIS TRANSITION MADE**
|
||||
# (`before.data.get(k) != value`) AND NOT ALREADY SPOKEN FOR
|
||||
# (`k not in claimed`). Without the first, a roster unit that was
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user