PKG-16: cut 0.10.1, so SAFETY-57's fix can reach an installed 0.10.0
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 8m0s

The Supervisor decides an update exists by comparing config.yaml's version
string with the one the box reports. master and release/1.0 both said 0.10.0,
so SAFETY-57 - a deadlock that parked the reference battery for ~13 min on
2026-09-21 while the house exported 2.4 kW - had no way of reaching the box
that has it. A patch bump is the delivery mechanism, not bookkeeping.

- config.yaml: 0.10.0 -> 0.10.1. Nothing else in the option surface moves:
  no key added or removed, no default changed, no enum widened, no rule added
  to validate.py, so a blob that starts on 0.10.0 starts on 0.10.1.

- CHANGELOG.md: a new `## 0.10.1` section, holding SAFETY-57's entry moved out
  of `## 0.10.0`. The entry opened by saying it was misfiled and that whoever
  cut the next version owned moving it; this is that cut, so that paragraph is
  replaced by what an operator actually needs in order to decide - what the
  deadlock does (command parked at 0 W, batt reading gated to MISSING, escape
  condition unreachable from inside the state), how to recognise it (setpoint
  stuck at exactly 0 W with the battery register flat, a STALE line and no
  clearing line) and that a restart of the add-on clears it.

- PKG-16 proper: `## 0.10.0`'s preamble still claimed 0.10.0 "has never been
  built or pulled anywhere" and that the reference install was on 0.7.0. Both
  stopped being true on 2026-09-20 ~22:18 CEST, when 0.10.0 was installed as a
  repository add-on (slug 68285ac7_goodwe_controller) and began regulating a
  real battery. The section's own bump argument was explicitly conditional on
  that; the condition has fired, so the argument is retold as history and the
  section is closed. This text is what the Supervisor shows beside Update.

Also fixes, in this file only, the three non-blocking documentation defects
raised on PR #104 - issuecomments 1445, 1446 and 1447:

- 1446: the live episode is 790 s, not 710 s. Re-derived rather than rescaled:
  at >= 790 s the committed 16-day replay gives 16 of 93, not 17.
- 1447: the BMS keep-alive pulse was an inference stated as a measurement. No
  committed capture identifies one, and on this episode 0x0518 never moved at
  all. The measured claim replaces the firmware story.
- 1445: "neither consumer can reach a verdict inside one window" is universal
  as written and graded on a fixture that puts the obligation back on every
  release. It now carries the qualifier the reviewer asked for, and names the
  unbounded case and why the shipped one-inverter roster cannot reach it.

The same three defects also sit in app/freshness.py, test_freshness.py,
DOCS.md and the DECISIONS note. They are deliberately NOT touched here: this
PR is config.yaml and CHANGELOG.md only, and none of them is worth delaying a
live safety fix. SAFETY-56 and SAFETY-58 are likewise untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
This commit is contained in:
glenn schrooyen
2026-09-22 15:22:03 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent b9f7bd0506
commit eb88646899
2 changed files with 203 additions and 95 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: GoodWe RS485 Controller
version: "0.10.0"
version: "0.10.1"
slug: goodwe_controller
description: >-
Drives a GoodWe ES/BP battery inverter over RS485 by emulating its smart