SAFETY-02 review: a latch that a restart clears is not a latch
BLOCKER. `auto` was persisted and `sign_wd.tripped` was not, so reconstructing the Controller against the same store - which is what a container restart does - brought it back ARMED, into the same fault, unattended: tripped=False, banner back to NOT READY, and it resumed commanding -1000 then -2000 W before re-tripping 180 s later. "Restart the add-on" is the first thing an operator looking at a FAILSAFE banner and a 0 W inverter will try, and under a supervisor that restarts a crashed add-on it is a loop of three-minute wrong-direction bursts. DOCS.md's "it does not clear itself" was false across a restart. `sign_tripped` and `sign_reason` are Store keys now, beside the maintenance state and for the reason store.py's own docstring gives. Written the moment the trip happens - reason first, flag second, so a crash between the two can never persist a latch with no explanation - restored in Controller.__init__, cleared only by the operator's start. The regression is covered: reverting the restore fails seven checks in test_watchdog.py. Review follow-ups, no behaviour change: - The arming gate is tested against the REAL arbiter. It is the decision the ticket turns on and it was asserted in three comment blocks and verified by nothing - every case passed `following` in as a literal. Twelve claim configurations now derive it from resolve(), including the redirect case `winner == "loop"` alone would have got wrong and the `lo` limit that raises magnitude without flipping sign. - The MQTT `status: "failsafe"` value is tested. The check that claimed to cover it restated the line above it and never touched the payload. - The worked example described a config that does not ship: at the defaults maintenance_charge_w 2500 against max_w 2000 is an arbiter contradiction and 0 W, not a -2500 W charge. Rewritten at 1500 W. The contradiction is a real pre-existing bug - a default cheap-window maintenance charge silently never happens - filed separately and deliberately not fixed here. - Forward hazard recorded at the gate: `winner == "loop"` disarms the watchdog under any higher-priority SET, and a peak-shaving strategy at P_PEAK IS grid-following in sign, so it would blind this for every peak event. - disagrees() is public so the replay harness stops carrying its own copy of the predicate it grades. - held_s takes the clock instead of reading one. - The two limits are now each stated in both places rather than one each. - The no-false-positive argument is tied to control.py's freeze permitting the command to cross zero; under the shrink-only encoding control.py records as rejected, this would false-trip on a load step. - Measured figures corrected: 93.4 % / 4212 of 17280, per-cluster 0.3/0.9/10.5/0.0, and the near-circularity of those figures is now stated rather than leaned on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Du77usMj8XNKNFZGmUiWDa
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
2513ba1f12
commit
cc4e88490b
@@ -294,11 +294,20 @@ there. The banner reads `FAILSAFE`, the commissioning list says which two
|
||||
numbers disagreed and for how long, and the `Controller status` entity reports
|
||||
`failsafe`.
|
||||
|
||||
**It does not clear itself.** Pressing *Start / stop control* twice clears it.
|
||||
That is deliberate: commanding 0 W removes the command side of the comparison,
|
||||
so the disagreement always vanishes the instant the trip works, and a watchdog
|
||||
that took that as proof the fault was over would hand the inverter straight back
|
||||
to the loop that was driving the wrong way.
|
||||
**It does not clear itself, and restarting the add-on does not clear it either.**
|
||||
Pressing *Start / stop control* twice — stop, then start — is the only thing that
|
||||
does. That is deliberate on both counts:
|
||||
|
||||
- Commanding 0 W removes the command side of the comparison, so the disagreement
|
||||
always vanishes the instant the trip works. A watchdog that took that as proof
|
||||
the fault was over would hand the inverter straight back to the loop that was
|
||||
driving the wrong way, three minutes later, forever.
|
||||
- The trip is written to `/data/state.json` and restored on startup. Restarting
|
||||
the add-on is the first thing most people try when they see a red banner, and
|
||||
a latch that a restart clears would bring the controller back **armed, into the
|
||||
same fault, unattended** — and under a Supervisor that restarts a crashed add-on
|
||||
automatically, would do so in a loop. After a restart the banner, the 0 W and
|
||||
the recorded reason are all still there.
|
||||
|
||||
**What it is for.** This is a loop-integrity check: it asks whether the loop's
|
||||
output direction still matches the input state it was regulating. It catches a
|
||||
@@ -326,7 +335,7 @@ must not be mistaken for a fault.
|
||||
|
||||
Both numbers are measured rather than chosen, and are exposed only because the
|
||||
ticket requires defaults rather than constants. On the captured healthy day sign
|
||||
agreement is 92.9 %; on the four captured fault episodes it is 0.3 %, 0.9 %,
|
||||
agreement is 93.4 %; on the four captured fault clusters it is 0.3 %, 0.9 %,
|
||||
10.5 % and 0.0 %. There is no reason to move either value without a capture that
|
||||
says so.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user