CI-12: test_tariff.py no longer says CI cannot see the infra repo
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5.5
parent
d0891a6bca
commit
c493a6d67a
@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ guard has to improve on, which is the useful thing a 2-day replay can say.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The two days are committed here as `scenarios/p1-net-<date>.jsonl.gz`
|
The two days are committed here as `scenarios/p1-net-<date>.jsonl.gz`
|
||||||
(`{"t": iso8601, "w": signed_watts}` per line, derived from the HA recorder
|
(`{"t": iso8601, "w": signed_watts}` per line, derived from the HA recorder
|
||||||
export) for the reason `scenarios/p1-age-2026-08-26.jsonl.gz` already is: the
|
export), as `scenarios/p1-age-2026-08-26.jsonl.gz` already is. When they were
|
||||||
infra repo is private, CI's token is minted for this repository only, and a
|
committed, CI could not see the infra repo; since CI-12 it checks admin/goodwe
|
||||||
regression fixture that CI cannot see is not a regression fixture.
|
out at `.gitea/infra-pin`, but these fixtures stay here with the tests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The recorder's window rolls: 2026-08-01 leaves it around 2026-09-15, which is
|
The recorder's window rolls: 2026-08-01 leaves it around 2026-09-15, which is
|
||||||
why the committed copy is the artefact and not the API call.
|
why the committed copy is the artefact and not the API call.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user