FCST-06: "cannot persist" becomes one question, asked once, about the outcome
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m14s

price_history.py's docstring states its rule unconditionally - "A store that
cannot persist now records nothing, and both of its answers say the same
thing" - and FCST-04 enforced it against `not self.ok` only, which is one
SYMPTOM: the durable volume is missing. `ok` is about the DIRECTORY, and a
read-only remount and a full disk both leave it True. Reproduced on 5059e28
against two real volumes, a /data bind-mounted read-only and a full tmpfs:

    last_error = 'could not write ([Errno 30] Read-only file system)'
    words      = '2026-01-14 (24 points over 24 h); 2026-01-15 (24 points
                  over 24 h) [could not write (...)]'
    yesterday()= series, 24 points
    ON DISK    = {}

`words` and `yesterday()` were describing two different stores, and the 24
points were gone on the next restart with nothing saying so - the
silently-forgetting cache that rule exists to refuse, reached by the condition
it did not name. No shipped path reaches it: /data is the Supervisor's durable
volume and this module is its only writer. The defect is that a guarantee the
module states about itself did not hold in one condition.

Route taken: `_remember()` refuses to retain what it could not write, and the
docstring's claim stands as written. It is now ONE derived predicate rather
than two places testing two symptoms. "Can this store persist?" cannot be
answered BEFORE the attempt - a directory that existed and was writable a
moment ago is not a write that completed - so it is answered after it, once,
by the only thing holding the evidence: `_save()` returns whether the file now
holds what memory holds. No volume is one False, an OSError is another.
`_remember()` keeps only what that one answer says was kept, and the
`not self.ok` test in `_remember()` is GONE rather than joined by a second one.
FCST-04's M4 and FCST-05's HIGH were the same shape, so a third cause now needs
no third branch.

What is undone is the MERGE, not the store. The state restored is the last one
that IS on disk, so a site whose volume fills at 14:00 goes on answering the
yesterday it wrote at 13:30 - that record survives a restart, so answering it
is not a promise the store cannot keep. It stops adding to it. The snapshot is
copy.deepcopy: a one-level copy shares the day record the merge rebinds
`points` on, and measured with one, a store holding 12 persisted points
answered 24 after a failed merge.

Not fatal, deliberately: §6 and this module's opening - a broken cache must not
be a broken controller, and an add-on that will not start because /data filled
up is a worse defect than this one. `_save()` reports and returns; the shipped
resolve_tariff() path still gives a provider plan with no §11.4 degradation.
What changed is that the failure is now acted on rather than only logged.

test_price_history.py section 5d drives it on two REAL failures with different
syscalls and different errnos - a directory where the file goes (os.replace,
EISDIR) and a volume moved out from under an open store (mkstemp, ENOENT) -
because the rule is enforced on the outcome and one cause would grade a
coincidence. DOCS.md's "where there is no /data" sentence is widened to the
condition the code now holds to.

MUTATION.md gains what M4 exposed: a mutation whose red is a TRACEBACK reports
however many checks ran before it and grades none after it. M4 first printed
1 FAIL; the true figure is 3. An f-string operand read `len(read.points)`, and
`.points` on a no_data raises `Absence` by design - why()'s rule arriving in
what a check PRINTS rather than in what it asserts. `npts()` is now beside
why(), and a red count is a lower bound until the run is seen to reach the end
of its section.

6 mutations, purged tree, every one RED on named checks, no survivors:
M1 self._days = before -> dict(self._days)          +10 B  9 red
M2 _save() OSError handler returns True             -1 B   9 red
M3 _save() returns True on `not self.ok`            -1 B   3 red
M4 self._days = before -> self._days = {}           -4 B   3 red
M5 copy.deepcopy -> dict                            -9 B   3 red
M6 `if not self.ok: return` back in _remember()     +43 B  1 red

All 29 test files green. Nothing deployed; no option added; config.yaml and
app/ behaviour on a healthy /data untouched. No version number picked - that
is the open decision the Unreleased block names.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwRLw7eKYj2byVdwB6kbjU
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-10 08:43:17 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 5059e28860
commit c45893ffad
6 changed files with 512 additions and 22 deletions
+105 -18
View File
@@ -61,6 +61,38 @@ yesterday that works all day and is gone on the next restart, which is exactly
the silently-forgetting cache this rule exists to refuse. A store that cannot
persist now records nothing, and both of its answers say the same thing.
⚠️ AND "CANNOT PERSIST" IS ONE QUESTION, ASKED ONCE, ABOUT THE OUTCOME -
FCST-06. The paragraph above enforced that rule against `not self.ok`, which is
one SYMPTOM of not persisting: the durable volume is missing. There is a second,
and FCST-06 measured it. With `ok=True` and the directory present, `_save()` can
still fail - a read-only remount (`[Errno 30] Read-only file system`), a full
volume (`[Errno 28] No space left on device`) - and it logs, records
`last_error` and returns. `_remember()` had already populated `self._days`, so
`words` read `'2026-01-14 (24 points over 24 h); 2026-01-15 (24 points over
24 h) [could not write (...)]'` while the file on disk held `{}`, and
`yesterday()` answered 24 REAL POINTS for the rest of the process's life. Gone
on the next restart, and nothing said it would be - the same silently-forgetting
cache, reached by the condition the rule did not name.
⚠️ SO IT IS NOT TWO RULES, AND IT IS DELIBERATELY NOT TWO TESTS. "Can this
store persist?" CANNOT BE ANSWERED BEFORE THE ATTEMPT - a directory that existed
and was writable a moment ago is not a write that completed - so it is answered
AFTER it, once, by the only thing holding the evidence: `_save()` returns
whether the file now holds what memory holds. A missing volume is one of its
False cases and an `OSError` from the write is another, and `_remember()` KEEPS
ONLY WHAT THAT ONE ANSWER SAYS WAS KEPT. There is no `not self.ok` test in
`_remember()` any more, because there is nothing left for a second test to add -
and a third symptom nobody has thought of is how this defect arrived both times.
⚠️ AND WHAT IS KEPT IS THE LAST STATE THAT IS ON DISK, NOT AN EMPTY ONE. The
MERGE is undone, not the store. A site whose volume fills at 14:00 goes on
answering the yesterday it wrote at 13:30 - that record survives a restart, so
answering it is not a promise the store cannot keep. What it stops doing is
adding to it. The invariant the rule was always describing, stated once:
`self._days` NEVER HOLDS A POINT THE FILE DOES NOT. (Not "mirrors the file" -
`_usable_days()` drops records the file still holds. The only direction that can
invent a yesterday is the one named.)
THE FOUR RULES THIS FILE IS SHAPED BY
=====================================
@@ -148,6 +180,7 @@ and turning it on is a product decision, not a wiring one. See
DECISIONS/FCST-04-the-day-that-is-carried.md.
"""
import copy
import json
import logging
import os
@@ -333,6 +366,14 @@ class PriceHistory:
site's first day, and a different thing from a store that could not be
opened. Both are visible: `ok`/`last_error` describe the file, and
`yesterday()`'s reason describes the answer.
⚠️ AND `ok` IS NOT "CAN PERSIST" (FCST-06). It says the directory was
there when the store opened, which a full volume and a read-only remount
both leave true. The one thing that answers "can this store persist" is
`_save()`'s return value, and `self._days` NEVER HOLDS A POINT THE FILE DOES
NOT, because `_remember()` undoes a merge that answer refused. That is what
makes `words` and `yesterday()` describe the same store in EVERY degraded
state rather than only in the ones somebody enumerated.
"""
def __init__(self, path: str = "/data/price_history.json"):
@@ -478,14 +519,31 @@ class PriceHistory:
"it", self.path, self.last_error)
return kept
def _save(self) -> None:
def _save(self) -> bool:
"""Write `self._days` out. True only if the file now holds it.
⚠️ THE RETURN VALUE IS THE "CAN THIS STORE PERSIST?" PREDICATE, AND
IT IS THE ONLY ONE (FCST-06). Both ways of not persisting end here and
are the same answer: no durable volume returns False without touching
the disk, an `OSError` out of the write returns False after recording
why. `_remember()` acts on that one answer, so the second place that
used to test the first symptom on its own - and missed the second - has
nothing left to test. See the module docstring's fifth warning.
⚠️ AND IT REPORTS, IT DOES NOT RAISE. §6 and this module's opening: a
broken cache must not be a broken controller. An add-on that will not
start because /data filled up is a worse defect than the one FCST-06
fixed, so a failed write is logged, kept in `last_error` - where `words`
and `yesterday()` both read it - and RETURNED, never thrown.
⚠️ THE TEMP FILE IS REMOVED ON EVERY FAILING PATH. A write that dies
between `mkstemp` and `os.replace` used to leave its temp behind, and
the refresh task runs 48 times a day: a persistent write failure - a
full volume being the likeliest cause - leaked 48 inodes a day onto the
volume that was already the problem.
"""
if not self.ok:
return
# ⚠️ THE TEMP FILE IS REMOVED ON EVERY FAILING PATH. A write that dies
# between `mkstemp` and `os.replace` used to leave its temp behind, and
# the refresh task runs 48 times a day: a persistent write failure -
# a full volume being the likeliest cause - leaked 48 inodes a day onto
# the volume that was already the problem.
return False
tmp = None
try:
fd, tmp = tempfile.mkstemp(dir=os.path.dirname(self.path))
@@ -498,12 +556,14 @@ class PriceHistory:
except OSError as err:
self.last_error = f"could not write ({err})"
_LOG.error("could not persist price history: %s", err)
return False
finally:
if tmp is not None:
try:
os.unlink(tmp)
except OSError: # nothing further to try, and a
pass # failed cleanup is not a fault
return True
# -- the one public entry point -----------------------------------------
def carry(self, read: PriceRead, *, since: datetime, until: datetime,
@@ -540,15 +600,6 @@ class PriceHistory:
nothing outside this file names it, and `test_price_history.py` checks
the tree for that rather than trusting the underscore.
"""
if not self.ok:
# ⚠️ A STORE THAT CANNOT PERSIST RECORDS NOTHING. See the module
# docstring's third warning: filling `self._days` here would give a
# site with no /data an in-memory yesterday that answers a series
# all day and is gone on the next restart - a cache that forgets
# without saying so, which is the one thing that rule refuses. The
# honest degraded state is `words` = "unavailable" and `yesterday()`
# = `no_data`, and those two must agree.
return
points = read.match(series=lambda r: r.points, no_data=lambda _r: ())
if not points:
return
@@ -557,6 +608,25 @@ class PriceHistory:
provider = read.match(series=lambda r: r.provider,
no_data=lambda _r: None)
# ⚠️ THE STATE THIS READ STARTED FROM, KEPT SO IT CAN BE PUT BACK
# (FCST-06). Everything below merges into `self._days` IN PLACE, and
# whether any of it may be KEPT is not knowable until `_save()` has
# tried - so the merge runs, and it is undone if the file did not take
# it. There is no `not self.ok` branch above any more: a store with no
# durable volume is one of the answers `_save()` gives, not a separate
# symptom with a test of its own. Module docstring, fifth warning.
#
# ⚠️ DEEP, NOT `dict(self._days)`. A one-level copy shares the day
# RECORDS, and the loop below rebinds keys on the ones it touches - so
# the "previous" state would hand back records the merge had already
# edited, and a store with a good yesterday on disk would go on
# answering the merge of it that never reached the file. It would also
# be right only for as long as nobody makes this loop mutate a `points`
# list or a row in place. A copy that is right by construction outlives
# that, and the store holds at most KEEP_DAYS + 2 records, 48 times a
# day.
before = copy.deepcopy(self._days)
touched = set()
junked = {}
for p in points:
@@ -605,7 +675,9 @@ class PriceHistory:
# has just discarded rows off disk stops reporting plain health -
# and after `_save()` below the file is clean, so a restart clears
# this. `_save()` overwrites it if the write itself fails, which is
# the more urgent fact of the two.
# the more urgent fact of the two - and on that path the drop is
# undone with the rest of the merge, so those rows are still in the
# file and the next write that completes drops them again.
self.last_error = (
f"{sum(junked.values())} malformed point row(s) dropped from "
+ ", ".join(f"{d} ({n})" for d, n in sorted(junked.items())))
@@ -613,7 +685,22 @@ class PriceHistory:
"without them and the refresh continues",
self.path, self.last_error)
self._prune(stamp)
self._save()
if not self._save():
# ⚠️ A STORE THAT CANNOT PERSIST RECORDS NOTHING - the rule, asked
# ONCE as a question about the outcome instead of tested twice
# against two symptoms of it. Keeping the merge here is exactly the
# cache the module docstring refuses: `yesterday()` would answer a
# series the file does not contain, all day, until a restart
# dropped it without a word - and `words` and `yesterday()` would
# be describing two different stores. The reason is already in
# `last_error` (from `_save()`, or from `_open()` when there is no
# volume at all), so both answers now describe what is on disk.
#
# It does NOT raise, and §6 is why: a broken cache must not be a
# broken controller. `carry()` still returns the fill, the horizon
# is as short as the feed makes it, and the add-on regulates.
self._days = before
return
_LOG.debug("price history: %d point(s) filed under %s; %d day(s) held",
len(points), ", ".join(sorted(touched)), len(self._days))