From b9ff6acea4da352f4d7855f87d780bf491595c25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: glenn schrooyen Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:29:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] SAFETY-119 review: DECISIONS, at least once a quarter A bigger house warns more often (every 150 s at 7.4 kW), so 'about' was wrong. Text only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bdqr7PiaHcBnzPituu2yTC --- goodwe_controller/DECISIONS/SAFETY-119-bound-after-hand-back.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/goodwe_controller/DECISIONS/SAFETY-119-bound-after-hand-back.md b/goodwe_controller/DECISIONS/SAFETY-119-bound-after-hand-back.md index 7f4d923..49f3a5c 100644 --- a/goodwe_controller/DECISIONS/SAFETY-119-bound-after-hand-back.md +++ b/goodwe_controller/DECISIONS/SAFETY-119-bound-after-hand-back.md @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ again within 11 cycles is never counted. Seen in review: N=2 (2 x 2500 W), a 5 s meter, a cheap-window charge with no usable forecast, a house 50-100 W over the 5000 W rating. The guard and the charge took the wire back at least every 11 cycles. 0 notifications in 2 h, 28 without this rule. The cap held. -From 200 W over the rating it warns about once a quarter. +From 200 W over the rating it warns at least once a quarter. **Not changed.** The kick itself is control behaviour: for a few seconds at a quarter's edge the loop asks up to its rail. In `test_safety119.py` part 1