Merge master (0.19.2, f1c9733) into sync-0.19: TARIFF-24 and SAFETY-125 reach release/1.0

Brings in 0.19.1 (TARIFF-24) and 0.19.2 (SAFETY-125). Git merged every file
without a text conflict. config.yaml's version becomes 0.19.2, the newest
CHANGELOG section: test_version_gate.py (PKG-14, 11b) requires the two to be
equal, and release/1.0 took 0.19.0 the same way (#207). The 0.19.1 and 0.19.2
CHANGELOG sections come in as history.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
glenn schrooyen
2026-10-30 08:09:44 +01:00
co-authored by Claude
23 changed files with 1777 additions and 108 deletions
+16 -1
View File
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import datetime
from .arbiter import ACTUATOR_SITE, P_ARBITRAGE, Claim
from .price import Absence, price_option
from .price import Absence, Uncertainty, price_option
_LOG = logging.getLogger("goodwe.arbitrage")
@@ -267,6 +267,21 @@ def threshold_eur_kwh(opts: dict) -> float:
return v
def weather_uncertainty(modes_on: bool, solar_fc, held: bool = False) -> frozenset:
"""The "no weather" doubt (x1.5) a trade must clear. TARIFF-24.
Battery modes read a solar forecast; with one read (`solar_fc` not None) the
doubt is gone, and `held` (a run planned with a forecast is under way, see
`Controller.weather_held()`) keeps it gone until that run ends. Everything
else, and the modes without a forecast, keep it. One rule for the run plan,
the charge gate and Home's mirror. See
DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
if modes_on and (solar_fc is not None or held):
return frozenset()
return frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
def soc_bounds(opts: dict) -> tuple:
"""(floor, ceiling) in percent. The reserve arbitrage may not spend."""
return (float(price_option(opts, "arbitrage_soc_floor")),
+17 -4
View File
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ from .dayplan import EFF
from .maintenance import CHARGE as M_CHARGE, DRAIN as M_DRAIN, HOLD as M_HOLD
from .maintenance import IDLE as M_IDLE, next_slot_start
from .packmode import CHEAP_HOURS, GRID_CHARGE_MODES, LEFTOVER_SOLAR, SOLAR_FIRST
from .price import Absence, Uncertainty, brussels, _cover_table
from .price import Absence, brussels, _cover_table
from .static_tariff import static_plan
from .tariff import BILLING_TZ
from .uimodel import REGION_PRESETS, options_to_ui
@@ -280,7 +280,11 @@ def trade_verdict(c, plan, now):
return None, "no_prices"
verdict = plan.arbitrage(peak_guard_active=guard,
min_spread_eur_kwh=arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(c.o),
uncertainty=frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER}),
uncertainty=arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
bool(getattr(c, "modes_on", False)),
getattr(c, "solar_fc", None),
bool(getattr(c, "weather_held",
lambda _n: False)(now))),
now=now)
return verdict.match(
allowed=lambda v: (v, "allowed"),
@@ -1058,7 +1062,8 @@ def month_peak(c, now):
ceiling = pg.ceiling_w or limit_w
out["line"] = line_period(out["period_w"], ceiling, c.shadow,
unmeasured=getattr(c, "peak_unmeasured_s", 0.0)
> 0.0)
> 0.0,
cut=getattr(c, "room_charge", False))
return out
@@ -1504,13 +1509,19 @@ def line_peak_not_covered() -> str:
return _t("peak_not_covered")
def line_period(period_w, limit_w, shadow, unmeasured=False) -> str:
def line_period(period_w, limit_w, shadow, unmeasured=False,
cut=False) -> str:
step = _w(shadow, "step_in", kw=_kw(limit_w))
if unmeasured:
# SAFETY-90: the add-on started during this period.
return _t("period_unmeasured") + " " + step
if period_w is None:
return step
if period_w > limit_w:
# SAFETY-125: the figure is the current rate, and a grid charge is
# what gets cut back.
return _t("period_over", kw=_kw(period_w)) + " " + (
_w(shadow, "charge_cut", kw=_kw(limit_w)) if cut else step)
return _t("period", kw=_kw(period_w)) + " " + step
@@ -1584,6 +1595,8 @@ def _samples() -> list:
("plan", line_period(1240, 3500, sh)),
("plan", line_period(None, 3500, sh)),
("plan", line_period(1240, 3500, sh, unmeasured=True)),
("plan", line_period(5814, 5413, sh)),
("plan", line_period(5814, 5413, sh, cut=True)),
("plan", control_text(True, sh)),
("plan", control_text(False, sh))]
out += [("plan", run_grid_why(0.1412)), ("plan", run_grid_amount(1.23)),
+75 -69
View File
@@ -175,57 +175,17 @@ TARIFF_MAX_AGE_S = 3 * TARIFF_REFRESH_S
def tariff_refresh_wanted(opts: dict) -> bool:
"""TARIFF-10. Does this install need the background tariff refresh at all?
"""Does this install need the background tariff refresh? (TARIFF-10, TARIFF-24)
THE DEFECT THIS PREVENTS, and it shipped: the gate below used to be
`arbitrage.enabled(opts)` alone. That option defaults to `false`, and
`run_tariff_refresh` is the only caller of `resolve_tariff()`, which is the
only caller of `price_history.carry()` - so on a shipped install with a
provider configured NOTHING was ever fetched, no plan was ever resolved,
`/data/price_history.json` was never created, the *Price history* row read
`empty` forever, and TARIFF-09's short-horizon warning could not fire
because there was no fetch to warn about. Measured over a 40 h soak of two
instances side by side: zero feed requests and `present: false` across all
802 samples on the shipped default, against a resolved plan from the same
feed on the instance with arbitrage armed. ⚠️ AND `DOCS.md` HAS
DESCRIBED THE BEHAVIOUR BELOW SINCE THE COMMIT THAT WROTE THE GATE:
OPT-04 (bdd7f18) added the refresh task, the `arbitrage.enabled()` guard on
it, and the sentence saying a configured provider still fetches, all in one
change. config.yaml has said it since TARIFF-02 (852fc7c).
Two terms, and they answer two different questions:
provider_configured(opts) -> "the operator asked for a price feed", so
fetch it, validate it and record the day
(§8.3). This is the term TARIFF-10 ADDS.
arbitrage.enabled(opts) -> "the operator armed trading". This term is
what the gate USED to be, kept verbatim.
⚠️ IT IS AN `or`, SO THE GATE IS A STRICT WIDENING. Every configuration
that started this task before still starts it; none that did not start it
stops anything. That matters because the second term is not redundant:
`price_provider: off` + a `static_profile` + `arbitrage_enabled: true` is a
configuration validate.py explicitly ACCEPTS, and it trades - measured, at
`cycle_cost_threshold_eur: 0.05` on a 0.20/0.284 day/night profile,
`ARBITRAGE_CHARGE -5000 W`. Dropping that term to make the gate read
`provider_configured(opts)` alone would leave `self.tariff_plan` at None on
that site forever and `decide()` would answer "no tariff plan has been
resolved yet" on every cycle - silently disarming a strategy the UI says is
running, which is the exact failure validate.py's OPT-04 rules exist to
refuse.
⚠️ AND NO CONFIGURATION ACQUIRES A PERIODIC HTTPS CALL FROM THIS TICKET.
With `price_provider` off, `resolve_tariff()` returns `static_plan()` - pure
arithmetic, no socket - so the second term starts a task that fetches
nothing. The true shipped default (no provider, no arbitrage) starts no
task at all. What is fetched is decided by the FIRST term only.
⚠️ THIS IS NOT A TRADING SWITCH. It decides whether prices are LOOKED UP.
Whether they move energy is `arbitrage.enabled()` at the one call site in
`cycle()`, and TARIFF-10 did not touch it: `arbitrage_enabled: false` still
means no trade, ever, on any configuration.
Yes with a price feed, with trading on price armed, or with battery modes
on: the modes read `self.tariff_plan` for their price runs. With
`price_provider` off the refresh is pure arithmetic on `static_profile`, so
no term here adds an HTTPS call. It decides whether prices are looked up,
never whether energy moves. See DECISIONS/TARIFF-10-fetching-is-not-trading.md
and DECISIONS/TARIFF-24-modes-need-the-tariff-task.md.
"""
return provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
return (provider_configured(opts) or arbitrage.enabled(opts)
or packmode.enabled(opts))
def load_options() -> dict:
@@ -1001,6 +961,9 @@ class Controller:
# and whether last tick filed a mode trade (a run edge reseeds).
self.mode_runs = None
self._runs_key = None
# TARIFF-24: the end of the run that was under way while a forecast
# was read; until then losing the forecast does not widen the gap.
self._wx_free_to = None
self.mode_tick = None
# UX-53: why the trade gate refused a grid charge this tick (`peak`,
# `not_worth`, `not_covered`), or None when it allowed one. Home reads
@@ -1259,6 +1222,8 @@ class Controller:
# because `self.peak_guard` is a different cycle's decision by the time
# the status page renders.
self.arb_headroom_w = None
# SAFETY-125: a grid charge sized to the quarter's room this cycle.
self.room_charge = False
# UX-13 P1: today's prices as the Home chart has seen them. Display
# only; nothing reads it back into a decision.
self.home_prices = homeview.DayPrices()
@@ -2274,6 +2239,28 @@ class Controller:
probing=probing))
return out
def _wx_track(self, now) -> None:
"""TARIFF-24, once per cycle, before the plan: with a forecast read,
remember when the run now under way (cheap, give or sell) ends."""
if self.solar_fc is None:
return
rp = self.mode_runs
ends = []
if rp is not None and rp.on:
ends = [r.end for r in (rp.cheap, rp.sell)
if r is not None and r.holds(now)]
g = rp.give_at(now)
if g is not None:
ends.append(g.end)
self._wx_free_to = max(ends) if ends else None
def weather_held(self, now) -> bool:
"""TARIFF-24: no forecast now, but a run planned with one is under
way: it keeps its gap to its end. The wider gap applies from the next
run. Pure; Home asks the same (`homeview.trade_verdict()`)."""
return (self.solar_fc is None and self._wx_free_to is not None
and now < self._wx_free_to)
def _price_runs(self, now, packs, floor_pct, ceiling_pct):
"""The kept run plan, rebuilt at most once per price slot (15 min) or
when the prices or a battery's choice change; a run under way is
@@ -2287,9 +2274,11 @@ class Controller:
slot = int(now.timestamp() // 900)
key = (id(plan), slot, tuple((p.name, p.use, p.mode, p.sell)
for p in packs))
held = self.weather_held(now)
if self.fc_entity is not None:
# P4: a forecast arriving or going rebuilds the plan at once.
key += (self.solar_fc is None,)
# P4: a forecast arriving or going rebuilds the plan at once (and
# so does the end of a run that held the gap, TARIFF-24).
key += (self.solar_fc is None, held)
if key != self._runs_key:
done_c = self._run_done.get("charge", (None, set()))[1]
done_s = self._run_done.get("sell", (None, set()))[1]
@@ -2298,7 +2287,7 @@ class Controller:
required = price_required_spread(
arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(self.o),
price_uncertainty_of(plan.read.product)
| {Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER})
| arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(True, self.solar_fc, held))
ref = self._ref_cheap
if ref is not None and now - ref.end > REF_CHEAP_KEEP:
ref = self._ref_cheap = None
@@ -2367,6 +2356,7 @@ class Controller:
quarter), exactly the gate `arbitrage.decide()` has."""
floor_pct, ceiling_pct = arbitrage.soc_bounds(self.o)
packs = self._mode_packs(maint_results)
self._wx_track(now)
runs = self._price_runs(now, packs, floor_pct, ceiling_pct)
guard = arbitrage.guard_state(self.peak_guard)
plan = self.fresh_tariff_plan(now)
@@ -2377,7 +2367,8 @@ class Controller:
return plan.arbitrage(
peak_guard_active=active,
min_spread_eur_kwh=arbitrage.threshold_eur_kwh(self.o),
uncertainty=frozenset({Uncertainty.NO_WEATHER}),
uncertainty=arbitrage.weather_uncertainty(
True, self.solar_fc, self.weather_held(now)),
now=now).match(
allowed=lambda _v: True, refused=lambda _v: False)
if guard is not None and plan is not None and runs is not None:
@@ -3250,17 +3241,19 @@ class Controller:
return floor
def _charge_headroom(self, floor: float, claims) -> float:
"""SAFETY-84: at N>=2 a cheap-window charge pulls no more than the
quarter's headroom under the peak aim (`charge_headroom_w()`), so it
yields just enough to the peak guard, and nothing under a site stop
(its 0 W would need the other pack to give). N=1 is unchanged."""
if len(self.inverters) < 2:
return floor
if any(c.kind == SET and c.actuator == ACTUATOR_SITE
and c.priority > P_MAINT_SHAPE for c in claims):
"""SAFETY-84: a cheap-window charge pulls no more than the quarter's
room under the peak aim (`charge_room_w()`), so it yields just enough
to the peak guard; at N>=2 nothing under a site stop (its 0 W would
need the other pack to give). SAFETY-125: at N=1 too, owner
2026-10-29; the stop rule stays N>=2 only."""
if len(self.inverters) > 1 and any(
c.kind == SET and c.actuator == ACTUATOR_SITE
and c.priority > P_MAINT_SHAPE for c in claims):
return 0.0
room = peakguard.charge_headroom_w(self.peak_guard)
return floor if room is None else min(floor, room)
room = peakguard.charge_room_w(self.peak_guard, self._peak_proj)
floor = floor if room is None else min(floor, room)
self.room_charge = self.room_charge or floor > 0.0
return floor
def _charge_ceiling(self, claims):
"""SAFETY-84: the site `hi` for a cheap-window charge at N>=2, or None.
@@ -4910,6 +4903,7 @@ class Controller:
# decision presented as current.
self.arb, self.arb_at = None, now
self.arb_headroom_w = None
self.room_charge = False
# OPT-11 P3: with battery modes on, each battery's mode decides who
# trades (`_mode_roles()`, `_mode_trade()`, below, which read the
# same headroom), and this site-wide trade is not run.
@@ -4920,7 +4914,9 @@ class Controller:
# `arbitrage.sized_from_meter()` in `_shadow_settle()`, so the
# caveat on the recorded watts can never be answered from a
# different cycle's guard than the watts were.
self.arb_headroom_w = peakguard.charge_headroom_w(self.peak_guard)
# SAFETY-125: a late meter reading's seconds count, as the bill.
self.arb_headroom_w = peakguard.charge_room_w(self.peak_guard,
self._peak_proj)
if site_trade:
floor_pct, ceiling_pct = arbitrage.soc_bounds(self.o)
charge_w, discharge_w = self.trade_power_w(floor_pct, ceiling_pct)
@@ -4975,6 +4971,7 @@ class Controller:
arb_claim = arbitrage.claim(self.arb)
if arb_claim is not None:
claims.append(arb_claim)
self.room_charge = self.arb.action == arbitrage.CHARGE
# Edge-logged, for the peak guard's reason: the action log holds 40
# lines and a trade lasts a whole hour, so a line per cycle would
# flush the context that explains it. The transition is what an
@@ -5194,6 +5191,8 @@ class Controller:
mode_trade, trade_was = False, self._mode_trade_was
if self.modes_on:
mode_trade = self._mode_trade(claims, now)
self.room_charge = self.room_charge or (
mode_trade and self.arb.action == arbitrage.CHARGE)
self._mode_trade_was = mode_trade
self._charge_track(claims, maint_results)
_live96 = set(self.live_units())
@@ -7087,6 +7086,15 @@ class Controller:
"text": messages.row_peak_guard_on(
_pg.floor_w or 0.0, _pg.ceiling_w,
shadow=self.shadow)})
elif _pg.projected_w is not None:
# SAFETY-125: "under" only when it is; over the limit at this
# rate, a grid charge is cut back to the quarter's room.
out.append({"ok": True, "warn": False, "id": "peak_guard",
"text": messages.row_peak_guard_idle(
_pg.projected_w, _pg.ceiling_w,
month_peak=(_pg.ceiling_from
== peakguard.CEILING_MONTH_PEAK),
cut=self.room_charge and not self.shadow)})
else:
out.append({"ok": True, "warn": False, "id": "peak_guard",
"text": _pg.explain()})
@@ -8080,11 +8088,9 @@ async def amain() -> None:
# ESP32 heartbeat. A fetch on that path is a supplier's TLS timeout able
# to push this add-on towards layer 1's 30 s veto. See TARIFF_REFRESH_S.
#
# ⚠️ STARTED WHEN A PROVIDER IS CONFIGURED, *OR* WHEN TRADING IS ARMED
# - TARIFF-10, and it used to be the second term alone. `arbitrage_
# enabled` ships `false`, so a site that had selected a price feed
# fetched nothing at all; the whole argument, the measurement and what
# the `or` is protecting are in `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above.
# ⚠️ STARTED FOR A PROVIDER, FOR ARMED TRADING OR FOR BATTERY MODES:
# see `tariff_refresh_wanted()` above and DECISIONS/TARIFF-10 and
# TARIFF-24 for why each term is there.
#
# ⚠️ IT DOES NOT ARM ANYTHING. Fetching a price and trading on one are
# two decisions; this is the first, and `cycle()`'s
+17 -2
View File
@@ -1170,8 +1170,18 @@ def row_periods_measured(n) -> str:
f"Gemeten kwartieren deze maand: {getoond}")
def row_peak_guard_idle(projected_w, limit_w, month_peak: bool) -> str:
"""The projection first and the limit second (SAFETY-38's ordered pair)."""
def row_peak_guard_idle(projected_w, limit_w, month_peak: bool,
cut: bool = False) -> str:
"""The projection first and the limit second (SAFETY-38's ordered pair).
SAFETY-125: over the limit at this rate it says so, and `cut` that a
grid charge is limited to the room left."""
if float(projected_w) > float(limit_w):
doing, doet = (("grid charge limited", "laden beperkt") if cut
else ("idle", "in rust"))
return Bi(f"Peak guard: {doing}, at this rate {watts(projected_w)}, "
f"over {watts(limit_w)}",
f"Piekbewaking: {doet}, aan dit tempo "
f"{watts(projected_w)}, boven {watts(limit_w)}")
limit = (f"this month's {watts(limit_w)} peak" if month_peak
else f"the {watts(limit_w)} peak limit")
grens = (f"de maandpiek van {watts(limit_w)}" if month_peak
@@ -1563,6 +1573,11 @@ def status_samples() -> list:
("row_periods_measured", GREEN, row_periods_measured("unreadable")),
("row_peak_guard_idle", GREEN, row_peak_guard_idle(1300, 2500, True)),
("row_peak_guard_idle", GREEN, row_peak_guard_idle(1300, 2500, False)),
("row_peak_guard_idle", GREEN, row_peak_guard_idle(5814, 5413, True)),
("row_peak_guard_idle", GREEN, row_peak_guard_idle(5814, 5413, True,
cut=True)),
("row_peak_guard_idle", GREEN, row_peak_guard_idle(3814, 3500, False,
cut=True)),
("row_peak_guard_quiet", GREEN, row_peak_guard_quiet()),
("row_peak_guard_unmeasured", AMBER, row_peak_guard_unmeasured()),
*(("row_peak_guard_blind", AMBER, row_peak_guard_blind(k))
+15
View File
@@ -1136,6 +1136,21 @@ def charge_headroom_w(decision) -> float | None:
return max(0.0, -float(decision.wanted_w))
def charge_room_w(decision, projection) -> float | None:
"""SAFETY-125: `charge_headroom_w()` with the seconds since the last
meter reading counted at that reading, so a late reading near a
quarter's end is not read as room for a grid charge (SAFETY-99).
DECISIONS/SAFETY-125-grid-charge-under-the-month-peak.md."""
room = charge_headroom_w(decision)
if not room or projection is None or projection.block_start is None:
return room
left = QUARTER_S - float(projection.elapsed_s)
if left <= 0.0:
return room
late_ws = max(0.0, float(projection.held_w)) * uncovered_s(projection)
return max(0.0, room - late_ws / left)
def shaping_suspended(decision, peak_forecast_w, cap_w) -> bool:
"""Must the maintenance charge-only shaping stand down this cycle?
+3
View File
@@ -437,6 +437,9 @@
"step_in_would": "The batteries would step in above {kw}.",
"period": "This 15-minute period is heading for {kw}.",
"period_unmeasured": "Part of this 15-minute period was not measured.",
"period_over": "At this rate this 15-minute period reaches {kw}.",
"charge_cut": "The grid charge is cut back to stay under {kw}.",
"charge_cut_would": "The grid charge would be cut back to stay under {kw}.",
"prices": {
"now": "Price now {eur} per kWh, all in.",
"today": "Today: lowest {lo} at {lo_at}, highest {hi} at {hi_at}.",
+3
View File
@@ -372,6 +372,9 @@
"step_in_would": "De batterijen zouden bijspringen boven {kw}.",
"period": "Dit kwartier gaat richting {kw}.",
"period_unmeasured": "Een deel van dit kwartier is niet gemeten.",
"period_over": "Aan dit tempo komt dit kwartier op {kw}.",
"charge_cut": "Laadt minder van het net om onder {kw} te blijven.",
"charge_cut_would": "Zou minder van het net laden om onder {kw} te blijven.",
"prices": {"now": "Prijs nu {eur} per kWh, alles inbegrepen.", "today": "Vandaag: laagste {lo} om {lo_at}, hoogste {hi} om {hi_at}.", "none": "Geen prijzen voor vandaag."},
"tomorrow": {"known": "De prijzen van morgen zijn binnen.", "unknown": "De prijzen van morgen komen meestal na 13:00."},
"day": {