CI-02 probe F: the ORIGINAL gate, unchanged, on the same unmergeable PR

goodwe_controller/test_control.py

@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ its absence caused an observed failure on real hardware.
 
 If you change control.py, run this. If it fails, the inverter would have done
 something you did not intend.
+
+⚠️ MUTATING THE MODULE THIS FILE GRADES? PURGE `__pycache__` FIRST - or run
+`tools/mutation_run.sh`, which does. `python3 -B` alone does NOT save you: it
+stops bytecode being WRITTEN, not a stale one being READ, and a size-preserving
+edit reverted inside one second is invisible to CPython's staleness test. That
+is TEST-15, and it has already turned one live mutation into a false survivor.
+Read MUTATION.md before you report a survivor.
 """
 
 import sys
@@ -71,14 +78,22 @@ def check(name, cond):
 # Hence: A FIXTURE MUST SIT CLEAR OF EVERY RAIL IT IS NOT TESTING. Where a test
 # names one mechanism, make that mechanism the binding one (see TCLAMP and TF).
 #
-# ⚠️ RUN MUTATIONS WITH `python -B` AND CLEAR app/__pycache__. CPython
-# invalidates a .pyc on (source mtime in whole seconds, source size), so a
-# same-second rewrite that also preserves the file size reuses stale bytecode
-# and the suite reports on code you are no longer running. It under-reported one
-# mutation here as 2 where the true figure is 6. The error is one-directional -
-# stale bytecode can only under-report - so every figure above is a lower bound
-# at worst, and the two zeros ever recorded were both confirmed by fixing them
-# and watching the count rise, which a caching artefact cannot do.
+# ⚠️ RUN MUTATIONS THROUGH `tools/mutation_run.sh`, WHICH CLEARS __pycache__
+# BEFORE IT RUNS ANYTHING. CPython invalidates a .pyc on (source mtime in whole
+# seconds, source size), so a same-second rewrite that also preserves the file
+# size reuses stale bytecode and the suite reports on code you are no longer
+# running. It under-reported one mutation here as 2 where the true figure is 6.
+#
+# ⚠️ AND THE CLEAR IS THE HALF THAT WORKS. This note used to lead with
+# `python -B`; TEST-15 measured what that flag actually does, and it is
+# write-only - it does not stop an EXISTING stale .pyc being read, and a
+# mutation run always has one, because the previous run wrote it. -B is still
+# worth passing, for the NEXT edit rather than this one.
+#
+# The error is one-directional - stale bytecode can only under-report - so
+# every figure above is a lower bound at worst, and the two zeros ever recorded
+# were both confirmed by fixing them and watching the count rise, which a
+# caching artefact cannot do.
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 print("control law")