SAFETY-85: no false 'not keeping up' while maintenance or the peak guard sets the battery

The loop's integrator bound counts only on a cycle the loop decided. A battery
another owner set (maintenance, the peak guard, a safety limit) alarms only
when it gives more than saturation_w less than told for saturation_cycles
cycles. At N>=2 the loop is bounded while maintenance holds a battery, so it
does not wind and control comes back one slew step a cycle. The status row
counts episodes, not cycles. Digests re-pinned where behaviour changed on
purpose; DECISIONS/SAFETY-85-no-false-not-keeping-up.md has the list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019DBUfvndgHwaV339Fvd2gr

goodwe_controller/test_safety84.py

@@ -83,8 +83,11 @@ def banked(c):
 
 
 def alarmed(c):
-    """Did SAFETY-81's 'Load too high' alarm fire on this run?"""
-    return any("PEAK_GUARD_SATURATED" in e for e in c.events)
+    """Did SAFETY-81's 'Load too high' alarm fire on this run? Its quarter
+    stamp too, since ALLOCATOR rows can push its row out of the 40-row log
+    (SAFETY-85)."""
+    return c._peak_alarm_block is not None or any(
+        "PEAK_GUARD_SATURATED" in e for e in c.events)
 
 
 def run(house, n=2, **kw):
@@ -465,6 +468,10 @@ print("\n8. the N=1 and N=2 digests")
 # 2026-09-30, 480 cycles each, every claim hashed. N=1 and n2_charge_dear:
 # the same on release/1.0 9d5b7d1 (the tool copied in). N=2 in a cheap
 # window: new, the charge that 9d5b7d1 refused on every cycle.
+# SAFETY-85 re-pinned the three N=2 ones: the loop is bounded while A's
+# charge pin stands. n2_charge and _banked change only the loop's reason and
+# claim on 2 cycles; n2_charge_dear changes commands on 98 cycles, where A's
+# pin lifts (t=1800) and B no longer jumps 1390 W, and after the surplus step.
 PINNED = {
     "n1_charge":
         "0ed25c856456b97acb07a39299a8cb7b1a762c4d0005b88a0823c03057a80be5",
@@ -473,11 +480,11 @@ PINNED = {
     "n1_charge_banked":
         "2619acdd06b04e56c000b168d64e1d044346c6ba3f929c94258d6ad8189ec609",
     "n2_charge":
-        "748abe785a79084bc738c82d0d6f90b951e1cb78e9629195c0c01d3bb67b55e2",
+        "b16d692128f14bcce3d87b142d290e0d6b13724289680e44a05215c9eaa24a7c",
     "n2_charge_dear":
-        "c34f08b3b5b6256e68cf05030fb0c29522916dc8f57c351008f48384657966c0",
+        "00a197d89a5dd1e8b3ae6a5d1af66329a4dc4850476569c5931c125fa4d9eaee",
     "n2_charge_banked":
-        "fb600ee1dd3202910715c97c5809584d50c6b8b57b55aaa4dc83bcaaa97627ef",
+        "a6973faea916e4c88ca1770047f94478346eeb1efa4889b154fad0747f91267f",
 }
 _now = s84.digests()
 for k in PINNED:
@@ -485,7 +492,7 @@ for k in PINNED:
           f"{_now[k][:16]}")
 check("⭐ at N=1 a charge in and out of a cheap window and under a banked "
       "month peak is byte-identical to 9d5b7d1 (commands, reasons and every "
-      "claim), and so is N=2 outside a cheap window",
+      "claim), and N=2 outside a cheap window matches its SAFETY-85 pin",
       all(_now[k] == PINNED[k] for k in ("n1_charge", "n1_charge_dear",
                                          "n1_charge_banked",
                                          "n2_charge_dear")))